UPDATE: Letter by Ted Cruz and 6 GOP Senators and 4 Senators-Elect Sign Letter to Reject Election –Call For Election Commission 10-Day Emergency Audit

No, not agreed. The difference is a lawsuit may not get far in court without sufficient evidence. Impeachment was purely political. There was no supposdely unbiased judge or jury. It as merely voted on and passed by Democrats. Had they held the Senate, Trump would have been removed from office after the first sham. Evidence was not necessary so yes, it was a coup because there was no real trial or examination of the evidence.
I'm sorry, but calling an impeachment political isn't a criticism, it is precisely how it was designed. Nothing you've said about the impeachment was illegal or unconstitutional.

Therefore it cannot be considered a coup.

Eh, you sure about that? Many constitutional scholars disagree that a President who is out of office can be impeached. The Democrats didn’t care.

Many constitutional lawyers agree a President can be impeached even if he is out of office.
 
No, not agreed. The difference is a lawsuit may not get far in court without sufficient evidence. Impeachment was purely political. There was no supposdely unbiased judge or jury. It as merely voted on and passed by Democrats. Had they held the Senate, Trump would have been removed from office after the first sham. Evidence was not necessary so yes, it was a coup because there was no real trial or examination of the evidence.
I'm sorry, but calling an impeachment political isn't a criticism, it is precisely how it was designed. Nothing you've said about the impeachment was illegal or unconstitutional.

Therefore it cannot be considered a coup.

Eh, you sure about that? Many constitutional scholars disagree that a President who is out of office can be impeached. The Democrats didn’t care.

Many constitutional lawyers agree a President can be impeached even if he is out of office.
More importantly, the majority of Congress thinks he can be impeached. If he had been impeached and barred for office, it would have been an interesting court case about the constitutionality of it, but given the deference courts give to Congress on matters of impeachment, I think they would have been fine.
 
No one cares about your empty promises. The BLM riots were not done in the name of any Democrats. They were not inspired by any Democrats. There were no Democrats advertised during those riots. Whereas 1/6 was done by Trump supporters parading his name and fighting for him. The seditious insurrection on the Capitol was inspired by Trump and done for him.

Farouk, that right there is what we call "a fucking lie." We expect that from you because you're what we call "a fucking liar."

When BLM pulled down statues at the Capitol and Stormed the White House to kill the president, that was inspired by Kamala Harris and done for her.

After a year of Insurrection, the Nazis suddenly decide it's really bad when they can blame one instance on Trump.

That is a lie as usual. No one stormed the White House to kill Trump. You Nazis are the ones who chanted to hang Mike Pence and forced the evacuation of the capitol and surrounding buildings.
 
You're fucking deranged, Fruitcake. BLM never stormed the White House. :cuckoo:

One thing about you Nazis, you're pathological liars.


He was there for less than a hour. Clearly someone panicked. They did not storm the White House.
 
Why bother? I already know how 1/6 turned out for you. It was an utter embarrassment for America’s rightwing as they attacked the government in a failed attempt to get Trump installed as president; and now the belligerents are being rounded up from all around the country to face the music. I was just asking you to see if you’ve joined the rest of us in reality yet.

You lost. Deal with it.

Yeah, why bother?

You're a pathological liar, facts have no impact on you.

The Reichstag Fire was a bunch of goobers trespassing.

The attack on the White House where democrats tried to murder the president back in July was far worse.
LOL

Rightards encourage this as merely "trespassing"...



Oh, that's chilling, they chanted.

Of course this is peaceful protest.



You fucking Nazis are such hypocritical clowns.

^^^ a loon actually tries to compare attempting to overthrow the government with protesters. :cuckoo:

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ a Nazi actually tries to gaslight us that the Reichstag Fire was trying to overthrow the government?


View attachment 466235

You're fucking deranged, Fruitcake. What do you call storming the Capitol to murder the vice president and lawmakers and get a constitutionally mandated certification of an election thrown out and the LOSER of the election installed as president, if not "overthrowing the government?"


Not just that. Several of them had plastic ties which suggests they were out to take hostages.
 
You're fucking deranged, Fruitcake. What do you call storming the Capitol to murder the vice president and lawmakers and get a constitutionally mandated certification of an election thrown out and the LOSER of the election installed as president, if not "overthrowing the government?"

