there4eyeM
unlicensed metaphysician
- Jul 5, 2012
- 20,442
- 5,179
Define "weaker"!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
that’s how i understood herHad she presented it as such then it wouldn't have been an issue.
First, I am not a Democrat. Second, there is an appropriate way to approach it AND it was demonstrated by a colleague in the same article. It isn't that it can't be accomplished, right?that’s how i understood her
maybe you all are trying desperately to read to much into because of your own prejudice
i thought it wasFirst, I am not a Democrat. Second, there is an appropriate way to approach it AND it was demonstrated by a colleague in the same article. It isn't that it can't be accomplished, right?
When a guy, ranked #400 in DI collegiate swimming, is breaking all of the female records well duh.If Marge really believed this, she’d stay home baking cookies in an apron, mixing martinis for her husband and having an affair with the Amazon guy
Marjorie Taylor Greene Defines Women as ‘Weaker Sex,’ Accuses Numerous Republicans of Being ‘Pro-Pedophile’
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Georgia) has defined "what is a woman" with an explanation referring to women as the "weaker sex" made from "Adam's rib."www.mediaite.com
Sounds like she is an idiot but party before people at all costs, amiright?i thought it was
like i said sounds like it’s your own prejudice that made it out to be something different
i don’t know about being an idiot but she was right on this topic…basic biology…but apparently that goes right over the prejudicial dembots like yourselfSounds like she is an idiot but party before people at all costs, amiright?
I see your problem already.i don’t know about being an idiot but she was right on this topic…basic biology…but apparently that goes right over the prejudicial dembots like yourself
well admitting it’s a problem is the first step. Leaving the dembot cult is the next. Take the stepI see your problem already.
Which is of little value on the battlefield even if we accept that idea in the first place
Did you not read the article? There is a Republican woman that provided the right answer. Again, I am not a Dem.well admitting it’s a problem is the first step. Leaving the dembot cult is the next. Take the step
i did. i saw nothing wrong with either answerDid you not read the article? There is a Republican woman that provided the right answer. Again, I am not a Dem.
She made an extremely poor decision in her choice of words and I will not be making excuses for her.i did. i saw nothing wrong with either answer
Unless it's digital.Does this mean a broken clock is right two times a day….
Pregnancy is a show of strength? Who knew?Pregnancy and Labor. Often multiples times in a woman's life
vs.
The Man Cold
I rest my case.
Women are physically weaker than men
thats so obvious that I think even libs should see it
and maybe the see it but refuse to say so publically
Maybe in the future when drones are the main combat weaponThe traditional military roles are more suited for men, but there are plenty of support roles and some combat roles (pilots, AA, missile stuff) that aren't as demanding as infantry, armor, artillery.
Yes, but we are far from a pushbutton military yetThere is so much more to being strong or weak than just physical strength.