Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That is what the evidence proves and you cannot demonstrate any contrary evidenceOne has to be a brain dead moron to believe only three shots were fired with one "miss".
If "da gubermint" told you that the moon was actually made of bleu cheese, you would blindly believe it and swear it was gospel.
You will have to do a better job. I can’t help you if you are lazy.Lol. Other than the LYING Langley Nazi, I probably have more posts in this thread than anyone else. I just don’t have patience for fools.So true and so sad.
Some people will believe anything the state tells them. They are intellectual midgets. Orwell wrote about these kinds of people in 1984.
For all your self-imposed "superiority", you STILL provide no proof, no scientific unassailable fact, no reasonable doubt based on fact, that the Warren Commission was wrong. You're just not that bright.
It seems gipper is still running far and fast to get away from this thread because he has NOTHING to support any of his claims.
I'm sure you're a very prolific poster. But NONE of the posts from you that I've seen include any proof, any unassailable fact nor any reasonable doubt that would lead a person to believe you have anything that refutes the Warren Commission findings. I dont' know if it is because you are too stupid, too lazy or to emotionally troubled to realize that you have to prove your posts, but there's just nothing of substance there.
And none of them cites any evidenceLol. Other than the LYING Langley Nazi, I probably have more posts in this thread than anyone else. I just don’t have patience for fools.So true and so sad.It's the Kennedy killing for dummies. It's for people too stupid, lazy or emotionally troubled to seek out the actual facts of the Kennedy coup.
Some people will believe anything the state tells them. They are intellectual midgets. Orwell wrote about these kinds of people in 1984.
For all your self-imposed "superiority", you STILL provide no proof, no scientific unassailable fact, no reasonable doubt based on fact, that the Warren Commission was wrong. You're just not that bright.
It seems gipper is still running far and fast to get away from this thread because he has NOTHING to support any of his claims.
We have a problem Silly Lying Langley Nazi. You see what you think is evidence is really fiction, and what you think is fiction is really evidence. So, someone as highly intelligent as I, can’t possibly debate someone as ignorant as you. Sorry.By that you mean you are a stupid imbecile who rants and repeats himself but has no clue what the fuck he is talking aboutYou will have to do a better job. I can’t help you if you are lazy.Lol. Other than the LYING Langley Nazi, I probably have more posts in this thread than anyone else. I just don’t have patience for fools.It seems gipper is still running far and fast to get away from this thread because he has NOTHING to support any of his claims.
I'm sure you're a very prolific poster. But NONE of the posts from you that I've seen include any proof, any unassailable fact nor any reasonable doubt that would lead a person to believe you have anything that refutes the Warren Commission findings. I dont' know if it is because you are too stupid, too lazy or to emotionally troubled to realize that you have to prove your posts, but there's just nothing of substance there.
You have never backed up any of your posts with evidence because you are incapable of doing so
That makes you nothing more than a pathetic sap and a fool who just repeats crap you have half way heard and can never do any real research.
One has to be a brain dead moron to believe only three shots were fired with one "miss".
Here are the FACTS:
1. Oswald was a CIA asset.
2. Oswald never fired a shot that day.
3. Oswald was the Patsy.
4. The WC was made up bull shit by the government, to protect and conceal the perpetrators.
5. The Mob and Deep State colluded to perform the hit.
6. Ruby was the Mob’s point man for the entire operation. He had to murder Oswald, when the cops failed to kill him in the movie house.
Simple truths.
Here are the FACTS:
1. Oswald was a CIA asset.
2. Oswald never fired a shot that day.
3. Oswald was the Patsy.
4. The WC was made up bull shit by the government, to protect and conceal the perpetrators.
5. The Mob and Deep State colluded to perform the hit.
6. Ruby was the Mob’s point man for the entire operation. He had to murder Oswald, when the cops failed to kill him in the movie house.
Simple truths.
If those are facts, you should be able to prove them.
I have proven that Oswald did fire a shot that day. The paraffin test he took proved it.
"During the course of the interrogation of Lee Harvey Oswald following the assassination a paraffin test was performed by the Dallas police on both of his hands and his right cheek. The paraffin cast of Oswald's hands reacted positively to the test."
Appendix 10
"Oswald was the Patsy." is an opinion, not a fact. In fact, your last 4 "facts" are merely opinions. Perhaps you'd better learn the definition of a fact, so you stop using that word incorrectly. A fact is a thing that is known or proved to be true.
Both the FBI and CIA in their private assessments felt there were more shooters at Dealy Plaza than just the patsy Oswald.
