Rikurzhen
Gold Member
- Jul 24, 2014
- 6,145
- 1,292
- 185
Well I'll give you my opinion on why so many in the black community are unsuccessful. . . . .
Blacks have another thing altogether going on, and it's much different today than it was forty years ago.
The central theme I see today in the black community, is as individuals, they (especially males) seek to be perceived as a tough, bad, scary person. This seems to be key in how their self-esteem is achieved.
It's throughout their music today, it's all through their sports, they want to be seen as a bad ass, someone who not only can kick your ass, but can scare you just by looking at them.
I agree but I think you're missing some aspects. One important aspect is the Big Man model which is prevalent in Africa and still plays out in African-American culture. The Big Man who achieves success has obligations to help support those in his family and social circle. The wayward nephew, the pregnant niece, the widowed sister, plus his own family. This only works with financial success, but the Big Man model and its reputation enhancements also works with physical prowess, bravery, intimidation - these all buy respect from peers and family.
This obsession to be "bad ass" it appears, is the central driving force, as to where the black community gets their self esteem.
It's not just restricted to bad-assness though. Car salesman take advantage of black's need to be highly respected and up-sell them into more expensive cars. Even when many black men come in with a fixed budget, they can be more easily upsold to more expensive cars by having their status questioned.
Look at the money spent on status-sneakers. There are many aspects to this but what ties it all together is desire to be respected even if that respect comes with foolish decision ($500 sneakers), physical danger, criminal records, beggaring yourself supporting an extended family, spending more than you can afford for cars, etc.
For the average White person and many younger Blacks, your narrative fingers a Black subculture as being responsible for the social decay occurring in many of our inner cities. I disagree. What we are seeing is the end result of something that started with integration. Please don’t misinterpret that to mean that I am against integration. I am not. I am just pointing out a causal factor that had a disastrous effect on wealth and distribution of it in the Black community.
Growing up under Jim Crow, I am witness to the era of American Apartheid. While there was inequality in education and abuses in a system where Blacks had little political representation, there was prosperity. Black folk owned thriving businesses and most Blacks were gainfully employed. The social capitalistic engine of Black entrepreneurship was humming along nicely.
Then, the unthinkable happened. Integration cleared the path for Black consumers to abandon Black businesses and eagerly beat a well-worn path to the doors of White owned stores. Almost overnight
I agree with this too. This dynamic plays out all over the world in the form of "Big fish in a little pond." There's a lot to be said for this model. Women's colleges use it - those girls get to experience positions of leadership without having to compete with boys.
Frankly, I don't understand why you actually support integration when you have a pretty clear view of its negative effects.
Those drugs were grown and supplied by Whites, Asians and South American Hispanics.
People with little hope were easy prey for the system, the dealers and others, some of whom looked just like them. Nevertheless, the state of the Black Union rests with us all, Black and white alike.
Are blacks adults or are they children? Adults are responsible for their own choices in life. Children are excused from being held accountable. Blacks who consume drugs are making their own choices, just like white meth addicts and white crack whores and white cocaine addicts, etc. No special pleading for blacks. They're not victims of unique drug targeting.
Blacks make up 2/3rds of the population in Ferguson but hold virtually none of the key positions at city hall, or on the FPD. How the hell, did they let a minority of Whites gain such a powerful base over their lives? Don’t they vote? Do they care?... I have a feeling something will change in the future elections!
Politicians are drawn from a talent pool. The pool is deeper for the whites, even putting aside race, and just by looking at socioeconomic status. Secondly, Ferguson went from 75% white to 25% white in only 20 years. I'm betting that the local power structure that existed back in 1990 didn't move away - they have too much to lose to move away, so those who left were the ones who didn't benefit from having deep political connections in the area. As the whites moved away, the local white power structure remained in place. There's nothing odd or sinister about that.
The collective spending power of Black America is 1.2Trillion annually. That isn’t chump change, sport. And, welfare doesn’t even come close as applied t to the Black community alone.
That argument only stands when you apply a narrow definition of welfare - direct government hand-outs. There are trillions of dollars of indirect welfare in play here. One example: All levels of government have special preference programs for small businesses owned by blacks who bid on government purchases. When the town library has a toilet clogged up they call the plumber who has the city contract. If that plumber is black, he wasn't necessarily the lowest bidder - he received a preference due to his race. The difference between his contract rate and the lowest bidder's bid is indirect welfare.
That’s only the spending factor. The Back middle class is the prime source of that mindboggling figure. They make up about 2/3rds of the Black community. I’d venture to say that their holdings and net worth probably also hovers around 1.5. Trillion.. Isn’t that funny? I’m not through:
Blacks are vastly over-represented as government workers:
Though 10 percent of the U.S. civilian labor force, African-Americans are 18 percent of U.S. government workers. They are 25 percent of the employees at Treasury and Veterans Affairs, 31 percent of the State Department, 37 percent of Department of Education employees and 38 percent of Housing and Urban Development. They are 42 percent of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., 55 percent of the employees at the Government Printing Office and 82 percent at the Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency.
This vast over-representation doesn't happen without overt racism in hiring, especially considering skill and aptitude disparities. This is another form of indirect welfare.
Now add on the costs of of government inefficiency and featherbedding and inflated salaries and bloated pensions and the costs increase further (though these costs are not black-specific, merely capturing blacks as part of a government-employee welfare spending bonanza.)
Black population and you get: 27,846,000 Blacks who are NOT impoverished.
You ought to be giddy by now, chuckles… enjoy!
Don't overlook how many are benefiting from employment affirmative action - when money is extracted from taxpayers or corporations in order to pay for inefficient delivery of goods and services, this cost is a form of welfare which gets transferred to blacks.
If society ran on the basis or merit, and merit only, then the black middle class would be devastated. Not obliterated because there are blacks who hold their own in the merit race but the Liberal Racism is so entwined in our economy that it really is a TAX on everyone and the principal characteristic of taxes is that they are not voluntary.