- Banned
- #41
NoIt has always been a life.
Does the carpool lane say two or more lifes?
Would a dog count? A fish?
A LIVING HUMAN
OUTSIDE OF THE WOMB
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
NoIt has always been a life.
Does the carpool lane say two or more lifes?
Would a dog count? A fish?
How is the term "people" defined in the Texas Motor Vehicle Code? That's the real issue here. Often time different codes have different definitions for the same wordTexas law
Who can use the HOV lane?
A vehicle occupied by two or more people or a motorcyclist may use HOV lanes
No
A LIVING HUMAN
OUTSIDE OF THE WOMB
Good for her. Let the Supreme Court Decide [I'm sure Alito and Thomas won't support this women do to both being misogynists].A pregnant Texas woman used the reversal of Roe v Wade to argue she should be allowed to drive in a car-pool lane, since the baby she was carrying “is a life.”
By law, in order to use the high-occupancy vehicle lanes, drivers must have at least one passenger. But in Brandy Bottone’s eyes, she did. In her uterus.
Bottone was randomly stopped by a Dallas County Sheriff Department officer and given a ticket, The Dallas Morning News reported. “I pointed to my stomach and said, ‘My baby girl is right here. She is a person.’ He said, ‘Oh, no. It’s got to be two people outside of the body,’” she told the newspaper.
Though Texas penal code recognizes an unborn child as a person, the transportation code doesn’t. Bottone isn’t letting up anytime soon, though—she’s fighting the ticket in court on July 20. “This has my blood boiling,” she said. “How could this be fair? According to the new law, this is a life. I know this may fall on deaf ears, but as a woman, this was shocking.”
![]()
Pregnant Woman Uses Roe Reversal to Fight Car-Pool Lane Ticket
“I pointed to my stomach and said, ‘My baby girl is right here. She is a person.’”www.thedailybeast.com
What a loon
Does the baby on the womb not qualify as "people" in your view?
It's stupid. Any thinking person on the planet knows what a car pool lane is all about.
Save your nonsense
No
A LIVING HUMAN
OUTSIDE OF THE WOMB
Odd you did not answer the question. I guess you do not think the baby in the womb is another human being.
Good to know, will file that away for future reference.
Save your nonsense. Did you miss that?
Also and again...I think you're a loon so save away
This makes as much sense if not more than the left's condemnation of life for the unborn.
More like a nuisance
Odd you did not answer the question. I guess you do not think the baby in the womb is another human being.
Good to know, will file that away for future reference.
More like a nuisance
This is only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the repercussions of the decision. It's now been established that government has authority in the womb. How long before a miscarriage is prosecuted as manslaughter?A pregnant Texas woman used the reversal of Roe v Wade to argue she should be allowed to drive in a car-pool lane, since the baby she was carrying “is a life.”
By law, in order to use the high-occupancy vehicle lanes, drivers must have at least one passenger. But in Brandy Bottone’s eyes, she did. In her uterus.
Bottone was randomly stopped by a Dallas County Sheriff Department officer and given a ticket, The Dallas Morning News reported. “I pointed to my stomach and said, ‘My baby girl is right here. She is a person.’ He said, ‘Oh, no. It’s got to be two people outside of the body,’” she told the newspaper.
Though Texas penal code recognizes an unborn child as a person, the transportation code doesn’t. Bottone isn’t letting up anytime soon, though—she’s fighting the ticket in court on July 20. “This has my blood boiling,” she said. “How could this be fair? According to the new law, this is a life. I know this may fall on deaf ears, but as a woman, this was shocking.”
![]()
Pregnant Woman Uses Roe Reversal to Fight Car-Pool Lane Ticket
“I pointed to my stomach and said, ‘My baby girl is right here. She is a person.’”www.thedailybeast.com
Yes.but but BUT ... that there human DNA inside her is a PERSON .... riiiiiiight? with ALL the rights as a post born human BEING breathing in oxygen seperate from anybody else .... right?
LOL.
If a fetus is a person, that seems pretty clear.Texas law
Who can use the HOV lane?
A vehicle occupied by two or more people or a motorcyclist may use HOV lanes
Nevermind. Looks like they're aleady going there. WTF??This is only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the repercussions of the decision. It's now been established that government has authority in the womb. How long before a miscarriage is prosecuted as manslaughter?