justoffal
Diamond Member
- Jun 29, 2013
- 24,579
- 16,662
- 1,405
Using the term " Obama-hater" is a convenient way to justify the current POTUS's bumbling incompetence in the office that he occupies via the " Obama -lovers " that put him there most of whom were....wait for it now....WHITE.
When I see pieces written with that particular preface I immediately smell the presence of schooled disinformation hacks who specialize in changing perception by first changing the rhetoric. Alinsky 101, 102, and 103.... The entire goal is to obfuscate the details, bury the issues under layers of reactive sperse and vitriol and then redirect the entire discourse into a twisted version of the original and accurate picture. This is often done because the original frame of facts is defamatory or revealing to some extent of the person that is being protected by the profuse blanket of manufactured falsehoods.....such as the inference for instance, that those who disagree are just people who hate not people who think.
This kind of Obtuse approach to debate and conversation seeks to preemptively discredit any form of disagreement while at the same time drumming up sympathy for the target of such Imaginary hatred. The professional propagandist seeks to eliminate the boundaries between the finer definitions by welding all nuances together into one hot button phrase...such as " Obama-hater ". Ergo anyone who has a different opinion or a viewpoint that doesn't promote the narrative is pressured into the narrow definition by howling and repetitive verb-bots who use the language the same way a carpenter uses heavy tools....to drive, pry and rip.
This is an effective method and can be a real boon to those who have a legitimate crusade. I give you the word Greenscam as a perfect example of such a verbal hammer that efficiently describes the entire AGW/Alternative energy cabal and their method of operation. Of course not all green energy is wrapped up in the scam so the word is unfair to a certain extent because as a blanket term it leaves little room for the legitimate forms of Alternative energy that are now being developed. But I digress...
Similarly a phrase like " Obama-hater " seeks to eliminate all of the middle ground by suggesting that there are only two camps; Those who agree and love and those who disagree and hate. That is completely false of course but to the paid propaganda hack the word False is a relative term that can be played like a fiddle to the desired tune.
When I see pieces written with that particular preface I immediately smell the presence of schooled disinformation hacks who specialize in changing perception by first changing the rhetoric. Alinsky 101, 102, and 103.... The entire goal is to obfuscate the details, bury the issues under layers of reactive sperse and vitriol and then redirect the entire discourse into a twisted version of the original and accurate picture. This is often done because the original frame of facts is defamatory or revealing to some extent of the person that is being protected by the profuse blanket of manufactured falsehoods.....such as the inference for instance, that those who disagree are just people who hate not people who think.
This kind of Obtuse approach to debate and conversation seeks to preemptively discredit any form of disagreement while at the same time drumming up sympathy for the target of such Imaginary hatred. The professional propagandist seeks to eliminate the boundaries between the finer definitions by welding all nuances together into one hot button phrase...such as " Obama-hater ". Ergo anyone who has a different opinion or a viewpoint that doesn't promote the narrative is pressured into the narrow definition by howling and repetitive verb-bots who use the language the same way a carpenter uses heavy tools....to drive, pry and rip.
This is an effective method and can be a real boon to those who have a legitimate crusade. I give you the word Greenscam as a perfect example of such a verbal hammer that efficiently describes the entire AGW/Alternative energy cabal and their method of operation. Of course not all green energy is wrapped up in the scam so the word is unfair to a certain extent because as a blanket term it leaves little room for the legitimate forms of Alternative energy that are now being developed. But I digress...
Similarly a phrase like " Obama-hater " seeks to eliminate all of the middle ground by suggesting that there are only two camps; Those who agree and love and those who disagree and hate. That is completely false of course but to the paid propaganda hack the word False is a relative term that can be played like a fiddle to the desired tune.
