Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thanks for proving the article to be correct and true in every aspect.
In the House the vote among Democrats was 153 to 91 in favor.
In the Senate it was 41 to 26 in favor.
Blacks were just presumed to be Republicans. That is why they were attacked.Actually they formed it to terrorize, control, and kill blacks.The Democrats formed the KKK to terrorize Republicans, so this is nothing new.
You are too immature to understand that the republicans don't condone the violence and harassment.This was not a 'mean thing', as you callously try to brush it off as. This was despicable, deplorable, socially unacceptable, inappropriate behavior for human beings, unethical, immoral, unbelievable sick.Yep. Lots of people say mean things to victims.
It is telling how you snowflakes can accept such behavior as 'normal', just 'mean'.....
And this isn't mean?
![]()
The Democrats formed the KKK to terrorize Republicans, so this is nothing new.
Actually they formed it to terrorize, control, and kill blacks.The Democrats formed the KKK to terrorize Republicans, so this is nothing new.
Well stated.....'HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE', not FACT!In reality it was an insurgency to reestablish white rule in the South. They achieved victory and erected a bunch of statues along with institutionalized racism in the South. In the South there was only the Democrat party. So yeah they were a creation of the White's only Democrat party, as in past tense, not so anymore is it?
But don't let historical perspective get in the way of a highly and long established partisan rant.....
So you are saying the KKK's origin had nothing / little to do with race / color, it was all an anti-Republican thing?Actually they formed it to terrorize, control, and kill blacks.The Democrats formed the KKK to terrorize Republicans, so this is nothing new.
Nah, they killed thousands of Republicans black and white in my home state alone.
So you are saying the KKK's origin had nothing / little to do with race / color, it was all an anti-Republican thing?Actually they formed it to terrorize, control, and kill blacks.The Democrats formed the KKK to terrorize Republicans, so this is nothing new.
Nah, they killed thousands of Republicans black and white in my home state alone.
So how exactly was burning crosses and hanging blacks suppose to help fight that anti-Northern / Republican Control? Was that supposed to replace the 'Massah's' whip to keep the (ex)slaves in line?Anti Northern control of the Southern States which included voting rights and civil rights for blacks.
So how exactly was burning crosses and hanging blacks suppose to help fight that anti-Northern / Republican Control? Was that supposed to replace the 'Massah's' whip to keep the (ex)slaves in line?Anti Northern control of the Southern States which included voting rights and civil rights for blacks.
The Democratic party's KKK did not exclusively lynch black Republicans, they also lynched white Republicans. They were equal opportunity terrorists.So you are saying the KKK's origin had nothing / little to do with race / color, it was all an anti-Republican thing?Actually they formed it to terrorize, control, and kill blacks.The Democrats formed the KKK to terrorize Republicans, so this is nothing new.
Nah, they killed thousands of Republicans black and white in my home state alone.
So you are saying there was a 'peaceful', non-racist KKK at one time?You must be conflating the original KKK with the one formed after the Racist Wilson took control.
I am just attempting to clarify what YOU are saying to make sure I understand without any assumptions, confusions, or mis-interpretations. Thank you.So, you're going off the rails of the Crazy Train? No iteration of the KKK was peaceful or non-racist. Or is it you simple don't understand American History?