Warmest March on record

[Chris]

Show me the lowest level in recorded history evidence chris...... You keep saying it so please show us this...

And "they" are those like the NOAA and such....

Did you read the graph?

2007 was the lowest level of ice in recorded history, and the ice has returned to that level.

Look closely at it chris..... See the ice coverage growing over the winter months and the leveling off at nearly the same levels in may.... yeah MAY chris.... A lot of freezing goin on in MAY chris? Also how much do you think they can tell in preliminary readings? LOL they are usually wrong in those as we can all attest to....Ice coverage till may is not evidence of the year... When 2010 is over come back with a real graph that shows 2010 and not a best guess....

Did you forget what year this was?

They are usually wrong? No they are not.

There was one time they had an equipment failure for about six weeks, that is the only time they had to change it.

Nice try though.

Meanwhile, the ice cap continues to melt...

 

[gslack]

Did you read the graph?

2007 was the lowest level of ice in recorded history, and the ice has returned to that level.

Look closely at it chris..... See the ice coverage growing over the winter months and the leveling off at nearly the same levels in may.... yeah MAY chris.... A lot of freezing goin on in MAY chris? Also how much do you think they can tell in preliminary readings? LOL they are usually wrong in those as we can all attest to....Ice coverage till may is not evidence of the year... When 2010 is over come back with a real graph that shows 2010 and not a best guess....

Did you forget what year this was?

They are usually wrong? No they are not.

There was one time they had an equipment failure for about six weeks, that is the only time they had to change it.

Nice try though.

Meanwhile, the ice cap continues to melt...

Nice.... so you just going to pretend it is all make believe....

Add this little example of mindless denial of truth to all the rest of the things giving AGW theory a black eye these days..

things like removing 80% of the stations they measure temps with (most of them rural) and relying more on heat islands to get their temps.Or the way they changed the datasets this past year because they were getting too low temp readings and it didn't fit in their hypothesis. And the way they continue to deliberately mislead with their data and claims. Then their own emails saying they doctor data and twist the findings.... And all the rest of the claims that do not match up to data or anything in reality, all the predictions that are never even close, all the lies and exaggerations over the years, and we see all too clearly why the theory is so full of shit...

Thanks for helping to out this for the BS it is chris...

 

[Chris]

Look closely at it chris..... See the ice coverage growing over the winter months and the leveling off at nearly the same levels in may.... yeah MAY chris.... A lot of freezing goin on in MAY chris? Also how much do you think they can tell in preliminary readings? LOL they are usually wrong in those as we can all attest to....Ice coverage till may is not evidence of the year... When 2010 is over come back with a real graph that shows 2010 and not a best guess....

Did you forget what year this was?

They are usually wrong? No they are not.

There was one time they had an equipment failure for about six weeks, that is the only time they had to change it.

Nice try though.

Meanwhile, the ice cap continues to melt...

Nice.... so you just going to pretend it is all make believe....

Add this little example of mindless denial of truth to all the rest of the things giving AGW theory a black eye these days..

things like removing 80% of the stations they measure temps with (most of them rural) and relying more on heat islands to get their temps.Or the way they changed the datasets this past year because they were getting too low temp readings and it didn't fit in their hypothesis. And the way they continue to deliberately mislead with their data and claims. Then their own emails saying they doctor data and twist the findings.... And all the rest of the claims that do not match up to data or anything in reality, all the predictions that are never even close, all the lies and exaggerations over the years, and we see all too clearly why the theory is so full of shit...

Thanks for helping to out this for the BS it is chris...

The melting ice has no agenda.

Unlike you.

 

[gslack]

They are usually wrong? No they are not.

There was one time they had an equipment failure for about six weeks, that is the only time they had to change it.

Nice try though.

Meanwhile, the ice cap continues to melt...

Nice.... so you just going to pretend it is all make believe....

Add this little example of mindless denial of truth to all the rest of the things giving AGW theory a black eye these days..

things like removing 80% of the stations they measure temps with (most of them rural) and relying more on heat islands to get their temps.Or the way they changed the datasets this past year because they were getting too low temp readings and it didn't fit in their hypothesis. And the way they continue to deliberately mislead with their data and claims. Then their own emails saying they doctor data and twist the findings.... And all the rest of the claims that do not match up to data or anything in reality, all the predictions that are never even close, all the lies and exaggerations over the years, and we see all too clearly why the theory is so full of shit...

