U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson Orders White House to Turn Over Ukraine Emails Being Withheld from the Public

This isn't a rare move at all. The emails are not being made public but given to the judge to review. It happens every day.
 
Trump is guilty. He should have been removed. I don't care what the lawyers paid to defend him said. That's their job. I do care what the witnesses said, including two that Trump fired for testifying.

Actually you're guilty of TDS repeat offender.
1589493271218.png
 
This is interesting.

The trump administration is trying to violate the FOIA law. They're using very flimsy excuse for it too.

It will be interesting to see how this works out.


Another fishing expedition in the works since there have been ZERO indications of laws being violated. The link states:

A federal judge in Washington, D.C. has ordered the White House to turn over 20 emails directly relating to President Donald Trump’s decision to withhold congressionally appropriated military aid from Ukraine. The administration has refused to produce the communications thus far, claiming the documents are protected from public release by executive privilege.

A decision he changed in a few weeks, fully complying with the Congressionally Appropriated Military Aid package (with additional military hardware) within the Fiscal year of its passage. You guys are running on nothing..... as usual.

:cuckoo:
He released the funds when he'd been caught red handed. I'm not overly impressed. What the committee wants is the evidence that Trump withheld it and why. If Trump was not withholding the money until he got Zelensky's cooperation, he's got nothing to worry about, does he?

Of course, it's entirely possible that Trump is crafty enough to keep any such admission out of an email. In his private business he forbade email communication (kind of unusual, don't you think?). But not all of those emails were from him. Did others know to hide what was going on? Hopefully we will find out.


Wasn't there already a failed impeachment attempt about this?
Yeah, there was, I remember now.
President Trump was totally vindicated and acquitted.
Which we knew before it happened was going to be the case in the Republican held Senate. It was a totally partisan acquittal and means nothing to justice.

You may not know what Partisan means.
Of course I do. And everyone knew it was going to be the case. Fox admitted it, every single conservative admitted it--they knew that no matter what Trump did, they had no intention of convicting him.

And, no matter the fact that the House had, and produced no evidence, the Democrats were going to bring charges.
You worry about the members in your shithole party before you worry about others.
I watched the hearing. All of it. They had plenty of evidence. Closing your eyes to it does not make it go away. You should be defending America, not a miserable political agenda. America stands by the strength of her leaders. A leader that abuses his authority the way Trump has is not only an embarrassment, it leaves the obvious question: What ELSE is he up to? He has the morals of a sewer rat and only another sewer rat can't see that.


Absolutely delusional.
The cookie lady has lost it.
 
This is interesting.

The trump administration is trying to violate the FOIA law. They're using very flimsy excuse for it too.

It will be interesting to see how this works out.


Another fishing expedition in the works since there have been ZERO indications of laws being violated. The link states:

A federal judge in Washington, D.C. has ordered the White House to turn over 20 emails directly relating to President Donald Trump’s decision to withhold congressionally appropriated military aid from Ukraine. The administration has refused to produce the communications thus far, claiming the documents are protected from public release by executive privilege.

A decision he changed in a few weeks, fully complying with the Congressionally Appropriated Military Aid package (with additional military hardware) within the Fiscal year of its passage. You guys are running on nothing..... as usual.

:cuckoo:
He released the funds when he'd been caught red handed. I'm not overly impressed. What the committee wants is the evidence that Trump withheld it and why. If Trump was not withholding the money until he got Zelensky's cooperation, he's got nothing to worry about, does he?

Of course, it's entirely possible that Trump is crafty enough to keep any such admission out of an email. In his private business he forbade email communication (kind of unusual, don't you think?). But not all of those emails were from him. Did others know to hide what was going on? Hopefully we will find out.


Wasn't there already a failed impeachment attempt about this?
Yeah, there was, I remember now.
President Trump was totally vindicated and acquitted.
Which we knew before it happened was going to be the case in the Republican held Senate. It was a totally partisan acquittal and means nothing to justice.

