Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
right, again the liberal interpretation of evidence turns out to be hearsay. the democrat party is a tortise on it's back, which is unpleasant for all of us.can someone explain this ?
where there russian operatives (e.g. the black panthers) at the polling sites ? did they mess with with electronic ballots. where they having secret russian meetings convincing obama supporters to vote for hillary ?
what specifically did they do to throw our election.
Not a thing.
....the proof that this 'fake news' tale of Russia changing the course of our election....
a. The day before any leaks, wikileaks or otherwise, the RealClearPolitics had Hillary at 48%
b. The election result gave Hillary 48.08% per the election.
Soooo......where is any....ANY....result due to Russia, Putin, Wiki, or Mickey Mouse????
The media sure made it sound like it...Without GOP BS propaganda for 25 years, she would have won by 30 pts...That's all you morons have...can someone explain this ?
where there russian operatives (e.g. the black panthers) at the polling sites ? did they mess with with electronic ballots. where they having secret russian meetings convincing obama supporters to vote for hillary ?
what specifically did they do to throw our election.
Not a thing.
....the proof that this 'fake news' tale of Russia changing the course of our election....
a. The day before any leaks, wikileaks or otherwise, the RealClearPolitics had Hillary at 48%
b. The election result gave Hillary 48.08% per the election.
Soooo......where is any....ANY....result due to Russia, Putin, Wiki, or Mickey Mouse????
I asked you to name the new disastrous revelations that were revealed....that no one knew about before the Wiki leaks....
...obviously you couldn't come up with a single one.
"Single one".....as in the total number of your cerebral neurons.
He's a scumbag mediocrity. How the hell was she supposed to prove it?right, again the liberal interpretation of evidence turns out to be hearsay. the democrat party is a tortise on it's back, which is unpleasant for all of us.can someone explain this ?
where there russian operatives (e.g. the black panthers) at the polling sites ? did they mess with with electronic ballots. where they having secret russian meetings convincing obama supporters to vote for hillary ?
what specifically did they do to throw our election.
Not a thing.
....the proof that this 'fake news' tale of Russia changing the course of our election....
a. The day before any leaks, wikileaks or otherwise, the RealClearPolitics had Hillary at 48%
b. The election result gave Hillary 48.08% per the election.
Soooo......where is any....ANY....result due to Russia, Putin, Wiki, or Mickey Mouse????
They don' need no stinkin' evidence!!!!
What was new with the Thomas nomination was the accusation of criminal wrongdoing on his part, namely the unproved sexual harassment claims of one Anita Hill.
Even though Ms. Hill couldn't prove her accusation, that didn't matter.
Thus, a new mantra for the Left was born:
“The nature of the evidence is irrelevant; it’s the seriousness of the charge that matters.”
Tom Foley, Democrat, Former Speaker of the House.
how ? who gave wrong questions, this is news to me.can someone explain this ?
where there russian operatives (e.g. the black panthers) at the polling sites ? did they mess with with electronic ballots. where they having secret russian meetings convincing obama supporters to vote for hillary ?
what specifically did they do to throw our election.
They exposed the truth about the Bulldyke, and that kind of thing can not be tolerated. They also sent Russian operatives here to respond to the polls so they we all wrong. They also gave Donna Brazile the wrong debate questions because they knew that evil bitch would give them to Hellary. Yea, Russian fingerprints are all over this election.
The vast majority of voters who decided not to vote for Hillary based on the Russian hack of the totally corrupt DNC stayed home and didn't vote for Clinton OR Trump.Fine.this is the wikipedia account:
The United States Intelligence Community has officially concluded that the Russian government interfered in the 2016 United States elections.[1] An intelligence community assessment stated, "Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the U.S. presidential election. Russia’s goals were to undermine public faith in the U.S. democratic process, denigrate Secretary Hillary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency. We further assess Putin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump. We have high confidence in these judgments."[2]
Conceded as truth, for the sake of argument.
Now...
Give us a defensible metric, which shows us how many people switched votes, from Clinton to Trump, as a result of that intervention.
Wise up!
The news of Russians hacking into the election really didn't break until AFTER the election was long over. Hillary Clinton mentioned it during one of the debates but no one paid any attention to that. She called Trump --Putin's puppet if I remember correctly. While Trump said it was some 400 lb. fat guy sitting on his bed doing it.
Trump continually denied it. He denied the CIA, the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security and 13 other intelligence agencies. At one point even saying "he knows people that know more than they do, and he'll get back with us next week about it." Of course he never did.
