TemplarKormac
Political Atheist
.....and concluded that because they used the word 'freely' in their explanation of why they have restrictions, that Twitter wasn't allowed to have restrictions?
That's not a great argument.
It is called "cogent interpretation of the English language" Skylar.
And knowing that the rules contradict the usage of that word.
'Freely' means without restriction, hence there would be no restrictions in the first place. The whole thing is a contradiction of itself. It is or is not a platform allowing the free exchange of ideas, it can't be both. And from what I saw, it is insisting to be both, when it is simply the latter.