Thanks for helping to out this for the BS it is chris...

The melting ice has no agenda.

Unlike you.

Okay..... So you just basically told me... No? What? LOL why not just pull out the big "I know you are but what am I " defense? LOL

 

[westwall]

They are usually wrong? No they are not.

There was one time they had an equipment failure for about six weeks, that is the only time they had to change it.

Nice try though.

Meanwhile, the ice cap continues to melt...

Nice.... so you just going to pretend it is all make believe....

Add this little example of mindless denial of truth to all the rest of the things giving AGW theory a black eye these days..

things like removing 80% of the stations they measure temps with (most of them rural) and relying more on heat islands to get their temps.Or the way they changed the datasets this past year because they were getting too low temp readings and it didn't fit in their hypothesis. And the way they continue to deliberately mislead with their data and claims. Then their own emails saying they doctor data and twist the findings.... And all the rest of the claims that do not match up to data or anything in reality, all the predictions that are never even close, all the lies and exaggerations over the years, and we see all too clearly why the theory is so full of shit...

Thanks for helping to out this for the BS it is chris...

The melting ice has no agenda.

Unlike you.

Chris the melting ice may have no agenda but the people who want to control the carbon output of the planet certainly do. They have lied about just about every aspect of the arctic ice. Below is a blog page from a university and they found that in the area they explored the ice was 100% thicker than the scientists had predicted. How much more info is either not being released or ignored?

The Reference Frame: North Pole: ice 100% thicker than expected

 

[Old Rocks]

Sorry folks, but the volume of Arctic Sea Ice has been declining precipitously for the last five years, and this year appears to be setting up for a real banner year in that trend.


Arctic poised to see record low sea ice volume this year Climate Progress

 

[westwall]

Sorry folks, but the volume of Arctic Sea Ice has been declining precipitously for the last five years, and this year appears to be setting up for a real banner year in that trend.


Arctic poised to see record low sea ice volume this year Climate Progress

Ahh yes Climate Progress who's Big Cheese uttered this memorable quote..

'Execute' Skeptics! Shock Call To Action: 'At what point do we jail or execute global warming deniers' -- 'Shouldn't we start punishing them now?'

And that goes with this Canadian newspaper "article" claiming that 4.5 BILLION people could die by 2012 due to methane hydrate release. Don't you see a problem here? Goebbels said it best when referring to propoganda, "allways tell a big lie because are more inclined to believe it than a small lie."


The Canadian National Newspaper: Over 4.5 Billion people could die from Global Warming-related causes by 2012

Fortunately people aren't that stupid to believe this kind of nonsense.

And here is a link to another arctic sea ice viewpoint.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/05/16/wuwt-arctic-sea-ice-news-5/

 

[RollingThunder]

Perhaps we should leave these drooling denier cult retards to sit in the corner circle-jerking while muttering their denier cult myths and delusions to one another while the rational humans consider the latest news about the topic of this thread. As is obvious, the world is on course for this to be the new hottest year on record, as scientists have been predicting for some time.

NOAA: Warmest April Global Temperature on Record

Also Warmest January-April

NOAA
May 17, 2010

The combined global land and ocean surface temperature was the warmest on record for both April and for the period from January-April, according to NOAA. Additionally, last month’s average ocean surface temperature was the warmest on record for any April, and the global land surface temperature was the third warmest on record.

Global Temperature Highlights – April 2010

* The combined April global land and ocean average surface temperature was the warmest on record at 58.1°F (14.5°C), which is 1.37°F (0.76°C) above the 20th century average of 56.7°F (13.7°C).

* The combined global land and ocean average surface temperature was the warmest on record for January-April at 56.0°F (13.3°C), which is 1.24°F (0.69°C) above the 20th century average.

* Separately, the global ocean surface temperature was 1.03°F (0.57°C) above the 20th century average of 60.9°F (16.0°C) and the warmest on record for April. The warmth was most pronounced in the equatorial portions of the major oceans, especially the Atlantic.

