Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Are you making a pass at him?I bet you think of that movie a lot. Do you have a purty mouth too?
So why did she shy away when asked about who was on the list? She was asked directly and couldn’t answer, if the judge gave her permission, she shouldn’t have tip toed around it.Nope, not according to the judge.
Not correct .. Georgia law requires jurors to take an oath about keeping the deliberations quiet to protect the due process rights of individuals who .. haven't been charged with a crime. The judge redacted the public release for this very purpose, and the prosecutor will have to decide if charges will be made.Well, smartass, according to what the judge said today - she could have said whether Trump was going to be indicted. She could have named everyone who was going to be indicted. It was also discussed on Lawrence O'Donnell tonight.
On a grand jury, you hear one side.There’s no evidence that she had a prior bias.
What you are seeing is how she felt after sitting on the GJ and hearing the evidence
Not correct .. Georgia law requires jurors to take an oath about keeping the deliberations quiet to protect the due process rights of individuals who .. haven't been charged with a crime. The judge redacted the public release for this very purpose, and the prosecutor will have to decide if charges will be made.
When she discussed the outcomes that were redacted ...that is a grey area that potentially violates the due process of individuals who haven't yet been charged with a crime.She DID keep the "deliberations" quiet! However, she is allowed to discuss the "outcome" of those "deliberations".
She shouldn't have spoken out but in the end it won't ammount to anything except trigger you Trump asseaters in the hope it will get him off..
They just need desperately to GET HIM!
Even if only in their own tiny minds.
.
And then he lost his lunch.To be fair, his Big, Beautiful Wall that he made Mexico pay for is not the Loser's only source of comfort these days:
You have just explained exactly how Trump behaves.A colleague pointed me toward the series of interviews this women gave, so I caught the video of them late last night and I marveled at what I beheld. In a series of edited interactions with media I immediately saw what likely most would miss sans mental health professionals, specifically her inappropriate affect, and eccentric expressions, such as stopping in a reply, looking up and away whilst rolling eyes, giggling, and seemingly momentarily lost in thought. Did you folks see any of that shit??? I am nearly convinced she is a schizophrenic, those inappropriate expressions being a hallmark of such, indeed at one point I was all but convinced she was actively listening to voices, another hallmark of the disease....
My God, she exhibits the brand of vapid stupidity that is typical of Democrats and their voters. In what world is this OK? Moreover, in what world would an individual think this is OK?!? Forget that this involves Trump. This is just plain asinine. Truly, the local DA, and affirmative action lawyer, wasted a lot of taxpayer money going after Trump only to have this nitwit F- it up like this.
I don't recall that. They say, 'DO NOT discuss this with anyone'. That means EVERYTHING. and it is understood....that is...by anyone with a brain.She DID keep the "deliberations" quiet! However, she is allowed to discuss the "outcome" of those "deliberations".