You may not know what Partisan means.
Of course I do. And everyone knew it was going to be the case. Fox admitted it, every single conservative admitted it--they knew that no matter what Trump did, they had no intention of convicting him.
Innocent people frequently don’t get convicted. Obsessive people maintain the not found guilty really are guilty because they feel it and want it.
 
This isn't a rare move at all. The emails are not being made public but given to the judge to review. It happens every day.
And she is going to determine if there is actually a reason to withhold them. If not, they go where they were requested.
This ain't over yet.
 
It will be tied up in the courts a long long time. No worries.

So, you're pretty much admitting the evidence is very damning for Trump, which is why you're very glad it will be hidden for a while longer.

Even the Trump cultists are very aware of the Trump admin's guilt. That's why they all fight so hard to hide all the evidence. The Trump cultists act guilty as sin, hence everyone correctly assumes they are guilty as sin.

The funny part is that this was the same crowd that said, during impeachment "LET THE VOTERS LOOK AT THE EVIDENCE AND DECIDE", and now they're all saying "HIDE THE EVIDENCE FROM THE VOTERS!". If it weren't for double standards, the Trump cultists would have no standards at all.




They may have said let the voters see the evidence and decide but they sure did all they could to prevent evidence from being seen.

trump and the republicans blocked evidence, documents, emails, and witnesses in both the House investigation and the Senate trial.

This is just a continuation of their obstruction and corruption.
 
This is interesting.

The trump administration is trying to violate the FOIA law. They're using very flimsy excuse for it too.

It will be interesting to see how this works out.


Another fishing expedition in the works since there have been ZERO indications of laws being violated. The link states:

A federal judge in Washington, D.C. has ordered the White House to turn over 20 emails directly relating to President Donald Trump’s decision to withhold congressionally appropriated military aid from Ukraine. The administration has refused to produce the communications thus far, claiming the documents are protected from public release by executive privilege.

A decision he changed in a few weeks, fully complying with the Congressionally Appropriated Military Aid package (with additional military hardware) within the Fiscal year of its passage. You guys are running on nothing..... as usual.

:cuckoo:
He released the funds when he'd been caught red handed. I'm not overly impressed. What the committee wants is the evidence that Trump withheld it and why. If Trump was not withholding the money until he got Zelensky's cooperation, he's got nothing to worry about, does he?

Of course, it's entirely possible that Trump is crafty enough to keep any such admission out of an email. In his private business he forbade email communication (kind of unusual, don't you think?). But not all of those emails were from him. Did others know to hide what was going on? Hopefully we will find out.


Wasn't there already a failed impeachment attempt about this?
Yeah, there was, I remember now.
President Trump was totally vindicated and acquitted.
Which we knew before it happened was going to be the case in the Republican held Senate. It was a totally partisan acquittal and means nothing to justice.

You may not know what Partisan means.
Of course I do. And everyone knew it was going to be the case. Fox admitted it, every single conservative admitted it--they knew that no matter what Trump did, they had no intention of convicting him.
Innocent people frequently don’t get convicted. Obsessive people maintain the not found guilty really are guilty because they feel it and want it.
You didn't watch the hearings did you?
 
This is interesting.

The trump administration is trying to violate the FOIA law. They're using very flimsy excuse for it too.

It will be interesting to see how this works out.


Another fishing expedition in the works since there have been ZERO indications of laws being violated. The link states:

A federal judge in Washington, D.C. has ordered the White House to turn over 20 emails directly relating to President Donald Trump’s decision to withhold congressionally appropriated military aid from Ukraine. The administration has refused to produce the communications thus far, claiming the documents are protected from public release by executive privilege.

A decision he changed in a few weeks, fully complying with the Congressionally Appropriated Military Aid package (with additional military hardware) within the Fiscal year of its passage. You guys are running on nothing..... as usual.

:cuckoo:
He released the funds when he'd been caught red handed. I'm not overly impressed. What the committee wants is the evidence that Trump withheld it and why. If Trump was not withholding the money until he got Zelensky's cooperation, he's got nothing to worry about, does he?

