Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
She supports them 100% , just as Ears and Hilary did.What has Warren done to deserve Wall Street's love?That’s bull shit. Warren loves Wall Street and they love her.
Disinformation designed to dupe voters.
Ears and Hillary never proposed a wealth taxShe supports them 100% , just as Ears and Hilary did.
I am all for a wealth tax. While Warren proposes it, I suspect she won’t enact it should she be potus.She supports them 100% , just as Ears and Hilary did.What has Warren done to deserve Wall Street's love?That’s bull shit. Warren loves Wall Street and they love her.
Disinformation designed to dupe voters.Ears and Hillary never proposed a wealth taxShe supports them 100% , just as Ears and Hilary did.
Bloomberg - Are you a robot?
"Billionaires such as Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates and Warren Buffett could have collectively lost hundreds of billions of dollars in net worth over decades if presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren’s wealth tax plan had been in effect -- and they had done nothing to avoid it."
I am all for a wealth tax. While Warren proposes it, I suspect she won’t enact it should she be potus.She supports them 100% , just as Ears and Hilary did.What has Warren done to deserve Wall Street's love?That’s bull shit. Warren loves Wall Street and they love her.
Disinformation designed to dupe voters.Ears and Hillary never proposed a wealth taxShe supports them 100% , just as Ears and Hilary did.
Bloomberg - Are you a robot?
"Billionaires such as Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates and Warren Buffett could have collectively lost hundreds of billions of dollars in net worth over decades if presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren’s wealth tax plan had been in effect -- and they had done nothing to avoid it."
Apparently, there are some potential drawbacks even if it becomes law?I am all for a wealth tax. While Warren proposes it, I suspect she won’t enact it should she be potus.
Wall Street factions back every POTUS to one degree or another.Wall Street backed that shithead Obama and that asshole Clinton. I don't see what they could possibly have against Pocahontas.
The only "choice" is between Republican billionaire shitheads and Democratic billionaire shitheads:
America’s Billionaires Congealing Around Warren and Buttigieg | Washington's Blog
"This, in turn, would mean that Democratic Party billionaires, instead of Republican Party billionaires, would almost certainly control the country after 2020 — the country would be controlled by people such as Thomas Steyer and Donald Sussman, instead of by people such as Sheldon Adelson and Paul Singer.
"It would be a different ‘democracy’, but not really much different; it would be like the difference between George W. Bush and Barack Obama — it would be different in rhetoric and bumper-stickers, but very similar in actual policies."
But they gave more money to Obama than they gave to either McCain or Romney and they gave a shitload to crooked Hillary.
I don't know why because they were dumbasses. Maybe the promise of bailouts or who they perceived was going to win.Most of US productivity gains over the past five decades have gone to the richest 10% of Americans with the richest 1% and 0.1% hogging the lions' share. This has happened regardless of which corporate party controls government, and those at the top always want more.But they gave more money to Obama than they gave to either McCain or Romney and they gave a shitload to crooked Hillary.
I don't know why because they were dumbasses. Maybe the promise of bailouts or who they perceived was going to win.
You might call them sociopaths...
Charles Derber on Our Sociopathic Society - Corporate Crime Reporter
"Sociopathic individuals in the United States are often successful and well adjusted. Most of them are sane and well educated.
"They are more likely to be conforming to the values and rules of conduct of a society than violating them.
"The reason?
"It is the society, it’s rules and values, that are sociopathic."
Obama screwed up the economy. Under his administration poverty increased, family income decreased, $10 trillion was added to the debt and we had piss poor economic growth. In addition to that taxes were increased and healthcare was screwed up.
If you want to bitch about something bitch about how failed Left policies have screwed the American people.
Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.
But not Reagan, Thatcher, and Bush?Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.
Everybody is still responsible for themselvesSo you want Warren for president?The Wall Street Campaign to Stop Elizabeth Warren Officially Began on September 10, 2019
"Yesterday, that Wall Street campaign officially began. CNBC’s Jim Cramer and David Faber discussed on TV how they are hearing from Wall Street bank executives that Warren must be stopped..."
Can you guess why Wall Street's trolls have a problem with Liz?
Bloomberg Knows:
"On the same day, September 10, 2019, Bloomberg News, which is majority owned by billionaire Michael Bloomberg, whose $52.4 billion net worth derives from leasing his data terminals to thousands of Wall Street trading floors around the globe, ran this headline: 'Richest Could Lose Hundreds of Billions Under Warren’s Wealth Tax.'
