Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Exactly! Cruz has no real logical, intelligent, informative, strategy to dispute this election over, as per your explanation. You're right, "that's it."3 U.S.C. 15 tells congress how to count the votes. They open the certificates sent to them from the December 14th EC vote, one by one in alphabetical order starting with "A"The problem Cruz and the rest of them have, is the fact that there is nothing being disputed other than the magical thinking of voter fraud. They are showing up to this gun fight essentially with no bullets. They're going to be the laughing stock when this is over. And they don't seem to care.
After reading and entering them in the ledger, they call for objections, whereupon they debate for 2 hours and vote thumbs up or thumbs down on accepting the electors.
That's it. There is no mechanism for adding EC votes to the pile after the fact. And no mechanism to make changes to the votes already there, other than to reject them.
Why can't one thing that was prove there is no fraud being concealed? The ballots will prove there is no fraud if there was no fraud. Why aren't Democrats transparent? What can you possibly be scared of?Other than cheating, that's the only thing you can accomplish right? You certainly haven't proven voter fraud, so what's left on your plate?Wow! You really don't understand, do you. Crazy stupid.what are they trying to accomplish?
grandstanding.
"Not one of the Republican officeholders objecting to Biden's victory have objected to their own wins on the same day on the same ballots using the same election systems."
The videos prove fraud. The end.Yep! But boy howdy, has he made a complete fool of himself doing it.He can't. That would mean admitting tRump lost.Dude, you can't be that stupid. You got caught with your pants down lying about what's under the table, when you yourself do not know. Stop making an absolute idiot out of yourself. You have boxed yourself in, courtesy of your own words.Then you do not believe what anyone can see? You have serious problems. Maybe politics is too stressful for you.No, they don't.The videos prove it, you stupid bag of shit.You are a liar who cannot prove that. Disgusting ass lying pos.There are videos of people re scanning the same ballots, many times. There are videos of ballots hidden under the only table covered in the whole room. It is right in front of your eyes and you deny it. You are seriously addled.Dozens of credible accusations by real people (not crazy drunks and their "afterdavids" who know the dead people voted because they saw them leaving) and were backed up by real witnesses and recordings.One anonymous accusation was made about Trump,
There is no evidence of any wrongdoing as far as this election goes. There are no credible accusations of it either.
Nothing, nada, nope, nyet.
Dude, go back to your closet. You got the shit kicked out of you by way of your own words. " The end" for you is your way of running from your own bs and lies.
Cruz can present evidence. That is what lawyers do, and Cruz is good at it.Exactly! Cruz has no real logical, intelligent, informative, strategy to dispute this election over, as per your explanation. You're right, "that's it."3 U.S.C. 15 tells congress how to count the votes. They open the certificates sent to them from the December 14th EC vote, one by one in alphabetical order starting with "A"The problem Cruz and the rest of them have, is the fact that there is nothing being disputed other than the magical thinking of voter fraud. They are showing up to this gun fight essentially with no bullets. They're going to be the laughing stock when this is over. And they don't seem to care.
After reading and entering them in the ledger, they call for objections, whereupon they debate for 2 hours and vote thumbs up or thumbs down on accepting the electors.
That's it. There is no mechanism for adding EC votes to the pile after the fact. And no mechanism to make changes to the votes already there, other than to reject them.
He and the rest of these thugs are just going to try and make names for themselves over something that doesn't exist, while believing their base will believe every bit of nonsense they can bring to the floor.
When are you going to learn you saying something does not make it so? I do not see it your way. But please go ahead and keep repeating it anyway. You have no answer about destroying evidence and withholding ballots and machines hostage, do you?The videos prove fraud. The end.Yep! But boy howdy, has he made a complete fool of himself doing it.He can't. That would mean admitting tRump lost.Dude, you can't be that stupid. You got caught with your pants down lying about what's under the table, when you yourself do not know. Stop making an absolute idiot out of yourself. You have boxed yourself in, courtesy of your own words.Then you do not believe what anyone can see? You have serious problems. Maybe politics is too stressful for you.No, they don't.The videos prove it, you stupid bag of shit.You are a liar who cannot prove that. Disgusting ass lying pos.There are videos of people re scanning the same ballots, many times. There are videos of ballots hidden under the only table covered in the whole room. It is right in front of your eyes and you deny it. You are seriously addled.Dozens of credible accusations by real people (not crazy drunks and their "afterdavids" who know the dead people voted because they saw them leaving) and were backed up by real witnesses and recordings.One anonymous accusation was made about Trump,
There is no evidence of any wrongdoing as far as this election goes. There are no credible accusations of it either.
