U.N. Director Admits Syrian Muslims Not Fleeing War

[Clementine]

"Speaking to the Huffington Post this week, Michael Møller described his dissatisfaction with response to Europe’s migrant crisis, specifically taking aim at the media for failing to "educate" the public, and calling for schools to "educat[e] the youth for the problems… of tomorrow."


But amongst his critique of the Western response to the migrant crisis, the Director-General lets slip two major points often dismissed by open borders campaigners:


1. The migrants from Syria are not fleeing because of the Syrian war:


Mr. Møller says the main reason people are leaving Syria "isn’t the crippling violence in the country", the HuffPo reports.


"The number one reason why people leave Syria is not the bombs or the food or the cold, it’s because they want to find educational opportunities for their children," he explains.


This would mean that most of the Syrian migrants would fall under the category of "economic migrants" rather than "refugees" – a point that Mr. Møller even clarifies later in the interview."



So, instead of sending aid to improve their country, which other countries could do, we are going to keep relocating them all over the globe, even as the Muslim leaders tell them to impregnant infidels and spread Islam. That is the only purpose of this "refugee" crisis.

It's bullshit.

We need to stop the migration of these Muslim jihadists now. If we were concerned about the safety of people, we'd be getting Christians, gays, women and children out of the Muslim countries, not the males responsible for the abuse, torture and murder of innocents.

Liberals don't even talk about the murder of gays in Muslim countries because it's not happening here, so it's not our problem to deal with.

The left won't discuss the murder of Christians in Muslim countries because it's not affecting us.

They don't discuss the brutal treatment of women and children in Muslim countries because their culture is none of our business.

They don't talk about the refugees brutal treatment of women and children in Great Britain, France and Germany because it's not happening here.

Yet, when Muslim males claim they need help, we rush to rescue them. And we don't rescue the Christians who are actually in danger.

Kurdish women are fighting against ISIS while Muslim males are being sent all over the world to find a better life and stomp out infidels.

Most of the refugees are young Muslim males of fighting age and we don't need them coming here to carry out their fucked-up jihad.

The media here doesn't like reporting on any negative events surrounding Muslims. The people of France, Great Britain and Germany are protesting the invasion of nasty males who have no respect for the host countries. There are more rapes and violence than ever before, yet Obama responds by insisting that we increase the number of Muslims bought in and shorten the vetting process from 18 months to 2 months.

Either Obama is helping them seed Islam across the country or he is the most ignorant leader in history.



http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/05/15/un-director-admits-syrians-not-fleeing-war-gulf-countries-havent-taken-single-one/

 

[Clementine]

This certainly explains why many opted to return to Syria when things didn't go the way they hoped. No one would return to a place if they feared for their life. That certainly proves that what the U.N. director admitted is the truth. There is no reason to accept them and we should stop this insanity right now.

The Christians and gays do fear for their lives, yet Obama doesn't seem to think their need to live is greater than the need of Syrian Muslims to improve their status. The U.N. is focused on seeding Muslims everywhere while ignoring the plight of those tortured and murdered at the hands of those they are helping.

The Syrians have posed problems for countries they move to by bringing their nasty traditions with them.

So, what is considered an improvement for Muslims is anything but improvement for those who have a culture of violence towards women, children and gays forced upon them. How many more will have to sacrifice their lives and well being so that Muslims can spread their religion?

 

[Clementine]

So, the libs have nothing to say? This was during an interview with HuffPo that the U.N. director admitted that the Syrian Muslims are not running from war and yet they are the ones being approved for refugee status, as in economic refugee status, while Christians are denied. It's Christians being tortured and murdered so why aren't we giving priority to those whose lives are in immediate danger?

Many of the refugees opted to return to Syria after being disappointed that they didn't get enough benefits. They are quick to demand that countries move faster to give them better accommodations. I knew then that they didn't fear for their lives and there was another reason for all the migration. That and the fact that Muslim Imams were telling the refugees how to conquer the infidel communities.