Of course, it's entirely possible that Trump is crafty enough to keep any such admission out of an email. In his private business he forbade email communication (kind of unusual, don't you think?). But not all of those emails were from him. Did others know to hide what was going on? Hopefully we will find out.


Wasn't there already a failed impeachment attempt about this?
Yeah, there was, I remember now.
President Trump was totally vindicated and acquitted.
Which we knew before it happened was going to be the case in the Republican held Senate. It was a totally partisan acquittal and means nothing to justice.
It was a partisan conviction too.
You're right. Every blessed Republican in the House opposed the Articles of Impeachment. It was the first time a President was impeached with no votes by his own party. The Republicans are consistent, if not ethical.

Biden is your candidate. He’s on video doing exactly what your partisan hacks accused Trump of.
 
It will be tied up in the courts a long long time. No worries.

So, you're pretty much admitting the evidence is very damning for Trump, which is why you're very glad it will be hidden for a while longer.

Even the Trump cultists are very aware of the Trump admin's guilt. That's why they all fight so hard to hide all the evidence. The Trump cultists act guilty as sin, hence everyone correctly assumes they are guilty as sin.

The funny part is that this was the same crowd that said, during impeachment "LET THE VOTERS LOOK AT THE EVIDENCE AND DECIDE", and now they're all saying "HIDE THE EVIDENCE FROM THE VOTERS!". If it weren't for double standards, the Trump cultists would have no standards at all.




They may have said let the voters see the evidence and decide but they sure did all they could to prevent evidence from being seen.

trump and the republicans blocked evidence, documents, emails, and witnesses in both the House investigation and the Senate trial.

This is just a continuation of their obstruction and corruption.


That is actually not true.
The House had the opportunity to call the witnesses.
The Jury voted to not add additional witnesses.
Which makes sense since they were the jury and not the Prosecution or defense.
 
So you assume there was no legitimate reason to investigate Joe?

That was quite the performance of feigned indignation you put forward here. There wasn't a true word in it, except for Coyote being the nicest person you could find anywhere.

That said, ever since that video came out, Biden bragging about getting that to-the-bones-corrupt, non-prosecuting "investigator" fired, there was ample opportunity to prosecute Biden. Sessions could have done it. So could Barr. Neither did, and if you had a hint of integrity, misplaced but maybe retrievable, you could come up with a valid reason for that: Biden, openly and publicly executed official U.S. policy, with the support by the entire Western world. That is to say, there isn't so much as a hint of evidence for a crime there. None. Whereas Trump executed his extortion and bribery in a phone call, without public announcement, and immediately started to hide, and to this very day hides, the evidence for his corruption and his crime.

It takes mendacity and sycophancy on a near unprecedented scale to feign not seeing that. But then, Shrimp, that cannot possibly be news to you.
 
This is interesting.

The trump administration is trying to violate the FOIA law. They're using very flimsy excuse for it too.

It will be interesting to see how this works out.


Another fishing expedition in the works since there have been ZERO indications of laws being violated. The link states:

A federal judge in Washington, D.C. has ordered the White House to turn over 20 emails directly relating to President Donald Trump’s decision to withhold congressionally appropriated military aid from Ukraine. The administration has refused to produce the communications thus far, claiming the documents are protected from public release by executive privilege.

A decision he changed in a few weeks, fully complying with the Congressionally Appropriated Military Aid package (with additional military hardware) within the Fiscal year of its passage. You guys are running on nothing..... as usual.

:cuckoo:
He released the funds when he'd been caught red handed. I'm not overly impressed. What the committee wants is the evidence that Trump withheld it and why. If Trump was not withholding the money until he got Zelensky's cooperation, he's got nothing to worry about, does he?

Of course, it's entirely possible that Trump is crafty enough to keep any such admission out of an email. In his private business he forbade email communication (kind of unusual, don't you think?). But not all of those emails were from him. Did others know to hide what was going on? Hopefully we will find out.


