Turning down three interviews after getting job, people keep offering to buy my house!!!

The question is, who do we trust more to spend their money? The rich or the government? Democrats obviously think that government bureaucrats are the right people to decide how to spend money. That's also what the socialists and the Communists think. History has proven them wrong.


They have massive operating and ineffeciency costs. FED pensions take 7-10% off the top too. They live large and retire early at 10X common man.
 
Government bureaucrats live large off of money grabbed away from the people by force of arms.
 
The economy goes up then goes down it's nothing new and has nothing to do with who is president. Unless you want to play sycophant to Bill Clinton...
You can believe that if you want, but I think the Democrats' new idea of taxing people at 90% will definitely harm the economy!!!
You sound like an uninformed sucker. Probably believe the lie Trump spews about creating the best economy ever. Brainwashed fools. 90% was the rate on obscene wealth during the '50s. They called it "Happy Days".
The economy was stagnant in the 1950's!!! Eisenhower used to invite billionaires over to the White House and ask them what the hell was going on!!! But he never figured out the answer!!! But then JFK was elected and he lowered income tax rates for all brackets!!! An economic boom followed!!!

John F. Kennedy and Ronald Reagan Proved Tax Cuts Work

You are really clueless, about the 1950's.
The 1950's was the dramatic time, when America became the greatest country in the world. The economy was great. I have no idea where you were educated, you need to go back and start from scratch.
Didn't you claim to be an attorney? That claim was pure bullshit.

"America at this moment,” said the former British Prime Minister Winston Churchill in 1945, “stands at the summit of the world.” During the 1950s, it was easy to see what Churchill meant. The United States was the world’s strongest military power. Its economy was booming, and the fruits of this prosperity–new cars, suburban houses and other consumer goods–were available to more people than ever before. However, the 1950s were also an era of great conflict. For example, the nascent civil rights movement and the crusade against communism at home and abroad exposed the underlying divisions in American society."
https://www.history.com/topics/cold-war/1950s
Post–World War II economic expansion - Wikipedia
The US Economic Boom of the 1950s | Tuva
America was on top of the world in the 1950's because the rest of the world was in ruins from World War II. What a moron you are!!!

But income tax rates were ruinous!!!

Seriously, you stated this:
The economy was stagnant in the 1950's
That statement is so ignorant, it's unbelievable. The 1950"s experienced an economic boom. That era was America had the greatest infrastructure development in history. That's when Eisenhower started the US interstate highway project, that grew jobs, developed the strong middle class and the development of the suburbs.
This is why presidential historians rank Eisenhower as one of the top presidents in the history of the United States..
The links I provided, are historical facts, something where you have a zero
knowledge.
You just made an ass out of yourself, congratulations. :happy-1:
 
Every boss I ever had was a rich person spending their money running a business which paid my salary!!!


I'm sure that sounds quite profound to a person with a simple mind.
Do you deny the truth of what I have said?

Because I never got a job from one of the Democrats' beloved poor people!!!

From any job you might have ever had, who made more money off of your endeavors, you or your employer?


Do you seriously think an employer makes a 100% profit off an employee? You really are delusional.

.
 
You can believe that if you want, but I think the Democrats' new idea of taxing people at 90% will definitely harm the economy!!!
You sound like an uninformed sucker. Probably believe the lie Trump spews about creating the best economy ever. Brainwashed fools. 90% was the rate on obscene wealth during the '50s. They called it "Happy Days".
The economy was stagnant in the 1950's!!! Eisenhower used to invite billionaires over to the White House and ask them what the hell was going on!!! But he never figured out the answer!!! But then JFK was elected and he lowered income tax rates for all brackets!!! An economic boom followed!!!

John F. Kennedy and Ronald Reagan Proved Tax Cuts Work

You are really clueless, about the 1950's.
The 1950's was the dramatic time, when America became the greatest country in the world. The economy was great. I have no idea where you were educated, you need to go back and start from scratch.
Didn't you claim to be an attorney? That claim was pure bullshit.

"America at this moment,” said the former British Prime Minister Winston Churchill in 1945, “stands at the summit of the world.” During the 1950s, it was easy to see what Churchill meant. The United States was the world’s strongest military power. Its economy was booming, and the fruits of this prosperity–new cars, suburban houses and other consumer goods–were available to more people than ever before. However, the 1950s were also an era of great conflict. For example, the nascent civil rights movement and the crusade against communism at home and abroad exposed the underlying divisions in American society."
https://www.history.com/topics/cold-war/1950s
Post–World War II economic expansion - Wikipedia
The US Economic Boom of the 1950s | Tuva
America was on top of the world in the 1950's because the rest of the world was in ruins from World War II. What a moron you are!!!

But income tax rates were ruinous!!!

Seriously, you stated this:
The economy was stagnant in the 1950's
That statement is so ignorant, it's unbelievable. The 1950"s experienced an economic boom. That era was America had the greatest infrastructure development in history. That's when Eisenhower started the US interstate highway project, that grew jobs, developed the strong middle class and the development of the suburbs.
This is why presidential historians rank Eisenhower as one of the top presidents in the history of the United States..
The links I provided, are historical facts, something where you have a zero
knowledge.
You just made an ass out of yourself, congratulations. :happy-1:
Read my link about JFK cutting taxes, and the economic boom that followed.
 
The economy goes up then goes down it's nothing new and has nothing to do with who is president. Unless you want to play sycophant to Bill Clinton...
You can believe that if you want, but I think the Democrats' new idea of taxing people at 90% will definitely harm the economy!!!
A large swath of the nation's wealth never passes through the everyday consumer economy. Tax the fuck out of this locked up wealth and you never even touch the economy that matters to you and me.

Better yet, lower taxes and 'unlock' billions.
 
The economy goes up then goes down it's nothing new and has nothing to do with who is president. Unless you want to play sycophant to Bill Clinton...
You can believe that if you want, but I think the Democrats' new idea of taxing people at 90% will definitely harm the economy!!!
A large swath of the nation's wealth never passes through the everyday consumer economy. Tax the fuck out of this locked up wealth and you never even touch the economy that matters to you and me.
That's an obvious lie!!!
Taxing static wealth is as American as apple pie. We need all the money rolling around making more money. Not sitting around like a solid gold toilet in a fifth home.

Tell that to government entitlement programs.
 
Apparently you don't have money invested in the market.

My investments made about 10% in 2017. They were DOWN 5% in 2018. They grew at a steady 2% per year under Obama.
If you only made 2% a year in the market while Obama was president, that's not a reflection on him -- it shows what a fucking moron you are.

NASDAQ went from 1,521 to 5,557 on his watch. That's more than triple.

NASDAQ ..... 265% gain
DJIA ............ 149% gain
S&P500 ....... 167% gain

.... and all you made was a 16% gain??

1348488761322-smiley_rofl.gif
 
The economy goes up then goes down it's nothing new and has nothing to do with who is president. Unless you want to play sycophant to Bill Clinton...
You can believe that if you want, but I think the Democrats' new idea of taxing people at 90% will definitely harm the economy!!!
A large swath of the nation's wealth never passes through the everyday consumer economy. Tax the fuck out of this locked up wealth and you never even touch the economy that matters to you and me.
That's an obvious lie!!!
Taxing static wealth is as American as apple pie. We need all the money rolling around making more money. Not sitting around like a solid gold toilet in a fifth home.
There's no such thing as "static wealth," you fucking moron. Whether it's saved or invested in stocks or in bonds, all wealth is used to make the economy grow. Even if someone moron like you keeps all his money in the form of cash, he's still avoiding consumption, which means that that someone one else can use the wealth he avoids consuming to invest it in expanding production.

The use of terms like "static wealth" shows that you're an economic ignoramus.
 
You can believe that if you want, but I think the Democrats' new idea of taxing people at 90% will definitely harm the economy!!!
A large swath of the nation's wealth never passes through the everyday consumer economy. Tax the fuck out of this locked up wealth and you never even touch the economy that matters to you and me.
That's an obvious lie!!!
Taxing static wealth is as American as apple pie. We need all the money rolling around making more money. Not sitting around like a solid gold toilet in a fifth home.

You can't get capital gains without a sell. :funnyface:
I was talking about a wealth tax. There should be a penalty for locking up wealth, it's the same as just destroying money as far as the real economy is concerned.
There should be a penalty for being as stupid as you.
 
