What are Obama's personal feeling about the 2nd Amendment?

[Black_Label]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C4O8C74dQxA

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FqKnVr3I9q8]7 Lies In Under 2 Minutes (obama lies) - YouTube[/ame]

Yes, because we all know he is good for his word.

How many guns has Obama taken so far?

 

[PoliticalChic]

He is personally all for keeping it, but he has to do something about the gun violence.

Not true.


A fellow professor at the University of Chicago had occasion to discuss same with Obama, and he stated that it was his belief that no one should own a gun.




"Pro gun author and researcher John Lott, wrote the popular book, More Guns, Less Crime which highlights the correlation between a reduced crime rate and a well armed populace.

Dr. Lott has a new book out in which he quotes President Obama (them Professor Obama at the University of Chicago) as saying, “I don’t believe people should be able to own guns.”

According to CNSNews, Lott explains that he first met Obama shortly after completing his research on concealed handgun laws and crime.

“He did not come across as a moderate who wanted to bring people together,” Lott writes.

After he introduced himself to Obama, Lott suggested that they have lunch one day to discuss their views on guns. According to Lott, Obama “grimaced and turned away.” That was the way many conversations with Obama ended, Lott says.

Not surprised."
John Lott Quotes Then-Professor Obama Saying, ?I Don?t Believe People Should Be Able To Own Guns?

 

[The2ndAmendment]

Oh wow

 

[jon_berzerk]

Oh wow

on the issues has quite a track record

on his anti gun stance

 

[rightwinger]

Obama opposes the massacre of first graders

Does that help?

 

[jon_berzerk]

Obama opposes the massacre of first graders

Does that help?

then he should end the gun free zone

and agree with a vast number of schools

to arm up against these creeps

 

[aaronleland]

Suffice it to say that If Obama said the following, the Right would call him Stalin.


Why I'm for the Brady Bill
By Ronald Reagan

This nightmare might never have happened if legislation that is before Congress now -- the Brady bill -- had been law back in 1981.

Named for Jim Brady, this legislation would establish a national seven-day waiting period before a handgun purchaser could take delivery. It would allow local law enforcement officials to do background checks for criminal records or known histories of mental disturbances. Those with such records would be prohibited from buying the handguns.

While there has been a Federal law on the books for more than 20 years that prohibits the sale of firearms to felons, fugitives, drug addicts and the mentally ill, it has no enforcement mechanism and basically works on the honor system, with the purchaser filling out a statement that the gun dealer sticks in a drawer.

The Brady bill would require the handgun dealer to provide a copy of the prospective purchaser's sworn statement to local law enforcement authorities so that background checks could be made. Based upon the evidence in states that already have handgun purchase waiting periods, this bill -- on a nationwide scale -- can't help but stop thousands of illegal handgun purchases.

And, since many handguns are acquired in the heat of passion (to settle a quarrel, for example) or at times of depression brought on by potential suicide, the Brady bill would provide a cooling-off period that would certainly have the effect of reducing the number of handgun deaths.

Critics claim that "waiting period" legislation in the states that have it doesn't work, that criminals just go to nearby states that lack such laws to buy their weapons. True enough, and all the more reason to have a Federal law that fills the gaps. While the Brady bill would not apply to states that already have waiting periods of at least seven days or that already require background checks, it would automatically cover the states that don't. The effect would be a uniform standard across the country.

Even with the current gaps among states, those that have waiting periods report some success. California, which has a 15-day waiting period that I supported and signed into law while Governor, stopped nearly 1,800 prohibited handgun sales in 1989. New Jersey has had a permit-to-purchase system for more than two decades. During that time, according to the state police, more than 10,000 convicted felons have been caught trying to buy handguns.

Every year, an average of 9,200 Americans are murdered by handguns, according to Department of Justice statistics. This does not include suicides or the tens of thousands of robberies, rapes and assaults committed with handguns.

This level of violence must be stopped. Sarah and Jim Brady are working hard to do that, and I say more power to them. If the passage of the Brady bill were to result in a reduction of only 10 or 15 percent of those numbers (and it could be a good deal greater), it would be well worth making it the law of the land.

And there would be a lot fewer families facing anniversaries such as the Bradys, Delahantys, McCarthys and Reagans face every March 30.