What do I call it? I call it a fiction - a fabrication by the Reich.

It simply never happened.

Unarmed protestors entered the Capitol.

What did Nazi Pigshit say about that?

View attachment 466237

Oh, but that's different - Uber Alles Democrat.

Those supposedly unarmed protestors killed 1 police officer and injured 140 other officers.
 
You're fucking deranged, Fruitcake. BLM never stormed the White House. :cuckoo:

One thing about you Nazis, you're pathological liars.

LOLOLOL

You're fucking deranged, Fruitcake. Your own link shows they never stormed the White House. They never even got closer than 30 yards from the White House lawn.

You're a mental case. Seek professional help. Meds are in order.

The President was in such severe danger secret service had to move him to the Underground Bunker - the democrats posed a credible threat to his life.

During the Reichstag Fire, no one had be be hustled to a bunker.

Unarmed protestors with no guns, bombs, or incendiaries trespassed. . (despite blatant lies to the contrary by the Reich press at the time, lies you continue to repeat even though they were debunked long ago.)

You Nazis are trying to paint a protest as something it isn't and never was. You're lying scum and traitors, so that's expected.

But you don't get to get away with it.

Fuck you
Fuck your Reichstag Fire fiction
Fuck all Nazis, democrats or otherwise.

Bullshit. They never even got on the White House lawn and that is a fact. You are the Nazis who staged a attempted coup.
 
I can promise you that 99% of the BLM crowd voted for veggie Joe and likely voted for every Democratic candidate running in the general election every single year.

And those who think police should shoot as many blacks as possible voted for Trump

Please link to me where people who think like this rioted and looted in mass this past year? I’ll wait.

I said they voted for Trump

There aren’t enough of Republicans who think that cops ”should shoot as many blacks as possible” to amount to anything. The opposite can’t be said about the largely Democratic protesters who caused more than 2 billion dollars worth of damage in 2020.
Very true

Most of America supports BLM

Pretty scary if most people support and organization responsible for rioting and looting. I guess that is where the Democratic Party is at this point. Lunatics are running it and the majority of the rest are just useful idiots.
BLM does not support rioting

" BLM does not support rioting"
calvin-and-hobbes-rofl.jpg
 
Last edited:
You're a fucking retard.

Oh, I know you're just lying, you're pathological - but you're a fucking retard to think ANYONE on any side will buy your moronic lie.

Nixon resigned because impeachment proceeding were close to drawing up articles to the Senate. Goldwater told Nixon the Senate would convict.

Lie all you want Nazi - you only make yourself look like the fool you are.
LOLOLOL

You're fucking deranged, Fruitcake. :cuckoo:

As always, you prove you have no idea what you're talking about.

Again, the House never voted on Articles of Impeachment. <-- That is the reason Nixon wasn't impeached.

Again, an individual is impeached the moment the House formally passes Articles of Impeachment. It has nothing at all to do with sending them to the Senate. Maybe you'll take this advice from Fox News...

E8Yolyjz-720.jpg
 
That's really had to do since all of America votes by secret ballot.

So then, Farouk's demand is disingenuous and a logical fallacy...

The Nazi fuck thinks he's clever - he isn't - he's just dishonest.
Wrong as always, Fruitcake. The audit was performed and proved the Dominion machines did not produce any fraud.
Those audits were preformed by companies with a history of working with Dominion. The results were known before they started. I posted a link in another thread that proves it. They keep saying no fraud but keep withholding ballots and machines. That can only mean obvious guilt.
:cuckoo:
 
You're fucking deranged, Fruitcake. BLM never stormed the White House. :cuckoo:

One thing about you Nazis, you're pathological liars.

LOLOLOL

You're fucking deranged, Fruitcake. Your own link shows they never stormed the White House. They never even got closer than 30 yards from the White House lawn.

You're a mental case. Seek professional help. Meds are in order.

The President was in such severe danger secret service had to move him to the Underground Bunker - the democrats posed a credible threat to his life.

During the Reichstag Fire, no one had be be hustled to a bunker.

Unarmed protestors with no guns, bombs, or incendiaries trespassed. . (despite blatant lies to the contrary by the Reich press at the time, lies you continue to repeat even though they were debunked long ago.)

