- Thread starter
- #21
What i mean is I don't see that they are saying anything different from what my source said.it comes from the american bar association which is the body that governs lawyers
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What i mean is I don't see that they are saying anything different from what my source said.it comes from the american bar association which is the body that governs lawyers
It stated the prosecution goes last, you said it does not, prosecution has the last word, a rebuttal.What i mean is I don't see that they are saying anything different from what my source said.
And it's not cut in stone.......at the whim of the court.It stated the prosecution goes last, you said it does not, prosecution has the last word, a rebuttal.
yet, it is cut in stone, as in practice which sets precedent, and by the dictates of the American Bar AssociationAnd it's not cut in stone.......at the whim of the court.
It stated the prosecution goes last, you said it does not, prosecution has the last word, a rebuttal.
yet, it is cut in stone, as in practice which sets precedent, and by the dictates of the American Bar Association
How can you say I dont know what I am talking about when you post the exact same phrase that I did? Prosecution goes last, they get the opportunity for a rebuttal. That last say, the last closing argument.Only if they chose to..........not cast in stone. In this case, they violated ABA precedent by making defense go first.
The Right to Present a Defense
.The prosecutor, who has the burden of proof, frequently gets the chance to respond to the defense's final argument.
Looks like you don't know what you are talking about.