Wait a minute. Trump said he'd sue the women accusing him of sexual misconduct?

[ScienceRocks]

Wait a minute. Trump said he'd sue the women accusing him of sexual misconduct?

How's this for a campaign promise?

“I will immediately embroil the country in my sex scandal”

lol'ed

 

[TemplarKormac]

Because an accusation is not an automatic inference of guilt. Please, unthicken that skull of yours, Matt.

 

[Andylusion]

Wait a minute. Trump said he'd sue the women accusing him of sexual misconduct?

How's this for a campaign promise?

“I will immediately embroil the country in my sex scandal”

lol'ed

But it's not a scandal, unless he did it.

Matthew, you are a anti-semite that works with the Iranians to plant a dirty nuclear bomb in New York.

Matthew why are you embroiling the forum in your terrorism scandal?

Well... you are not. It's an accusation. When it is proven true, then, and only then, is it a scandal.

Travelgate was a scandal. It happened.
Chinagate was a scandal. It happened.
Whitewater was a scandal. It happened.
Lawrence was a scandal. It happened.
Pardongate was a scandal. It happened.
Huma-gate is a scandal. It happened.
Rose Law Firm Records, was a scandal. It happened.
These and dozens more.... they happened.

Asia fundraising scandal, which is actually a collection of scandals, ranging from direct calls from the office of the vice-president (al gore) shaking down companies and individuals for money, to collecting hundreds of thousands from Buddhist monks which take a vow of poverty, to Charlie Trie and China military front companies, to selling a night at the Lincoln Bedroom in the White House.

These are all things that actually happened. Real events, with real people, and real convictions.

Right now, all you have is a bunch of allegations. When they are proven to have actually happened, then and only then, will they be real scandals. And compared to all the things Bill Clinton, and Hillary Clinton have done....

Well what goes around, comes around. Maybe you shouldn't have defended some scummy people in the past. Now, most of America doesn't even care if Trump has a scandal or two. You didn't. Why should anyone else?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Trump did those things.

Let the women sue him, put him under deposition to swear and tell the truth, and he is forever politically ruined as well as his movement.

 

[320 Years of History]

Were Trump currently but a private citizen, he'd be well within his rights to sue those women. But he's not at the moment a private citizen; he's a man running for public office. As such, the standard for what constitutes libelous and slanderous speech against him is very different than that which applies to you and me.

If Trump had any sense at all, he'd just ignore those women's remarks/accusations and focus on detailing and/or refining the details of his policy positions. For example,

• After over a year of decrying NAFTA, one'd think by now he'd have explicitly identified what specific provisions of NAFTA he finds objectionable, but he hasn't done that.
• He'd refine his proposals such as the one note below which is thoroughly absurd seeing as most colleges and universities are 501(c) entities that do not pay federal income taxes and that cannot be exempted from federal payroll taxes
  • Work with Congress on reforms to ensure universities are making a good faith effort to reduce the cost of college and student debt in exchange for the federal tax breaks and tax dollars.
• He'd simply release his tax returns (current or those not under audit) to outright remove that objection from those his critics inveigh.
• He'd identify specific regulations he wants to overturn and what be the specific impacts of doing so.
• He'd identify what he sees as possible responses should an enemy attack one of our NATO or Pacific allies who have have not made their promised monetary contributions to pay for the military aid the receive from the U.S.

In short, the man would go about increasing the clarity and precision of the vision he's so far articulated only very broadly, too broadly for the American people to fully understand just how we'll be affected were he to achieve it.

 

[JakeStarkey]

andyillusion write, "Matthew, you are a anti-semite that works with the Iranians to plant a dirty nuclear bomb in New York."

That is libel and scandalous and should be reported.

 

[mascale]

The Gettysburg Addresses are what the election is all about--at the new GOP in the down-ticket races(?)!

Republican parents want graphic displays! Anyone can point to the RNC top ticket, in public and in the schools! If elected, this will continue for years!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(For A Good Time--call Occupant, Trump Tower!)

 

[A Perez]

Wait a minute. Trump said he'd sue the women accusing him of sexual misconduct?

How's this for a campaign promise?

“I will immediately embroil the country in my sex scandal”

lol'ed

But it's not a scandal, unless he did it.

