We need FBI polygraph tests of the persons named in affidavits to confirm voter fraud.

[kyzr]

The many poll workers accused of voter fraud should be made to take polygraph tests to prove or disprove voter fraud.
If the TX lawsuit can force the issue, so much the better, otherwise the bogus electors in question should be voided.
The basis for suspecting voter fraud is the mathematical proof based on voting norms.

 

[WinterBorn]

The many poll workers accused of voter fraud should be made to take polygraph tests to prove or disprove voter fraud.
If the TX lawsuit can force the issue, so much the better, otherwise the bogus electors in question should be voided.
The basis for suspecting voter fraud is the mathematical proof based on voting norms.

You cannot force anyone to take a polygraph.

Plus, if the polygraph does not show they are lying, the people who want these tests will not say they are innocent. They will say they beat the polygraph.

 

[colfax_m]

The basis for suspecting voter fraud is the mathematical proof based on voting norms

Based on voting norms?

It’s a garbage analysis seems to assume that circumstances aren’t different from one election to another. Fundamentally flawed.

 

[Canon Shooter]

Well, there's the fact that polygraphs don't prove or disprove anything.

All a polygraph does is register minute physiological changes in the body. The belief is that deceptive answers will produce a different physiological response than a non-deceptive answer. There are, however, no known specific physiological reactions associated with lying, making it difficult to identify factors that would distinguish a liar from someone telling the truth...

 

[Claudette]

Polygraphs aren't admissible in court but I'd bet you would get loads of those counters who couldn't pass one.

 

[irosie91]

The many poll workers accused of voter fraud should be made to take polygraph tests to prove or disprove voter fraud.
If the TX lawsuit can force the issue, so much the better, otherwise the bogus electors in question should be voided.
The basis for suspecting voter fraud is the mathematical proof based on voting norms.

if only

 

[Canon Shooter]

Polygraphs aren't admissible in court but I'd bet you would get loads of those counters who couldn't pass one.

The idea that a polygraph test is "pass" or "fail" is false. It's really not...

 

[WinterBorn]

Also, there is a little detail called the 5th Amendment of the US Constitution. Forcing someone to take a polygraph violates that.

 

[kyzr]

Meh. Even though polygraphs aren't admissible in court, their results would show "deception" or not.
IMHO most of the yahoos who committed voter fraud would have glaring results, proving voter fraud.
Polygraphs would at least be doing "something" as opposed to doing nothing and letting the cheaters win.

 

[Claudette]

Also, there is a little detail called the 5th Amendment of the US Constitution. Forcing someone to take a polygraph violates that.

You can't force anyone to take a polygraph. They have to want to take it. Nuff said.

 

[WinterBorn]

Meh. Even though polygraphs aren't admissible in court, their results would show "deception" or not.
IMHO most of the yahoos who committed voter fraud would have glaring results, proving voter fraud.
Polygraphs would at least be doing "something" as opposed to doing nothing and letting the cheaters win.

Fine, except you can only ask that they take one. You cannot force them.

 

[kyzr]

Also, there is a little detail called the 5th Amendment of the US Constitution. Forcing someone to take a polygraph violates that.

I'm not proposing using the polygraphs to prosecute the poll workers, but to prove or disprove the claims of voter fraud.
The MSM and democrats are claiming "nothing to see here" that all the claims have been "debunked".
Polygraphs would show that voter fraud had been committed, or not.

 

[Damaged Eagle]

The many poll workers accused of voter fraud should be made to take polygraph tests to prove or disprove voter fraud.
If the TX lawsuit can force the issue, so much the better, otherwise the bogus electors in question should be voided.
The basis for suspecting voter fraud is the mathematical proof based on voting norms.

You cannot force anyone to take a polygraph.

Plus, if the polygraph does not show they are lying, the people who want these tests will not say they are innocent. They will say they beat the polygraph.

Oh I'm sure it can be mandated during this national emergency just like masks.

*****CHUCKLE*****

 

[Rigby5]

Polygraphs aren't admissible in court but I'd bet you would get loads of those counters who couldn't pass one.

Polygraphs are not reliable, and I would bet that even if there was no voter fraud, those claiming there was would pass a polygraph test because they do not believe they are lying.

 

[Osiris-ODS]

The many poll workers accused of voter fraud should be made to take polygraph tests to prove or disprove voter fraud.
If the TX lawsuit can force the issue, so much the better, otherwise the bogus electors in question should be voided.
The basis for suspecting voter fraud is the mathematical proof based on voting norms.

Polygraphs are generally not admissible as evidence of a crime. Like others have noted, they are too subjective depending on the conditions, questions, and the person interpreting the results.

 

[EvilEyeFleegle]

The many poll workers accused of voter fraud should be made to take polygraph tests to prove or disprove voter fraud.
If the TX lawsuit can force the issue, so much the better, otherwise the bogus electors in question should be voided.
The basis for suspecting voter fraud is the mathematical proof based on voting norms.

That's pretty good idea..test the people who swore out the affidavits..and see if they're telling the truth! I bet you'd see a whole lot of backpedaling!

 

[kyzr]

The many poll workers accused of voter fraud should be made to take polygraph tests to prove or disprove voter fraud.
If the TX lawsuit can force the issue, so much the better, otherwise the bogus electors in question should be voided.
The basis for suspecting voter fraud is the mathematical proof based on voting norms.

That's pretty good idea..test the people who swore out the affidavits..and see if they're telling the truth! I bet you'd see a whole lot of backpedaling!

Exactly, test BOTH the affidavit writers and the accused poll workers who are claimed to have committed the voter fraud to see who is most probably lying.

 

[boilermaker55]

It shows you how simple-minded most tRUMP voters(cultists) are, they have no idea that polygraphs are inadmissible in a court of law.
The fascists that they are.

The many poll workers accused of voter fraud should be made to take polygraph tests to prove or disprove voter fraud.
If the TX lawsuit can force the issue, so much the better, otherwise the bogus electors in question should be voided.
The basis for suspecting voter fraud is the mathematical proof based on voting norms.

You cannot force anyone to take a polygraph.

Plus, if the polygraph does not show they are lying, the people who want these tests will not say they are innocent. They will say they beat the polygraph.

 

[boilermaker55]

If you think that is the way to see if someone is lying, give one to the lying pile of DOG Excrement that occupies the Whitehouse right now.

Polygraphs aren't admissible in court but I'd bet you would get loads of those counters who couldn't pass one.

 

[boilermaker55]

Give one daily to the lying fucking asshole tRUMP!

Meh. Even though polygraphs aren't admissible in court, their results would show "deception" or not.
IMHO most of the yahoos who committed voter fraud would have glaring results, proving voter fraud.
Polygraphs would at least be doing "something" as opposed to doing nothing and letting the cheaters win.