Rshermr
VIP Member
It's purported. Deal with it. And look at you trying to gain money on this. If this is a point of pride, you would offer to prove it straight up. As it is, I don't care about your scam. And you spazzing doesn't prove you know sh**, tbh. You're the troll telling us that doubling wages has no negative economic impact. What a load of utter horse shit. You are a hack and a half.
Right. Says the clown who has no credentials at all. Really, me boy, you are a simpleton clown, a conservative troll with nothing but con talking points.
If I remember, and I do, it was you that suggested I was lying about my background. So, put your money where your mouth is, or you can simply admit you are a coward. No guts, just empty attacks. Only really, really small and unimportant people who are jealous of others make personal attacks against those others.
It costs to prove anything, me boy. It costs for a referee, typically a financial institution. it costs to put money in escrow. And it would show you had some integrity if you would try to back up your accusations. But, refusing simply shows what we all know. You know you are going to loose money, and you know you will look like a fool. Unless you are correct. Really, you are such a small time tiny minded clown.
And, me boy, despite your best efforts at personal attacks, you are out of your comfort zone. I can prove what I say. You can not. All you can do is rely on totally agenda driven bat shit crazy sources. Because no impartial sources will back you up.
Consider:
"Myth: Increasing the minimum wage will cause people to lose their jobs.
Not true: In a letter to President Obama and congressional leaders urging a minimum wage increase, more than 600 economists, including 7 Nobel Prize winners wrote, "In recent years there have been important developments in the academic literature on the effect of increases in the minimum wage on employment, with the weight of evidence now showing that increases in the minimum wage have had little or no negative effect on the employment of minimum-wage workers, even during times of weakness in the labor market. Research suggests that a minimum-wage increase could have a small stimulative effect on the economy as low-wage workers spend their additional earnings, raising demand and job growth, and providing some help on the jobs front.""
Minimum Wage Mythbusters
Damn. so, over 600 economists say the new minimum wage law is a good idea. You say it is not. So, 600 economists, to one con troll with absolutely no credentials. That is 600 to zero. You did not just loose, you were just destroyed. [/QUOTE][/QUOTE]
Dude, you're on a message board; not a college symposium. Nobody here has "credentials," jackass. Sorry, many do not (like you) but some do. You have econ professors, and people with lots of business background. Just because you have no credentials does not mean that others do not. As it is, you are a sh** economist if you think you're one. You ignore the most basic of concepts while spouting wild erroneous ideas as if they were absolute truth (which is really not what non-hack economists do).Or, if I interpret your little rant, what you are saying is that you hate it when I explain economics with expert proof of what I say. Because you as a troll want to simply state con talking points. Because even the small amount of searching for the truth is against your intent to simply post talking points. Got it. All that proves is that you are a simple minded con troll. Which is normal for con trolls. Cons in general prefer to have someone tell them what to believe. It is the way they want to get what they can then choose to believe. While rational people hate that concept, cons love it. It makes things so much easier, eh, dipshit. No research of any kind needed. No pesky hours of research. Just believe what you are told. Then, pretend you are knowledgeable and spout your con talking points.
And tell AYSO is costs (money) for their volunteer referees lmao: You're such a tool) Well, at least you admit it is your arrogant opinion. Because, as a simpleton con troll, it could not be IMHO. Again though, I'm not at all interested in your stupid little scam. So, you call naming someone a liar honorable? And proving that I never lie a scam? Really, dipshit. You are the tool here. I don't care about getting a PDF of someone else's economics degree (along with a virus). And if you weren't such a poor excuse for an economist, Really, me poor ignorant con. Getting a ba in economics does not make me an economist. There are economists on this board, but they are not me. And, importantly, I never in my life claimed to be an economist. And you are lying when you say I did. dipshit. And it takes no PDF copy of anything to prove a college degree. You simply call the registrar's office, ask a few questions, and they will send you an actual photo copy of the diploma. And you are welcome for another little bit of education, me ignorant con troll. you wouldn't be worried about that sh**. Really, you're just some phony ass peddler. And in the event that you did get a degree, you're a fucking disgrace to the discipline. Funny. You are providing the opinion you have to be that of a person who is angry at the world because you have no background that you can lean on. You have not done the work. You are just a simple minded con troll cutting and pasting con talking points with nothing to back you up, Funny, but not serious.
Citing numbers of libtard infiltrators doesn't mean a thing, dude. Really, me boy, you are making a spectacle of yourself. Calling impartial sources names means nothing. Because you are a complete nothing yourself. You know what their economics are? Get as much money from the government to publish sh** like that. Right, me simpleton con troll. They spend years of effort to get advanced degrees in Economics, and some clown with no credentials and who does not know anything about economics makes ignorant comments about their expertise. Because he is jealous of them, since he has done nothing but absorb con talking points. And is himself nothing at all, just a lying con troll. It's a glorified crime syndicate. That's basic fucking economics. This sh** goes right over your peabrain fucking head, you mother fucking country nugget. And as a con troll with no background or expert knowledge, you think that your opinion of people, and your base stupidity in calling people names and performing personal attacks means something. No one cares, me boy. You are a nothing, just capable of personal attacks, posting unsubstantiated personal attacks, and posting talking points and other drivel. No one believes you, me boy. You are just a joke, attacking with ignorance as hard as you can. Sad.
