We owe Europe an apology

[forkup]

For years in America we've been lax about allowing the Socialists to do what ever the hell they want.

They've been actively pursuing their agenda of world domination through destruction of nations.

American Socialists have been united with world Socialists in promoting "no borders" to allow plunder of wealthy nations and economical shift.

Europe and other nations should follow our lead and preserve their country with a correction back to nationalism.

Yea it's not like nationalism ever gave Europe any problems lol. Your lack of historical awareness and clear distortion of facts are staggering.

communism and socialism (including the progressive nazi movement) along with Islam are the worst problems Europe has ever dealt with.Bar none. So much for your grasp of history, professor.

Hell of a way to proof your right, you give an unsubstantiated opinion and then pretend like you've proved your point. I'm not a professor. What I am is someone who is capable of proving a point by corroborating it with facts. For instance the fact that global terrorism has killed less people then either of the world wars did in a particularly bad week. The fact that NAZI germany is not notorious for being socialistic but that it is notorious for being nationalistic an expansionist. The fact that young men volunteered in droves during the first world war not for socialism but for nationalistic reasons. You on the other hand give opinions, and pretend they are facts.

I deal in facts, professor. Now shut up, nobody wants to read your drivel.

I deal in facts, professor.

What facts are you referring to? You do know what facts are? Facts are things you can corroborate by giving examples, definitions, tests, when have you done any of that? Of course you will find me copy pasting definitions sad, those are things you don't have in your arsenal. You just have opinions and your only hope of talking to someone like me is to try to belittle me in the hope that I don't notice that you have nothing. I have proven my point by giving historical examples and by the simple expediency of comparing the current peace enjoyed by an Europe that mostly consists of social democracies, to the centuries of strive it had under previous forms of government. So until you can site examples how Europe was better of when it's nations had a strong sense of nationalism, I suggest you actually return to school, instead of trying to say how it's not teaching anymore. Oh and btw I am European. I'm speaking to you in a language that is not my own, can you do the same?

 

[koshergrl]

For years in America we've been lax about allowing the Socialists to do what ever the hell they want.

They've been actively pursuing their agenda of world domination through destruction of nations.

American Socialists have been united with world Socialists in promoting "no borders" to allow plunder of wealthy nations and economical shift.

Europe and other nations should follow our lead and preserve their country with a correction back to nationalism.

Yea it's not like nationalism ever gave Europe any problems lol. Your lack of historical awareness and clear distortion of facts are staggering.

communism and socialism (including the progressive nazi movement) along with Islam are the worst problems Europe has ever dealt with.Bar none. So much for your grasp of history, professor.

Hell of a way to proof your right, you give an unsubstantiated opinion and then pretend like you've proved your point. I'm not a professor. What I am is someone who is capable of proving a point by corroborating it with facts. For instance the fact that global terrorism has killed less people then either of the world wars did in a particularly bad week. The fact that NAZI germany is not notorious for being socialistic but that it is notorious for being nationalistic an expansionist. The fact that young men volunteered in droves during the first world war not for socialism but for nationalistic reasons. You on the other hand give opinions, and pretend they are facts.

I deal in facts, professor. Now shut up, nobody wants to read your drivel.

I deal in facts, professor.

What facts are you referring to? You do know what facts are? Facts are things you can corroborate by giving examples, definitions, tests, when have you done any of that? Of course you will find me copy pasting definitions sad, those are things you don't have in your arsenal. You just have opinions and your only hope of talking to someone like me is to try to belittle me in the hope that I don't notice that you have nothing. I have proven my point by giving historical examples and by the simple expediency of comparing the current peace enjoyed by an Europe that mostly consists of social democracies, to the centuries of strive it had under previous forms of government. So until you can site examples how Europe was better of when it's nations had a strong sense of nationalism, I suggest you actually return to school, instead of trying to say how it's not teaching anymore. Oh and btw I am European. I'm speaking to you in a language that is not my own, can you do the same?

You come across as a commie who engages in hysterical hyperbole. You are dismissed. I don't waste time on idiots whose only debate tool is logical fallacy. On ignore you go, you are a waste of breath and consideration. A brainwashed minion.