"Obviously, that wouldn’t sit too well with Michael Bloomberg, who has frequently penned his own OpEds for his financial news empire..."
"The opinion piece was titled 'Warren’s Assault on Retiree Wealth,' and was written by Phil Gramm and Mike Solon. Gramm is the former Republican Senator whose name appears on the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, the legislation that repealed the Glass-Steagall Act."
"t was that repeal that allowed Wall Street’s casino investment banks to merge with commercial banks holding Federally-insured deposits.
"And it was this dangerous combo that led to the epic crash on Wall Street in 2008 and the ensuing economic collapse in the U.S. – the greatest collapse since the Great Depression."
There are economic events on the horizon (like negative interest rates) that pose a legitimate threat to savers and retirees; Liz Warren is not among them.
What Negative Interest Rates Mean For Your RetirementRight now she's my second choice.So you want Warren for president?
However, Warren appears to be trending in ways Bernie isn't doing yet, so I'll wait to see which one appears to have the best chance of burying Joe and the other corporate whores next summer.
Good for you, what "free stuff" are you hoping for.Are you sure you want the answer to that loaded question?Good for you, what "free stuff" are you hoping for
A society free of land rents?
Mixed economies and monopoly | Michael Hudson
"The kind of 'mixed economy' envisioned by Adam Smith, John Stuart Mill and other classical 19th century free market economists aimed at saving the economy from land rent paid to Europe’s hereditary landlord class.
"Either the government would tax away the land’s rent, or would nationalize it by taking land out of the hands of landlords.
"The idea was to free markets from economic rent ('unearned income') in general, including monopoly rents, and also to subsidize basic needs to create a price-competitive national economy."
Don't worry, Scrooge.
I'll give you a good deal on a used tent and a free patch of sidewalk to camp on
She and Bernie seem like the only two possibilities for those disgusted with the last 40 years of neoliberal wealth and income redistribution.Liz Warren has their number
Unconstrained greed will not be tolerated
Wall Street factions back every POTUS to one degree or another.Wall Street backed that shithead Obama and that asshole Clinton. I don't see what they could possibly have against Pocahontas.
The only "choice" is between Republican billionaire shitheads and Democratic billionaire shitheads:
America’s Billionaires Congealing Around Warren and Buttigieg | Washington's Blog
"This, in turn, would mean that Democratic Party billionaires, instead of Republican Party billionaires, would almost certainly control the country after 2020 — the country would be controlled by people such as Thomas Steyer and Donald Sussman, instead of by people such as Sheldon Adelson and Paul Singer.
"It would be a different ‘democracy’, but not really much different; it would be like the difference between George W. Bush and Barack Obama — it would be different in rhetoric and bumper-stickers, but very similar in actual policies."
But they gave more money to Obama than they gave to either McCain or Romney and they gave a shitload to crooked Hillary.
I don't know why because they were dumbasses. Maybe the promise of bailouts or who they perceived was going to win.Most of US productivity gains over the past five decades have gone to the richest 10% of Americans with the richest 1% and 0.1% hogging the lions' share. This has happened regardless of which corporate party controls government, and those at the top always want more.But they gave more money to Obama than they gave to either McCain or Romney and they gave a shitload to crooked Hillary.
I don't know why because they were dumbasses. Maybe the promise of bailouts or who they perceived was going to win.
You might call them sociopaths...
Charles Derber on Our Sociopathic Society - Corporate Crime Reporter
"Sociopathic individuals in the United States are often successful and well adjusted. Most of them are sane and well educated.
"They are more likely to be conforming to the values and rules of conduct of a society than violating them.
"The reason?
"It is the society, it’s rules and values, that are sociopathic."
Obama screwed up the economy. Under his administration poverty increased, family income decreased, $10 trillion was added to the debt and we had piss poor economic growth. In addition to that taxes were increased and healthcare was screwed up.
If you want to bitch about something bitch about how failed Left policies have screwed the American people.
Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.But not Reagan, Thatcher, and Bush?Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.
Every POTUS since Carter has advanced the cause of neoliberal economics in the interest of those who own the means of production, proving once again how capitalism is designed to enrich private interests at the expense of the public.
Bernie is the best candidate for those who think the rich have too large a share of national income and wealth.
