Wall Street Declares War on Warren

So you want Warren for president?
So you want Warren for president?
Right now she's my second choice.
bernie_sanders_20201.jpg

However, Warren appears to be trending in ways Bernie isn't doing yet, so I'll wait to see which one appears to have the best chance of burying Joe and the other corporate whores next summer.


Good for you, what "free stuff" are you hoping for.
Good for you, what "free stuff" are you hoping for
Are you sure you want the answer to that loaded question?
quote-landlords-grow-rich-in-their-sleep-without-working-risking-or-economizing-the-increase-john-stuart-mill-85-85-92.jpg

A society free of land rents?

Mixed economies and monopoly | Michael Hudson

"The kind of 'mixed economy' envisioned by Adam Smith, John Stuart Mill and other classical 19th century free market economists aimed at saving the economy from land rent paid to Europe’s hereditary landlord class.

"Either the government would tax away the land’s rent, or would nationalize it by taking land out of the hands of landlords.

"The idea was to free markets from economic rent ('unearned income') in general, including monopoly rents, and also to subsidize basic needs to create a price-competitive national economy."

Don't worry, Scrooge.
I'll give you a good deal on a used tent and a free patch of sidewalk to camp on:19:
Everybody is still responsible for themselves
Everybody is still responsible for themselves
Americans tend to see problems in individual or psychological terms instead of social and structural ones; we see people rather than systems (like capitalism), and we've been taught to believe all behavior reflects free personal choice.

When the next white American male picks up his gun and shoots up the nearest school he will be judged mentally ill, or individually evil, or someone who failed to receive the moral teachings a good society imparts.

It will never occur to most good Americans that it is their sociopathic society that creates the psychological disorders that drive school shooters, here and abroad.
Gun-US-Flag-2.jpg

Americans Escaping Gun Violence Flee to Iraq and Syria - The Mideast Beast
Does not matter why-both the jerk who shot up El Paso and the shithead illegal who shot Kate Steinle need to be held responsible for their actions.
 
Wall Street factions back every POTUS to one degree or another.
The only "choice" is between Republican billionaire shitheads and Democratic billionaire shitheads:


America’s Billionaires Congealing Around Warren and Buttigieg | Washington's Blog

"This, in turn, would mean that Democratic Party billionaires, instead of Republican Party billionaires, would almost certainly control the country after 2020 — the country would be controlled by people such as Thomas Steyer and Donald Sussman, instead of by people such as Sheldon Adelson and Paul Singer.

"It would be a different ‘democracy’, but not really much different; it would be like the difference between George W. Bush and Barack Obama — it would be different in rhetoric and bumper-stickers, but very similar in actual policies."


But they gave more money to Obama than they gave to either McCain or Romney and they gave a shitload to crooked Hillary.

I don't know why because they were dumbasses. Maybe the promise of bailouts or who they perceived was going to win.
But they gave more money to Obama than they gave to either McCain or Romney and they gave a shitload to crooked Hillary.

I don't know why because they were dumbasses. Maybe the promise of bailouts or who they perceived was going to win.
Most of US productivity gains over the past five decades have gone to the richest 10% of Americans with the richest 1% and 0.1% hogging the lions' share. This has happened regardless of which corporate party controls government, and those at the top always want more.

You might call them sociopaths..
.

Charles Derber on Our Sociopathic Society - Corporate Crime Reporter

"Sociopathic individuals in the United States are often successful and well adjusted. Most of them are sane and well educated.

"They are more likely to be conforming to the values and rules of conduct of a society than violating them.

"The reason?

"It is the society, it’s rules and values, that are sociopathic."

Obama screwed up the economy. Under his administration poverty increased, family income decreased, $10 trillion was added to the debt and we had piss poor economic growth. In addition to that taxes were increased and healthcare was screwed up.

If you want to bitch about something bitch about how failed Left policies have screwed the American people.

Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.
Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.
But not Reagan, Thatcher, and Bush?
Every POTUS since Carter has advanced the cause of neoliberal economics in the interest of those who own the means of production, proving once again how capitalism is designed to enrich private interests at the expense of the public.
neoliberalism-32-638.jpg

Bernie is the best candidate for those who think the rich have too large a share of national income and wealth.


Wall Street sucks off the teat of big government just like other welfare queens. Especially when it comes to subsidies and bailouts. They also love globalism. That is why they tend to support the more Liberal candidates.
Wall Street factions back every POTUS to one degree or another.
The only "choice" is between Republican billionaire shitheads and Democratic billionaire shitheads:


America’s Billionaires Congealing Around Warren and Buttigieg | Washington's Blog

"This, in turn, would mean that Democratic Party billionaires, instead of Republican Party billionaires, would almost certainly control the country after 2020 — the country would be controlled by people such as Thomas Steyer and Donald Sussman, instead of by people such as Sheldon Adelson and Paul Singer.

"It would be a different ‘democracy’, but not really much different; it would be like the difference between George W. Bush and Barack Obama — it would be different in rhetoric and bumper-stickers, but very similar in actual policies."


But they gave more money to Obama than they gave to either McCain or Romney and they gave a shitload to crooked Hillary.

I don't know why because they were dumbasses. Maybe the promise of bailouts or who they perceived was going to win.
But they gave more money to Obama than they gave to either McCain or Romney and they gave a shitload to crooked Hillary.

I don't know why because they were dumbasses. Maybe the promise of bailouts or who they perceived was going to win.
Most of US productivity gains over the past five decades have gone to the richest 10% of Americans with the richest 1% and 0.1% hogging the lions' share. This has happened regardless of which corporate party controls government, and those at the top always want more.

You might call them sociopaths..
.

Charles Derber on Our Sociopathic Society - Corporate Crime Reporter

"Sociopathic individuals in the United States are often successful and well adjusted. Most of them are sane and well educated.

"They are more likely to be conforming to the values and rules of conduct of a society than violating them.

"The reason?

"It is the society, it’s rules and values, that are sociopathic."

Obama screwed up the economy. Under his administration poverty increased, family income decreased, $10 trillion was added to the debt and we had piss poor economic growth. In addition to that taxes were increased and healthcare was screwed up.

If you want to bitch about something bitch about how failed Left policies have screwed the American people.

Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.
Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.
But not Reagan, Thatcher, and Bush?
Every POTUS since Carter has advanced the cause of neoliberal economics in the interest of those who own the means of production, proving once again how capitalism is designed to enrich private interests at the expense of the public.
neoliberalism-32-638.jpg

Bernie is the best candidate for those who think the rich have too large a share of national income and wealth.


Wall Street sucks off the teat of big government just like other welfare queens. Especially when it comes to subsidies and bailouts. They also love globalism. That is why they tend to support the more Liberal candidates.
They all serve the same rich, white trash
CmKcshQXIAAdQFx.jpg
 
So you want Warren for president?
So you want Warren for president?
Right now she's my second choice.
bernie_sanders_20201.jpg

However, Warren appears to be trending in ways Bernie isn't doing yet, so I'll wait to see which one appears to have the best chance of burying Joe and the other corporate whores next summer.


Good for you, what "free stuff" are you hoping for.
Good for you, what "free stuff" are you hoping for
Are you sure you want the answer to that loaded question?
quote-landlords-grow-rich-in-their-sleep-without-working-risking-or-economizing-the-increase-john-stuart-mill-85-85-92.jpg

A society free of land rents?

Mixed economies and monopoly | Michael Hudson

"The kind of 'mixed economy' envisioned by Adam Smith, John Stuart Mill and other classical 19th century free market economists aimed at saving the economy from land rent paid to Europe’s hereditary landlord class.

"Either the government would tax away the land’s rent, or would nationalize it by taking land out of the hands of landlords.

"The idea was to free markets from economic rent ('unearned income') in general, including monopoly rents, and also to subsidize basic needs to create a price-competitive national economy."

Don't worry, Scrooge.
I'll give you a good deal on a used tent and a free patch of sidewalk to camp on:19:

Great, so ya want free rent. Good luck with your tent.
reat, so ya want free rent. Good luck with your tent.
Some of the tents are becoming quite spacious.
As an extra bonus, no GREEDY landlords required.
Monterrosa_Burlington_3.0.jpg

"It’s a warm Friday night in Westlake, and more than 50 tenants living in apartments on Burlington Avenue are crowding sidewalks, huddled around tents and cloth banners that hang from orange and yellow apartment buildings.

"The tenants, who call themselves Burlington Unidos, have formed a 'homeless encampment' outside their apartments at 131, 143, and 171 Burlington Avenue as part of an ongoing protest over rent hikes."

Westlake tenants form homeless encampment to protest rent hikes: ‘The prospect of becoming homeless is real’
Start the deportations there!
 
Warren will not be good for business, why would Wall Street like her? that makes no sense at all.

you are normally not this stupid, are you drunk or high today?

He has zero knowledge about the real world.
the real world? what is that? whatever is in your space? you think that's the real world? hahahahahaahha for fk sake.
 
Liz Warren has their number

Unconstrained greed will not be tolerated
She and Bernie seem like the only two possibilities for those disgusted with the last 40 years of neoliberal wealth and income redistribution.

Elizabeth Warren understands Wall Street better than any other presidential candidate

"Elizabeth Warren understands Wall Street better than any other presidential candidate.

"She studied it in her previous career as a Harvard professor, and she has effectively built her own think tank inside the Senate, coming up with genuinely novel ideas for how to improve financial regulation.

"What to watch: Warren has already received the grudging respect of many on Wall Street.

"Her diagnoses of where the financial services industry falls short are generally accurate, and her proposed regulations would probably give a competitive advantage to financial giants with large compliance departments."

One analysis I've read claims Wall Street prefers Biden or Mayor Pete, and they think they can leverage Warren to advance Pete.
The fix is in just as it was in 2016. The DNC will never allow their candidate bring anything other than controlled by the elite establishment.

This is why Tulsi was excluded. She is the real deal. Can’t have that.

“…this also points to a bigger issue and challenge that goes beyond the DNC and party politics, the government itself. There’s people who are increasingly losing that faith and trust in the government because they see a lack of transparency there and they see that we don’t have a government that is of, by, and for the people, and really what they see is a small group of really powerful political elites, the establishment, making decisions that serve their interests and maintaining that power while the rest of us are left outside.” Tulsi Gabbard
The fix is in just as it was in 2016. The DNC will never allow their candidate bring anything other than controlled by the elite establishment.

This is why Tulsi was excluded. She is the real deal. Can’t have that.
Tulsi was one of my first two POTUS picks a year ago.
I'm hoping Bernie taps her for his first Secretary of State.
90

Tulsi Gabbard: ‘Assad is not the enemy of the United States’
 
But they gave more money to Obama than they gave to either McCain or Romney and they gave a shitload to crooked Hillary.

I don't know why because they were dumbasses. Maybe the promise of bailouts or who they perceived was going to win.
But they gave more money to Obama than they gave to either McCain or Romney and they gave a shitload to crooked Hillary.

I don't know why because they were dumbasses. Maybe the promise of bailouts or who they perceived was going to win.
Most of US productivity gains over the past five decades have gone to the richest 10% of Americans with the richest 1% and 0.1% hogging the lions' share. This has happened regardless of which corporate party controls government, and those at the top always want more.

You might call them sociopaths..
.

Charles Derber on Our Sociopathic Society - Corporate Crime Reporter

"Sociopathic individuals in the United States are often successful and well adjusted. Most of them are sane and well educated.

"They are more likely to be conforming to the values and rules of conduct of a society than violating them.

"The reason?

"It is the society, it’s rules and values, that are sociopathic."

Obama screwed up the economy. Under his administration poverty increased, family income decreased, $10 trillion was added to the debt and we had piss poor economic growth. In addition to that taxes were increased and healthcare was screwed up.

If you want to bitch about something bitch about how failed Left policies have screwed the American people.

Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.
Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.
But not Reagan, Thatcher, and Bush?
Every POTUS since Carter has advanced the cause of neoliberal economics in the interest of those who own the means of production, proving once again how capitalism is designed to enrich private interests at the expense of the public.
neoliberalism-32-638.jpg

Bernie is the best candidate for those who think the rich have too large a share of national income and wealth.


Wall Street sucks off the teat of big government just like other welfare queens. Especially when it comes to subsidies and bailouts. They also love globalism. That is why they tend to support the more Liberal candidates.
But they gave more money to Obama than they gave to either McCain or Romney and they gave a shitload to crooked Hillary.

I don't know why because they were dumbasses. Maybe the promise of bailouts or who they perceived was going to win.
But they gave more money to Obama than they gave to either McCain or Romney and they gave a shitload to crooked Hillary.

I don't know why because they were dumbasses. Maybe the promise of bailouts or who they perceived was going to win.
Most of US productivity gains over the past five decades have gone to the richest 10% of Americans with the richest 1% and 0.1% hogging the lions' share. This has happened regardless of which corporate party controls government, and those at the top always want more.

You might call them sociopaths..
.

Charles Derber on Our Sociopathic Society - Corporate Crime Reporter

"Sociopathic individuals in the United States are often successful and well adjusted. Most of them are sane and well educated.

"They are more likely to be conforming to the values and rules of conduct of a society than violating them.

"The reason?

"It is the society, it’s rules and values, that are sociopathic."

Obama screwed up the economy. Under his administration poverty increased, family income decreased, $10 trillion was added to the debt and we had piss poor economic growth. In addition to that taxes were increased and healthcare was screwed up.

If you want to bitch about something bitch about how failed Left policies have screwed the American people.

Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.
Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.
But not Reagan, Thatcher, and Bush?
Every POTUS since Carter has advanced the cause of neoliberal economics in the interest of those who own the means of production, proving once again how capitalism is designed to enrich private interests at the expense of the public.
neoliberalism-32-638.jpg

Bernie is the best candidate for those who think the rich have too large a share of national income and wealth.


Wall Street sucks off the teat of big government just like other welfare queens. Especially when it comes to subsidies and bailouts. They also love globalism. That is why they tend to support the more Liberal candidates.
They all serve the same rich, white trash
CmKcshQXIAAdQFx.jpg
George Soros?
 
The Wall Street Campaign to Stop Elizabeth Warren Officially Began on September 10, 2019

"Yesterday, that Wall Street campaign officially began. CNBC’s Jim Cramer and David Faber discussed on TV how they are hearing from Wall Street bank executives that Warren must be stopped..."

Can you guess why Wall Street's trolls have a problem with Liz?

Bloomberg Knows:


"On the same day, September 10, 2019, Bloomberg News, which is majority owned by billionaire Michael Bloomberg, whose $52.4 billion net worth derives from leasing his data terminals to thousands of Wall Street trading floors around the globe, ran this headline: 'Richest Could Lose Hundreds of Billions Under Warren’s Wealth Tax.'

"Obviously, that wouldn’t sit too well with Michael Bloomberg, who has frequently penned his own OpEds for his financial news empire..."

"The opinion piece was titled 'Warren’s Assault on Retiree Wealth,' and was written by Phil Gramm and Mike Solon. Gramm is the former Republican Senator whose name appears on the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, the legislation that repealed the Glass-Steagall Act."

"t was that repeal that allowed Wall Street’s casino investment banks to merge with commercial banks holding Federally-insured deposits.

"And it was this dangerous combo that led to the epic crash on Wall Street in 2008 and the ensuing economic collapse in the U.S. – the greatest collapse since the Great Depression."
https%3A%2F%2Fblogs-images.forbes.com%2Fstephenchen%2Ffiles%2F2019%2F08%2FBond-Market-is-the-GOAT-1200x900.jpg

There are economic events on the horizon (like negative interest rates) that pose a legitimate threat to savers and retirees; Liz Warren is not among them.

What Negative Interest Rates Mean For Your Retirement
God Bless Phil Gramm for watching our investments. (sarcasm)
 
But they gave more money to Obama than they gave to either McCain or Romney and they gave a shitload to crooked Hillary.

I don't know why because they were dumbasses. Maybe the promise of bailouts or who they perceived was going to win.
But they gave more money to Obama than they gave to either McCain or Romney and they gave a shitload to crooked Hillary.

I don't know why because they were dumbasses. Maybe the promise of bailouts or who they perceived was going to win.
Most of US productivity gains over the past five decades have gone to the richest 10% of Americans with the richest 1% and 0.1% hogging the lions' share. This has happened regardless of which corporate party controls government, and those at the top always want more.

You might call them sociopaths..
.

Charles Derber on Our Sociopathic Society - Corporate Crime Reporter

"Sociopathic individuals in the United States are often successful and well adjusted. Most of them are sane and well educated.

"They are more likely to be conforming to the values and rules of conduct of a society than violating them.

"The reason?

"It is the society, it’s rules and values, that are sociopathic."

Obama screwed up the economy. Under his administration poverty increased, family income decreased, $10 trillion was added to the debt and we had piss poor economic growth. In addition to that taxes were increased and healthcare was screwed up.

If you want to bitch about something bitch about how failed Left policies have screwed the American people.

Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.
Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.
But not Reagan, Thatcher, and Bush?
Every POTUS since Carter has advanced the cause of neoliberal economics in the interest of those who own the means of production, proving once again how capitalism is designed to enrich private interests at the expense of the public.
neoliberalism-32-638.jpg

Bernie is the best candidate for those who think the rich have too large a share of national income and wealth.


Wall Street sucks off the teat of big government just like other welfare queens. Especially when it comes to subsidies and bailouts. They also love globalism. That is why they tend to support the more Liberal candidates.
But they gave more money to Obama than they gave to either McCain or Romney and they gave a shitload to crooked Hillary.

I don't know why because they were dumbasses. Maybe the promise of bailouts or who they perceived was going to win.
But they gave more money to Obama than they gave to either McCain or Romney and they gave a shitload to crooked Hillary.

I don't know why because they were dumbasses. Maybe the promise of bailouts or who they perceived was going to win.
Most of US productivity gains over the past five decades have gone to the richest 10% of Americans with the richest 1% and 0.1% hogging the lions' share. This has happened regardless of which corporate party controls government, and those at the top always want more.

You might call them sociopaths..
.

Charles Derber on Our Sociopathic Society - Corporate Crime Reporter

"Sociopathic individuals in the United States are often successful and well adjusted. Most of them are sane and well educated.

"They are more likely to be conforming to the values and rules of conduct of a society than violating them.

"The reason?

"It is the society, it’s rules and values, that are sociopathic."

Obama screwed up the economy. Under his administration poverty increased, family income decreased, $10 trillion was added to the debt and we had piss poor economic growth. In addition to that taxes were increased and healthcare was screwed up.

If you want to bitch about something bitch about how failed Left policies have screwed the American people.

Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.
Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.
But not Reagan, Thatcher, and Bush?
Every POTUS since Carter has advanced the cause of neoliberal economics in the interest of those who own the means of production, proving once again how capitalism is designed to enrich private interests at the expense of the public.
neoliberalism-32-638.jpg

Bernie is the best candidate for those who think the rich have too large a share of national income and wealth.


Wall Street sucks off the teat of big government just like other welfare queens. Especially when it comes to subsidies and bailouts. They also love globalism. That is why they tend to support the more Liberal candidates.
They all serve the same rich, white trash
CmKcshQXIAAdQFx.jpg
I am still better off than most of the world-and so are you.
 
Most of US productivity gains over the past five decades have gone to the richest 10% of Americans with the richest 1% and 0.1% hogging the lions' share. This has happened regardless of which corporate party controls government, and those at the top always want more.

You might call them sociopaths..
.

Charles Derber on Our Sociopathic Society - Corporate Crime Reporter

"Sociopathic individuals in the United States are often successful and well adjusted. Most of them are sane and well educated.

"They are more likely to be conforming to the values and rules of conduct of a society than violating them.

"The reason?

"It is the society, it’s rules and values, that are sociopathic."

Obama screwed up the economy. Under his administration poverty increased, family income decreased, $10 trillion was added to the debt and we had piss poor economic growth. In addition to that taxes were increased and healthcare was screwed up.

If you want to bitch about something bitch about how failed Left policies have screwed the American people.

Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.
Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.
But not Reagan, Thatcher, and Bush?
Every POTUS since Carter has advanced the cause of neoliberal economics in the interest of those who own the means of production, proving once again how capitalism is designed to enrich private interests at the expense of the public.
neoliberalism-32-638.jpg

Bernie is the best candidate for those who think the rich have too large a share of national income and wealth.


Wall Street sucks off the teat of big government just like other welfare queens. Especially when it comes to subsidies and bailouts. They also love globalism. That is why they tend to support the more Liberal candidates.
Most of US productivity gains over the past five decades have gone to the richest 10% of Americans with the richest 1% and 0.1% hogging the lions' share. This has happened regardless of which corporate party controls government, and those at the top always want more.

You might call them sociopaths..
.

Charles Derber on Our Sociopathic Society - Corporate Crime Reporter

"Sociopathic individuals in the United States are often successful and well adjusted. Most of them are sane and well educated.

"They are more likely to be conforming to the values and rules of conduct of a society than violating them.

"The reason?

"It is the society, it’s rules and values, that are sociopathic."

Obama screwed up the economy. Under his administration poverty increased, family income decreased, $10 trillion was added to the debt and we had piss poor economic growth. In addition to that taxes were increased and healthcare was screwed up.

If you want to bitch about something bitch about how failed Left policies have screwed the American people.

Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.
Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.
But not Reagan, Thatcher, and Bush?
Every POTUS since Carter has advanced the cause of neoliberal economics in the interest of those who own the means of production, proving once again how capitalism is designed to enrich private interests at the expense of the public.
neoliberalism-32-638.jpg

Bernie is the best candidate for those who think the rich have too large a share of national income and wealth.


Wall Street sucks off the teat of big government just like other welfare queens. Especially when it comes to subsidies and bailouts. They also love globalism. That is why they tend to support the more Liberal candidates.
They all serve the same rich, white trash
CmKcshQXIAAdQFx.jpg
I am still better off than most of the world-and so are you.
not sure why he cares who has money and how much, he should get a different job. Envious.
 
But they gave more money to Obama than they gave to either McCain or Romney and they gave a shitload to crooked Hillary.

I don't know why because they were dumbasses. Maybe the promise of bailouts or who they perceived was going to win.
But they gave more money to Obama than they gave to either McCain or Romney and they gave a shitload to crooked Hillary.

I don't know why because they were dumbasses. Maybe the promise of bailouts or who they perceived was going to win.
Most of US productivity gains over the past five decades have gone to the richest 10% of Americans with the richest 1% and 0.1% hogging the lions' share. This has happened regardless of which corporate party controls government, and those at the top always want more.

You might call them sociopaths..
.

Charles Derber on Our Sociopathic Society - Corporate Crime Reporter

"Sociopathic individuals in the United States are often successful and well adjusted. Most of them are sane and well educated.

"They are more likely to be conforming to the values and rules of conduct of a society than violating them.

"The reason?

"It is the society, it’s rules and values, that are sociopathic."

Obama screwed up the economy. Under his administration poverty increased, family income decreased, $10 trillion was added to the debt and we had piss poor economic growth. In addition to that taxes were increased and healthcare was screwed up.

If you want to bitch about something bitch about how failed Left policies have screwed the American people.

Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.
Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.
But not Reagan, Thatcher, and Bush?
Every POTUS since Carter has advanced the cause of neoliberal economics in the interest of those who own the means of production, proving once again how capitalism is designed to enrich private interests at the expense of the public.
neoliberalism-32-638.jpg

Bernie is the best candidate for those who think the rich have too large a share of national income and wealth.


Wall Street sucks off the teat of big government just like other welfare queens. Especially when it comes to subsidies and bailouts. They also love globalism. That is why they tend to support the more Liberal candidates.
But they gave more money to Obama than they gave to either McCain or Romney and they gave a shitload to crooked Hillary.

I don't know why because they were dumbasses. Maybe the promise of bailouts or who they perceived was going to win.
But they gave more money to Obama than they gave to either McCain or Romney and they gave a shitload to crooked Hillary.

I don't know why because they were dumbasses. Maybe the promise of bailouts or who they perceived was going to win.
Most of US productivity gains over the past five decades have gone to the richest 10% of Americans with the richest 1% and 0.1% hogging the lions' share. This has happened regardless of which corporate party controls government, and those at the top always want more.

You might call them sociopaths..
.

Charles Derber on Our Sociopathic Society - Corporate Crime Reporter

"Sociopathic individuals in the United States are often successful and well adjusted. Most of them are sane and well educated.

"They are more likely to be conforming to the values and rules of conduct of a society than violating them.

"The reason?

"It is the society, it’s rules and values, that are sociopathic."

Obama screwed up the economy. Under his administration poverty increased, family income decreased, $10 trillion was added to the debt and we had piss poor economic growth. In addition to that taxes were increased and healthcare was screwed up.

If you want to bitch about something bitch about how failed Left policies have screwed the American people.

Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.
Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.
But not Reagan, Thatcher, and Bush?
Every POTUS since Carter has advanced the cause of neoliberal economics in the interest of those who own the means of production, proving once again how capitalism is designed to enrich private interests at the expense of the public.
neoliberalism-32-638.jpg

Bernie is the best candidate for those who think the rich have too large a share of national income and wealth.


Wall Street sucks off the teat of big government just like other welfare queens. Especially when it comes to subsidies and bailouts. They also love globalism. That is why they tend to support the more Liberal candidates.
They all serve the same rich, white trash
CmKcshQXIAAdQFx.jpg


You are confused.

Most of the stocks that are traded on Wall Street service pension plans for ordinary working Americans. Like over 70%.

We all want want Wall Street to do well because most of us benefit from it. Everybody that has a job that was funded through equity capital and everybody that has a 401K or pension plan.

That asshole Obama was at war everyday of his administration so you can cram your partisan bullshit where the sun don't shine.

Take all your mindless socialist hate and cram it.
 
Most of US productivity gains over the past five decades have gone to the richest 10% of Americans with the richest 1% and 0.1% hogging the lions' share. This has happened regardless of which corporate party controls government, and those at the top always want more.

You might call them sociopaths..
.

Charles Derber on Our Sociopathic Society - Corporate Crime Reporter

"Sociopathic individuals in the United States are often successful and well adjusted. Most of them are sane and well educated.

"They are more likely to be conforming to the values and rules of conduct of a society than violating them.

"The reason?

"It is the society, it’s rules and values, that are sociopathic."

Obama screwed up the economy. Under his administration poverty increased, family income decreased, $10 trillion was added to the debt and we had piss poor economic growth. In addition to that taxes were increased and healthcare was screwed up.

If you want to bitch about something bitch about how failed Left policies have screwed the American people.

Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.
Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.
But not Reagan, Thatcher, and Bush?
Every POTUS since Carter has advanced the cause of neoliberal economics in the interest of those who own the means of production, proving once again how capitalism is designed to enrich private interests at the expense of the public.
neoliberalism-32-638.jpg

Bernie is the best candidate for those who think the rich have too large a share of national income and wealth.


Wall Street sucks off the teat of big government just like other welfare queens. Especially when it comes to subsidies and bailouts. They also love globalism. That is why they tend to support the more Liberal candidates.
Most of US productivity gains over the past five decades have gone to the richest 10% of Americans with the richest 1% and 0.1% hogging the lions' share. This has happened regardless of which corporate party controls government, and those at the top always want more.

You might call them sociopaths..
.

Charles Derber on Our Sociopathic Society - Corporate Crime Reporter

"Sociopathic individuals in the United States are often successful and well adjusted. Most of them are sane and well educated.

"They are more likely to be conforming to the values and rules of conduct of a society than violating them.

"The reason?

"It is the society, it’s rules and values, that are sociopathic."

Obama screwed up the economy. Under his administration poverty increased, family income decreased, $10 trillion was added to the debt and we had piss poor economic growth. In addition to that taxes were increased and healthcare was screwed up.

If you want to bitch about something bitch about how failed Left policies have screwed the American people.

Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.
Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.
But not Reagan, Thatcher, and Bush?
Every POTUS since Carter has advanced the cause of neoliberal economics in the interest of those who own the means of production, proving once again how capitalism is designed to enrich private interests at the expense of the public.
neoliberalism-32-638.jpg

Bernie is the best candidate for those who think the rich have too large a share of national income and wealth.


Wall Street sucks off the teat of big government just like other welfare queens. Especially when it comes to subsidies and bailouts. They also love globalism. That is why they tend to support the more Liberal candidates.
They all serve the same rich, white trash
CmKcshQXIAAdQFx.jpg


You are confused.

Most of the stocks that are traded on Wall Street service pension plans for ordinary working Americans. Like over 70%.

We all want want Wall Street to do well because most of us benefit from it. Everybody that has a job that was funded through equity capital and everybody that has a 401K or pension plan.

That asshole Obama was at war everyday of his administration so you can cram your partisan bullshit where the sun don't shine.

Take all your mindless socialist hate and cram it.
401k's show the SS is a farce, we all could have invested in our 401k's an additional 12% of our money over 40 years and had a shit full of money.

The government stole from us.
 
Right now she's my second choice.
bernie_sanders_20201.jpg

However, Warren appears to be trending in ways Bernie isn't doing yet, so I'll wait to see which one appears to have the best chance of burying Joe and the other corporate whores next summer.


Good for you, what "free stuff" are you hoping for.
Good for you, what "free stuff" are you hoping for
Are you sure you want the answer to that loaded question?
quote-landlords-grow-rich-in-their-sleep-without-working-risking-or-economizing-the-increase-john-stuart-mill-85-85-92.jpg

A society free of land rents?

Mixed economies and monopoly | Michael Hudson

"The kind of 'mixed economy' envisioned by Adam Smith, John Stuart Mill and other classical 19th century free market economists aimed at saving the economy from land rent paid to Europe’s hereditary landlord class.

"Either the government would tax away the land’s rent, or would nationalize it by taking land out of the hands of landlords.

"The idea was to free markets from economic rent ('unearned income') in general, including monopoly rents, and also to subsidize basic needs to create a price-competitive national economy."

Don't worry, Scrooge.
I'll give you a good deal on a used tent and a free patch of sidewalk to camp on:19:
Everybody is still responsible for themselves
Everybody is still responsible for themselves
Americans tend to see problems in individual or psychological terms instead of social and structural ones; we see people rather than systems (like capitalism), and we've been taught to believe all behavior reflects free personal choice.

When the next white American male picks up his gun and shoots up the nearest school he will be judged mentally ill, or individually evil, or someone who failed to receive the moral teachings a good society imparts.

It will never occur to most good Americans that it is their sociopathic society that creates the psychological disorders that drive school shooters, here and abroad.
Gun-US-Flag-2.jpg

Americans Escaping Gun Violence Flee to Iraq and Syria - The Mideast Beast
Does not matter why-both the jerk who shot up El Paso and the shithead illegal who shot Kate Steinle need to be held responsible for their actions.
Does not matter why-both the jerk who shot up El Paso and the shithead illegal who shot Kate Steinle need to be held responsible for their actions.
What of those who get rich from selling the guns?
gun-sales-terrorism-obama-restrictions-1449710314128-facebookJumbo-v6.jpg

You should consider the possibility the US is a sociopathic society driven by mass consumerism and deep-seated economic arrangements prioritizing profits over people and leading toward societal self-cannibalization.
4118rNlZmXL._SR600%2C315_PIWhiteStrip%2CBottomLeft%2C0%2C35_PIAmznPrime%2CBottomLeft%2C0%2C-5_PIStarRatingFOURANDHALF%2CBottomLeft%2C360%2C-6_SR600%2C315_ZA(10%20Reviews)%2C445%2C291%2C400%2C400%2Carial%2C12%2C4%2C0%2C0%2C5_SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg
 
Good for you, what "free stuff" are you hoping for.
Good for you, what "free stuff" are you hoping for
Are you sure you want the answer to that loaded question?
quote-landlords-grow-rich-in-their-sleep-without-working-risking-or-economizing-the-increase-john-stuart-mill-85-85-92.jpg

A society free of land rents?

Mixed economies and monopoly | Michael Hudson

"The kind of 'mixed economy' envisioned by Adam Smith, John Stuart Mill and other classical 19th century free market economists aimed at saving the economy from land rent paid to Europe’s hereditary landlord class.

"Either the government would tax away the land’s rent, or would nationalize it by taking land out of the hands of landlords.

"The idea was to free markets from economic rent ('unearned income') in general, including monopoly rents, and also to subsidize basic needs to create a price-competitive national economy."

Don't worry, Scrooge.
I'll give you a good deal on a used tent and a free patch of sidewalk to camp on:19:
Everybody is still responsible for themselves
Everybody is still responsible for themselves
Americans tend to see problems in individual or psychological terms instead of social and structural ones; we see people rather than systems (like capitalism), and we've been taught to believe all behavior reflects free personal choice.

When the next white American male picks up his gun and shoots up the nearest school he will be judged mentally ill, or individually evil, or someone who failed to receive the moral teachings a good society imparts.

It will never occur to most good Americans that it is their sociopathic society that creates the psychological disorders that drive school shooters, here and abroad.
Gun-US-Flag-2.jpg

Americans Escaping Gun Violence Flee to Iraq and Syria - The Mideast Beast
Does not matter why-both the jerk who shot up El Paso and the shithead illegal who shot Kate Steinle need to be held responsible for their actions.
Does not matter why-both the jerk who shot up El Paso and the shithead illegal who shot Kate Steinle need to be held responsible for their actions.
What of those who get rich from selling the guns?
gun-sales-terrorism-obama-restrictions-1449710314128-facebookJumbo-v6.jpg

You should consider the possibility the US is a sociopathic society driven by mass consumerism and deep-seated economic arrangements prioritizing profits over people and leading toward societal self-cannibalization.
4118rNlZmXL._SR600%2C315_PIWhiteStrip%2CBottomLeft%2C0%2C35_PIAmznPrime%2CBottomLeft%2C0%2C-5_PIStarRatingFOURANDHALF%2CBottomLeft%2C360%2C-6_SR600%2C315_ZA(10%20Reviews)%2C445%2C291%2C400%2C400%2Carial%2C12%2C4%2C0%2C0%2C5_SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg
so you think we're worse than this in syria?

syria-air-strike-damage-2-0.jpg


Why the fk are people coming here then? dude, you can't have it both fking ways. makes you stupid.
 
That’s bull shit. Warren loves Wall Street and they love her.

Disinformation designed to dupe voters.
What has Warren done to deserve Wall Street's love?
what has warren done period.
what has warren done period.
Quite a lot.
(For a girl)


Elizabeth Warren - Wikipedia

"Warren is a graduate of the University of Houston and Rutgers Law School and has taught law at several universities, including the University of Houston, the University of Texas at Austin, the University of Pennsylvania, and Harvard University.

"She was one of the most cited professors in the field of commercial law before beginning her political career.

"She is the author of three and coauthor of six books, both academic and for a general audience..."

"Warren was an early advocate for the creation of a new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). The bureau was established by the Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, signed into law by President Obama in July 2010.

"In September 2010, Obama named Warren Assistant to the President and Special Advisor to the Secretary of the Treasury on the CFPB to set up the new agency.[40]

"While liberal groups and consumer advocacy groups urged Obama to formally nominate Warren as the agency's director, financial institutions and Republican members of Congress strongly opposed her, believing she would be an overly zealous regulator.[41][42][43]

"Reportedly convinced that Warren could not win Senate confirmation as the bureau's first director,[44] in January 2012, Obama appointed former Ohio Attorney General Richard Cordray to the post in a recess appointment over Republican senators' objections.[45]["
 
Then I'm way ahead of Wall St. because I knew that fake-Indian was a scammer years ago when that whore claimed to be AmerIndian in order to help herself (I mean ITSELF) to guilty-white-liberal minority set-asides. That pig's DNA test has already proven that it's every bit as Caucasian as I am. That fucking, thieving, utterly lying c*nt.
 
The Wall Street Campaign to Stop Elizabeth Warren Officially Began on September 10, 2019

"Yesterday, that Wall Street campaign officially began. CNBC’s Jim Cramer and David Faber discussed on TV how they are hearing from Wall Street bank executives that Warren must be stopped..."

Can you guess why Wall Street's trolls have a problem with Liz?

Bloomberg Knows:


"On the same day, September 10, 2019, Bloomberg News, which is majority owned by billionaire Michael Bloomberg, whose $52.4 billion net worth derives from leasing his data terminals to thousands of Wall Street trading floors around the globe, ran this headline: 'Richest Could Lose Hundreds of Billions Under Warren’s Wealth Tax.'

"Obviously, that wouldn’t sit too well with Michael Bloomberg, who has frequently penned his own OpEds for his financial news empire..."

"The opinion piece was titled 'Warren’s Assault on Retiree Wealth,' and was written by Phil Gramm and Mike Solon. Gramm is the former Republican Senator whose name appears on the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, the legislation that repealed the Glass-Steagall Act."

"t was that repeal that allowed Wall Street’s casino investment banks to merge with commercial banks holding Federally-insured deposits.

"And it was this dangerous combo that led to the epic crash on Wall Street in 2008 and the ensuing economic collapse in the U.S. – the greatest collapse since the Great Depression."
https%3A%2F%2Fblogs-images.forbes.com%2Fstephenchen%2Ffiles%2F2019%2F08%2FBond-Market-is-the-GOAT-1200x900.jpg

There are economic events on the horizon (like negative interest rates) that pose a legitimate threat to savers and retirees; Liz Warren is not among them.

What Negative Interest Rates Mean For Your Retirement
God Bless Phil Gramm for watching our investments. (sarcasm)
God Bless Phil Gramm for watching our investments. (sarcasm)
Enron Phil has been one of our greatest Americans:

The Wall Street Campaign to Stop Elizabeth Warren Officially Began on September 10, 2019

"Gramm was not only a registered lobbyist for the global investment bank, UBS, but he formed his own lobbying firm, Gramm Partners.

"Gramm’s wife is Wendy Lee Gramm, the former Chair of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) from 1988 to January 1993, who gave Wall Street exactly what it wanted in leaving its dangerous derivative contracts free from Federal regulation until the crash...."

"According to a report from Public Citizen:

"'In 1992, as the first step in its business plan to profit on the speculation of energy, Enron petitioned the CFTC to make regulatory changes that would limit the scope of the commission’s authority over certain kinds of futures contracts.'

"'Immediately before leaving the CFTC, Gramm muscled through approval of an unusual draft regulation that would do just that – it narrowed the definition of futures contracts and excluded Enron’s energy future contracts and swaps from regulatory oversight.'
enron-n-y-post.jpg

"Although her actions were criticized by government officials who feared the change would have severe negative consequences (as, in fact, it did), Gramm was rewarded five weeks after she left the CFTC with a lucrative appointment to Enron’s Board of Directors. Between 1993 and 2001, when the company declared bankruptcy, Enron paid Gramm between $915,000 and $1.85 million in salary, attendance fees, stock option sales, and dividends.'"
 
Liz Warren has their number

Unconstrained greed will not be tolerated
She and Bernie seem like the only two possibilities for those disgusted with the last 40 years of neoliberal wealth and income redistribution.

Elizabeth Warren understands Wall Street better than any other presidential candidate

"Elizabeth Warren understands Wall Street better than any other presidential candidate.

"She studied it in her previous career as a Harvard professor, and she has effectively built her own think tank inside the Senate, coming up with genuinely novel ideas for how to improve financial regulation.

"What to watch: Warren has already received the grudging respect of many on Wall Street.

"Her diagnoses of where the financial services industry falls short are generally accurate, and her proposed regulations would probably give a competitive advantage to financial giants with large compliance departments."

One analysis I've read claims Wall Street prefers Biden or Mayor Pete, and they think they can leverage Warren to advance Pete.
The fix is in just as it was in 2016. The DNC will never allow their candidate bring anything other than controlled by the elite establishment.

This is why Tulsi was excluded. She is the real deal. Can’t have that.

“…this also points to a bigger issue and challenge that goes beyond the DNC and party politics, the government itself. There’s people who are increasingly losing that faith and trust in the government because they see a lack of transparency there and they see that we don’t have a government that is of, by, and for the people, and really what they see is a small group of really powerful political elites, the establishment, making decisions that serve their interests and maintaining that power while the rest of us are left outside.” Tulsi Gabbard
The fix is in just as it was in 2016. The DNC will never allow their candidate bring anything other than controlled by the elite establishment.

This is why Tulsi was excluded. She is the real deal. Can’t have that.
Tulsi was one of my first two POTUS picks a year ago.
I'm hoping Bernie taps her for his first Secretary of State.
90

Tulsi Gabbard: ‘Assad is not the enemy of the United States’
Bernie will not get the nomination. If they have to cheat him again to prevent it, they will.

If they can exclude Tulsi but include Pete B and Harris (two clearly unqualified idiots owned by the .1%), they will deny Bernie again.

Plus Bernie is self destructive with his free everything for illegals and funding abortions in Africa.
 
Most of US productivity gains over the past five decades have gone to the richest 10% of Americans with the richest 1% and 0.1% hogging the lions' share. This has happened regardless of which corporate party controls government, and those at the top always want more.

You might call them sociopaths..
.

Charles Derber on Our Sociopathic Society - Corporate Crime Reporter

"Sociopathic individuals in the United States are often successful and well adjusted. Most of them are sane and well educated.

"They are more likely to be conforming to the values and rules of conduct of a society than violating them.

"The reason?

"It is the society, it’s rules and values, that are sociopathic."

Obama screwed up the economy. Under his administration poverty increased, family income decreased, $10 trillion was added to the debt and we had piss poor economic growth. In addition to that taxes were increased and healthcare was screwed up.

If you want to bitch about something bitch about how failed Left policies have screwed the American people.

Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.
Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.
But not Reagan, Thatcher, and Bush?
Every POTUS since Carter has advanced the cause of neoliberal economics in the interest of those who own the means of production, proving once again how capitalism is designed to enrich private interests at the expense of the public.
neoliberalism-32-638.jpg

Bernie is the best candidate for those who think the rich have too large a share of national income and wealth.


Wall Street sucks off the teat of big government just like other welfare queens. Especially when it comes to subsidies and bailouts. They also love globalism. That is why they tend to support the more Liberal candidates.
Most of US productivity gains over the past five decades have gone to the richest 10% of Americans with the richest 1% and 0.1% hogging the lions' share. This has happened regardless of which corporate party controls government, and those at the top always want more.

You might call them sociopaths..
.

Charles Derber on Our Sociopathic Society - Corporate Crime Reporter

"Sociopathic individuals in the United States are often successful and well adjusted. Most of them are sane and well educated.

"They are more likely to be conforming to the values and rules of conduct of a society than violating them.

"The reason?

"It is the society, it’s rules and values, that are sociopathic."

Obama screwed up the economy. Under his administration poverty increased, family income decreased, $10 trillion was added to the debt and we had piss poor economic growth. In addition to that taxes were increased and healthcare was screwed up.

If you want to bitch about something bitch about how failed Left policies have screwed the American people.

Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.
Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.
But not Reagan, Thatcher, and Bush?
Every POTUS since Carter has advanced the cause of neoliberal economics in the interest of those who own the means of production, proving once again how capitalism is designed to enrich private interests at the expense of the public.
neoliberalism-32-638.jpg

Bernie is the best candidate for those who think the rich have too large a share of national income and wealth.


Wall Street sucks off the teat of big government just like other welfare queens. Especially when it comes to subsidies and bailouts. They also love globalism. That is why they tend to support the more Liberal candidates.
They all serve the same rich, white trash
CmKcshQXIAAdQFx.jpg


You are confused.

Most of the stocks that are traded on Wall Street service pension plans for ordinary working Americans. Like over 70%.

We all want want Wall Street to do well because most of us benefit from it. Everybody that has a job that was funded through equity capital and everybody that has a 401K or pension plan.

That asshole Obama was at war everyday of his administration so you can cram your partisan bullshit where the sun don't shine.

Take all your mindless socialist hate and cram it.
Most of the stocks that are traded on Wall Street service pension plans for ordinary working Americans. Like over 70%.

We all want want Wall Street to do well because most of us benefit from it. Everybody that has a job that was funded through equity capital and everybody that has a 401K or pension plan
Today, Wall Street and US markets in general are simply well-orchestrated wealth transfer mechanisms for the one percent:

Is Corporate Media Tricking the Public with Reports that the Stock Market Is Setting New Highs?

"On January 26, 2018 the Dow Jones Industrial Average set a new record high of 26,616.71.

"Despite setting new highs multiple times thereafter, the moves were so negligible on a percentage basis that the reality is that the stock market has been a real dog over the past year and a half.

"This past Friday, the Dow closed at 26,797.46.

"That’s a meager 180.75 points, or less than a one percent move, in 19 months.

"That’s not exactly the stuff that retirement dreams are built on."
l-cbgBqtVbnyfCWalHvT4-RmUyVXlOrtOU4PX7qe2axtA0Mb15u5_WHkZrKB9gslA8xPQ4gj0x6GxeT466yntVLz0ONMPs-uKxfOBf4o7INRFWSiOtSfZIi2sAoxLm1ACEB-7uMu

What percentage of Americans own stocks?
 
Most of US productivity gains over the past five decades have gone to the richest 10% of Americans with the richest 1% and 0.1% hogging the lions' share. This has happened regardless of which corporate party controls government, and those at the top always want more.

You might call them sociopaths..
.

Charles Derber on Our Sociopathic Society - Corporate Crime Reporter

"Sociopathic individuals in the United States are often successful and well adjusted. Most of them are sane and well educated.

"They are more likely to be conforming to the values and rules of conduct of a society than violating them.

"The reason?

"It is the society, it’s rules and values, that are sociopathic."

Obama screwed up the economy. Under his administration poverty increased, family income decreased, $10 trillion was added to the debt and we had piss poor economic growth. In addition to that taxes were increased and healthcare was screwed up.

If you want to bitch about something bitch about how failed Left policies have screwed the American people.

Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.
Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.
But not Reagan, Thatcher, and Bush?
Every POTUS since Carter has advanced the cause of neoliberal economics in the interest of those who own the means of production, proving once again how capitalism is designed to enrich private interests at the expense of the public.
neoliberalism-32-638.jpg

Bernie is the best candidate for those who think the rich have too large a share of national income and wealth.


Wall Street sucks off the teat of big government just like other welfare queens. Especially when it comes to subsidies and bailouts. They also love globalism. That is why they tend to support the more Liberal candidates.
Most of US productivity gains over the past five decades have gone to the richest 10% of Americans with the richest 1% and 0.1% hogging the lions' share. This has happened regardless of which corporate party controls government, and those at the top always want more.

You might call them sociopaths..
.

Charles Derber on Our Sociopathic Society - Corporate Crime Reporter

"Sociopathic individuals in the United States are often successful and well adjusted. Most of them are sane and well educated.

"They are more likely to be conforming to the values and rules of conduct of a society than violating them.

"The reason?

"It is the society, it’s rules and values, that are sociopathic."

Obama screwed up the economy. Under his administration poverty increased, family income decreased, $10 trillion was added to the debt and we had piss poor economic growth. In addition to that taxes were increased and healthcare was screwed up.

If you want to bitch about something bitch about how failed Left policies have screwed the American people.

Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.
Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.
But not Reagan, Thatcher, and Bush?
Every POTUS since Carter has advanced the cause of neoliberal economics in the interest of those who own the means of production, proving once again how capitalism is designed to enrich private interests at the expense of the public.
neoliberalism-32-638.jpg

Bernie is the best candidate for those who think the rich have too large a share of national income and wealth.


Wall Street sucks off the teat of big government just like other welfare queens. Especially when it comes to subsidies and bailouts. They also love globalism. That is why they tend to support the more Liberal candidates.
They all serve the same rich, white trash
CmKcshQXIAAdQFx.jpg


You are confused.

Most of the stocks that are traded on Wall Street service pension plans for ordinary working Americans. Like over 70%.

We all want want Wall Street to do well because most of us benefit from it. Everybody that has a job that was funded through equity capital and everybody that has a 401K or pension plan.

That asshole Obama was at war everyday of his administration so you can cram your partisan bullshit where the sun don't shine.

Take all your mindless socialist hate and cram it.
That asshole Obama was at war everyday of his administration so you can cram your partisan bullshit where the sun don't shine.
I was never gullible enough to vote for Obama OR Trump.
Were you?
 

Forum List

Back
Top