That is the strength of science, evidence falsifies its mistaken theories and understandings, new theories and understandings that better match and explain all relevant evidences replace the old. Theories only become compelling when they are robust enough to survive review, testing and new evidences. Much of the understanding regarding atmospheric CO2's impact upon the earth's climate, predate the study you link, and it has only grown continuously more robust since.
Science is MEASURABLE. You guys do everything possible to avoid presenting anything that is measurable...that makes it pseudo-scientific monkey boy....
Your assertions are unsupported, incorrect and without standing. Your personal name-calling is simply rude and vulgar, and generally a poor reflection upon your upbringing.
Really? Then GIVE US SOMETHING MEASURABLE INSTEAD OF ALL THE HAND WAVING.