Wasn't there already a failed impeachment attempt about this?
Yeah, there was, I remember now.
President Trump was totally vindicated and acquitted.
Which we knew before it happened was going to be the case in the Republican held Senate. It was a totally partisan acquittal and means nothing to justice.

You may not know what Partisan means.
Of course I do. And everyone knew it was going to be the case. Fox admitted it, every single conservative admitted it--they knew that no matter what Trump did, they had no intention of convicting him.

And, no matter the fact that the House had, and produced no evidence, the Democrats were going to bring charges.
You worry about the members in your shithole party before you worry about others.
I watched the hearing. All of it. They had plenty of evidence. Closing your eyes to it does not make it go away. You should be defending America, not a miserable political agenda. America stands by the strength of her leaders. A leader that abuses his authority the way Trump has is not only an embarrassment, it leaves the obvious question: What ELSE is he up to? He has the morals of a sewer rat and only another sewer rat can't see that.


Absolutely delusional.
The cookie lady has lost it.
This is interesting.

The trump administration is trying to violate the FOIA law. They're using very flimsy excuse for it too.

It will be interesting to see how this works out.


Another fishing expedition in the works since there have been ZERO indications of laws being violated. The link states:

A federal judge in Washington, D.C. has ordered the White House to turn over 20 emails directly relating to President Donald Trump’s decision to withhold congressionally appropriated military aid from Ukraine. The administration has refused to produce the communications thus far, claiming the documents are protected from public release by executive privilege.

A decision he changed in a few weeks, fully complying with the Congressionally Appropriated Military Aid package (with additional military hardware) within the Fiscal year of its passage. You guys are running on nothing..... as usual.

:cuckoo:
He released the funds when he'd been caught red handed. I'm not overly impressed. What the committee wants is the evidence that Trump withheld it and why. If Trump was not withholding the money until he got Zelensky's cooperation, he's got nothing to worry about, does he?

Of course, it's entirely possible that Trump is crafty enough to keep any such admission out of an email. In his private business he forbade email communication (kind of unusual, don't you think?). But not all of those emails were from him. Did others know to hide what was going on? Hopefully we will find out.


Wasn't there already a failed impeachment attempt about this?
Yeah, there was, I remember now.
President Trump was totally vindicated and acquitted.
Which we knew before it happened was going to be the case in the Republican held Senate. It was a totally partisan acquittal and means nothing to justice.
It was a partisan conviction too.
You're right. Every blessed Republican in the House opposed the Articles of Impeachment. It was the first time a President was impeached with no votes by his own party. The Republicans are consistent, if not ethical.

Biden is your candidate. He’s on video doing exactly what your partisan hacks accused Trump of.
There is not a justifiable comparison there. I'm not going back into the reasons. I'm sure you've heard them many times. If they haven't sunk in by now, telling you one more time isn't going to make any difference. So wallow in your half informed and opinionated position. It's what Trumpers do.
 
This is interesting.

The trump administration is trying to violate the FOIA law. They're using very flimsy excuse for it too.

It will be interesting to see how this works out.


Another fishing expedition in the works since there have been ZERO indications of laws being violated. The link states:

A federal judge in Washington, D.C. has ordered the White House to turn over 20 emails directly relating to President Donald Trump’s decision to withhold congressionally appropriated military aid from Ukraine. The administration has refused to produce the communications thus far, claiming the documents are protected from public release by executive privilege.

A decision he changed in a few weeks, fully complying with the Congressionally Appropriated Military Aid package (with additional military hardware) within the Fiscal year of its passage. You guys are running on nothing..... as usual.

:cuckoo:
He released the funds when he'd been caught red handed. I'm not overly impressed. What the committee wants is the evidence that Trump withheld it and why. If Trump was not withholding the money until he got Zelensky's cooperation, he's got nothing to worry about, does he?

Of course, it's entirely possible that Trump is crafty enough to keep any such admission out of an email. In his private business he forbade email communication (kind of unusual, don't you think?). But not all of those emails were from him. Did others know to hide what was going on? Hopefully we will find out.