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

No I mean the National Socialist German Workers' Party, see that first word, that's says that they are nationalistic. They considered themself nationalistic before they considered themselves socialist. And it's not that they wanted to expand socialism, it's that they wanted to give themselves living space 'lebensraum'. A clearly nationalistic view. Only what I want as a nation matters, the rest can go fuck themselfs. Sounds familiar?

Nationalistic socialists you mean?

Socialism is a range of economic and social systems characterised by social ownership and democratic control of the means of production; as well as the political ideologies, theories, and movements that aim to establish them. This is socialism. In the places they occupied though, they didn't establish socialism, they instead simply took the recourses and brought them to Germany. Including people. The idea that every other nation should serve another is not socialism but nationalism.nationalism - Dictionary Definition.

You mean like the national socialist workers party?

Like the fact they were socialists no matter which way you slice it evades you.


Are you dumb?

Sure they were socialist, can you tie that fact to them starting a war? Because I can sure as hell tie their nationalistic ideas to it and in that way invalidate the OP.

Do you know what 'yellow socialism' was?

 

[forkup]

Can't say that I do. I looked it up though. What's your point?

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

Can't say that I do. I looked it up though. What's your point?

Socialism has a history of violence in every form it has manifested in.

 

[forkup]

Can't say that I do. I looked it up though. What's your point?

Socialism has a history of violence in every form it has manifested in.

Glad you at least want to answer the premise. So if I'm correct your point is that because Yellow Socialism had violence, all socialism is inherently violent? If my grandfather was a member of the Ku Klux Klan, would you be able to claim I am a member to? Let's look at my system of government, what violence can you connect to social democracies.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

.

Yea it's not like nationalism ever gave Europe any problems lol. Your lack of historical awareness and clear distortion of facts are staggering.

I know I know.
Hitler is hiding under every rock, we all got that written down

Hitler.... good Lord.

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

Can't say that I do. I looked it up though. What's your point?

Socialism has a history of violence in every form it has manifested in.

Glad you at least want to answer the premise. So if I'm correct your point is that because Yellow Socialism had violence, all socialism is inherently violent? If my grandfather was a member of the Ku Klux Klan, would you be able to claim I am a member to? Let's look at my system of government, what violence can you connect to social democracies.

No...the point is yellow socialists(Fascists) and red socialists(Internationalists and Commies) are all violent ideologies.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

For years in America we've been lax about allowing the Socialists to do what ever the hell they want.

They've been actively pursuing their agenda of world domination through destruction of nations.

American Socialists have been united with world Socialists in promoting "no borders" to allow plunder of wealthy nations and economical shift.

Europe and other nations should follow our lead and preserve their country with a correction back to nationalism.

Yea it's not like nationalism ever gave Europe any problems lol. Your lack of historical awareness and clear distortion of facts are staggering.

communism and socialism (including the progressive nazi movement) along with Islam are the worst problems Europe has ever dealt with.Bar none. So much for your grasp of history, professor.

Hell of a way to proof your right, you give an unsubstantiated opinion and then pretend like you've proved your point. I'm not a professor. What I am is someone who is capable of proving a point by corroborating it with facts. For instance the fact that global terrorism has killed less people then either of the world wars did in a particularly bad week. The fact that NAZI germany is not notorious for being socialistic but that it is notorious for being nationalistic an expansionist. The fact that young men volunteered in droves during the first world war not for socialism but for nationalistic reasons. You on the other hand give opinions, and pretend they are facts.

I deal in facts, professor. Now shut up, nobody wants to read your drivel.

I deal in facts, professor.

What facts are you referring to? You do know what facts are? Facts are things you can corroborate by giving examples, definitions, tests, when have you done any of that? Of course you will find me copy pasting definitions sad, those are things you don't have in your arsenal. You just have opinions and your only hope of talking to someone like me is to try to belittle me in the hope that I don't notice that you have nothing. I have proven my point by giving historical examples and by the simple expediency of comparing the current peace enjoyed by an Europe that mostly consists of social democracies, to the centuries of strive it had under previous forms of government. So until you can site examples how Europe was better of when it's nations had a strong sense of nationalism, I suggest you actually return to school, instead of trying to say how it's not teaching anymore. Oh and btw I am European. I'm speaking to you in a language that is not my own, can you do the same?

Who's language is it then if not yours?

I fucking hate Europeans... fucking cheese eating surrender monkeys.

