UN Official found dead was set to testify against Hillary Clinton same day.

[Kat]

UN Official found dead was set to testify against Hillary Clinton same day. “BARBELL FELL ON HIS NECK”

Ashe was due in court Monday with his Chinese businessman co-defendant Ng Lap Seng, who is charged with smuggling $4.5 million into the US since 2013 and lying that it was to buy art and casino chips.
Ng was identified in a 1998 Senate report as the source of hundreds of thousands of dollars illegally funneled through an Arkansas restaurant owner, Charlie Trie, to the Democratic National Committee during the Clinton administration. (Ng was not charged with any crime.)
Ng and Trie had visited the White House several times for Democratic fund-raising events and were photographed with then-President Bill Clinton and First Lady Hillary Clinton.
One source told me, “During the trial, the prosecutors would have linked Ashe to the Clinton bagman Ng. It would have been very embarrassing. His death was conveniently timed.”


UN Official found dead was set to testify against Hillary Clinton same day. “BARBELL FELL ON HIS NECK”


Wondering why this was not all over the news. I did find several sources online. I did excactly what is wanted of us all......I forgot about it. Remembered today.

Okay you guys.....let's start the pooh poohing and blame gun control and Christians. 1-2-3 Go!

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Your headline is an utter lie. Ashe was not going to be testifying "against Hillary Clinton".

The Clintons have absolutely nothing to do with this case, which is about money smuggling occurring in 2013. The only "connection" to the Clintons is that it involves a Chinese billionaire who was associated with the Clintons 25 years ago.

 

[Kat]

Your headline is an utter lie. Ashe was not going to be testifying "against Hillary Clinton".

The Clintons have absolutely nothing to do with this case, which is about money smuggling occurring in 2013. The only "connection" to the Clintons is that it involves a Chinese billionaire who was associated with the Clintons 25 years ago.

Link? And one proving he was not to testify and that he had nothing to do with Clintons.

 

[Kat]

I never mind being proven wrong. Doesn't bother me in the least.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Your headline is an utter lie. Ashe was not going to be testifying "against Hillary Clinton".

The Clintons have absolutely nothing to do with this case, which is about money smuggling occurring in 2013. The only "connection" to the Clintons is that it involves a Chinese billionaire who was associated with the Clintons 25 years ago.

Link? And one proving he was not to testify and that he had nothing to do with Clintons.

Read your own article - the whole thing, not just the headline.

It's not my job to "prove" you wrong. It's your job to "prove" your own claims.

 

[sealybobo]

I never mind being proven wrong. Doesn't bother me in the least.

Liars lie shamelessly and unapologetically

 

[Kat]

Your headline is an utter lie. Ashe was not going to be testifying "against Hillary Clinton".

The Clintons have absolutely nothing to do with this case, which is about money smuggling occurring in 2013. The only "connection" to the Clintons is that it involves a Chinese billionaire who was associated with the Clintons 25 years ago.

Link? And one proving he was not to testify and that he had nothing to do with Clintons.

Read your own article - the whole thing, not just the headline.

It's not my job to "prove" you wrong. It's your job to "prove" your own claims.

I posted the article. People draw their own conclusions. Is the man dead or not?

 

[Kat]

I never mind being proven wrong. Doesn't bother me in the least.

Liars lie shamelessly and unapologetically

What do you mean?

 

[Witchit]

roflmao!! OMG. Literal tears of laughter @ "is the man dead or not."

Word.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Your headline is an utter lie. Ashe was not going to be testifying "against Hillary Clinton".

The Clintons have absolutely nothing to do with this case, which is about money smuggling occurring in 2013. The only "connection" to the Clintons is that it involves a Chinese billionaire who was associated with the Clintons 25 years ago.

Link? And one proving he was not to testify and that he had nothing to do with Clintons.

Read your own article - the whole thing, not just the headline.

It's not my job to "prove" you wrong. It's your job to "prove" your own claims.

I posted the article. People draw their own conclusions. Is the man dead or not?

So you refuse to actually defend your OP, but somehow it's my responsibility to prove it wrong?

The only conclusion I can draw at this point is that you're being intentionally dishonest. Don't try to pretend that you're just some innocent bystander - you posted the story.

Why don't you tell us, in your own words, how the Clintons were connected to Ashe's trial?

 

[bodecea]

Your headline is an utter lie. Ashe was not going to be testifying "against Hillary Clinton".

The Clintons have absolutely nothing to do with this case, which is about money smuggling occurring in 2013. The only "connection" to the Clintons is that it involves a Chinese billionaire who was associated with the Clintons 25 years ago.

Link? And one proving he was not to testify and that he had nothing to do with Clintons.

Read your own article - the whole thing, not just the headline.

