- Banned
- #1
It wasn't really a hack since Podesta was stupid enough to click on a phishing link...but let's call it a hack to keep it simple for the proglodytes in attendance. First off, Barry had no business being president because he was born in Kenya....period. As a result, he's kept his background muddied at best, refusing to turn over his college grade transcripts or explain how his SS# belonged to a 100 year old man from Connecticut. His bathhouse activities in Chicago, the surrender of his license to practice law, and the bundled campaign funds from the middle-east are topics he'll run like a scalded poodle from. So how paranoid of being exposed is he?
Enough to have scoured his WH staff for leakers to the extent only a few confidants were allowed anywhere near the real dirt.....like the Iran payoff, the tampering with the Israeli election, trying to block the UK from leaving the EU, or his backing the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt. His DOJ and IRS were weaponized to harm the GOP and yet, it was his own people he was most leery of. And why he had ample cause to find out what was really going on with the Clinton campaign. But what if he got caught at it? No problem...Brennan could get dirt or the nitty gritty on anybody his master pleased....and blame it on.......the Russians.
As Wikileaks notes, the UMBRAGE group and its related projects allow the CIA to misdirect the attribution of cyber attacks by “leaving behind the ‘fingerprints’ of the very groups that the attack techniques were stolen from.”
In other words, the CIA’s sophisticated hacking tools all have a “signature” marking them as originating from the agency. In order to avoid arousing suspicion as to the true extent of its covert cyber operations, the CIA has employed UMBRAGE’s techniques in order to create signatures that allow multiple attacks to be attributed to various entities – instead of the real point of origin at the CIA – while also increasing its total number of attack types.
Now that the CIA has been shown to not only have the capability but also the express intention of replacing the “fingerprint” of cyber-attacks it conducts with those of another state actor, the CIA’s alleged evidence that Russia hacked the U.S. election – or anything else for that matter – is immediately suspect. There is no longer any way to determine if the CIA’s proof of Russian hacks on U.S. infrastructure is legitimate, as it could very well be a “false flag” attack.
Wikileaks Exposes CIA Exploit Capable Of Cyber "False Flag" Attack To Blame Russia | Zero Hedge
Enough to have scoured his WH staff for leakers to the extent only a few confidants were allowed anywhere near the real dirt.....like the Iran payoff, the tampering with the Israeli election, trying to block the UK from leaving the EU, or his backing the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt. His DOJ and IRS were weaponized to harm the GOP and yet, it was his own people he was most leery of. And why he had ample cause to find out what was really going on with the Clinton campaign. But what if he got caught at it? No problem...Brennan could get dirt or the nitty gritty on anybody his master pleased....and blame it on.......the Russians.
As Wikileaks notes, the UMBRAGE group and its related projects allow the CIA to misdirect the attribution of cyber attacks by “leaving behind the ‘fingerprints’ of the very groups that the attack techniques were stolen from.”
In other words, the CIA’s sophisticated hacking tools all have a “signature” marking them as originating from the agency. In order to avoid arousing suspicion as to the true extent of its covert cyber operations, the CIA has employed UMBRAGE’s techniques in order to create signatures that allow multiple attacks to be attributed to various entities – instead of the real point of origin at the CIA – while also increasing its total number of attack types.
Now that the CIA has been shown to not only have the capability but also the express intention of replacing the “fingerprint” of cyber-attacks it conducts with those of another state actor, the CIA’s alleged evidence that Russia hacked the U.S. election – or anything else for that matter – is immediately suspect. There is no longer any way to determine if the CIA’s proof of Russian hacks on U.S. infrastructure is legitimate, as it could very well be a “false flag” attack.
Wikileaks Exposes CIA Exploit Capable Of Cyber "False Flag" Attack To Blame Russia | Zero Hedge