Matthew, you are a anti-semite that works with the Iranians to plant a dirty nuclear bomb in New York.

Matthew why are you embroiling the forum in your terrorism scandal?

Well... you are not. It's an accusation. When it is proven true, then, and only then, is it a scandal.

Travelgate was a scandal. It happened.
Chinagate was a scandal. It happened.
Whitewater was a scandal. It happened.
Lawrence was a scandal. It happened.
Pardongate was a scandal. It happened.
Huma-gate is a scandal. It happened.
Rose Law Firm Records, was a scandal. It happened.
These and dozens more.... they happened.

Asia fundraising scandal, which is actually a collection of scandals, ranging from direct calls from the office of the vice-president (al gore) shaking down companies and individuals for money, to collecting hundreds of thousands from Buddhist monks which take a vow of poverty, to Charlie Trie and China military front companies, to selling a night at the Lincoln Bedroom in the White House.

These are all things that actually happened. Real events, with real people, and real convictions.

Right now, all you have is a bunch of allegations. When they are proven to have actually happened, then and only then, will they be real scandals. And compared to all the things Bill Clinton, and Hillary Clinton have done....

Well what goes around, comes around. Maybe you shouldn't have defended some scummy people in the past. Now, most of America doesn't even care if Trump has a scandal or two. You didn't. Why should anyone else?

In how many of these events ending in "gate" was Hillary or Bill charged with a crime?

Sent from my SM-J700P using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

 

[JakeStarkey]

Wait a minute. Trump said he'd sue the women accusing him of sexual misconduct?

How's this for a campaign promise?

“I will immediately embroil the country in my sex scandal”

lol'ed

But it's not a scandal, unless he did it.

Matthew, you are a anti-semite that works with the Iranians to plant a dirty nuclear bomb in New York.

Matthew why are you embroiling the forum in your terrorism scandal?

Well... you are not. It's an accusation. When it is proven true, then, and only then, is it a scandal.

Travelgate was a scandal. It happened.
Chinagate was a scandal. It happened.
Whitewater was a scandal. It happened.
Lawrence was a scandal. It happened.
Pardongate was a scandal. It happened.
Huma-gate is a scandal. It happened.
Rose Law Firm Records, was a scandal. It happened.
These and dozens more.... they happened.

Asia fundraising scandal, which is actually a collection of scandals, ranging from direct calls from the office of the vice-president (al gore) shaking down companies and individuals for money, to collecting hundreds of thousands from Buddhist monks which take a vow of poverty, to Charlie Trie and China military front companies, to selling a night at the Lincoln Bedroom in the White House.

These are all things that actually happened. Real events, with real people, and real convictions.

Right now, all you have is a bunch of allegations. When they are proven to have actually happened, then and only then, will they be real scandals. And compared to all the things Bill Clinton, and Hillary Clinton have done....

Well what goes around, comes around. Maybe you shouldn't have defended some scummy people in the past. Now, most of America doesn't even care if Trump has a scandal or two. You didn't. Why should anyone else?

In how many of these events ending in "gate" was Hillary or Bill charged with a crime?

Sent from my SM-J700P using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

andyillusion does not get it is all.

 

[Andylusion]

Were Trump currently but a private citizen, he'd be well within his rights to sue those women. But he's not at the moment a private citizen; he's a man running for public office. As such, the standard for what constitutes libelous and slanderous speech against him is very different than that which applies to you and me.

If Trump had any sense at all, he'd just ignore those women's remarks/accusations and focus on detailing and/or refining the details of his policy positions. For example,

• After over a year of decrying NAFTA, one'd think by now he'd have explicitly identified what specific provisions of NAFTA he finds objectionable, but he hasn't done that.
• He'd refine his proposals such as the one note below which is thoroughly absurd seeing as most colleges and universities are 501(c) entities that do not pay federal income taxes and that cannot be exempted from federal payroll taxes
  • Work with Congress on reforms to ensure universities are making a good faith effort to reduce the cost of college and student debt in exchange for the federal tax breaks and tax dollars.
• He'd simply release his tax returns (current or those not under audit) to outright remove that objection from those his critics inveigh.
• He'd identify specific regulations he wants to overturn and what be the specific impacts of doing so.
• He'd identify what he sees as possible responses should an enemy attack one of our NATO or Pacific allies who have have not made their promised monetary contributions to pay for the military aid the receive from the U.S.