* The global land surface temperature was 2.32°F (1.29°C) above the 20th century average of 46.5 °F (8.1°C) — the third warmest on record for April. Warmer-than-normal conditions dominated the globe, with the most prominent warmth in Canada, Alaska, the eastern United States, Australia, South Asia, northern Africa and northern Russia. Cooler-than-normal places included Mongolia, Argentina, far eastern Russia, the western contiguous United States and most of China.

* El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) weakened in April, as sea-surface temperature anomalies decreased across the equatorial Pacific Ocean. The weakening contributed significantly to the warmth observed in the tropical belt and the warmth of the overall ocean temperature for April. According to NOAA's Climate Prediction Center, El Niño is expected to continue through June.

(Credit: NOAA)


Other Highlights

* Arctic sea ice was below normal for the 11th consecutive April, covering an average of 5.7 million square miles (14.7 million square kilometers). This is 2.1 percent below the 1979-2000 average extent and the 15th smallest April extent since records began in 1979. It was, however, the largest April Arctic sea ice extent since 2001.

* Antarctic sea ice extent in April was near average, just 0.3 percent below the 1979-2000 average.

* Based on NOAA satellite observations, snow cover extent was the fourth-lowest on record (since 1967), and below the 1967-2010 average for the Northern Hemisphere for the seventh consecutive April. Warmer-than-normal conditions over North America, Europe and parts of Russia contributed to the small snow footprint.

* The North American snow cover extent for the month was the smallest on record for April. It also was the largest negative anomaly, meaning difference below the long-term average, on record for any month.

* According to Australia’s Bureau of Meteorology, Victoria and Tasmania had their warmest 12-month period since national records began.

* According to the Beijing Climate Center, China experienced its coolest April since 1961. Liaoning, Jilin and Shandong had their coolest April on record. Hebei, Anhui and Jiangsu had their second coolest April since records began in 1951.

* China had its wettest April since 1974 and Tibet had its wettest April since records began in 1951. Meanwhile, Germany had its second-driest April on record since 1901, behind 2007, according to the German Meteorological Service (Deutscher Wetterdienst).

(Credit: NOAA)

 

[gslack]

Trolling Blunder, tell me why they use "anomalies" ? Come on little fella tell me....LOL

 

[Big Fitz]

Hah! Trollingblunder is EdtheCynic!

Busted!

 

[gslack]

Hah! Trollingblunder is EdtheCynic!

Busted!

LOL, is he?

 

[ScienceRocks]

Perhaps we should leave these drooling denier cult retards to sit in the corner circle-jerking while muttering their denier cult myths and delusions to one another while the rational humans consider the latest news about the topic of this thread. As is obvious, the world is on course for this to be the new hottest year on record, as scientists have been predicting for some time.

NOAA: Warmest April Global Temperature on Record

Also Warmest January-April

NOAA
May 17, 2010

The combined global land and ocean surface temperature was the warmest on record for both April and for the period from January-April, according to NOAA. Additionally, last month’s average ocean surface temperature was the warmest on record for any April, and the global land surface temperature was the third warmest on record.

Global Temperature Highlights – April 2010

* The combined April global land and ocean average surface temperature was the warmest on record at 58.1°F (14.5°C), which is 1.37°F (0.76°C) above the 20th century average of 56.7°F (13.7°C).

* The combined global land and ocean average surface temperature was the warmest on record for January-April at 56.0°F (13.3°C), which is 1.24°F (0.69°C) above the 20th century average.

* Separately, the global ocean surface temperature was 1.03°F (0.57°C) above the 20th century average of 60.9°F (16.0°C) and the warmest on record for April. The warmth was most pronounced in the equatorial portions of the major oceans, especially the Atlantic.

* The global land surface temperature was 2.32°F (1.29°C) above the 20th century average of 46.5 °F (8.1°C) — the third warmest on record for April. Warmer-than-normal conditions dominated the globe, with the most prominent warmth in Canada, Alaska, the eastern United States, Australia, South Asia, northern Africa and northern Russia. Cooler-than-normal places included Mongolia, Argentina, far eastern Russia, the western contiguous United States and most of China.

