Well, I guess she has a point -- Pregnant Texas woman stopped for driving solo in HOV told police ...

The officer tells her that it will likely be dropped but wrote the ticket anyway?

"Here, I'm going to write you a ticket with the idea you won't go through all of the hassle of getting it dropped".

And they wonder why people treat them with such disrespect.
 
But of course actually she was NOT carrying "another person" in the car, she was pregant [sic]with a non-person, and the policeman understood that, as do all normal people. So she got a ticket.

So, if I'm the only white person in my car, but I have passengers who are black, Jewish, or some other sort that have historically been denied personhood, should I not be allowed to use the HOV lane?

How is what you said any different?
 
A pregnant Texas woman used the reversal of Roe v Wade to argue she should be allowed to drive in a car-pool lane, since the baby she was carrying “is a life.”

By law, in order to use the high-occupancy vehicle lanes, drivers must have at least one passenger. But in Brandy Bottone’s eyes, she did. In her uterus.

Bottone was randomly stopped by a Dallas County Sheriff Department officer and given a ticket, The Dallas Morning News reported. “I pointed to my stomach and said, ‘My baby girl is right here. She is a person.’ He said, ‘Oh, no. It’s got to be two people outside of the body,’” she told the newspaper.

Though Texas penal code recognizes an unborn child as a person, the transportation code doesn’t. Bottone isn’t letting up anytime soon, though—she’s fighting the ticket in court on July 20. “This has my blood boiling,” she said. “How could this be fair? According to the new law, this is a life. I know this may fall on deaf ears, but as a woman, this was shocking.”
 

Forum List

Back
Top