In short, the man would go about increasing the clarity and precision of the vision he's so far articulated only very broadly, too broadly for the American people to fully understand just how we'll be affected were he to achieve it.

While you are correct, I don't think this is the way it should be. One of the primary reasons American politics is so devastatingly loathsome, is specifically because anyone can say anything, and supposedly it's protected as freedom of speech.

I can say I have evidence that you murdered black babies in the 1970s, and because you are in an office, you can't do anything about it. Well when that's the standard, of course everyone is going to say every hateful thing they can, because whomever causes the most damage wins.

Then you complain only the idiots end up in office.... well... yeah. That's the system you created, so that's the result you get.

Moreover, politicians generally avoid specifics, because if you have specifics, then you are locked into a position that you may or may not wish to keep.

How many times has a politicians said "I want to do X" and then immediately the government moves to prevent that specific thing from happening. They may even pass a reform bill, that changes everything, except for that specific thing. Simply so they can say, you didn't keep your promise.

Then the public claims politicians lie all the time. Bush lied when he said he was going to privatize part of socialist insecurity. No he didn't. The government refused to let him do it.

His anti NAFTA stance is terrible, and I hope it does not succeed.

I don't see any need for anyone, in public or in private, to release their tax documents. Especially since I disagree with income tax to begin with.

The only reason people demand to see other's tax documents is because they are evil, greed, envious people, looking for reasons to heat others who do better in life.

He'd identify what he sees as possible responses should an enemy attack?

Are you crazy? If you go in the boxing ring, and tell your opponent "If you do this, I'll swing with a right hook", you are going to get your head knocked off. You never tell the enemy openly what you will or won't do before hand.

Never. Did you learn nothing from Obama? "Red line is chemical weapons!" And immediately Assad sent chlorine into rockets, and made the US look weak, pathetic, and incompetent.

No, absolutely not. I do not want Trump going "We're going to do X or Y, if you do this". Bad plan. Stupid plan. Every situation is different, and must be analyzed and planned for as it happens. You don't telegraph your moves in advance.

 

[xyz]

andyillusion write, "Matthew, you are a anti-semite that works with the Iranians to plant a dirty nuclear bomb in New York."

That is libel and scandalous and should be reported.

Plus if he has knowledge of such a thing he should be reported to the authorities.

 

[Andylusion]

Wait a minute. Trump said he'd sue the women accusing him of sexual misconduct?

How's this for a campaign promise?

“I will immediately embroil the country in my sex scandal”

lol'ed

But it's not a scandal, unless he did it.

Matthew, you are a anti-semite that works with the Iranians to plant a dirty nuclear bomb in New York.

Matthew why are you embroiling the forum in your terrorism scandal?

Well... you are not. It's an accusation. When it is proven true, then, and only then, is it a scandal.

Travelgate was a scandal. It happened.
Chinagate was a scandal. It happened.
Whitewater was a scandal. It happened.
Lawrence was a scandal. It happened.
Pardongate was a scandal. It happened.
Huma-gate is a scandal. It happened.
Rose Law Firm Records, was a scandal. It happened.
These and dozens more.... they happened.

Asia fundraising scandal, which is actually a collection of scandals, ranging from direct calls from the office of the vice-president (al gore) shaking down companies and individuals for money, to collecting hundreds of thousands from Buddhist monks which take a vow of poverty, to Charlie Trie and China military front companies, to selling a night at the Lincoln Bedroom in the White House.

These are all things that actually happened. Real events, with real people, and real convictions.

Right now, all you have is a bunch of allegations. When they are proven to have actually happened, then and only then, will they be real scandals. And compared to all the things Bill Clinton, and Hillary Clinton have done....

Well what goes around, comes around. Maybe you shouldn't have defended some scummy people in the past. Now, most of America doesn't even care if Trump has a scandal or two. You didn't. Why should anyone else?

In how many of these events ending in "gate" was Hillary or Bill charged with a crime?

Sent from my SM-J700P using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

Only a mindless idiot, sees a 30 year pattern, and shoves his head so far up his butt, that he can say "Nothing to see up my butt... move along".