You can believe that if you want, but I think the Democrats' new idea of taxing people at 90% will definitely harm the economy!!!
A large swath of the nation's wealth never passes through the everyday consumer economy. Tax the fuck out of this locked up wealth and you never even touch the economy that matters to you and me.
That's an obvious lie!!!
Taxing static wealth is as American as apple pie. We need all the money rolling around making more money. Not sitting around like a solid gold toilet in a fifth home.
That's an obvious lie!!! There is no such thing as static wealth!!! Most of the world's billionaires have their wealth heavily invested in the companies they founded!!! Taxing that would destroy them and throw millions out of work!!!
Static wealth is a dozen homes full of gold-plated, rare, exotic, diamond-encrusted useless status symbol stuff like art and antique collections that will never be sold. Property taxes are themselves a form of wealth tax.
Stuff like that is always only a small fraction of what a wealthy person owns. Most of their money is tied up in stocks, bonds and their businesses.
 
Every boss I ever had was a rich person spending their money running a business which paid my salary!!!


I'm sure that sounds quite profound to a person with a simple mind.
Do you deny the truth of what I have said?

Because I never got a job from one of the Democrats' beloved poor people!!!

From any job you might have ever had, who made more money off of your endeavors, you or your employer?
You do. The employer probably makes far less than 10% profit
 
You can believe that if you want, but I think the Democrats' new idea of taxing people at 90% will definitely harm the economy!!!
A large swath of the nation's wealth never passes through the everyday consumer economy. Tax the fuck out of this locked up wealth and you never even touch the economy that matters to you and me.
That's an obvious lie!!!
Taxing static wealth is as American as apple pie. We need all the money rolling around making more money. Not sitting around like a solid gold toilet in a fifth home.

You can't get capital gains without a sell. :funnyface:
I was talking about a wealth tax. There should be a penalty for locking up wealth, it's the same as just destroying money as far as the real economy is concerned.

Commie.
 
The economy goes up then goes down it's nothing new and has nothing to do with who is president. Unless you want to play sycophant to Bill Clinton...
it can to a degree but not as much as people give the president credit, or blame, for.
 
You can believe that if you want, but I think the Democrats' new idea of taxing people at 90% will definitely harm the economy!!!
A large swath of the nation's wealth never passes through the everyday consumer economy. Tax the fuck out of this locked up wealth and you never even touch the economy that matters to you and me.
That's an obvious lie!!!
Taxing static wealth is as American as apple pie. We need all the money rolling around making more money. Not sitting around like a solid gold toilet in a fifth home.

You can't get capital gains without a sell. :funnyface:
I was talking about a wealth tax. There should be a penalty for locking up wealth, it's the same as just destroying money as far as the real economy is concerned.
my wealth i'll do with it what i want.

there should be a penalty for those who get pissed when people don't live life according to their terms.
 
The economy is BURNING HOT HERE IN LAS VEGAS!!!!

Another indicator is the planes stacked up to land at our airport. I counted five planes in a row, when Obama was President, usually it was ONE airplane landing at a time, now its FIVE.

Trump is the guy who made it happen because it started THE MOMENT HE WAS ELECTED.

Also look at Wall Street, except for a bad December, it's been a bull market all the way.
BECAUSE LAS VEGAS REPRESENTS THE most degenerate and morally corrupt society has to offer, I wouldnt use it as an example of the country getting better, in fact it shows the greed and waste that you humans are infected with
 
The economy goes up then goes down it's nothing new and has nothing to do with who is president. Unless you want to play sycophant to Bill Clinton...
it can to a degree but not as much as people give the president credit, or blame, for.
The tax cut was a stimulus to make them look good but the steam is already running low. But in my business since houses cost more people are staying in their old homes and fixing them up..
 
The economy goes up then goes down it's nothing new and has nothing to do with who is president. Unless you want to play sycophant to Bill Clinton...
it can to a degree but not as much as people give the president credit, or blame, for.
The tax cut was a stimulus to make them look good but the steam is already running low. But in my business since houses cost more people are staying in their old homes and fixing them up..
in 4 years my home went from $180k to $280k. taxes have become hell to be honest. if i buy another house, it will be more out in the country with some space around me. trouble is, dallas area is growing so much in a few years i'll be back in the middle of it all again.

that's what spiked my value in the last 4 years was all the "crap" moving in my area.
 
The economy goes up then goes down it's nothing new and has nothing to do with who is president. Unless you want to play sycophant to Bill Clinton...
You can believe that if you want, but I think the Democrats' new idea of taxing people at 90% will definitely harm the economy!!!
I doubt it ever passes both houses of Congress...

It can’t, but the mentality of actually putting it out there for consideration is ludicrous. These people should be playing in a sandbox, rather than pretending to serve society. All the while, they are internally protected and the only ones that can benefit from their cost of living increases.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Forum List

Back
Top