 

[forkup]

Yea it's not like nationalism ever gave Europe any problems lol. Your lack of historical awareness and clear distortion of facts are staggering.

communism and socialism (including the progressive nazi movement) along with Islam are the worst problems Europe has ever dealt with.Bar none. So much for your grasp of history, professor.

Hell of a way to proof your right, you give an unsubstantiated opinion and then pretend like you've proved your point. I'm not a professor. What I am is someone who is capable of proving a point by corroborating it with facts. For instance the fact that global terrorism has killed less people then either of the world wars did in a particularly bad week. The fact that NAZI germany is not notorious for being socialistic but that it is notorious for being nationalistic an expansionist. The fact that young men volunteered in droves during the first world war not for socialism but for nationalistic reasons. You on the other hand give opinions, and pretend they are facts.

I deal in facts, professor. Now shut up, nobody wants to read your drivel.

I deal in facts, professor.

What facts are you referring to? You do know what facts are? Facts are things you can corroborate by giving examples, definitions, tests, when have you done any of that? Of course you will find me copy pasting definitions sad, those are things you don't have in your arsenal. You just have opinions and your only hope of talking to someone like me is to try to belittle me in the hope that I don't notice that you have nothing. I have proven my point by giving historical examples and by the simple expediency of comparing the current peace enjoyed by an Europe that mostly consists of social democracies, to the centuries of strive it had under previous forms of government. So until you can site examples how Europe was better of when it's nations had a strong sense of nationalism, I suggest you actually return to school, instead of trying to say how it's not teaching anymore. Oh and btw I am European. I'm speaking to you in a language that is not my own, can you do the same?

Who's language is it then if not yours?

I fucking hate Europeans... fucking cheese eating surrender monkeys.

I'm Belgian, my native language is Dutch, and name calling makes you look ignorant.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

communism and socialism (including the progressive nazi movement) along with Islam are the worst problems Europe has ever dealt with.Bar none. So much for your grasp of history, professor.

Hell of a way to proof your right, you give an unsubstantiated opinion and then pretend like you've proved your point. I'm not a professor. What I am is someone who is capable of proving a point by corroborating it with facts. For instance the fact that global terrorism has killed less people then either of the world wars did in a particularly bad week. The fact that NAZI germany is not notorious for being socialistic but that it is notorious for being nationalistic an expansionist. The fact that young men volunteered in droves during the first world war not for socialism but for nationalistic reasons. You on the other hand give opinions, and pretend they are facts.

I deal in facts, professor. Now shut up, nobody wants to read your drivel.

I deal in facts, professor.

What facts are you referring to? You do know what facts are? Facts are things you can corroborate by giving examples, definitions, tests, when have you done any of that? Of course you will find me copy pasting definitions sad, those are things you don't have in your arsenal. You just have opinions and your only hope of talking to someone like me is to try to belittle me in the hope that I don't notice that you have nothing. I have proven my point by giving historical examples and by the simple expediency of comparing the current peace enjoyed by an Europe that mostly consists of social democracies, to the centuries of strive it had under previous forms of government. So until you can site examples how Europe was better of when it's nations had a strong sense of nationalism, I suggest you actually return to school, instead of trying to say how it's not teaching anymore. Oh and btw I am European. I'm speaking to you in a language that is not my own, can you do the same?

Who's language is it then if not yours?

I fucking hate Europeans... fucking cheese eating surrender monkeys.

I'm Belgian, my native language is Dutch, and name calling makes you look ignorant.

Wait, you just called me ignorant....

 

[koshergrl]

communism and socialism (including the progressive nazi movement) along with Islam are the worst problems Europe has ever dealt with.Bar none. So much for your grasp of history, professor.

Hell of a way to proof your right, you give an unsubstantiated opinion and then pretend like you've proved your point. I'm not a professor. What I am is someone who is capable of proving a point by corroborating it with facts. For instance the fact that global terrorism has killed less people then either of the world wars did in a particularly bad week. The fact that NAZI germany is not notorious for being socialistic but that it is notorious for being nationalistic an expansionist. The fact that young men volunteered in droves during the first world war not for socialism but for nationalistic reasons. You on the other hand give opinions, and pretend they are facts.

I deal in facts, professor. Now shut up, nobody wants to read your drivel.

I deal in facts, professor.