True but some of us are more equal than others, while receiving a lot of help along the way.Everybody is still responsible for themselvesSo you want Warren for president?The Wall Street Campaign to Stop Elizabeth Warren Officially Began on September 10, 2019
"Yesterday, that Wall Street campaign officially began. CNBC’s Jim Cramer and David Faber discussed on TV how they are hearing from Wall Street bank executives that Warren must be stopped..."
Can you guess why Wall Street's trolls have a problem with Liz?
Bloomberg Knows:
"On the same day, September 10, 2019, Bloomberg News, which is majority owned by billionaire Michael Bloomberg, whose $52.4 billion net worth derives from leasing his data terminals to thousands of Wall Street trading floors around the globe, ran this headline: 'Richest Could Lose Hundreds of Billions Under Warren’s Wealth Tax.'
"Obviously, that wouldn’t sit too well with Michael Bloomberg, who has frequently penned his own OpEds for his financial news empire..."
"The opinion piece was titled 'Warren’s Assault on Retiree Wealth,' and was written by Phil Gramm and Mike Solon. Gramm is the former Republican Senator whose name appears on the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, the legislation that repealed the Glass-Steagall Act."
"t was that repeal that allowed Wall Street’s casino investment banks to merge with commercial banks holding Federally-insured deposits.
"And it was this dangerous combo that led to the epic crash on Wall Street in 2008 and the ensuing economic collapse in the U.S. – the greatest collapse since the Great Depression."
There are economic events on the horizon (like negative interest rates) that pose a legitimate threat to savers and retirees; Liz Warren is not among them.
What Negative Interest Rates Mean For Your RetirementRight now she's my second choice.So you want Warren for president?
However, Warren appears to be trending in ways Bernie isn't doing yet, so I'll wait to see which one appears to have the best chance of burying Joe and the other corporate whores next summer.
Good for you, what "free stuff" are you hoping for.Are you sure you want the answer to that loaded question?Good for you, what "free stuff" are you hoping for
A society free of land rents?
Mixed economies and monopoly | Michael Hudson
"The kind of 'mixed economy' envisioned by Adam Smith, John Stuart Mill and other classical 19th century free market economists aimed at saving the economy from land rent paid to Europe’s hereditary landlord class.
"Either the government would tax away the land’s rent, or would nationalize it by taking land out of the hands of landlords.
"The idea was to free markets from economic rent ('unearned income') in general, including monopoly rents, and also to subsidize basic needs to create a price-competitive national economy."
Don't worry, Scrooge.
I'll give you a good deal on a used tent and a free patch of sidewalk to camp on
The fix is in just as it was in 2016. The DNC will never allow their candidate bring anything other than controlled by the elite establishment.She and Bernie seem like the only two possibilities for those disgusted with the last 40 years of neoliberal wealth and income redistribution.Liz Warren has their number
Unconstrained greed will not be tolerated
Elizabeth Warren understands Wall Street better than any other presidential candidate
"Elizabeth Warren understands Wall Street better than any other presidential candidate.
"She studied it in her previous career as a Harvard professor, and she has effectively built her own think tank inside the Senate, coming up with genuinely novel ideas for how to improve financial regulation.
"What to watch: Warren has already received the grudging respect of many on Wall Street.
"Her diagnoses of where the financial services industry falls short are generally accurate, and her proposed regulations would probably give a competitive advantage to financial giants with large compliance departments."
One analysis I've read claims Wall Street prefers Biden or Mayor Pete, and they think they can leverage Warren to advance Pete.
I tend to agree. She is much like Obama who promised hope and change, but gave us little hope and more of the same.Warren will promise anything she thinks will get her votes but all those promises will go the way of her Indian heritage once she gets what she wants. In other words, she's the exact opposite of Trump where her word is concerned. She's more of a promises made, promises broken candidate. We call that an establishment elitist or a swamper.
Re-adjusting your portfolio?The Wall Street Campaign to Stop Elizabeth Warren Officially Began on September 10, 2019
"Yesterday, that Wall Street campaign officially began. CNBC’s Jim Cramer and David Faber discussed on TV how they are hearing from Wall Street bank executives that Warren must be stopped..."
Can you guess why Wall Street's trolls have a problem with Liz?
Bloomberg Knows:
"On the same day, September 10, 2019, Bloomberg News, which is majority owned by billionaire Michael Bloomberg, whose $52.4 billion net worth derives from leasing his data terminals to thousands of Wall Street trading floors around the globe, ran this headline: 'Richest Could Lose Hundreds of Billions Under Warren’s Wealth Tax.'
