Wasserman Scultz can't tell the Difference between being a Socialist and a Democrat!

That confirms what I wrote, rather than refutes it. You understand that, right?
You clearly have no comprehension.

Socialism is all about the abolition of private property. If you don't know this basic fact, you are a fool. Is there something in "becomes obsolete" you need explained to you? Apparently so.
Is Sweden socialist?
Did Sweden abolish private property?

Was the Soviet Union communist?
Did the SOviet Union abolish private property?

Is North Korea communist?
Did North Korea abolish private property?

You're distance from reality is enormous.

Is public education socialist?

Absolutely, that's why 80% of NYC School student can't read at grade level

You think poor kids would read better if there was no affordable school system for them?

How would that work?


We were number 3 in the world of education before it was turned over to the Feds.
 
That confirms what I wrote, rather than refutes it. You understand that, right?
You clearly have no comprehension.

Socialism is all about the abolition of private property. If you don't know this basic fact, you are a fool. Is there something in "becomes obsolete" you need explained to you? Apparently so.
Is Sweden socialist?
Did Sweden abolish private property?

Was the Soviet Union communist?
Did the SOviet Union abolish private property?

Is North Korea communist?
Did North Korea abolish private property?

You're distance from reality is enormous.

Is public education socialist?

Absolutely, that's why 80% of NYC School student can't read at grade level

You think poor kids would read better if there was no affordable school system for them?

How would that work?

I think they'd do better in charter schools. Public education has done them a great disservice
 
This is HILLARIOUS! Chris Matthews is obviously a shill for HILLARY!, but it is quite amusing to see him nail Debbie Wasserman Schultz. She will not answer his question to tell the difference between being a Socialist and a Democrat.



Matthews has good moments but this wasn't one of them.
 
This is HILLARIOUS! Chris Matthews is obviously a shill for HILLARY!, but it is quite amusing to see him nail Debbie Wasserman Schultz. She will not answer his question to tell the difference between being a Socialist and a Democrat.


Hope he has a Repuke on and asks what the difference is between a Republican and a Nazi.


Yeah that would be pretty much the same thing.
 
You clearly have no comprehension.

Socialism is all about the abolition of private property. If you don't know this basic fact, you are a fool. Is there something in "becomes obsolete" you need explained to you? Apparently so.
Is Sweden socialist?
Did Sweden abolish private property?

Was the Soviet Union communist?
Did the SOviet Union abolish private property?

Is North Korea communist?
Did North Korea abolish private property?

You're distance from reality is enormous.

Is public education socialist?

Absolutely, that's why 80% of NYC School student can't read at grade level

You think poor kids would read better if there was no affordable school system for them?

How would that work?


We were number 3 in the world of education before it was turned over to the Feds.

lol, now you're jabbering like a monkey.

Why would denying poor kids an affordable education make their lives better?
 
Nope, can't do that. The point was you have 0.4secondstoanswer.Time'sup.

I answered upon reading the post. So, too bad.

No you didn't. All you could do was to ask for a definition of the question, and even that exceeds the allotted Chris Matthews spittle time. That's the point. It can't be answered in that context.

It's like saying, "we've only got ten seconds before commercial but before we go, what's the meaning of life?"


Trouble with reading comprehension? I provided a comparison of Classical Liberalism and Burkian Conservatism. As you neglected to define what versions of Liberalism and Conservatism you intended, I used what the terms mean to me.

Doesn't matter -- Chris Matthews would have cut you off at "Which defi..." and that would have been it. That's the point.


Sorry, that doesn't work. Debbie tried to spin to the difference between Dems and the GOP - and that is why she kept getting cut off.

Again... that's a deflection. There's not much else you can do with a bullshit question, other than simply say, "that's a bullshit question".
 
I answered upon reading the post. So, too bad.

No you didn't. All you could do was to ask for a definition of the question, and even that exceeds the allotted Chris Matthews spittle time. That's the point. It can't be answered in that context.

It's like saying, "we've only got ten seconds before commercial but before we go, what's the meaning of life?"


Trouble with reading comprehension? I provided a comparison of Classical Liberalism and Burkian Conservatism. As you neglected to define what versions of Liberalism and Conservatism you intended, I used what the terms mean to me.

Doesn't matter -- Chris Matthews would have cut you off at "Which defi..." and that would have been it. That's the point.


Sorry, that doesn't work. Debbie tried to spin to the difference between Dems and the GOP - and that is why she kept getting cut off.

You must not have ever watched Chris Matthews. NOBODY gets to finish a sentence. About anything.


You are correct. I never watch Chris Matthews. He's a pompous leg-tingly blowhard.
 