Right. Says the clown who has no credentials at all. Really, me boy, you are a simpleton clown, a conservative troll with nothing but con talking points.
If I remember, and I do, it was you that suggested I was lying about my background. So, put your money where your mouth is, or you can simply admit you are a coward. No guts, just empty attacks. Only really, really small and unimportant people who are jealous of others make personal attacks against those others.
It costs to prove anything, me boy. It costs for a referee, typically a financial institution. it costs to put money in escrow. And it would show you had some integrity if you would try to back up your accusations. But, refusing simply shows what we all know. You know you are going to loose money, and you know you will look like a fool. Unless you are correct. Really, you are such a small time tiny minded clown.
And, me boy, despite your best efforts at personal attacks, you are out of your comfort zone. I can prove what I say. You can not. All you can do is rely on totally agenda driven bat shit crazy sources. Because no impartial sources will back you up.
Consider:
"Myth: Increasing the minimum wage will cause people to lose their jobs.
Not true: In a letter to President Obama and congressional leaders urging a minimum wage increase, more than 600 economists, including 7 Nobel Prize winners wrote, "In recent years there have been important developments in the academic literature on the effect of increases in the minimum wage on employment, with the weight of evidence now showing that increases in the minimum wage have had little or no negative effect on the employment of minimum-wage workers, even during times of weakness in the labor market. Research suggests that a minimum-wage increase could have a small stimulative effect on the economy as low-wage workers spend their additional earnings, raising demand and job growth, and providing some help on the jobs front.""
Minimum Wage Mythbusters
Damn. so, over 600 economists say the new minimum wage law is a good idea. You say it is not. So, 600 economists, to one con troll with absolutely no credentials. That is 600 to zero. You did not just loose, you were just destroyed. [/QUOTE][/QUOTE]
Dude, you're on a message board; not a college symposium. Nobody here has "credentials," jackass. Sorry, many do not (like you) but some do. You have econ professors, and people with lots of business background. Just because you have no credentials does not mean that others do not. As it is, you are a sh** economist if you think you're one. You ignore the most basic of concepts while spouting wild erroneous ideas as if they were absolute truth (which is really not what non-hack economists do).Or, if I interpret your little rant, what you are saying is that you hate it when I explain economics with expert proof of what I say. Because you as a troll want to simply state con talking points. Because even the small amount of searching for the truth is against your intent to simply post talking points. Got it. All that proves is that you are a simple minded con troll. Which is normal for con trolls. Cons in general prefer to have someone tell them what to believe. It is the way they want to get what they can then choose to believe. While rational people hate that concept, cons love it. It makes things so much easier, eh, dipshit. No research of any kind needed. No pesky hours of research. Just believe what you are told. Then, pretend you are knowledgeable and spout your con talking points.
And tell AYSO is costs (money) for their volunteer referees lmao: You're such a tool) Well, at least you admit it is your arrogant opinion. Because, as a simpleton con troll, it could not be IMHO. Again though, I'm not at all interested in your stupid little scam. So, you call naming someone a liar honorable? And proving that I never lie a scam? Really, dipshit. You are the tool here. I don't care about getting a PDF of someone else's economics degree (along with a virus). And if you weren't such a poor excuse for an economist, Really, me poor ignorant con. Getting a ba in economics does not make me an economist. There are economists on this board, but they are not me. And, importantly, I never in my life claimed to be an economist. And you are lying when you say I did. dipshit. And it takes no PDF copy of anything to prove a college degree. You simply call the registrar's office, ask a few questions, and they will send you an actual photo copy of the diploma. And you are welcome for another little bit of education, me ignorant con troll. you wouldn't be worried about that sh**. Really, you're just some phony ass peddler. And in the event that you did get a degree, you're a fucking disgrace to the discipline. Funny. You are providing the opinion you have to be that of a person who is angry at the world because you have no background that you can lean on. You have not done the work. You are just a simple minded con troll cutting and pasting con talking points with nothing to back you up, Funny, but not serious.
Citing numbers of libtard infiltrators doesn't mean a thing, dude. Really, me boy, you are making a spectacle of yourself. Calling impartial sources names means nothing. Because you are a complete nothing yourself. You know what their economics are? Get as much money from the government to publish sh** like that. Right, me simpleton con troll. They spend years of effort to get advanced degrees in Economics, and some clown with no credentials and who does not know anything about economics makes ignorant comments about their expertise. Because he is jealous of them, since he has done nothing but absorb con talking points. And is himself nothing at all, just a lying con troll. It's a glorified crime syndicate. That's basic fucking economics. This sh** goes right over your peabrain fucking head, you mother fucking country nugget. And as a con troll with no background or expert knowledge, you think that your opinion of people, and your base stupidity in calling people names and performing personal attacks means something. No one cares, me boy. You are a nothing, just capable of personal attacks, posting unsubstantiated personal attacks, and posting talking points and other drivel. No one believes you, me boy. You are just a joke, attacking with ignorance as hard as you can. Sad.
Last edited: