jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 139,000
- 29,039
- 2,180
Wow, back pedaling muchThe ones no one ever denied? Great plan there, Ace.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wow, back pedaling muchThe ones no one ever denied? Great plan there, Ace.
The dumbass is the twat whining about surplus value.
Wow, back pedaling much
It will increase fiduciary responsibility liability in courts of law, for one, and it will channel more money into real business investments instead of stock speculation for two.
Every company will be like a sole proprietorship?
I thought leftists with all those fancy degrees were the rich?Liberals endlessly argue that the rich are not paying their fair share because many rich people do not pay income taxes but "only" pay capital gains taxes. Many rich people do not work for anyone and therefore do not receive a salary--and thus do not pay income taxes. These rich folks earn their money via capital gains and therefore they pay capital gains taxes.
Okay, well, if you make between $47K and $519K in capital gains, your capital gains tax rate is 15%. If you make over $519K in capital gains, your capital gains tax rate is 20%. This is well above the tax rate paid by most employed Americans. Tax data show that 77% of Americans pay an income tax rate of 15%. If your household income is between $22K than $89.4K, your income tax rate is only about 11% (since the income tax is graduated and the first $21K of household income is taxed at a rate of only 10%).
Anyone can confirm these facts by checking the federal capital gains tax brackets and the federal income tax brackets.
So, rich people who earn their money from capital gains do not pay a lower tax rate than most other Americans--they pay a higher tax rate than most other Americans.
Furthermore, these numbers do not include the enormous amount of taxes that many rich people pay in state and local property taxes, and the rich, unlike most other people, do not get a tax deduction for all of those taxes.
I thought leftists with all those fancy degrees were the rich?
On 401ks?
Spoken like someone without a lot of investments, but I believe that is an option for your 401k / IRA's, and it certainly is for short term capital gains.It should be taxed the same as earned income
That's what you got from that? lol
What, exactly, do you think a share of stock represents?
That's what you got from that? lol
I'm trying to better understand your moronic suggestion.
Sole proprietorships don't allow owners to shield their assets like a corporation does.
Is that what you want? An end to the corporate shield? An end to limited liability?
What, exactly, do you think a share of stock represents?
Ownership in a corporation that allows you to share in the profits but doesn't
allow you to be sued if the corporation does something wrong.
What, exactly, is wrong with that?
Ownership in a corporation that allows you to share in the profits but doesn't
allow you to be sued if the corporation does something wrong.
What, exactly, is wrong with that?
Is it time to occupy Wall Street?and the people who have a massive majority of those funds are the ungodly wealthy, You seem to be confused. I said this multiple ways and it is the truth and you can't argue against it with facts , maybe with your alternative facts bu not real facts. The market is owned and operated by the ungodly wealthy , not only the people that control it but also the number of people that are invested in it. gains gains would never exist at 15% if the market money was middle class and poor money. Its time their free ride is over.
lol so you oppose free markets and personal responsibility for owners. Okay
Doesn’t matter. I have withdrawn some in the past and it was taxed as regular income. Not capital gainsHow much are you planning to withdraw per year?
Under what filing status?
A fair amount, in my opinion. Limited liability relieves investors of the responsibility to invest prudently.That's what you got from that? lol
I'm trying to better understand your moronic suggestion.
Sole proprietorships don't allow owners to shield their assets like a corporation does.
Is that what you want? An end to the corporate shield? An end to limited liability?
What, exactly, do you think a share of stock represents?
Ownership in a corporation that allows you to share in the profits but doesn't
allow you to be sued if the corporation does something wrong.
What, exactly, is wrong with that?
Doesn’t matter. I have withdrawn some in the past and it was taxed as regular income. Not capital gains
A fair amount, in my opinion. Limited liability relieves investors of the responsibility to invest prudently.
If a sole proprietor of a business hires a manager for that business, and says "Do whatever you have to turn a profit. I don't wanna hear about the details, just do it." And then that manager does heinous things, illegal things, to make it happen - you can bet the proprietor will be held accountable to some extent. And they should be. Why should it be any different when there are multiple owners?
Profit is incomeSpoken like someone without a lot of investments, but I believe that is an option for your 401k / IRA's, and it certainly is for short term capital gains.![]()
It is for short term capital gains.Profit is income
It should be treated the same
All profitIt is for short term capital gains.![]()