You Nazis are trying to paint a protest as something it isn't and never was. You're lying scum and traitors, so that's expected.

But you don't get to get away with it.

Fuck you
Fuck your Reichstag Fire fiction
Fuck all Nazis, democrats or otherwise.
Fruitcake, BLM never stormed the White House. You really are out of your fucking mind. :cuckoo:

Nazi; being a pathological liar is mental illness.


Get help, Nazi.
You're fucking deranged, Fruitcake. :cuckoo:

Repeating Trump had to be taken to a secure location does not mean the White House was stormed. It wasn't and your own link corroborates that. Your own link states BLM skirmishes with police occurred "outside" the White House. That would be NOT storming the White House.

And your denial that Mike Pence had to be taken to a secure location on 1/6 was utterly destroyed by the video I posted of him being escorted to a secure location.
 
And you likely disagree with that assessment based on the “facts” you choose to believe. The point is, the Democrats got their impeachment TWICE, both times with little to no evidence, so Republicans should have their lawsuits heard.
I don't call lawsuits from Trump and his cadre of idiots "sedition" or "treason". But just because you file a lawsuit doesn't mean the case should get very far in court.

Lawsuits can't be treason. Impeachment can't be a coup.

Agreed?

No, not agreed. The difference is a lawsuit may not get far in court without sufficient evidence. Impeachment was purely political. There was no supposdely unbiased judge or jury. It as merely voted on and passed by Democrats. Had they held the Senate, Trump would have been removed from office after the first sham. Evidence was not necessary so yes, it was a coup because there was no real trial or examination of the evidence.

There was more than sufficient evidence to convict Trump in both cases. In the second impeachment, few if any Republicans def3ended Trump Typical was McConnell who said that Trump incited a riot but they refused to convict because they decided to use a loophole.
There is more than sufficient evidence of fraud in the election. That went nowhere. Stop the whine. Trump is like a crack pipe you can't put down.
LOL

If there was, you would have been able to prove it by now.
 
That's really had to do since all of America votes by secret ballot.

So then, Farouk's demand is disingenuous and a logical fallacy...

The Nazi fuck thinks he's clever - he isn't - he's just dishonest.
Wrong as always, Fruitcake. The audit was performed and proved the Dominion machines did not produce any fraud.
Those audits were preformed by companies with a history of working with Dominion. The results were known before they started. I posted a link in another thread that proves it. They keep saying no fraud but keep withholding ballots and machines. That can only mean obvious guilt.
:cuckoo:
Why have the ballots and the machines been withheld from discovery?
 
And you likely disagree with that assessment based on the “facts” you choose to believe. The point is, the Democrats got their impeachment TWICE, both times with little to no evidence, so Republicans should have their lawsuits heard.
I don't call lawsuits from Trump and his cadre of idiots "sedition" or "treason". But just because you file a lawsuit doesn't mean the case should get very far in court.

Lawsuits can't be treason. Impeachment can't be a coup.

Agreed?

No, not agreed. The difference is a lawsuit may not get far in court without sufficient evidence. Impeachment was purely political. There was no supposdely unbiased judge or jury. It as merely voted on and passed by Democrats. Had they held the Senate, Trump would have been removed from office after the first sham. Evidence was not necessary so yes, it was a coup because there was no real trial or examination of the evidence.

There was more than sufficient evidence to convict Trump in both cases. In the second impeachment, few if any Republicans def3ended Trump Typical was McConnell who said that Trump incited a riot but they refused to convict because they decided to use a loophole.
There is more than sufficient evidence of fraud in the election. That went nowhere. Stop the whine. Trump is like a crack pipe you can't put down.
LOL

If there was, you would have been able to prove it by now.
I have proven it. That is why you keep saying I have not. The obvious guilt coming from you and the MSM and politicians is unmistakably an admission of guilt.
 
More importantly, the majority of Congress thinks he can be impeached. If he had been impeached and barred for office, it would have been an interesting court case about the constitutionality of it, but given the deference courts give to Congress on matters of impeachment, I think they would have been fine.

"Deference" like Lefty Roberts refusing to take part in the Reich's unconstitutional farce?
 

Forum List

Back
Top