"Obviously, that wouldn’t sit too well with Michael Bloomberg, who has frequently penned his own OpEds for his financial news empire..."
"The opinion piece was titled 'Warren’s Assault on Retiree Wealth,' and was written by Phil Gramm and Mike Solon. Gramm is the former Republican Senator whose name appears on the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, the legislation that repealed the Glass-Steagall Act."
"t was that repeal that allowed Wall Street’s casino investment banks to merge with commercial banks holding Federally-insured deposits.
"And it was this dangerous combo that led to the epic crash on Wall Street in 2008 and the ensuing economic collapse in the U.S. – the greatest collapse since the Great Depression."
There are economic events on the horizon (like negative interest rates) that pose a legitimate threat to savers and retirees; Liz Warren is not among them.
What Negative Interest Rates Mean For Your Retirement
So you want Warren for president?The Wall Street Campaign to Stop Elizabeth Warren Officially Began on September 10, 2019
"Yesterday, that Wall Street campaign officially began. CNBC’s Jim Cramer and David Faber discussed on TV how they are hearing from Wall Street bank executives that Warren must be stopped..."
Can you guess why Wall Street's trolls have a problem with Liz?
Bloomberg Knows:
"On the same day, September 10, 2019, Bloomberg News, which is majority owned by billionaire Michael Bloomberg, whose $52.4 billion net worth derives from leasing his data terminals to thousands of Wall Street trading floors around the globe, ran this headline: 'Richest Could Lose Hundreds of Billions Under Warren’s Wealth Tax.'
"Obviously, that wouldn’t sit too well with Michael Bloomberg, who has frequently penned his own OpEds for his financial news empire..."
"The opinion piece was titled 'Warren’s Assault on Retiree Wealth,' and was written by Phil Gramm and Mike Solon. Gramm is the former Republican Senator whose name appears on the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, the legislation that repealed the Glass-Steagall Act."
"t was that repeal that allowed Wall Street’s casino investment banks to merge with commercial banks holding Federally-insured deposits.
"And it was this dangerous combo that led to the epic crash on Wall Street in 2008 and the ensuing economic collapse in the U.S. – the greatest collapse since the Great Depression."
There are economic events on the horizon (like negative interest rates) that pose a legitimate threat to savers and retirees; Liz Warren is not among them.
What Negative Interest Rates Mean For Your RetirementRight now she's my second choice.So you want Warren for president?
However, Warren appears to be trending in ways Bernie isn't doing yet, so I'll wait to see which one appears to have the best chance of burying Joe and the other corporate whores next summer.
Good for you, what "free stuff" are you hoping for.Are you sure you want the answer to that loaded question?Good for you, what "free stuff" are you hoping for
A society free of land rents?
Mixed economies and monopoly | Michael Hudson
"The kind of 'mixed economy' envisioned by Adam Smith, John Stuart Mill and other classical 19th century free market economists aimed at saving the economy from land rent paid to Europe’s hereditary landlord class.
"Either the government would tax away the land’s rent, or would nationalize it by taking land out of the hands of landlords.
"The idea was to free markets from economic rent ('unearned income') in general, including monopoly rents, and also to subsidize basic needs to create a price-competitive national economy."
Don't worry, Scrooge.
I'll give you a good deal on a used tent and a free patch of sidewalk to camp on
The Wall Street Campaign to Stop Elizabeth Warren Officially Began on September 10, 2019
"Yesterday, that Wall Street campaign officially began. CNBC’s Jim Cramer and David Faber discussed on TV how they are hearing from Wall Street bank executives that Warren must be stopped..."
Can you guess why Wall Street's trolls have a problem with Liz?
Bloomberg Knows:
"On the same day, September 10, 2019, Bloomberg News, which is majority owned by billionaire Michael Bloomberg, whose $52.4 billion net worth derives from leasing his data terminals to thousands of Wall Street trading floors around the globe, ran this headline: 'Richest Could Lose Hundreds of Billions Under Warren’s Wealth Tax.'
"Obviously, that wouldn’t sit too well with Michael Bloomberg, who has frequently penned his own OpEds for his financial news empire..."
"The opinion piece was titled 'Warren’s Assault on Retiree Wealth,' and was written by Phil Gramm and Mike Solon. Gramm is the former Republican Senator whose name appears on the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, the legislation that repealed the Glass-Steagall Act."