Years ago, we hired a guy to work in shipping. Over the next few months, we noticed things disappear. Not a ton. Not a lot. But this and that, small stuff, would vanish without a trace. We could never prove anything. Finally, we hired a new guy, and told him thanks for his time, and sent him on his way.

Surprisingly... stuff no longer disappeared anymore.

Now I realize that in brain damaged leftardian idiot world, it was obviously that someone fed a Mogwai after midnight the day this guy started work, and the resulting Gremlin was responsible for stealing all the stuff, and somehow on the day this guy life, the Gremlin fell in from of a window, and was killed by the sun thus ending the thefts.

Of course to all of us not as dumb as a left-wing retard stuck in a bad 80s movie..... It's pretty clear from the history, that scandals have followed these Clintons around everywhere they have ever been.... for now 30+ years. Everywhere they go, dirt and skeletons been left in their path. Where there is smoke, there is fire. And where it smells like crap, there is rot.

Maybe that concept is too hard for some, but we on the right-wing grasp this.

 

[strollingbones]

too bad those on both extremes do not realize....this only works if we all work toward acceptable goals and together....i think most have common goals...a good job, a secure place to live ....just how to get there is the major issue...

i am always suspect of anyone speaking for a large group "we on the right wing grasp this"

 

[tinydancer]

Trump did those things.

Let the women sue him, put him under deposition to swear and tell the truth, and he is forever politically ruined as well as his movement.

No the onus is on the women to prove it. And many already have been seriously blown out of the water. Got to love the porno queen who launched her website Wicked and got all sorts of free publicity for saying he came on to her and offering her 10 grand. Oh she'd be so credible on the stand.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Yes, the women are under offensive.

Since it is a civil suit, they file their complaint, and ask the judge to put Trump and each of them under deposition to the other and their own sides' lawyers.

 

[dannyboys]

Were Trump currently but a private citizen, he'd be well within his rights to sue those women. But he's not at the moment a private citizen; he's a man running for public office. As such, the standard for what constitutes libelous and slanderous speech against him is very different than that which applies to you and me.

If Trump had any sense at all, he'd just ignore those women's remarks/accusations and focus on detailing and/or refining the details of his policy positions. For example,

• After over a year of decrying NAFTA, one'd think by now he'd have explicitly identified what specific provisions of NAFTA he finds objectionable, but he hasn't done that.
• He'd refine his proposals such as the one note below which is thoroughly absurd seeing as most colleges and universities are 501(c) entities that do not pay federal income taxes and that cannot be exempted from federal payroll taxes
  • Work with Congress on reforms to ensure universities are making a good faith effort to reduce the cost of college and student debt in exchange for the federal tax breaks and tax dollars.
• He'd simply release his tax returns (current or those not under audit) to outright remove that objection from those his critics inveigh.
• He'd identify specific regulations he wants to overturn and what be the specific impacts of doing so.
• He'd identify what he sees as possible responses should an enemy attack one of our NATO or Pacific allies who have have not made their promised monetary contributions to pay for the military aid the receive from the U.S.

In short, the man would go about increasing the clarity and precision of the vision he's so far articulated only very broadly, too broadly for the American people to fully understand just how we'll be affected were he to achieve it.

WRONG!
Trump is NOT an elected official.......yet.
He most definitely IS a private citizen.
These Hillary 'plants' have made libelous and slanderous accusations against Trump. He has every legal right to seek legal recourse.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Wait a minute. Trump said he'd sue the women accusing him of sexual misconduct?

How's this for a campaign promise?

“I will immediately embroil the country in my sex scandal”

lol'ed

Wait a minute, Matthew is a twat.

 

[JakeStarkey]

As are you, Toddster. Trump is going to be put under sworn deposition by his accusers.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Wait a minute. Trump said he'd sue the women accusing him of sexual misconduct?

How's this for a campaign promise?

“I will immediately embroil the country in my sex scandal”

lol'ed

Take your Prozac

 

[martybegan]

Trump did those things.

Let the women sue him, put him under deposition to swear and tell the truth, and he is forever politically ruined as well as his movement.

Would you bet slicing off your big toe on that statement?

A court case would bring everything to the light of day. I notice the Hillary camp isn't saying "BRING IT ON", which speaks more about the situation than anything else.