Nothing, nada, nope, nyet.
Trump has no path to victory. They know the democratic house of representatives under Nancy Pelosi won't agree to throw out any of Bidens electors.Exactly! Cruz has no real logical, intelligent, informative, strategy to dispute this election over, as per your explanation. You're right, "that's it."
Are you going to put more stupid on top of the other stupid comments you just made? Give it up. You lost big time. You are getting real boring for one, and you're drowning even deeper with your questions. You took the time to lie like a dog, only to get caught with your own lies by asking "why", and now look at you. You're doing it again. And multiple questions on top of it, with terrible word usage. Have you graduated from High School? Man get out of here.Why can't one thing that was prove there is no fraud being concealed? The ballots will prove there is no fraud if there was no fraud. Why aren't Democrats transparent? What can you possibly be scared of?Other than cheating, that's the only thing you can accomplish right? You certainly haven't proven voter fraud, so what's left on your plate?Wow! You really don't understand, do you. Crazy stupid.what are they trying to accomplish?
grandstanding.
"Not one of the Republican officeholders objecting to Biden's victory have objected to their own wins on the same day on the same ballots using the same election systems."
And neither do you. That's the problem for you. You aren't smart enough to figure that out, so you keep grinding stupid to its limit.When are you going to learn you saying something does not make it so? I do not see it your way. But please go ahead and keep repeating it anyway. You have no answer about destroying evidence and withholding ballots and machines hostage, do you?The videos prove fraud. The end.Yep! But boy howdy, has he made a complete fool of himself doing it.He can't. That would mean admitting tRump lost.Dude, you can't be that stupid. You got caught with your pants down lying about what's under the table, when you yourself do not know. Stop making an absolute idiot out of yourself. You have boxed yourself in, courtesy of your own words.Then you do not believe what anyone can see? You have serious problems. Maybe politics is too stressful for you.No, they don't.The videos prove it, you stupid bag of shit.You are a liar who cannot prove that. Disgusting ass lying pos.There are videos of people re scanning the same ballots, many times. There are videos of ballots hidden under the only table covered in the whole room. It is right in front of your eyes and you deny it. You are seriously addled.Dozens of credible accusations by real people (not crazy drunks and their "afterdavids" who know the dead people voted because they saw them leaving) and were backed up by real witnesses and recordings.One anonymous accusation was made about Trump,
There is no evidence of any wrongdoing as far as this election goes. There are no credible accusations of it either.
Nothing, nada, nope, nyet.
What you do not understand is that election disputes had to be settled by December 8th. EC votes had to be cast by December 14th.When are you going to learn you saying something does not make it so? I do not see it your way. But please go ahead and keep repeating it anyway. You have no answer about destroying evidence and withholding ballots and machines hostage, do you?
You are doing nothing but trying to ridicule me. It means you do not have one thing to say about the obvious fraud. Guess what? Everybody knows that.Are you going to put more stupid on top of the other stupid comments you just made? Give it up. You lost big time. You are getting real boring for one, and you're drowning even deeper with your questions. You took the time to lie like a dog, only to get caught with your own lies by asking "why", and now look at you. You're doing it again. And multiple questions on top of it, with terrible word usage. Have you graduated from High School? Man get out of here.Why can't one thing that was prove there is no fraud being concealed? The ballots will prove there is no fraud if there was no fraud. Why aren't Democrats transparent? What can you possibly be scared of?Other than cheating, that's the only thing you can accomplish right? You certainly haven't proven voter fraud, so what's left on your plate?Wow! You really don't understand, do you. Crazy stupid.what are they trying to accomplish?
grandstanding.
"Not one of the Republican officeholders objecting to Biden's victory have objected to their own wins on the same day on the same ballots using the same election systems."
The confessions of a loser right here folks. He got the shit kicked out of him over his own words, and he thinks memes are going to rescue him. Poor thing!