The facts bear out their judgement. https://www.usnews.com/debate-club/...hots-prove-jfk-assassination-was-a-conspiracy
One does have to have the abily to think logically and put the totality of the event in focus. You have proven you do not have these abilities.Here are the FACTS:
1. Oswald was a CIA asset.
2. Oswald never fired a shot that day.
3. Oswald was the Patsy.
4. The WC was made up bull shit by the government, to protect and conceal the perpetrators.
5. The Mob and Deep State colluded to perform the hit.
6. Ruby was the Mob’s point man for the entire operation. He had to murder Oswald, when the cops failed to kill him in the movie house.
Simple truths.
If those are facts, you should be able to prove them.
I have proven that Oswald did fire a shot that day. The paraffin test he took proved it.
"During the course of the interrogation of Lee Harvey Oswald following the assassination a paraffin test was performed by the Dallas police on both of his hands and his right cheek. The paraffin cast of Oswald's hands reacted positively to the test."
Appendix 10
"Oswald was the Patsy." is an opinion, not a fact. In fact, your last 4 "facts" are merely opinions. Perhaps you'd better learn the definition of a fact, so you stop using that word incorrectly. A fact is a thing that is known or proved to be true.
Those are not facts.Here are the FACTS:
1. Oswald was a CIA asset.
2. Oswald never fired a shot that day.
3. Oswald was the Patsy.
4. The WC was made up bull shit by the government, to protect and conceal the perpetrators.
5. The Mob and Deep State colluded to perform the hit.
6. Ruby was the Mob’s point man for the entire operation. He had to murder Oswald, when the cops failed to kill him in the movie house.
Simple truths.
One needs evidence to reach logical conclusions and you have no evidence.One does have to have the abily to think logically and put the totality of the event in focus. You have proven you do not have these abilities.Here are the FACTS:
1. Oswald was a CIA asset.
2. Oswald never fired a shot that day.
3. Oswald was the Patsy.
4. The WC was made up bull shit by the government, to protect and conceal the perpetrators.
5. The Mob and Deep State colluded to perform the hit.
6. Ruby was the Mob’s point man for the entire operation. He had to murder Oswald, when the cops failed to kill him in the movie house.
Simple truths.
If those are facts, you should be able to prove them.
I have proven that Oswald did fire a shot that day. The paraffin test he took proved it.
"During the course of the interrogation of Lee Harvey Oswald following the assassination a paraffin test was performed by the Dallas police on both of his hands and his right cheek. The paraffin cast of Oswald's hands reacted positively to the test."
Appendix 10
"Oswald was the Patsy." is an opinion, not a fact. In fact, your last 4 "facts" are merely opinions. Perhaps you'd better learn the definition of a fact, so you stop using that word incorrectly. A fact is a thing that is known or proved to be true.
So sorry.
The fbi and CIA made no such assessments and the facts do not support such an assessment.Both the FBI and CIA in their private assessments felt there were more shooters at Dealy Plaza than just the patsy Oswald.
The facts bear out their judgement. https://www.usnews.com/debate-club/...hots-prove-jfk-assassination-was-a-conspiracy
Just opinion with no evidenceThe incredible 'wrongness' of the Warren Report...it is deeply flawed.
The Incredible Wrongness of the Warren Report The Official Inquiry into the Assassination of JFK Is Deeply Flawed By Donald E. Wilkes, Jr. There was never any substantial reason to congratulate the Warren Commission for its performance.—Murray Kempton In my article last week I explained why, based on information discovered or disclosed since the 1964 Warren Report, the Report’s principal conclusions—that there was no conspiracy behind the JFK assassination, and that Lee Harvey Oswald, acting alone, shot and killed JFK—now stand discredited. I shall now explain why a reevaluation of the Report in light of the new information requires rejection of other key aspects of the Report.
The Incredible Wrongness of the Warren Report
Paraffin tests were proven unreliable which means they prove nothing one way or the otherHere are the FACTS:
1. Oswald was a CIA asset.
2. Oswald never fired a shot that day.
3. Oswald was the Patsy.
4. The WC was made up bull shit by the government, to protect and conceal the perpetrators.
5. The Mob and Deep State colluded to perform the hit.
6. Ruby was the Mob’s point man for the entire operation. He had to murder Oswald, when the cops failed to kill him in the movie house.
Simple truths.
If those are facts, you should be able to prove them.
I have proven that Oswald did fire a shot that day. The paraffin test he took proved it.
"During the course of the interrogation of Lee Harvey Oswald following the assassination a paraffin test was performed by the Dallas police on both of his hands and his right cheek. The paraffin cast of Oswald's hands reacted positively to the test."
