Patriot911
Rookie
- Banned
- #1,361
So you want a former NASA enginer and a former NIST engineer - but do you accept them for their credentials or do you except them for what the say?
Have Deets or Quintiere published on the subject?
Quintiere has, but neither eots nor Jones accept his conclusions. They like him because he has credentials and questions the NIST report. Eots is only looking for someone people would find credible to whine for his new investigation. They would never accept his conclusions though because he doesn't believe the controlled demolition theories.
his conclusion was the investigation was blocked and fact finding deterred and a independent fact driven re-investigation is required...something you can not seem to except
At least I am intelligent enough to understand and use the English language. That is something you cannot accept either. ;-)
Quintiere has his opinions. He has no evidence to back them up. He believes his own theory more than the NIST theory and the NIST theory more than the bullshit theories of you lowlifes and your controlled demolition. Him being in charge of a new investigation would only produce a result you and your fellow retards could not and will not live with. Thus you will demand a new NEW investigation, this time with Alex Jones, Richard Gage, and Judy Woods leading the investigation just to insure yourselves SOMEONE will validate you and your theories. It would be meaningless because none of the above have any kind of real world credibility. Not only that, but Jones, Gage, and Woods have differing theories. They would have to agree and that is something truthtards are notoriously bad at.
So I'm still waiting for one real piece of evidence from you, eots. You've already been caught lying your ass off once. Care to finally be a man and admit you were doing so about evidence as well?