Wasn't there already a failed impeachment attempt about this?
Yeah, there was, I remember now.
President Trump was totally vindicated and acquitted.
Which we knew before it happened was going to be the case in the Republican held Senate. It was a totally partisan acquittal and means nothing to justice.

You may not know what Partisan means.
Of course I do. And everyone knew it was going to be the case. Fox admitted it, every single conservative admitted it--they knew that no matter what Trump did, they had no intention of convicting him.

And, no matter the fact that the House had, and produced no evidence, the Democrats were going to bring charges.
You worry about the members in your shithole party before you worry about others.
I watched the hearing. All of it. They had plenty of evidence. Closing your eyes to it does not make it go away. You should be defending America, not a miserable political agenda. America stands by the strength of her leaders. A leader that abuses his authority the way Trump has is not only an embarrassment, it leaves the obvious question: What ELSE is he up to? He has the morals of a sewer rat and only another sewer rat can't see that.


Absolutely delusional.
The cookie lady has lost it.
This is interesting.

The trump administration is trying to violate the FOIA law. They're using very flimsy excuse for it too.

It will be interesting to see how this works out.


Another fishing expedition in the works since there have been ZERO indications of laws being violated. The link states:

A federal judge in Washington, D.C. has ordered the White House to turn over 20 emails directly relating to President Donald Trump’s decision to withhold congressionally appropriated military aid from Ukraine. The administration has refused to produce the communications thus far, claiming the documents are protected from public release by executive privilege.

A decision he changed in a few weeks, fully complying with the Congressionally Appropriated Military Aid package (with additional military hardware) within the Fiscal year of its passage. You guys are running on nothing..... as usual.

:cuckoo:
He released the funds when he'd been caught red handed. I'm not overly impressed. What the committee wants is the evidence that Trump withheld it and why. If Trump was not withholding the money until he got Zelensky's cooperation, he's got nothing to worry about, does he?

Of course, it's entirely possible that Trump is crafty enough to keep any such admission out of an email. In his private business he forbade email communication (kind of unusual, don't you think?). But not all of those emails were from him. Did others know to hide what was going on? Hopefully we will find out.


Wasn't there already a failed impeachment attempt about this?
Yeah, there was, I remember now.
President Trump was totally vindicated and acquitted.
Which we knew before it happened was going to be the case in the Republican held Senate. It was a totally partisan acquittal and means nothing to justice.
It was a partisan conviction too.
You're right. Every blessed Republican in the House opposed the Articles of Impeachment. It was the first time a President was impeached with no votes by his own party. The Republicans are consistent, if not ethical.

Biden is your candidate. He’s on video doing exactly what your partisan hacks accused Trump of.
There is not a justifiable comparison there. I'm not going back into the reasons. I'm sure you've heard them many times. If they haven't sunk in by now, telling you one more time isn't going to make any difference. So wallow in your half informed and opinionated position. It's what Trumpers do.
So now, like a typical libtard who has lost an argument you resort to calling me a Trumper. Fuck ewe too.
 
Trump is guilty. He should have been removed. I don't care what the lawyers paid to defend him said. That's their job. I do care what the witnesses said, including two that Trump fired for testifying.

Actually you're guilty of TDS repeat offender.
View attachment 336102
And you're a trump buttlicker. Glad you two know what you are, now.
I am NOT a TDS repeat offender!!!! Fuck that, Fort Fun Indiana.
 
This is interesting.

The trump administration is trying to violate the FOIA law. They're using very flimsy excuse for it too.

It will be interesting to see how this works out.


Another fishing expedition in the works since there have been ZERO indications of laws being violated. The link states:

A federal judge in Washington, D.C. has ordered the White House to turn over 20 emails directly relating to President Donald Trump’s decision to withhold congressionally appropriated military aid from Ukraine. The administration has refused to produce the communications thus far, claiming the documents are protected from public release by executive privilege.

A decision he changed in a few weeks, fully complying with the Congressionally Appropriated Military Aid package (with additional military hardware) within the Fiscal year of its passage. You guys are running on nothing..... as usual.