Appendix 10
"Oswald was the Patsy." is an opinion, not a fact. In fact, your last 4 "facts" are merely opinions. Perhaps you'd better learn the definition of a fact, so you stop using that word incorrectly. A fact is a thing that is known or proved to be true.
Anyone who has ever been in the military knows the difference between a gun and a rifle....you are trying to be disingenuous.
The ole sgt. hearing the recruit refer to his rifle as his gun.....would have the recruit hold his rifle in his right hand and his dick in his left hand and then have him hold up his rifle and say this is my rifle and then have him shake his dick and say this is my gun....and then hold up his rifle again and say this is for shooting....and then have him shake his dick and say this is for fun. over and over.
Irregardless..............., the FBI had conducted experiments showing the unreliability of paraffin tests. FBI expert Cortlandt Cunningham testified to this in front of the Warren Commission (3H487):And 17 men were involved in this test. Each man fired five shots from a .38 caliber revolver. Both the firing hand and the hand that was not involved in the firing were treated with paraffin casts, and then those casts treated with diphenylamine. A total of eight men showed negative or essentially negative results on both hands. A total of three men showed positive results on the idle hand, but negative on the firing hand. Two men showed positive results on their firing hand and negative results on their idle hands. And four men showed positive on both hands, after having fired only with their right hands.It is evident that false positives and false negatives occur with the revolvers. After the assassination the Warren Commission directed the FBI to run the same experiment using the C2766 rifle and ammunition which was identical to what was found in the Texas School Book Depository. Cunningham related the results of that experiment (3H494):
JFK Assassination Firearms Factoids -- The "Paraffin Test"
By trolls you mean people who started the thread and disagree with you."The post-Watergate Church Committee documented CIA plots to kill Fidel Castro in great detail; its probe into the Kennedy assassination was more limited, as seen in the name of the slim volume "The Investigation of the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy: Performance of the Intelligence Agencies." But this report was highly critical of both the CIA and FBI; Senator Schweiker told a TV audience that "the [Warren] report...has collapsed like a house of cards" and spoke of "senior intelligence officials who directed the cover-up."
The CIA and the JFK Assassination
Doesn't Schweiker know that there are several trolls here who swear by the Warren Commission the way a Southern Baptist preacher swears by every single word in the Holy Bible?
Here are the FACTS:
1. Oswald was a CIA asset.
2. Oswald never fired a shot that day.
3. Oswald was the Patsy.
4. The WC was made up bull shit by the government, to protect and conceal the perpetrators.
5. The Mob and Deep State colluded to perform the hit.
6. Ruby was the Mob’s point man for the entire operation. He had to murder Oswald, when the cops failed to kill him in the movie house.
Simple truths.
If those are facts, you should be able to prove them.
I have proven that Oswald did fire a shot that day. The paraffin test he took proved it.
"During the course of the interrogation of Lee Harvey Oswald following the assassination a paraffin test was performed by the Dallas police on both of his hands and his right cheek. The paraffin cast of Oswald's hands reacted positively to the test."
Appendix 10
"Oswald was the Patsy." is an opinion, not a fact. In fact, your last 4 "facts" are merely opinions. Perhaps you'd better learn the definition of a fact, so you stop using that word incorrectly. A fact is a thing that is known or proved to be true.
Anyone who has ever been in the military knows the difference between a gun and a rifle....you are trying to be disingenuous.
The ole sgt. hearing the recruit refer to his rifle as his gun.....would have the recruit hold his rifle in his right hand and his dick in his left hand and then have him hold up his rifle and say this is my rifle and then have him shake his dick and say this is my gun....and then hold up his rifle again and say this is for shooting....and then have him shake his dick and say this is for fun. over and over.
Irregardless..............., the FBI had conducted experiments showing the unreliability of paraffin tests. FBI expert Cortlandt Cunningham testified to this in front of the Warren Commission (3H487):And 17 men were involved in this test. Each man fired five shots from a .38 caliber revolver. Both the firing hand and the hand that was not involved in the firing were treated with paraffin casts, and then those casts treated with diphenylamine. A total of eight men showed negative or essentially negative results on both hands. A total of three men showed positive results on the idle hand, but negative on the firing hand. Two men showed positive results on their firing hand and negative results on their idle hands. And four men showed positive on both hands, after having fired only with their right hands.It is evident that false positives and false negatives occur with the revolvers. After the assassination the Warren Commission directed the FBI to run the same experiment using the C2766 rifle and ammunition which was identical to what was found in the Texas School Book Depository. Cunningham related the results of that experiment (3H494):
JFK Assassination Firearms Factoids -- The "Paraffin Test"