Is Sweden socialist?
Did Sweden abolish private property?

Was the Soviet Union communist?
Did the SOviet Union abolish private property?

Is North Korea communist?
Did North Korea abolish private property?

You're distance from reality is enormous.

Is public education socialist?

Absolutely, that's why 80% of NYC School student can't read at grade level

You think poor kids would read better if there was no affordable school system for them?

How would that work?


We were number 3 in the world of education before it was turned over to the Feds.

lol, now you're jabbering like a monkey.

Why would denying poor kids an affordable education make their lives better?

Historical facts are not jabbering.
There you go again twisting and adding something that was not said.
It proves you do not know our history and how much better off our education system was before the Feds got involved.
 
Last edited:
No you didn't. All you could do was to ask for a definition of the question, and even that exceeds the allotted Chris Matthews spittle time. That's the point. It can't be answered in that context.

It's like saying, "we've only got ten seconds before commercial but before we go, what's the meaning of life?"


Trouble with reading comprehension? I provided a comparison of Classical Liberalism and Burkian Conservatism. As you neglected to define what versions of Liberalism and Conservatism you intended, I used what the terms mean to me.

Doesn't matter -- Chris Matthews would have cut you off at "Which defi..." and that would have been it. That's the point.


Sorry, that doesn't work. Debbie tried to spin to the difference between Dems and the GOP - and that is why she kept getting cut off.

You must not have ever watched Chris Matthews. NOBODY gets to finish a sentence. About anything.


You are correct. I never watch Chris Matthews. He's a pompous leg-tingly blowhard.

He drools a lot too. And that accent... these and the constant interruptions all tell me he's not interested in hearing any voice but that of Numero Uno.
 
Trouble with reading comprehension? I provided a comparison of Classical Liberalism and Burkian Conservatism. As you neglected to define what versions of Liberalism and Conservatism you intended, I used what the terms mean to me.

Doesn't matter -- Chris Matthews would have cut you off at "Which defi..." and that would have been it. That's the point.


Sorry, that doesn't work. Debbie tried to spin to the difference between Dems and the GOP - and that is why she kept getting cut off.

You must not have ever watched Chris Matthews. NOBODY gets to finish a sentence. About anything.


You are correct. I never watch Chris Matthews. He's a pompous leg-tingly blowhard.

He drools a lot too. And that accent... these and the constant interruptions all tell me he's not interested in hearing any voice but that of Numero Uno.


He has a lot in common with OBAMA!
 
Trouble with reading comprehension? I provided a comparison of Classical Liberalism and Burkian Conservatism. As you neglected to define what versions of Liberalism and Conservatism you intended, I used what the terms mean to me.

Doesn't matter -- Chris Matthews would have cut you off at "Which defi..." and that would have been it. That's the point.


Sorry, that doesn't work. Debbie tried to spin to the difference between Dems and the GOP - and that is why she kept getting cut off.

You must not have ever watched Chris Matthews. NOBODY gets to finish a sentence. About anything.


You are correct. I never watch Chris Matthews. He's a pompous leg-tingly blowhard.

He drools a lot too. And that accent... these and the constant interruptions all tell me he's not interested in hearing any voice but that of Numero Uno.
He's an orielly clone. Imagine those two interviewing each other.
 
Is public education socialist?

Absolutely, that's why 80% of NYC School student can't read at grade level

You think poor kids would read better if there was no affordable school system for them?

How would that work?


We were number 3 in the world of education before it was turned over to the Feds.

lol, now you're jabbering like a monkey.

Why would denying poor kids an affordable education make their lives better?

Historical facts are not jabbering.
There you go again twisting and adding something that was not said.
It proves you do not know our history and how much better off our education system was before the Feds got involved.

Our public education system was run by government since its inception.

Do you REALLY want to revert to some sort of system where poor families cannot get their children educated because of the cost?

What is wrong with you?
 
Absolutely, that's why 80% of NYC School student can't read at grade level

You think poor kids would read better if there was no affordable school system for them?

How would that work?


We were number 3 in the world of education before it was turned over to the Feds.

lol, now you're jabbering like a monkey.

Why would denying poor kids an affordable education make their lives better?

Historical facts are not jabbering.
There you go again twisting and adding something that was not said.
It proves you do not know our history and how much better off our education system was before the Feds got involved.

Our public education system was run by government since its inception.

Do you REALLY want to revert to some sort of system where poor families cannot get their children educated because of the cost?

What is wrong with you?


Can you help the Deb-ster out? Poor thing is clueless. What do you see as the difference between a Socialist and a Dimocrap?

I think your answer will be fascinating. :D
 

Forum List

Back
Top