"t was that repeal that allowed Wall Street’s casino investment banks to merge with commercial banks holding Federally-insured deposits.
"And it was this dangerous combo that led to the epic crash on Wall Street in 2008 and the ensuing economic collapse in the U.S. – the greatest collapse since the Great Depression."
There are economic events on the horizon (like negative interest rates) that pose a legitimate threat to savers and retirees; Liz Warren is not among them.
What Negative Interest Rates Mean For Your Retirement
Offense taken. I really dislike stupidity.Wall Street WANTS Warren to win. They know she will do their bidding just as Ears and Hillary did.Yeah, it's not like Warren's gonna stop monetizing debt.
Agree with the gipper, all show in order to weaponize democracy at every stage of the game and on every channel 24/7.
No offense, but that is the stupidest thing I've heard in a long, long time.
You live in a weird alternative universe, where up is down, wet is dry, east is west, and the Buccaneers are better than the Patriots. You have absolutely zero clue about what is happening in the real world.
You are not informed. Allow me to get you informed.
Warren was a Reagan republican into her 40s.
“I was a Republican because I thought that those were the people who best supported markets. I think that is not true anymore,” Warren toldthe Daily Beast in 2011. “I was a Republican at a time when I felt like there was a problem that the markets were under a lot more strain. It worried me whether or not the government played too activist a role.”
Elizabeth Warren confronted by her Republican past
America’s Billionaires Congealing Around Warren and Buttigieg
America’s Billionaires Congealing Around Warren and Buttigieg | Washington's Blog
It just might prove she isn’t a real progressive. No? She admits to being a capitalist. She said the following:Offense taken. I really dislike stupidity.Wall Street WANTS Warren to win. They know she will do their bidding just as Ears and Hillary did.Yeah, it's not like Warren's gonna stop monetizing debt.
Agree with the gipper, all show in order to weaponize democracy at every stage of the game and on every channel 24/7.
No offense, but that is the stupidest thing I've heard in a long, long time.
You live in a weird alternative universe, where up is down, wet is dry, east is west, and the Buccaneers are better than the Patriots. You have absolutely zero clue about what is happening in the real world.
You are not informed. Allow me to get you informed.
Warren was a Reagan republican into her 40s.
“I was a Republican because I thought that those were the people who best supported markets. I think that is not true anymore,” Warren toldthe Daily Beast in 2011. “I was a Republican at a time when I felt like there was a problem that the markets were under a lot more strain. It worried me whether or not the government played too activist a role.”
Elizabeth Warren confronted by her Republican past
America’s Billionaires Congealing Around Warren and Buttigieg
America’s Billionaires Congealing Around Warren and Buttigieg | Washington's Blog
And Trump was a Dem into his 60s, what the hell does that prove?
-------------------------- I like your reasoning G.G. and thanks for it as that's the way I see things though I don't really follow money issues . Warren or similar is my backup if the TRUMP messes up on any new gun laws and makes its impossible for me to vote TRUMP GGator .I thought you were smart. I guess I am wrong once in a great while.That’s bull shit. Warren loves Wall Street and they love her.
Disinformation designed to dupe voters.
You take some very heavy drugs
Warren will not be good for business, why would Wall Street like her? that makes no sense at all.
you are normally not this stupid, are you drunk or high today?
Everybody is still responsible for themselvesSo you want Warren for president?The Wall Street Campaign to Stop Elizabeth Warren Officially Began on September 10, 2019
"Yesterday, that Wall Street campaign officially began. CNBC’s Jim Cramer and David Faber discussed on TV how they are hearing from Wall Street bank executives that Warren must be stopped..."
Can you guess why Wall Street's trolls have a problem with Liz?
Bloomberg Knows:
"On the same day, September 10, 2019, Bloomberg News, which is majority owned by billionaire Michael Bloomberg, whose $52.4 billion net worth derives from leasing his data terminals to thousands of Wall Street trading floors around the globe, ran this headline: 'Richest Could Lose Hundreds of Billions Under Warren’s Wealth Tax.'
"Obviously, that wouldn’t sit too well with Michael Bloomberg, who has frequently penned his own OpEds for his financial news empire..."
"The opinion piece was titled 'Warren’s Assault on Retiree Wealth,' and was written by Phil Gramm and Mike Solon. Gramm is the former Republican Senator whose name appears on the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, the legislation that repealed the Glass-Steagall Act."