What facts are you referring to? You do know what facts are? Facts are things you can corroborate by giving examples, definitions, tests, when have you done any of that? Of course you will find me copy pasting definitions sad, those are things you don't have in your arsenal. You just have opinions and your only hope of talking to someone like me is to try to belittle me in the hope that I don't notice that you have nothing. I have proven my point by giving historical examples and by the simple expediency of comparing the current peace enjoyed by an Europe that mostly consists of social democracies, to the centuries of strive it had under previous forms of government. So until you can site examples how Europe was better of when it's nations had a strong sense of nationalism, I suggest you actually return to school, instead of trying to say how it's not teaching anymore. Oh and btw I am European. I'm speaking to you in a language that is not my own, can you do the same?

Who's language is it then if not yours?

I fucking hate Europeans... fucking cheese eating surrender monkeys.

I'm Belgian, my native language is Dutch, and name calling makes you look ignorant.

No, it doesn't. You, however, do look ignorant. You come to a US message board, post from a position of superiority, then whine and claim that you can't be held accountable for your stupidity because you aren't American and English isn't your first language?

STFU.

 

[forkup]

Can't say that I do. I looked it up though. What's your point?

Socialism has a history of violence in every form it has manifested in.

Glad you at least want to answer the premise. So if I'm correct your point is that because Yellow Socialism had violence, all socialism is inherently violent? If my grandfather was a member of the Ku Klux Klan, would you be able to claim I am a member to? Let's look at my system of government, what violence can you connect to social democracies.

No...the point is yellow socialists(Fascists) and red socialists(Internationalists and Commies) are all violent ideologies.

Fascism I can agree with, Communists to, internationalists seems a stretch since that calls for cooperation between nations, and you didn't answer at all, my actual question. Social democracies as Europe predominantly is and this OP specifically refers to has promoted violence how? If you make a blanket statement you should be able to back it up by given examples.

 

[forkup]

Hell of a way to proof your right, you give an unsubstantiated opinion and then pretend like you've proved your point. I'm not a professor. What I am is someone who is capable of proving a point by corroborating it with facts. For instance the fact that global terrorism has killed less people then either of the world wars did in a particularly bad week. The fact that NAZI germany is not notorious for being socialistic but that it is notorious for being nationalistic an expansionist. The fact that young men volunteered in droves during the first world war not for socialism but for nationalistic reasons. You on the other hand give opinions, and pretend they are facts.

I deal in facts, professor. Now shut up, nobody wants to read your drivel.

I deal in facts, professor.

What facts are you referring to? You do know what facts are? Facts are things you can corroborate by giving examples, definitions, tests, when have you done any of that? Of course you will find me copy pasting definitions sad, those are things you don't have in your arsenal. You just have opinions and your only hope of talking to someone like me is to try to belittle me in the hope that I don't notice that you have nothing. I have proven my point by giving historical examples and by the simple expediency of comparing the current peace enjoyed by an Europe that mostly consists of social democracies, to the centuries of strive it had under previous forms of government. So until you can site examples how Europe was better of when it's nations had a strong sense of nationalism, I suggest you actually return to school, instead of trying to say how it's not teaching anymore. Oh and btw I am European. I'm speaking to you in a language that is not my own, can you do the same?

Who's language is it then if not yours?

I fucking hate Europeans... fucking cheese eating surrender monkeys.

I'm Belgian, my native language is Dutch, and name calling makes you look ignorant.

Wait, you just called me ignorant....

;eek:

No I just said that you LOOK ignorant because you reverted to name calling.

 

[forkup]

Hell of a way to proof your right, you give an unsubstantiated opinion and then pretend like you've proved your point. I'm not a professor. What I am is someone who is capable of proving a point by corroborating it with facts. For instance the fact that global terrorism has killed less people then either of the world wars did in a particularly bad week. The fact that NAZI germany is not notorious for being socialistic but that it is notorious for being nationalistic an expansionist. The fact that young men volunteered in droves during the first world war not for socialism but for nationalistic reasons. You on the other hand give opinions, and pretend they are facts.

I deal in facts, professor. Now shut up, nobody wants to read your drivel.

I deal in facts, professor.

What facts are you referring to? You do know what facts are? Facts are things you can corroborate by giving examples, definitions, tests, when have you done any of that? Of course you will find me copy pasting definitions sad, those are things you don't have in your arsenal. You just have opinions and your only hope of talking to someone like me is to try to belittle me in the hope that I don't notice that you have nothing. I have proven my point by giving historical examples and by the simple expediency of comparing the current peace enjoyed by an Europe that mostly consists of social democracies, to the centuries of strive it had under previous forms of government. So until you can site examples how Europe was better of when it's nations had a strong sense of nationalism, I suggest you actually return to school, instead of trying to say how it's not teaching anymore. Oh and btw I am European. I'm speaking to you in a language that is not my own, can you do the same?

Who's language is it then if not yours?

I fucking hate Europeans... fucking cheese eating surrender monkeys.

I'm Belgian, my native language is Dutch, and name calling makes you look ignorant.

No, it doesn't. You, however, do look ignorant. You come to a US message board, post from a position of superiority, then whine and claim that you can't be held accountable for your stupidity because you aren't American and English isn't your first language?

STFU.

Read the post, the entirety of it. You will notice I wasn't taling about not being held accountable, I was responding to someone claiming schooling is not up to the task anymore while I can hold this conversation in 2 languages while she can't. Granted, that was arrogant but no less untrue. I'm perfectly willing to be held accountable, in my language or yours. This OP was started by someone claiming Europe should revert to nationalism. How is it out of bounds when an European answers?

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

I deal in facts, professor. Now shut up, nobody wants to read your drivel.

I deal in facts, professor.

What facts are you referring to? You do know what facts are? Facts are things you can corroborate by giving examples, definitions, tests, when have you done any of that? Of course you will find me copy pasting definitions sad, those are things you don't have in your arsenal. You just have opinions and your only hope of talking to someone like me is to try to belittle me in the hope that I don't notice that you have nothing. I have proven my point by giving historical examples and by the simple expediency of comparing the current peace enjoyed by an Europe that mostly consists of social democracies, to the centuries of strive it had under previous forms of government. So until you can site examples how Europe was better of when it's nations had a strong sense of nationalism, I suggest you actually return to school, instead of trying to say how it's not teaching anymore. Oh and btw I am European. I'm speaking to you in a language that is not my own, can you do the same?

Who's language is it then if not yours?

I fucking hate Europeans... fucking cheese eating surrender monkeys.

I'm Belgian, my native language is Dutch, and name calling makes you look ignorant.

Wait, you just called me ignorant....

;eek:

No I just said that you LOOK ignorant because you reverted to name calling.

Actually, that might make me appear ignorant... not look ignorant. Ignorant is not an observable condition.

Hope this helps.

 

[forkup]

Hell of a way to proof your right, you give an unsubstantiated opinion and then pretend like you've proved your point. I'm not a professor. What I am is someone who is capable of proving a point by corroborating it with facts. For instance the fact that global terrorism has killed less people then either of the world wars did in a particularly bad week. The fact that NAZI germany is not notorious for being socialistic but that it is notorious for being nationalistic an expansionist. The fact that young men volunteered in droves during the first world war not for socialism but for nationalistic reasons. You on the other hand give opinions, and pretend they are facts.

I deal in facts, professor. Now shut up, nobody wants to read your drivel.

I deal in facts, professor.

What facts are you referring to? You do know what facts are? Facts are things you can corroborate by giving examples, definitions, tests, when have you done any of that? Of course you will find me copy pasting definitions sad, those are things you don't have in your arsenal. You just have opinions and your only hope of talking to someone like me is to try to belittle me in the hope that I don't notice that you have nothing. I have proven my point by giving historical examples and by the simple expediency of comparing the current peace enjoyed by an Europe that mostly consists of social democracies, to the centuries of strive it had under previous forms of government. So until you can site examples how Europe was better of when it's nations had a strong sense of nationalism, I suggest you actually return to school, instead of trying to say how it's not teaching anymore. Oh and btw I am European. I'm speaking to you in a language that is not my own, can you do the same?

Who's language is it then if not yours?

I fucking hate Europeans... fucking cheese eating surrender monkeys.

I'm Belgian, my native language is Dutch, and name calling makes you look ignorant.

No, it doesn't. You, however, do look ignorant. You come to a US message board, post from a position of superiority, then whine and claim that you can't be held accountable for your stupidity because you aren't American and English isn't your first language?

STFU.