* El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) weakened in April, as sea-surface temperature anomalies decreased across the equatorial Pacific Ocean. The weakening contributed significantly to the warmth observed in the tropical belt and the warmth of the overall ocean temperature for April. According to NOAA's Climate Prediction Center, El Niño is expected to continue through June.

(Credit: NOAA)


Other Highlights

* Arctic sea ice was below normal for the 11th consecutive April, covering an average of 5.7 million square miles (14.7 million square kilometers). This is 2.1 percent below the 1979-2000 average extent and the 15th smallest April extent since records began in 1979. It was, however, the largest April Arctic sea ice extent since 2001.

* Antarctic sea ice extent in April was near average, just 0.3 percent below the 1979-2000 average.

* Based on NOAA satellite observations, snow cover extent was the fourth-lowest on record (since 1967), and below the 1967-2010 average for the Northern Hemisphere for the seventh consecutive April. Warmer-than-normal conditions over North America, Europe and parts of Russia contributed to the small snow footprint.

* The North American snow cover extent for the month was the smallest on record for April. It also was the largest negative anomaly, meaning difference below the long-term average, on record for any month.

* According to Australia’s Bureau of Meteorology, Victoria and Tasmania had their warmest 12-month period since national records began.

* According to the Beijing Climate Center, China experienced its coolest April since 1961. Liaoning, Jilin and Shandong had their coolest April on record. Hebei, Anhui and Jiangsu had their second coolest April since records began in 1951.

* China had its wettest April since 1974 and Tibet had its wettest April since records began in 1951. Meanwhile, Germany had its second-driest April on record since 1901, behind 2007, according to the German Meteorological Service (Deutscher Wetterdienst).

(Credit: NOAA)

Funny all the record temps are within area's with few temperature stations, which are far apart. In the ones in Africa are garbage in and out. If this is the warmest march and april, I say congrats. I believe the planet is to cold and should get out of this long term ice age and get back to normal the way it was 25 million years ago.

 

[Big Fitz]

Hah! Trollingblunder is EdtheCynic!

Busted!

LOL, is he?

Look at his posting style. Exactly the same. Subject matter and everything. Explains why he came right in guns ablazing like he knew us too.

Whassamatta Ed? Get banned?

 

[gslack]

Hah! Trollingblunder is EdtheCynic!

Busted!

LOL, is he?

Look at his posting style. Exactly the same. Subject matter and everything. Explains why he came right in guns ablazing like he knew us too.

Whassamatta Ed? Get banned?

lol

 

[RollingThunder]

Trolling Blunder, tell me why they use "anomalies" ? Come on little fella tell me....LOL

Well, slack-jawed, I was hoping we could hear the definition you made up for the word. Those are usually hilariously absurd. Oh well. Here's what it actually means. From two sources, since you're such a troll.

From the Australian Government Bureau of Meteorology:
Anomaly
The departure of an element from its long-period average value for the location concerned. For example, if the maximum temperature for June in Melbourne was 1 degree Celsius higher than the long-term average for this month, the anomaly would be +1 degrees Celsius. The current international standard is to use the 30 year average from 1961 to 1990 as the long-term average.


a·nom·a·ly
   
–noun, plural-lies.

6. - Meteorology. the amount of deviation of a meteorological quantity from the accepted normal value of that quantity.


So come on little trollie, tell me what you hallucinate your point was.

 

[RollingThunder]

Hah! Trollingblunder is EdtheCynic! Busted!

LOL, is he?

Look at his posting style. Exactly the same. Subject matter and everything. Explains why he came right in guns ablazing like he knew us too. Whassamatta Ed? Get banned?

See second paragraph here.

 

[gslack]

Trolling Blunder, tell me why they use "anomalies" ? Come on little fella tell me....LOL

Well, slack-jawed, I was hoping we could hear the definition you made up for the word. Those are usually hilariously absurd. Oh well. Here's what it actually means. From two sources, since you're such a troll.

From the Australian Government Bureau of Meteorology:
Anomaly
The departure of an element from its long-period average value for the location concerned. For example, if the maximum temperature for June in Melbourne was 1 degree Celsius higher than the long-term average for this month, the anomaly would be +1 degrees Celsius. The current international standard is to use the 30 year average from 1961 to 1990 as the long-term average.


a·nom·a·ly
   
–noun, plural-lies.

