multivita-man
Platinum Member
- Aug 10, 2022
- 5,044
- 2,547
2. It's not an "excuse". It is the simple fact that no one (including you) can show/prove whether Trump knew documents had left the WH and gone to MAL. What time they asked for documents has nothing to do with it. If he didn't know of the transference of documents, he didnt know, period. FBI asking about them, doesn't change that.
He had custody of those records. He needs a damn good explanation for it - not the dog ate my homework kind of excuse, but a plausible one.
4. You can let a grand jury and a trial jury hear anything you like, but you cannot show/prove that Trump had any knowledge of any documents having moved from the White House to Mar-a-Lago (if there actually were any documents that did, besides the ones Trump previously handed over) This why I refuted you. NOBODY can show that Trump knew anything of this whole scenario. It is impossible.
Even if it were possible to show that document had been moved (before the FBI got there) no one can show that Trump knew of it, thereby having criminal intent. And without that criminal intent, there is no prosecution.
I'll concede one thing: this case may not be as easy to prove as what the MSM are saying. But I go back to a basic problem that Trump has: it's sensitive government property on his property. Like I said, he needs to explain that. He can't just say "You ain't got nuthin on me." A grand jury will hear the evidence and decide if there's enough to warrant a trial. There's a mountain of evidence in DOJ's possession, so there's a strong likelihood that the grand jury will return an indictment.