saintmichaeldefendthem
Gold Member
Which is why there is no case for a lawsuit. There's no doubt a refund was tendered which can be used to buy the ring elsewhere. No damage no case.you don't think contracts are broken all the time? of course they are, for a myriad of reasons, and when it happens the injured party has to be made whole, which in most cases involves a refund.I'm not a lawyer, but I would be surprised if Walmart did not break some type of contract law by reneging on the sales order that was paid for up front. Otherwise, contracts would be useless if parties are allowed to break them on a whim.the bakery discriminated and broke the law. walmart, in this circumstance, did not.Not insane when Jessie Jackass and Al Sharptongue demand the same to a business that actually did nothing wrong. Why is it insane here.and why is the story out? i doubt walmart is publicizing it. can't sue someone for damages you did to yourself - if she's been damaged at all.oh I disagree, now that the story is out and in the public, her image has been damaged.
She has a much stronger case.
lol. that's insaneI think wal mart should be forced to pay her damage, then forced to sell the confederate flag and make sure to promote decendants of Southern Civil war soldiers to management postions.
You would think the left would agree with me. They agree when its done to others, like, its ok to sue the bakery for doing less damage than wal mart did, but not ok to sue walmart because the liberals agree with them?
why don't you understand that? it's a simple concept.