Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Tulsi has polled well in many, many polls. She's met the threshold over and over again. Over 26 polls, in fact.
It's just that the DNC refuses to recognize them. How convenient.
And people only know what they hear on their tv. It's not like the media is going to say, hey, she met the threshold again and again, our side just doesn't wanna recognize them.
She's likely the only one who would have forced Trump to try to debate like an adult.
It's the democrats' loss, in my view. Enjoy irrelevance and the same old tired talking points.
It's not just a DNC thing.
The CFR, The Council on Foreign Relations, where all the government and corporate establishment press decide the nation's future meet to discuss who will be the future's leaders? If your ideas and persona don't pass approval there, you don't make it, and thus, the ruling class journalists won't propagandize the population toward their POV. It is there, that the corporate press decide what the American public will see on their TEE VEE's.
http://www.pennsylvaniacrier.com/filemgmt_data/files/Ruling Class Journalists.pdf
Take away the pretty face and smooth demeanor (obama?) and you'll see Tulsi as I see her - just another leftist.
Exactly, just another far left, egomaniac, partisan POLITICIAN.
I don't get why any self respecting conservative would want anything to do with her.
Define "real conservatives".... are paleo-conservatives real? what about the social conservatives ? is conservatism relative or is it absolute?Take away the pretty face and smooth demeanor (obama?) and you'll see Tulsi as I see her - just another leftist.
Exactly, just another far left, egomaniac, partisan POLITICIAN.
I don't get why any self respecting conservative would want anything to do with her.
The only real conservatives left in America are the classical liberals. And, I, for one, am offended to have to accept an adjective in order to placate an ever-growing demograph of confused leftists who have taken it upon themselves to speak for conservatism these days.
In my experience, improper of understanding of rights, what they are and where they come from is VERY common among both "conservatives" and "liberals"... so I don't think it's a good marker of whether an individual is a "conservative" or a "liberal" or a <fill in ideology here>.I just had a conservative tell me that rights came from the federal government the other day. And that's only the tip of the iceberg, it gets worse.
Agreed, the American Political process is just BREAD & CIRCUSES.Anyway. What's important here is the bastardization of the political process itself. Very few seem to care about that. It doesn't really matter who gets elected. The course of history needs changed, else the electorate will never have any say so in who gets nominated.
Define "real conservatives".... are paleo-conservatives real? what about the social conservatives ? is conservatism relative or is it absolute?Take away the pretty face and smooth demeanor (obama?) and you'll see Tulsi as I see her - just another leftist.
Exactly, just another far left, egomaniac, partisan POLITICIAN.
I don't get why any self respecting conservative would want anything to do with her.
The only real conservatives left in America are the classical liberals. And, I, for one, am offended to have to accept an adjective in order to placate an ever-growing demograph of confused leftists who have taken it upon themselves to speak for conservatism these days.
I don't consider myself a conservative at all and my philosophy draws heavily from classical liberalism.
In my experience, improper of understanding of rights, what they are and where they come from is VERY common among both "conservatives" and "liberals"... so I don't think it's a good marker of whether an individual is a "conservative" or a "liberal" or a <fill in ideology here>.I just had a conservative tell me that rights came from the federal government the other day. And that's only the tip of the iceberg, it gets worse.
Agreed, the American Political process is just BREAD & CIRCUSES.Anyway. What's important here is the bastardization of the political process itself. Very few seem to care about that. It doesn't really matter who gets elected. The course of history needs changed, else the electorate will never have any say so in who gets nominated.
"Scratch an egalitarian, and you will inevitably find a statist." -- Murray N. Rothbard
In my experience, improper of understanding of rights, what they are and where they come from is VERY common among both "conservatives" and "liberals"... so I don't think it's a good marker of whether an individual is a "conservative" or a "liberal" or a <fill in ideology here>.
Kamala said once the Democrats get rid of trump, they are coming for his supporters. Be ready America.I just want to see her knife Kamala in the back one more time before she bows out of the race.
In my experience, improper of understanding of rights, what they are and where they come from is VERY common among both "conservatives" and "liberals"... so I don't think it's a good marker of whether an individual is a "conservative" or a "liberal" or a <fill in ideology here>.
Here's perhaps the best moment , in my own view, from the 2012 RNC debates. It's before the RNC changed the rules in order to steal Ron's delegates and deny him the oportunity to speak at the convention, even after he' dalready won the right. Very similar to Gabard's situation with the DNC.
Thanks again but I have no interest in being a "good conservative", I find conservatives somewhat less irritating and intrusive than so called "liberals" but they're still irritating and intrusive.It's a minute and a half. But it's a short, concise guide to how we could all be good conservatives. And it'l save me a bit of typing, so
