Vegasgiants
Silver Member
- Apr 16, 2022
- 2,469
- 462
- 98
- Banned
- #1,641
Where is the CIA authorized in the constitution?The CIA yes the FBI No. Nor EPA or ATF,
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Where is the CIA authorized in the constitution?The CIA yes the FBI No. Nor EPA or ATF,
It is an off shoot of the Military so should be funded no more then 2 years at a time.Where is the CIA authorized in the constitution?
Off shoot????? No it is not. It has a completely separate mission.It is an off shoot of the Military so should be funded no more then 2 years at a time.
Perhaps this will help.No. It couldn't have meant that. For the states are in themselves separate entities co-empowered with the Fed. The states to oversee their individual territories, and for the Fed to oversee that which affects all, collectively, both the states and the people within them which make up the states.
So, something cannot be good for a state if it is bad for its people therein, and vise versa, as such, the general welfare had to apply not to any one individual but to all who reside legally within the USA, which yes, excludes illegal foreigners.
It never mentions the statesPerhaps this will help.
Interpretation: The Spending Clause | Constitution Center
Interpretations of The Spending Clause by constitutional scholarsconstitutioncenter.org
The general welfare clause applied to the states of the United States not to the individual people of the United States.
There would be national parks as there is an obligation to protect the land. There would be an FAA as an instrument of interstate commerce. There would be interstate highways as the benefit is generally applicable to the states. There would not be a CDC, Department of Education, or department of energy. There would be no welfare checks or federal student loans. There would certainly be no National Endowment for the Arts or National Endowment for the Humanities.Off shoot????? No it is not. It has a completely separate mission.
Now you are making things upon protect the land.
Let's go further
No national parks
No FAA....hope your plane doesnt crash
No CDC
No VA. The va is not the military
Shall I go on? Lol
General welfare of the United States.. it never meant sending out a check every month.It never mentions the states
You claim an obligation not listed in the constitutionThere would be national parks as there is an obligation to protect the land. There would be an FAA as an instrument of interstate commerce. There would be interstate highways as the benefit is generally applicable to the states. There would not be a CDC, Department of Education, or department of energy. There would be no welfare checks or federal student loans. There would certainly be no National Endowment for the Arts or National Endowment for the Humanities.
I call it making the winning point but be my guest to report it.You are spamming the thread now
To do for the people what the people can't do for themselves, not to do for the people what the people can and should do for themselves.Afraid it does
It gives Congress broad power to help We the People
A Government of the people, by the people and for the people
This was the guy who created the new deal.....right?I call it making the winning point but be my guest to report it.
"...The lessons of history, confirmed by the evidence immediately before me, show conclusively that continued dependence upon relief induces a spiritual disintegration fundamentally destructive to the national fiber. To dole out relief in this way is to administer a narcotic, a subtle destroyer of the human spirit. It is inimical to the dictates of a sound policy. It is in violation of the traditions of America..."
FDR, Annual Message to Congress, January 04, 1935
Where does it say that nonsense???????To do for the people what the people can't do for themselves, not to do for the people what the people can and should do for themselves.
Yep, that's the one. That's why he is such a credible witness when he said....This was the guy who created the new deal.....right?
HAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHA
So you believe the constitution implies the government should do everything for the people?Where does it say that nonsense???????
New deal!!!!!!!!!Yep, that's the one. That's why he is such a credible witness when he said....
"...The lessons of history, confirmed by the evidence immediately before me, show conclusively that continued dependence upon relief induces a spiritual disintegration fundamentally destructive to the national fiber. To dole out relief in this way is to administer a narcotic, a subtle destroyer of the human spirit. It is inimical to the dictates of a sound policy. It is in violation of the traditions of America..."
FDR, Annual Message to Congress, January 04, 1935
I know. Which is why you should listen to him when he said...New deal!!!!!!!!!
HAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHA
“The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little.”I know. Which is why you should listen to him when he said...
"...The lessons of history, confirmed by the evidence immediately before me, show conclusively that continued dependence upon relief induces a spiritual disintegration fundamentally destructive to the national fiber. To dole out relief in this way is to administer a narcotic, a subtle destroyer of the human spirit. It is inimical to the dictates of a sound policy. It is in violation of the traditions of America..."
FDR, Annual Message to Congress, January 04, 1935
In these days of difficulty, we Americans must and shall choose the path of social justice… the path of faith, the path of hope and the path of love toward our fellow man.”----FDRI know. Which is why you should listen to him when he said...
"...The lessons of history, confirmed by the evidence immediately before me, show conclusively that continued dependence upon relief induces a spiritual disintegration fundamentally destructive to the national fiber. To dole out relief in this way is to administer a narcotic, a subtle destroyer of the human spirit. It is inimical to the dictates of a sound policy. It is in violation of the traditions of America..."
FDR, Annual Message to Congress, January 04, 1935
Human kindness has never weakened the stamina or softened the fiber of a free people. A nation does not have to be cruel to be tough.” -----FDRI know. Which is why you should listen to him when he said...
"...The lessons of history, confirmed by the evidence immediately before me, show conclusively that continued dependence upon relief induces a spiritual disintegration fundamentally destructive to the national fiber. To dole out relief in this way is to administer a narcotic, a subtle destroyer of the human spirit. It is inimical to the dictates of a sound policy. It is in violation of the traditions of America..."
FDR, Annual Message to Congress, January 04, 1935
Sure... to a point. Beyond that point... "...The lessons of history, confirmed by the evidence immediately before me, show conclusively that continued dependence upon relief induces a spiritual disintegration fundamentally destructive to the national fiber.“The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little.”
------FDR