jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 139,642
- 29,313
that is ten times more logical than anything ever reported on about trump. just saying.I find it hilarious that THE DNC knowingly hired Pakistani Hackers with criminal records to do unethical and illegal things to benefit their party and Clinton's campaign like pry in to Congressional Files and LORD knows what else they did, only to have them get greedy and steal Podesta's emails and share them with Seth Rich, which he then shared with Assange.except there is this:He found the Russian hack and was going to the FBI.then why did they kill Seth Rich? again, there is no logic there.Assange is a known Russian agent.Assange stated so. He was the one that did the final leak to the world. You question him. funny.
A New Report Raises Big Questions About Last Year’s DNC Hack
" Forensic investigators, intelligence analysts, system designers, program architects, and computer scientists of long experience and strongly credentialed are now producing evidence disproving the official version of key events last year. Their work is intricate and continues at a kinetic pace as we speak. But its certain results so far are two, simply stated, and freighted with implications:
- There was no hack of the Democratic National Committee’s system on July 5 last year—not by the Russians, not by anyone else. Hard science now demonstrates it was a leak—a download executed locally with a memory key or a similarly portable data-storage device. In short, it was an inside job by someone with access to the DNC’s system. This casts serious doubt on the initial “hack,” as alleged, that led to the very consequential publication of a large store of documents on WikiLeaks last summer.
- Forensic investigations of documents made public two weeks prior to the July 5 leak by the person or entity known as Guccifer 2.0 show that they were fraudulent: Before Guccifer posted them they were adulterated by cutting and pasting them into a blank template that had Russian as its default language. Guccifer took responsibility on June 15 for an intrusion the DNC reported on June 14 and professed to be a WikiLeaks source—claims essential to the official narrative implicating Russia in what was soon cast as an extensive hacking operation. To put the point simply, forensic science now devastates this narrative."