MikeK
Gold Member
- Jun 11, 2010
- 15,930
- 2,495
I'm not certain but I believe it to be a component of the same ruling that changed the probable cause requirement to reasonable suspicion, which was done specifically to accommodate searching the vehicles of suspected drug traffickers.The problem here is the way a predominately authoritarian Supreme Court chooses to interpret the word, unreasonable. According to them, almost anything a police officer does is reasonable."The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated"
That's the reading that some of us need to be doing before approving the behavior of worthless traitors.
There doesn't appear to be a recent ruling on the subject.
I'm not willing to do a Find-Law search, but if you are in the mood to do it I would be interested in reading the language. It's been awhile but I believe it came down in the late 80s.