6. - Meteorology. the amount of deviation of a meteorological quantity from the accepted normal value of that quantity.


So come on little trollie, tell me what you hallucinate your point was.

So....Tell me... How is it I made the word up when its the proper plural of ANOMALY???

As in more then one so they are anomalies... Gee even your links say anomalies as plural..... LOL, how embarrassing for you...Again...

For a guy who claims he is so smart, you sure don't understand much do you? LOL

SO, beyond showing how ignorant you are I would like you to explain why they choose to measure anomalies rather then straight up temps.... Come on socko gives us an answer you're so smart should be easy....

 

[konradv]

Funny all the record temps are within area's with few temperature stations, which are far apart. In the ones in Africa are garbage in and out. If this is the warmest march and april, I say congrats. I believe the planet is to cold and should get out of this long term ice age and get back to normal the way it was 25 million years ago.
-------------------------

Humans weren't around 25 million years ago. How do you that would be in our best interest? Man evolved during a relatively cool era in earth's history. I'd like to see it stay that way, thanks. Jumping head first into warming as you want, doesn't seem prudent.

 

[RollingThunder]

Trolling Blunder, tell me why they use "anomalies" ? Come on little fella tell me....LOL

Well, slack-jawed, I was hoping we could hear the definition you made up for the word. Those are usually hilariously absurd. Oh well. Here's what it actually means. From two sources, since you're such a troll.

From the Australian Government Bureau of Meteorology:
Anomaly
The departure of an element from its long-period average value for the location concerned. For example, if the maximum temperature for June in Melbourne was 1 degree Celsius higher than the long-term average for this month, the anomaly would be +1 degrees Celsius. The current international standard is to use the 30 year average from 1961 to 1990 as the long-term average.


a·nom·a·ly
–noun, plural -lies.

6. - Meteorology. the amount of deviation of a meteorological quantity from the accepted normal value of that quantity.


So come on little trollie, tell me what you hallucinate your point was.

So....Tell me... How is it I made the word up when its the proper plural of ANOMALY???

I am quite frankly astonished. I never imagined that you could possibly post anything that was even more stupid than what you have already posted but I was wrong.

I said "I was hoping we could hear the definition you made up for the word" and you are sooooo mentally incompetent that you imagine that I said that you made up the word. LOL. Gsock, you take the prize for the stupidest post ever.

As in more then one so they are anomalies... Gee even your links say anomalies as plural..... LOL, how embarrassing for you...Again...

You just dig the hole deeper, gtard. Like you are so stupid you think I don't know the plural when I posted the definition:
"a·nom·a·ly –noun, plural -lies."

For a guy who claims he is so smart, you sure don't understand much do you? LOL

I understand what 'anomalies' means in the context it was used, something you obviously didn't or you wouldn't have made your first post about it. You only reveal yourself to be an even more ignorant troll than we thought.

SO, beyond showing how ignorant you are I would like you to explain why they choose to measure anomalies rather then straight up temps.... Come on socko gives us an answer you're so smart should be easy....

I understand why meteorologists and climate scientists use the term and you don't so I'm the ignorant one??? LOL. There are many really stupid denier cult trolls but gsock, you are their king.

 

[syrenn]

Trolling Blunder, tell me why they use "anomalies" ? Come on little fella tell me....LOL

Well, slack-jawed, I was hoping we could hear the definition you made up for the word. Those are usually hilariously absurd. Oh well. Here's what it actually means. From two sources, since you're such a troll.

From the Australian Government Bureau of Meteorology:
Anomaly
The departure of an element from its long-period average value for the location concerned. For example, if the maximum temperature for June in Melbourne was 1 degree Celsius higher than the long-term average for this month, the anomaly would be +1 degrees Celsius. The current international standard is to use the 30 year average from 1961 to 1990 as the long-term average.
a·nom·a·ly
   –noun, plural-lies.
6. - Meteorology. the amount of deviation of a meteorological quantity from the accepted normal value of that quantity.
So come on little trollie, tell me what you hallucinate your point was.

Unfortunately 30 years or for that matter 100 years is not long term data. The temperature is only "anomalous" for the time period that the meters have been in play. In Human standard time it could be construed as "long term" In geologic time it is nothing.