Roudy
Diamond Member
- Mar 16, 2012
- 59,493
- 17,802
It isn't me only, it's both the previous and current administrstion. They might at some point, it depends, if we let it someone who the Pakistani intelligence has cleared, who then goes on to commit terrorism, then all bets will be off. Who knows, they could be on the next list. Let's see how this one does in the courts first, before we go on to add more. One thing about the Pakistanis, they are ruthless and have full control of their population. the question is do we want to create more adversaries, especially nuclear, at a time when we are already fighting on many fronts?You said Pakistan could be relied on. You said Pakistan wasn't a state sponsor of terrorism to US or their allies. Clearly you say a lot of really dumb shit....and somehow that disproves my point, how?
So do you think they'll add Pakistan later? If you don't, this isn't relevant.The Administrstion already stated that more countries could be added later.