No, you did it to yourself. You came here unprepared as every Republican on this board has done, using magical thinking to fix their problems, and no fraud has been proven. 59 court cases that found no fraud, have made an idiot out of you and your ilk.You are doing nothing but trying to ridicule me. It means you do not have one thing to say about the obvious fraud. Guess what? Everybody knows that.Are you going to put more stupid on top of the other stupid comments you just made? Give it up. You lost big time. You are getting real boring for one, and you're drowning even deeper with your questions. You took the time to lie like a dog, only to get caught with your own lies by asking "why", and now look at you. You're doing it again. And multiple questions on top of it, with terrible word usage. Have you graduated from High School? Man get out of here.Why can't one thing that was prove there is no fraud being concealed? The ballots will prove there is no fraud if there was no fraud. Why aren't Democrats transparent? What can you possibly be scared of?Other than cheating, that's the only thing you can accomplish right? You certainly haven't proven voter fraud, so what's left on your plate?Wow! You really don't understand, do you. Crazy stupid.what are they trying to accomplish?
grandstanding.
"Not one of the Republican officeholders objecting to Biden's victory have objected to their own wins on the same day on the same ballots using the same election systems."
Wow! You really don't understand, do you. Crazy stupid.what are they trying to accomplish?
grandstanding.
"Not one of the Republican officeholders objecting to Biden's victory have objected to their own wins on the same day on the same ballots using the same election systems."
Let's hope we have a repeat of this again.Wow! You really don't understand, do you. Crazy stupid.what are they trying to accomplish?
grandstanding.
"Not one of the Republican officeholders objecting to Biden's victory have objected to their own wins on the same day on the same ballots using the same election systems."
That will go right over his head. He only has tunnel vision for voter fraud, he himself has to ask questions about, but claims voter fraud anyway. Lol! These folks are a trip.What you do not understand is that election disputes had to be settled by December 8th. EC votes had to be cast by December 14th.When are you going to learn you saying something does not make it so? I do not see it your way. But please go ahead and keep repeating it anyway. You have no answer about destroying evidence and withholding ballots and machines hostage, do you?
If you want to dispute the election I suggest you ask Doc Emmett Brown for a ride in his Delorean.
With 100 percent accuracy, Pulitzer said that his process could detect the following types of fraud or irregularities:
- How many ballots were printed by a specific machine.
- Counterfeit ballots.
- Ballots from China.
- The type of ink used.
- How many ballots were mailed.
- How many ballots were filled out by machine.
- How many ballots were counted more than once.
- Which ballots went through adjudication.
- How many ballots were scanned more than once.
- What candidates were marked on all the ballots in the categories above.
I can only take but so much retardation. Take a break there Sling Blade.With 100 percent accuracy, Pulitzer said that his process could detect the following types of fraud or irregularities:
- How many ballots were printed by a specific machine.
- Counterfeit ballots.
- Ballots from China.
- The type of ink used.
- How many ballots were mailed.
- How many ballots were filled out by machine.
- How many ballots were counted more than once.
- Which ballots went through adjudication.
- How many ballots were scanned more than once.
- What candidates were marked on all the ballots in the categories above.
Don't you see Pulitzer could vindicate the Democrats by not finding any of these things? Let him do if there was no fraud.
Wrong. They didn't look at any evidenc.eThe courts did look at what was presented and it wasn't evidence so they dismissed the cases as they should. What you Trump boot lickers can't seem to understand is that allegations are not proof..and oh ya..signed affidavits are just allegations.All you proved is that you're a jackass. You can't present evidence to a court if that court refuses to look at it.then present the evidence to courts. I am sure with your expertise you will be able to find Trump appointed judges and will be able to save Trump’s ass.Wrong, shit for brains. We've seen abundant evidence that this election was a swindle.We've seen that there's no fraud.Then stop asking Trump for his taxes. Scan the ballots or admit guilt.lol. prove there was no fraud, he queefs.Why is shit like that all that you have? Scan the ballots. Prove there was no fraud.Only in the bizzaro alternate reality occupied by tRump supporters.GP is 1000 times more credible than CNN or any "news" source you frequent.W
When are you kids gonna realize gateway pundit is not news. It's for entertainment purposes only.It looks like Republicans will release the Kraken on Jan 6. It will be fun watching the Republicans explaining to the entire country why Biden is a fraud.