:cuckoo:
He released the funds when he'd been caught red handed. I'm not overly impressed. What the committee wants is the evidence that Trump withheld it and why. If Trump was not withholding the money until he got Zelensky's cooperation, he's got nothing to worry about, does he?

Of course, it's entirely possible that Trump is crafty enough to keep any such admission out of an email. In his private business he forbade email communication (kind of unusual, don't you think?). But not all of those emails were from him. Did others know to hide what was going on? Hopefully we will find out.


Wasn't there already a failed impeachment attempt about this?
Yeah, there was, I remember now.
President Trump was totally vindicated and acquitted.
Which we knew before it happened was going to be the case in the Republican held Senate. It was a totally partisan acquittal and means nothing to justice.

You may not know what Partisan means.
Of course I do. And everyone knew it was going to be the case. Fox admitted it, every single conservative admitted it--they knew that no matter what Trump did, they had no intention of convicting him.

And, no matter the fact that the House had, and produced no evidence, the Democrats were going to bring charges.
You worry about the members in your shithole party before you worry about others.
I watched the hearing. All of it. They had plenty of evidence. Closing your eyes to it does not make it go away. You should be defending America, not a miserable political agenda. America stands by the strength of her leaders. A leader that abuses his authority the way Trump has is not only an embarrassment, it leaves the obvious question: What ELSE is he up to? He has the morals of a sewer rat and only another sewer rat can't see that.


Absolutely delusional.
The cookie lady has lost it.
This is interesting.

The trump administration is trying to violate the FOIA law. They're using very flimsy excuse for it too.

It will be interesting to see how this works out.


Another fishing expedition in the works since there have been ZERO indications of laws being violated. The link states:

A federal judge in Washington, D.C. has ordered the White House to turn over 20 emails directly relating to President Donald Trump’s decision to withhold congressionally appropriated military aid from Ukraine. The administration has refused to produce the communications thus far, claiming the documents are protected from public release by executive privilege.

A decision he changed in a few weeks, fully complying with the Congressionally Appropriated Military Aid package (with additional military hardware) within the Fiscal year of its passage. You guys are running on nothing..... as usual.

:cuckoo:
He released the funds when he'd been caught red handed. I'm not overly impressed. What the committee wants is the evidence that Trump withheld it and why. If Trump was not withholding the money until he got Zelensky's cooperation, he's got nothing to worry about, does he?

Of course, it's entirely possible that Trump is crafty enough to keep any such admission out of an email. In his private business he forbade email communication (kind of unusual, don't you think?). But not all of those emails were from him. Did others know to hide what was going on? Hopefully we will find out.


Wasn't there already a failed impeachment attempt about this?
Yeah, there was, I remember now.
President Trump was totally vindicated and acquitted.
Which we knew before it happened was going to be the case in the Republican held Senate. It was a totally partisan acquittal and means nothing to justice.
It was a partisan conviction too.
You're right. Every blessed Republican in the House opposed the Articles of Impeachment. It was the first time a President was impeached with no votes by his own party. The Republicans are consistent, if not ethical.

Biden is your candidate. He’s on video doing exactly what your partisan hacks accused Trump of.
There is not a justifiable comparison there. I'm not going back into the reasons. I'm sure you've heard them many times. If they haven't sunk in by now, telling you one more time isn't going to make any difference. So wallow in your half informed and opinionated position. It's what Trumpers do.
So now, like a typical libtard who has lost and argument you resort to calling me a Trumper. Fuck ewe too.
I have not "lost" this argument. You never had a chance since you have no idea what happened.
 
This is interesting.

The trump administration is trying to violate the FOIA law. They're using very flimsy excuse for it too.

It will be interesting to see how this works out.


Another fishing expedition in the works since there have been ZERO indications of laws being violated. The link states:

A federal judge in Washington, D.C. has ordered the White House to turn over 20 emails directly relating to President Donald Trump’s decision to withhold congressionally appropriated military aid from Ukraine. The administration has refused to produce the communications thus far, claiming the documents are protected from public release by executive privilege.

