If she sends it back, she should be kicked off welfare. Sounds like a win-win to me.
so some self-satisfied trumpian piece of garbage can tell people what to eat? why should she be grateful? how do you know there was a single thing in that box she or her family could eat.
loons?
there are ways to do it-------way back when I was young----
impoverished people DID get some staples.----government
stuff like American cheese, oil -----I think also rice. That
sort of stuff plus some "food stamp" allotment seems ok to me. Just about everyone eats it-----the target seemed to
be children and HOME GROWN stuff. ----also peanut butter.
As far as the PRE-PACK meals in the envelope------that's
MILITARY MRE s----------FORGET IT!!!!
but that isn't the goal of this... it's a) put money into the hands of their buddies who own/deliver the food; and b) humiliate people.
iirc, the reason they gave out "government cheese" is because there was a huge dairy surplus and it helped dairy farmers (or some senator who represented dairy farmers).
I am fully aware of the SURPLUS issue ----AND I SUPPORT
ENCOURAGEMENT OF AGRICULTURE------So long as it
is beneficial ---------keeping THIS COUNTRY food independent is very important -------I see no reason to subsidize Portugese sardines or products from Indonesia or
unidentifiable fish sauce from china. We SHOULD be producing wheat and rice and milk for ALL ------right here.
-----and tomatoes from Jersey......,for American "red gravy"----for New York pizza.
er..... which has what to do with humiliating people?
I did not bring up the "humiliating people" issue.
It might be better to mail coupons for the specific
available surplus items and let people pick them up
in cooperating grocery stores than drop a
GOVERNMENT FREE FOOD box on the doorstep.
My objective is---get wholesome food to those who
need it, preferably homegrown and---stimulation of
USA agriculture is a GOOD 'side-effect'