Ten US Senators are discussing plans to join Senator Josh Hawley in objecting to the 2020 fraudulent election results.According to Jack Posobiec they are upset with Mitch McConnell’s ABSOLUTE failure to follow President Trump’s lead and issue $2,000 checks to the American people.Seven GOP senators signed the letter and FOUR GOP Senators-elect signed on!Ted Cruz (R-Texas), Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), James Lankford (R-Okla.), Steve Daines (R-Mont.), John Kennedy (R-La.), Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.), Mike Braun (R-Ind.)Four Senators-Elect signed on:Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.) Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) Bill Hagerty (R-Tenn.) Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.)Here is the joint statement released on Saturday.FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Lauren Bianchi: [email protected] January 2, 2021Joint Statement from Senators Cruz, Johnson, Lankford, Daines, Kennedy, Blackburn, Braun, Senators-Elect Lummis, Marshall, Hagerty, TubervilleWASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senators Ted Cruz (R-Texas), Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), James Lankford (R-Okla.), Steve Daines (R-Mont.), John Kennedy (R-La.), Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.), and Mike Braun (R-Ind.), and Senators-Elect Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.), Roger Marshall (R-Kan.), Bill Hagerty (R-Tenn.), and Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.) issued the following statement in advance of the Electoral College certification process on January 6, 2021:“America is a Republic whose leaders are chosen in democratic elections. Those elections, in turn, must comply with the Constitution and with federal and state law.“When the voters fairly decide an election, pursuant to the rule of law, the losing candidate should acknowledge and respect the legitimacy of that election. And, if the voters choose to elect a new office-holder, our Nation should have a peaceful transfer of power.“The election of 2020, like the election of 2016, was hard fought and, in many swing states, narrowly decided. The 2020 election, however, featured unprecedented allegations of voter fraud, violations and lax enforcement of election law, and other voting irregularities.Voter fraud has posed a persistent challenge in our elections, although its breadth and scope are disputed. By any measure, the allegations of fraud and irregularities in the 2020 election exceed any in our lifetimes.“And those allegations are not believed just by one individual candidate. Instead, they are widespread.Reuters/Ipsos polling tragically, shows that 39% of Americans believe ‘the election was rigged.’ That belief is held by Republicans (67%), Democrats (17%), and Independents (31%).Some Members of Congress disagree with that assessment, as do many members of the media.“But, whether or not our elected officials or journalists believe it, that deep distrust of our democratic processes will not magically disappear. It should concern us all. And it poses an ongoing threat to the legitimacy of any subsequent administrations.“Ideally, the courts would have heard evidence and resolved these claims of serious election fraud. Twice, the Supreme Court had the opportunity to do so; twice, the Court declined.“On January 6, it is incumbent on Congress to vote on whether to certify the 2020 election results. That vote is the lone constitutional power remaining to consider and force resolution of the multiple allegations of serious voter fraud.At that quadrennial joint session, there is long precedent of Democratic Members of Congress raising objections to presidential election results, as they did in 1969, 2001, 2005, and 2017. And, in both 1969 and 2005, a Democratic Senator joined with a Democratic House Member in forcing votes in both houses on whether to accept the presidential electors being challenged.“The most direct precedent on this question arose in 1877, following serious allegations of fraud and illegal conduct in the Hayes-Tilden presidential race. Specifically, the elections in three states—Florida, Louisiana, and South Carolina—were alleged to have been conducted illegally.“In 1877, Congress did not ignore those allegations, nor did the media simply dismiss those raising them as radicals trying to undermine democracy. Instead, Congress appointed an Electoral Commission—consisting of five Senators, five House Members, and five Supreme Court Justices—to consider and resolve the disputed returns.“We should follow that precedent. To wit, Congress should immediately appoint an Electoral Commission, with full investigatory and fact-finding authority, to conduct an emergency 10-day audit of the election returns in the disputed states. Once completed, individual states would evaluate the Commission’s findings and could convene a special legislative session to certify a change in their vote, if needed.Accordingly, we intend to vote on January 6 to reject the electors from disputed states as not ‘regularly given’ and ‘lawfully certified’ (the statutory requisite), unless and until that emergency 10-day audit is completed.“We are not naïve. We fully expect most if not all Democrats, and perhaps more than a few Republicans, to vote otherwise. But support of election integrity should not be a partisan issue. A fair and credible audit—conducted expeditiously and completed well before January 20—would dramatically improve Americans’ faith in our electoral process and would significantly enhance the legitimacy of whoever becomes our next President. We owe that to the People.“These are matters worthy of the Congress, and entrusted to us to defend. We do not take this action lightly. We are acting not to thwart the democratic process, but rather to protect it. And every one of us should act together to ensure that the election was lawfully conducted under the Constitution and to do everything we can to restore faith in our Democracy.”
Nobody has seen his taxes.
False equivalency is FALSE.
The courts did look at what was presented and it wasn't evidence so they dismissed the cases as they should. What you Trump boot lickers can't seem to understand is that allegations are not proof..and oh ya..signed affidavits are just allegations.
Really? Even the judges that Trump appointed didn't look at the evidence?Wrong. They didn't look at any evidenc.e