A decision he changed in a few weeks, fully complying with the Congressionally Appropriated Military Aid package (with additional military hardware) within the Fiscal year of its passage. You guys are running on nothing..... as usual.

:cuckoo:
He released the funds when he'd been caught red handed. I'm not overly impressed. What the committee wants is the evidence that Trump withheld it and why. If Trump was not withholding the money until he got Zelensky's cooperation, he's got nothing to worry about, does he?

Of course, it's entirely possible that Trump is crafty enough to keep any such admission out of an email. In his private business he forbade email communication (kind of unusual, don't you think?). But not all of those emails were from him. Did others know to hide what was going on? Hopefully we will find out.


Wasn't there already a failed impeachment attempt about this?
Yeah, there was, I remember now.
President Trump was totally vindicated and acquitted.
Which we knew before it happened was going to be the case in the Republican held Senate. It was a totally partisan acquittal and means nothing to justice.

You may not know what Partisan means.
Of course I do. And everyone knew it was going to be the case. Fox admitted it, every single conservative admitted it--they knew that no matter what Trump did, they had no intention of convicting him.

And, no matter the fact that the House had, and produced no evidence, the Democrats were going to bring charges.
You worry about the members in your shithole party before you worry about others.
I watched the hearing. All of it. They had plenty of evidence. Closing your eyes to it does not make it go away. You should be defending America, not a miserable political agenda. America stands by the strength of her leaders. A leader that abuses his authority the way Trump has is not only an embarrassment, it leaves the obvious question: What ELSE is he up to? He has the morals of a sewer rat and only another sewer rat can't see that.


Absolutely delusional.
The cookie lady has lost it.
This is interesting.

The trump administration is trying to violate the FOIA law. They're using very flimsy excuse for it too.

It will be interesting to see how this works out.


Another fishing expedition in the works since there have been ZERO indications of laws being violated. The link states:

A federal judge in Washington, D.C. has ordered the White House to turn over 20 emails directly relating to President Donald Trump’s decision to withhold congressionally appropriated military aid from Ukraine. The administration has refused to produce the communications thus far, claiming the documents are protected from public release by executive privilege.

A decision he changed in a few weeks, fully complying with the Congressionally Appropriated Military Aid package (with additional military hardware) within the Fiscal year of its passage. You guys are running on nothing..... as usual.

:cuckoo:
He released the funds when he'd been caught red handed. I'm not overly impressed. What the committee wants is the evidence that Trump withheld it and why. If Trump was not withholding the money until he got Zelensky's cooperation, he's got nothing to worry about, does he?

Of course, it's entirely possible that Trump is crafty enough to keep any such admission out of an email. In his private business he forbade email communication (kind of unusual, don't you think?). But not all of those emails were from him. Did others know to hide what was going on? Hopefully we will find out.


Wasn't there already a failed impeachment attempt about this?
Yeah, there was, I remember now.
President Trump was totally vindicated and acquitted.
Which we knew before it happened was going to be the case in the Republican held Senate. It was a totally partisan acquittal and means nothing to justice.
It was a partisan conviction too.
You're right. Every blessed Republican in the House opposed the Articles of Impeachment. It was the first time a President was impeached with no votes by his own party. The Republicans are consistent, if not ethical.

Biden is your candidate. He’s on video doing exactly what your partisan hacks accused Trump of.
There is not a justifiable comparison there. I'm not going back into the reasons. I'm sure you've heard them many times. If they haven't sunk in by now, telling you one more time isn't going to make any difference. So wallow in your half informed and opinionated position. It's what Trumpers do.
So now, like a typical libtard who has lost and argument you resort to calling me a Trumper. Fuck ewe too.
I have not "lost" this argument. You never had a chance since you have no idea what happened.
Ewe lost it a long time ago. Asswipe!
 
There isn’t any arguemwnt to win or lose. This case is as over as the Watergate hearings. Liberals are bitter clingers to their fake or misguided emotion and they have found a judge who wants to do her own personal “look see” and they are giddy once again.
 

Forum List

Back
Top