They will ignore this entire post. Try explaining to them that their man-god Reagan paved the way for the "Obamaphone" and the silence will be just as deafening.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

Obama opposes the massacre of first graders

Does that help?

One can oppose a problem, but simultaneously offer no solution.

The only solution to school shootings are trading 4 regular security guards in each school for 2 armed bodyguards, who are never close enough together to be shot at the same time.

 

[S.J.]

Obama opposes the massacre of first graders

Does that help?

Give him time.

 

[OKTexas]

Suffice it to say that If Obama said the following, the Right would call him Stalin.


Why I'm for the Brady Bill
By Ronald Reagan

This nightmare might never have happened if legislation that is before Congress now -- the Brady bill -- had been law back in 1981.

Named for Jim Brady, this legislation would establish a national seven-day waiting period before a handgun purchaser could take delivery. It would allow local law enforcement officials to do background checks for criminal records or known histories of mental disturbances. Those with such records would be prohibited from buying the handguns.

While there has been a Federal law on the books for more than 20 years that prohibits the sale of firearms to felons, fugitives, drug addicts and the mentally ill, it has no enforcement mechanism and basically works on the honor system, with the purchaser filling out a statement that the gun dealer sticks in a drawer.

The Brady bill would require the handgun dealer to provide a copy of the prospective purchaser's sworn statement to local law enforcement authorities so that background checks could be made. Based upon the evidence in states that already have handgun purchase waiting periods, this bill -- on a nationwide scale -- can't help but stop thousands of illegal handgun purchases.

And, since many handguns are acquired in the heat of passion (to settle a quarrel, for example) or at times of depression brought on by potential suicide, the Brady bill would provide a cooling-off period that would certainly have the effect of reducing the number of handgun deaths.

Critics claim that "waiting period" legislation in the states that have it doesn't work, that criminals just go to nearby states that lack such laws to buy their weapons. True enough, and all the more reason to have a Federal law that fills the gaps. While the Brady bill would not apply to states that already have waiting periods of at least seven days or that already require background checks, it would automatically cover the states that don't. The effect would be a uniform standard across the country.

Even with the current gaps among states, those that have waiting periods report some success. California, which has a 15-day waiting period that I supported and signed into law while Governor, stopped nearly 1,800 prohibited handgun sales in 1989. New Jersey has had a permit-to-purchase system for more than two decades. During that time, according to the state police, more than 10,000 convicted felons have been caught trying to buy handguns.

Every year, an average of 9,200 Americans are murdered by handguns, according to Department of Justice statistics. This does not include suicides or the tens of thousands of robberies, rapes and assaults committed with handguns.

This level of violence must be stopped. Sarah and Jim Brady are working hard to do that, and I say more power to them. If the passage of the Brady bill were to result in a reduction of only 10 or 15 percent of those numbers (and it could be a good deal greater), it would be well worth making it the law of the land.

And there would be a lot fewer families facing anniversaries such as the Bradys, Delahantys, McCarthys and Reagans face every March 30.

They will ignore this entire post. Try explaining to them that their man-god Reagan paved the way for the "Obamaphone" and the silence will be just as deafening.

What makes you think republicans agreed with everything Reagan did, that's damn sure not true in my case or many others I know.

 

[JohnA]

As i see it he is for taking guns away from joe public when he is with the gun control nutters
if he is with the NRA he is for upholding the second amendment .
who knows he is such a fucking lying sack of shit i dont believe anything he says

 

[bitterlyclingin]

If his mouth be movin, Comrade Obama be lyin'

 

[jon_berzerk]

As i see it he is for taking guns away from joe public when he is with the gun control nutters
if he is with the NRA he is for upholding the second amendment .
who knows he is such a fucking lying sack of shit i dont believe anything he says

good observation

 

[jon_berzerk]

Does Rush still wear leather underwear? Jeebus, dupes, you go by policy, not try to figure out what politicians inner feelings are LOL . It's politics by gossip. You only get the best liars that way. So dumb.

what is it with the left

no matter what board one goes to

they always seem to be concerned over the underwear

that those on the right are wearing

--LOL

must be some kind of a fetish or something

--LOL