It's not my job to "prove" you wrong. It's your job to "prove" your own claims.

I posted the article. People draw their own conclusions. Is the man dead or not?

We had a few people killed here in a car accident yesterday also....shall we blame Clinton for that too? Are they dead or not?

 

[theDoctorisIn]

I never mind being proven wrong. Doesn't bother me in the least.

Liars lie shamelessly and unapologetically

What do you mean?

I think that's fairly self-explanatory.

 

[Kat]

roflmao!! OMG. Literal tears of laughter @ "is the man dead or not."

Word.

Your headline is an utter lie. Ashe was not going to be testifying "against Hillary Clinton".

The Clintons have absolutely nothing to do with this case, which is about money smuggling occurring in 2013. The only "connection" to the Clintons is that it involves a Chinese billionaire who was associated with the Clintons 25 years ago.

Link? And one proving he was not to testify and that he had nothing to do with Clintons.

Read your own article - the whole thing, not just the headline.

It's not my job to "prove" you wrong. It's your job to "prove" your own claims.

I posted the article. People draw their own conclusions. Is the man dead or not?

So you refuse to actually defend your OP, but somehow it's my responsibility to prove it wrong?

The only conclusion I can draw at this point is that you're being intentionally dishonest. Don't try to pretend that you're just some innocent bystander - you posted the story.

Why don't you tell us, in your own words, how the Clintons were connected to Ashe's trial?

Every article I find says the same exact thing. I have not been able to find anything that said different. Want me to just make it up

 

[theDoctorisIn]

The store around the corner from me was robbed last night, and I think it was on Donald Trump's orders.

Prove me wrong.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

roflmao!! OMG. Literal tears of laughter @ "is the man dead or not."

Word.

Your headline is an utter lie. Ashe was not going to be testifying "against Hillary Clinton".

The Clintons have absolutely nothing to do with this case, which is about money smuggling occurring in 2013. The only "connection" to the Clintons is that it involves a Chinese billionaire who was associated with the Clintons 25 years ago.

Link? And one proving he was not to testify and that he had nothing to do with Clintons.

Read your own article - the whole thing, not just the headline.

It's not my job to "prove" you wrong. It's your job to "prove" your own claims.

I posted the article. People draw their own conclusions. Is the man dead or not?

So you refuse to actually defend your OP, but somehow it's my responsibility to prove it wrong?

The only conclusion I can draw at this point is that you're being intentionally dishonest. Don't try to pretend that you're just some innocent bystander - you posted the story.

Why don't you tell us, in your own words, how the Clintons were connected to Ashe's trial?

Every article I find says the same exact thing. I have not been able to find anything that said different. Want me to just make it up

Well, since you've read so many articles that say the same thing (because you're only reading hysterical right wing blogs who are all reposting the same story), you must know exactly how the Clintons are involved.

Why won't you tell us?

 

[sealybobo]

UN Official found dead was set to testify against Hillary Clinton same day. “BARBELL FELL ON HIS NECK”

Ashe was due in court Monday with his Chinese businessman co-defendant Ng Lap Seng, who is charged with smuggling $4.5 million into the US since 2013 and lying that it was to buy art and casino chips.
Ng was identified in a 1998 Senate report as the source of hundreds of thousands of dollars illegally funneled through an Arkansas restaurant owner, Charlie Trie, to the Democratic National Committee during the Clinton administration. (Ng was not charged with any crime.)
Ng and Trie had visited the White House several times for Democratic fund-raising events and were photographed with then-President Bill Clinton and First Lady Hillary Clinton.
One source told me, “During the trial, the prosecutors would have linked Ashe to the Clinton bagman Ng. It would have been very embarrassing. His death was conveniently timed.”


UN Official found dead was set to testify against Hillary Clinton same day. “BARBELL FELL ON HIS NECK”


Wondering why this was not all over the news. I did find several sources online. I did excactly what is wanted of us all......I forgot about it. Remembered today.

Okay you guys.....let's start the pooh poohing and blame gun control and Christians. 1-2-3 Go!

Republicans don't realize they're the boys and girls who've cried wolf so many times now the Clinton's could get away with murder. No ones listening anymore. We win no matter what you try

 

[Ravi]

I heard she also murdered Elie Wiesel.

 

[Toro]

The headline is dishonest.

No one was testifying against the Clintons. The article says nothing of the sort.

This is why serious people don't believe right-wing news sites.

 

[JakeStarkey]

"Your headline is an utter lie. Ashe was not going to be testifying "against Hillary Clinton".

The Clintons have absolutely nothing to do with this case, which is about money smuggling occurring in 2013. The only "connection" to the Clintons is that it involves a Chinese billionaire who was associated with the Clintons 25 years ago."

^^^ That

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Thread Closed at OP request.