 

[Clementine]

Libs won't touch this one. Why is it okay to ignore the slaughter of gays and Christians while "saving" the Muslim economic refugees? This isn't about getting them out of a dangerous place, it's about spreading them around the world.

 

[Manonthestreet]

So, the libs have nothing to say? This was during an interview with HuffPo that the U.N. director admitted that the Syrian Muslims are not running from war and yet they are the ones being approved for refugee status, as in economic refugee status, while Christians are denied. It's Christians being tortured and murdered so why aren't we giving priority to those whose lives are in immediate danger?

Many of the refugees opted to return to Syria after being disappointed that they didn't get enough benefits. They are quick to demand that countries move faster to give them better accommodations. I knew then that they didn't fear for their lives and there was another reason for all the migration. That and the fact that Muslim Imams were telling the refugees how to conquer the infidel communities.

Yes, dont believe your eyes or the words they themselves or ISIS says..........
I mean what could possibly go wrong......

 

[Clementine]

Yes, dont believe your eyes or the words they themselves or ISIS says..........
I mean what could possibly go wrong......

We've been lied to yet again. This whole time we've been told they were fleeing certain death. It made no sense considering there was a 5 year plan in place and every refugee was to wait 18 months for the vetting process to be complete. I wondered why we weren't just relocating them in the area and sending aid over there. If people were in danger, they'd need immediate help, not a long term plan to relocate them all over the globe. Then we heard many were opting to return to Syria after blasting the host countries for not doing enough for them.

We were accused of fearing widows and children for expressing concern over the number of terrorists who were using the "crisis" to infiltrate countries. We've seen everything from outright terrorist attacks in Paris to countless attacks on the streets by males who seem to think they can do whatever they want to women and children.

Now we find out that they are just wanting a change to improve their financial status. Meanwhile, people are actually being tortured and killed for being gay or non-Muslim and there is no plan in place to help them.

I am infuriated at being lied to just so Obama can help his Muslim buddies spread around the world and ignoring the Christians who are being slaughtered.

We should be helping get the real victims away from the Muslims and moved to a safe place.

Helping refugees would have been cheaper and quicker to send aid there, but the Obama administration didn't do that because it wasn't about saving them from violence. The entire purpose was to help them blanket the world and spread Islam.

 

[Clementine]

Well, since the U.N. director has admitted that the Muslim Syrian refugees are not in danger, should we stop bringing them in? Should we focus on helping those in Syria who are in grave danger, such as the infidels getting slaughtered at an alarming rate?

 

[Clementine]

Syrian Muslims demanding refugee status so their kids can get a better education. Clearly, it's Americans who need a better education because the libs aren't teaching the truth.

We need to stop the influx of these "refugees" since they haven't shown any interest in being educated and seem more interested in educating the host countries by demanding that people accept their messed up culture.

Now we know why most of the women and children have been left behind. The men are coming ahead to make their demands and get settled before bringing the rest of the family.

No way should we allow this when many people are in actual danger and we are ignoring them in favor of the very people who are putting them in danger.

 

[Clementine]

Liberals, do you still think we should accept 50,000 people who aren't vetted and aren't really refugees?

They want better schools for their children and that is the real reason Obama is bringing them here while ignoring the people being slaughtered on a daily basis.

 

[Contumacious]

"Speaking to the Huffington Post this week, Michael Møller described his dissatisfaction with response to Europe’s migrant crisis, specifically taking aim at the media for failing to "educate" the public, and calling for schools to "educat[e] the youth for the problems… of tomorrow."


But amongst his critique of the Western response to the migrant crisis, the Director-General lets slip two major points often dismissed by open borders campaigners:


1. The migrants from Syria are not fleeing because of the Syrian war:


Mr. Møller says the main reason people are leaving Syria "isn’t the crippling violence in the country", the HuffPo reports.


"The number one reason why people leave Syria is not the bombs or the food or the cold, it’s because they want to find educational opportunities for their children," he explains.


This would mean that most of the Syrian migrants would fall under the category of "economic migrants" rather than "refugees" – a point that Mr. Møller even clarifies later in the interview."



