Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I didn't bring up the old witch, Simp. I simply provided facts proving he is a lying sack.Good to see Hillary is still living rent free in your head. Think you'll ever move on from the butthurt? Is Kleenex needed for the tears?
I notice that you are unable to refute any point I made.... We probably ought to start a GoFundMe for a good supply of K-Y....
.
From the cnn link you posted:
The judge has ordered the contents of the panel’s final report, including recommendations about whether anyone should face indictments, toremain under seal. But he acknowledged that special grand jurors are not prevented from discussing their work product.
From the cnn link you posted:
Trump Humpers want to make this about the Jury foreperson...instead of what it's really about.
Trump and his minions
I wasn't the only one thinking that^ Georgia Grand Jury, judge and prosecutor have screwed this up so bad it almost looks like they did it on purpose to hide the fact that....THEY. GOT.. NOTHING!!! again.This woman is whack. Are we sure she isn't a trump supporter?? She is singlehandedly destroying any legitimacy of the prosecutor, the case, the grand jury. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOOOLOLOL
leftist woman has the IQ of a turnip.
thelibertydaily.com
Exactly…who was going to be indicted was not one of the things she was allowed to discuss.Exactly.
How would that "taint" the jury pool?
The "special" grand jury that Emily Kohrs was on did not have the authority to indict - they could only "recommend" indictments. If the district attorney decides to indict - it will have to go before another grand jury with the authority to indict. Google it...
What's a special grand jury and how does it work?
Quote her saying who was going to be indicted as well as the rules of that special grand juryExactly…who was going to be indicted was not one of the things she was allowed to discuss.
She has heard tons of evidence. THAT creates a “bias” based on factYeah but her other statements show she had bias. They are going to question whether or not that bias existed when she was making recommendations to indict.
She is into Wicca, and based upon her behavior she is clearly a whack job. Whacky Wiccans, though I have no hard evidence, more often than not will tend to be leftists.She has heard tons of evidence. THAT creates a “bias” based on fact
Exactly…who was going to be indicted was not one of the things she was allowed to discuss.
Yeah but her other statements show she had bias. They are going to question whether or not that bias existed when she was making recommendations to indict.
Maybe, but they are going to question that, and try to make it look like she was biased from the beginning.She has heard tons of evidence. THAT creates a “bias” based on fact