What facts are you referring to? You do know what facts are? Facts are things you can corroborate by giving examples, definitions, tests, when have you done any of that? Of course you will find me copy pasting definitions sad, those are things you don't have in your arsenal. You just have opinions and your only hope of talking to someone like me is to try to belittle me in the hope that I don't notice that you have nothing. I have proven my point by giving historical examples and by the simple expediency of comparing the current peace enjoyed by an Europe that mostly consists of social democracies, to the centuries of strive it had under previous forms of government. So until you can site examples how Europe was better of when it's nations had a strong sense of nationalism, I suggest you actually return to school, instead of trying to say how it's not teaching anymore. Oh and btw I am European. I'm speaking to you in a language that is not my own, can you do the same?

Who's language is it then if not yours?

I fucking hate Europeans... fucking cheese eating surrender monkeys.

I'm Belgian, my native language is Dutch, and name calling makes you look ignorant.

Wait, you just called me ignorant....

;eek:

No I just said that you LOOK ignorant because you reverted to name calling.

Actually, that might make me appear ignorant... not look ignorant. Ignorant is not an observable condition.

Hope this helps.

Sure it does, thanks.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

I deal in facts, professor. Now shut up, nobody wants to read your drivel.

I deal in facts, professor.

What facts are you referring to? You do know what facts are? Facts are things you can corroborate by giving examples, definitions, tests, when have you done any of that? Of course you will find me copy pasting definitions sad, those are things you don't have in your arsenal. You just have opinions and your only hope of talking to someone like me is to try to belittle me in the hope that I don't notice that you have nothing. I have proven my point by giving historical examples and by the simple expediency of comparing the current peace enjoyed by an Europe that mostly consists of social democracies, to the centuries of strive it had under previous forms of government. So until you can site examples how Europe was better of when it's nations had a strong sense of nationalism, I suggest you actually return to school, instead of trying to say how it's not teaching anymore. Oh and btw I am European. I'm speaking to you in a language that is not my own, can you do the same?

Who's language is it then if not yours?

I fucking hate Europeans... fucking cheese eating surrender monkeys.

I'm Belgian, my native language is Dutch, and name calling makes you look ignorant.

No, it doesn't. You, however, do look ignorant. You come to a US message board, post from a position of superiority, then whine and claim that you can't be held accountable for your stupidity because you aren't American and English isn't your first language?

STFU.

Who's language is it then if not yours?

I fucking hate Europeans... fucking cheese eating surrender monkeys.

I'm Belgian, my native language is Dutch, and name calling makes you look ignorant.

Wait, you just called me ignorant....

;eek:

No I just said that you LOOK ignorant because you reverted to name calling.

Actually, that might make me appear ignorant... not look ignorant. Ignorant is not an observable condition.

Hope this helps.

Sure it does, thanks.

Dank je!

 

[forkup]

What facts are you referring to? You do know what facts are? Facts are things you can corroborate by giving examples, definitions, tests, when have you done any of that? Of course you will find me copy pasting definitions sad, those are things you don't have in your arsenal. You just have opinions and your only hope of talking to someone like me is to try to belittle me in the hope that I don't notice that you have nothing. I have proven my point by giving historical examples and by the simple expediency of comparing the current peace enjoyed by an Europe that mostly consists of social democracies, to the centuries of strive it had under previous forms of government. So until you can site examples how Europe was better of when it's nations had a strong sense of nationalism, I suggest you actually return to school, instead of trying to say how it's not teaching anymore. Oh and btw I am European. I'm speaking to you in a language that is not my own, can you do the same?

Who's language is it then if not yours?

I fucking hate Europeans... fucking cheese eating surrender monkeys.

I'm Belgian, my native language is Dutch, and name calling makes you look ignorant.

No, it doesn't. You, however, do look ignorant. You come to a US message board, post from a position of superiority, then whine and claim that you can't be held accountable for your stupidity because you aren't American and English isn't your first language?

STFU.

I'm Belgian, my native language is Dutch, and name calling makes you look ignorant.

Wait, you just called me ignorant....

;eek:

No I just said that you LOOK ignorant because you reverted to name calling.

Actually, that might make me appear ignorant... not look ignorant. Ignorant is not an observable condition.

Hope this helps.

Sure it does, thanks.

Dank je!

I'm impressed Soggy. Graag gedaan.