"t was that repeal that allowed Wall Street’s casino investment banks to merge with commercial banks holding Federally-insured deposits.
"And it was this dangerous combo that led to the epic crash on Wall Street in 2008 and the ensuing economic collapse in the U.S. – the greatest collapse since the Great Depression."
There are economic events on the horizon (like negative interest rates) that pose a legitimate threat to savers and retirees; Liz Warren is not among them.
What Negative Interest Rates Mean For Your RetirementRight now she's my second choice.So you want Warren for president?
However, Warren appears to be trending in ways Bernie isn't doing yet, so I'll wait to see which one appears to have the best chance of burying Joe and the other corporate whores next summer.
Good for you, what "free stuff" are you hoping for.Are you sure you want the answer to that loaded question?Good for you, what "free stuff" are you hoping for
A society free of land rents?
Mixed economies and monopoly | Michael Hudson
"The kind of 'mixed economy' envisioned by Adam Smith, John Stuart Mill and other classical 19th century free market economists aimed at saving the economy from land rent paid to Europe’s hereditary landlord class.
"Either the government would tax away the land’s rent, or would nationalize it by taking land out of the hands of landlords.
"The idea was to free markets from economic rent ('unearned income') in general, including monopoly rents, and also to subsidize basic needs to create a price-competitive national economy."
Don't worry, Scrooge.
I'll give you a good deal on a used tent and a free patch of sidewalk to camp on
Americans tend to see problems in individual or psychological terms instead of social and structural ones; we see people rather than systems (like capitalism), and we've been taught to believe all behavior reflects free personal choice.Everybody is still responsible for themselves
So you want Warren for president?The Wall Street Campaign to Stop Elizabeth Warren Officially Began on September 10, 2019
"Yesterday, that Wall Street campaign officially began. CNBC’s Jim Cramer and David Faber discussed on TV how they are hearing from Wall Street bank executives that Warren must be stopped..."
Can you guess why Wall Street's trolls have a problem with Liz?
Bloomberg Knows:
"On the same day, September 10, 2019, Bloomberg News, which is majority owned by billionaire Michael Bloomberg, whose $52.4 billion net worth derives from leasing his data terminals to thousands of Wall Street trading floors around the globe, ran this headline: 'Richest Could Lose Hundreds of Billions Under Warren’s Wealth Tax.'
"Obviously, that wouldn’t sit too well with Michael Bloomberg, who has frequently penned his own OpEds for his financial news empire..."
"The opinion piece was titled 'Warren’s Assault on Retiree Wealth,' and was written by Phil Gramm and Mike Solon. Gramm is the former Republican Senator whose name appears on the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, the legislation that repealed the Glass-Steagall Act."
"t was that repeal that allowed Wall Street’s casino investment banks to merge with commercial banks holding Federally-insured deposits.
"And it was this dangerous combo that led to the epic crash on Wall Street in 2008 and the ensuing economic collapse in the U.S. – the greatest collapse since the Great Depression."
There are economic events on the horizon (like negative interest rates) that pose a legitimate threat to savers and retirees; Liz Warren is not among them.
What Negative Interest Rates Mean For Your RetirementRight now she's my second choice.So you want Warren for president?
However, Warren appears to be trending in ways Bernie isn't doing yet, so I'll wait to see which one appears to have the best chance of burying Joe and the other corporate whores next summer.
Good for you, what "free stuff" are you hoping for.Are you sure you want the answer to that loaded question?Good for you, what "free stuff" are you hoping for
A society free of land rents?
Mixed economies and monopoly | Michael Hudson
"The kind of 'mixed economy' envisioned by Adam Smith, John Stuart Mill and other classical 19th century free market economists aimed at saving the economy from land rent paid to Europe’s hereditary landlord class.
"Either the government would tax away the land’s rent, or would nationalize it by taking land out of the hands of landlords.
"The idea was to free markets from economic rent ('unearned income') in general, including monopoly rents, and also to subsidize basic needs to create a price-competitive national economy."
Don't worry, Scrooge.
I'll give you a good deal on a used tent and a free patch of sidewalk to camp on
Great, so ya want free rent. Good luck with your tent.
Some of the tents are becoming quite spacious.reat, so ya want free rent. Good luck with your tent.
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/60488427/Monterrosa_Burlington_3.0.jpg)