So, instead of sending aid to improve their country, which other countries could do, we are going to keep relocating them all over the globe, even as the Muslim leaders tell them to impregnant infidels and spread Islam. That is the only purpose of this "refugee" crisis.

It's bullshit.

We need to stop the migration of these Muslim jihadists now. If we were concerned about the safety of people, we'd be getting Christians, gays, women and children out of the Muslim countries, not the males responsible for the abuse, torture and murder of innocents.

Liberals don't even talk about the murder of gays in Muslim countries because it's not happening here, so it's not our problem to deal with.

The left won't discuss the murder of Christians in Muslim countries because it's not affecting us.

They don't discuss the brutal treatment of women and children in Muslim countries because their culture is none of our business.

They don't talk about the refugees brutal treatment of women and children in Great Britain, France and Germany because it's not happening here.

Yet, when Muslim males claim they need help, we rush to rescue them. And we don't rescue the Christians who are actually in danger.

Kurdish women are fighting against ISIS while Muslim males are being sent all over the world to find a better life and stomp out infidels.

Most of the refugees are young Muslim males of fighting age and we don't need them coming here to carry out their fucked-up jihad.

The media here doesn't like reporting on any negative events surrounding Muslims. The people of France, Great Britain and Germany are protesting the invasion of nasty males who have no respect for the host countries. There are more rapes and violence than ever before, yet Obama responds by insisting that we increase the number of Muslims bought in and shorten the vetting process from 18 months to 2 months.

Either Obama is helping them seed Islam across the country or he is the most ignorant leader in history.



http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/05/15/un-director-admits-syrians-not-fleeing-war-gulf-countries-havent-taken-single-one/

If the schools and the infrastructure are destroyed and if they know that Obama is determined to destroy the country in order to allow the Zionists to steal a chunk of real state then it it reasonable that they would want to leave.


.

 

[Clementine]

Peachy, a liberal just rated this threat 'funny'. I guess he thinks the U.N. director was joking around with Huffington Post when he admitted the real reason the refugees are invading countries. They want better schools. Only thing funny about that is that they have no interest in learning anything not in their quran.

 

[Clementine]

If the schools and the infrastructure are destroyed and if they know that Obama is determined to destroy the country in order to allow the Zionists to steal a chunk of real state then it it reasonable that they would want to leave.


.

Pay attention, that isn't what is being said. They claim they want better education, which sounds like an excuse. They go to countries, start sharia patrols, harass the people, push their ugly culture of rape, mistreatment of all women and are only interested in making others change to suit them. The claim that it's about saving them is false.

Imams are telling the men to impregnate infidels and spread Islam.

Meanwhile, there are people being slaughtered daily and neither Obama or the U.N. is making them a priority. They are left behind while the young males are scattered around the world.

 

[Clementine]

Still waiting for libs to offer an explanation/excuse for why we are accepting these refugees.

Why is it necessary to send them all over the world for what they claim is an effort to find better education for their children?

Still wondering how the left can explain why Syrian Muslims, who are not fleeing war, are getting preferential treatment over people who actually are in mortal danger from Muslims.

Can't vet them. Can't afford them, yet Obama wants to increase the number of economic refugees from 10,000 to 50,000 and shorten the vetting process to 2 months. Considering they aren't in danger, why the rush? And why is the administration turning it's back on those being tortured, robbed, raped and slaughtered?

 

[Contumacious]

If the schools and the infrastructure are destroyed and if they know that Obama is determined to destroy the country in order to allow the Zionists to steal a chunk of real state then it it reasonable that they would want to leave.


.

Pay attention, that isn't what is being said. They claim they want better education, which sounds like an excuse. They go to countries, start sharia patrols, harass the people, push their ugly culture of rape, mistreatment of all women and are only interested in making others change to suit them. The claim that it's about saving them is false.

Imams are telling the men to impregnate infidels and spread Islam.

Meanwhile, there are people being slaughtered daily and neither Obama or the U.N. is making them a priority. They are left behind while the young males are scattered around the world.

Pay attention - you are full of shit.

.