Regardless if it changed one single vote, collusion with a Foreign Adversary to interfere into an American National election is TREASON. There is no getting around that.
Analysis | 5 times Donald Trump’s team denied contact with Russia
Trump aides were in constant touch with senior Russian officials during campaign - CNNPolitics.com
If Republicans can do 8 investigations into Benghazi, it's not hard to imagine what Democrats will do with Treason, Obstruction, Cover-Up and Lie after Lie when they take over in 2018. Then they'll move into Trumps many foreign conflicts of interest which are (in violation of the Emolution clause in the Constitution.) They will obtain his income tax returns via the Ways & Means committee, something Republicans refused to do a couple of weeks ago.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/15/...nvestigate-mr-trumps-ties-to-russia.html?_r=1
Watergate pales in comparison to this.
Republican Senate & House members can choose to be the point of the spear and dump Trump asap, or they can write their own obtituaries for 2018-2020 and beyond.
You really couldn't have given Democrats a better gift than electing Donald Trump.
Do you believe those exposures hurt Clinton's chances of winning?For the thousandth time, they used the criminal enterprise of hacking to invade the privacy rights of people in the DNC and released the stolen material to the public for the express purpose of undermining the Clinton campaign.
Translation:
They exposed the fraud, corruption, and lawlessness of the Clintons and the DNC.
And despite that, they didn't get into the ballot box which is what the OP specified. The DNC hack only exposed the DNC for the corrupt entity that it was. For the 1000th time.For the thousandth time, they used the criminal enterprise of hacking to invade the privacy rights of people in the DNC and released the stolen material to the public for the express purpose of undermining the Clinton campaign.
For the thousandth time, they used the criminal enterprise of hacking to invade the privacy rights of people in the DNC and released the stolen material to the public for the express purpose of undermining the Clinton campaign.
Keep tabs of those who talk against the American system in a way that aids and abet the enemy is the actions of a 'thought police.' Who knew?Anyone who approves the idea that the Russians hacked our elections does not support American values and institutions.
Such people should be reported to the feebs. But they already have been, I would suspect.
Thought control police. Interesting, that also seems to go against American values.
For the thousandth time, they used the criminal enterprise of hacking to invade the privacy rights of people in the DNC and released the stolen material to the public for the express purpose of undermining the Clinton campaign.
For the thousandth time, they used the criminal enterprise of hacking to invade the privacy rights of people in the DNC and released the stolen material to the public for the express purpose of undermining the Clinton campaign.
as a vermonter i can attest that bernie got rigged.OP- DUMB. Only the dupes are going on about collusion. There is circumstantial evidence and need for an investigationNo, son, you just proved mine... namely, that you cannot provide a defensible metric to gauge the impact of the leaks-disclosures on the Clinton-vs-Trump contest....You just proved my point...
All you can serve up is a recital of protocol violations and circumstances; you have not told us how many people switched their votes from Clinton to Trump at that time.
Correct. I was. I voted for Bernie Sanders over Hillary Clinton in the Illinois Primary last year....You're a Sanders supporter...
...that Believes that someone can win by losing byBut the deck WAS stacked against Bernie Sanders; that's how Shrillary won by the margins she did in many states; leaning on the Democratic Party Ruling Elites to push her to the fore and to push Bernie into the background; to do her dirty work for her; so that she would not have the appearance of having dirty hands; an idea that backfired.3,775,427 popular votes in a primary, which is exactly how badly she BEAT Bernie Sanders ASS. You still believe the deck was stacked against Sanders...
Had the deck NOT been stacked, the vote would probably have been closer; although that, too, is groundless speculation, akin to your own, with a different focus; the differene between us being that I am willing to concede the speculative nature of that observation, whereas you (and yours) delude yourselves that Shrillary lost due to outside influence.
Incorrect. I voted for Shrillary rather than He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named; although I felt dirty doing it, and wanted a shower by the time I got home from the polling place....& then you voted for Trump to prove your ignorance...
Oh, look, Mumsie, it's another Kornspiracy Theory Stab-In-the-Back nutjob... isn't it a cute little delusional twit?...We had two candidates that were campaigning on a RIGGED election, (Sanders & Trump) and in truth it was RIGGED, only it was rigged against Hillary Clinton...
That's right, LibTard... blame everybody else but yourselves and your staggeringly flawed candidate for your humiliation at the polls.
Ya'll really need to grow-the-phukk up and think really hard about why White Christian Middle America just bitch-slapped you at the polls on November 8, 2016.
Get a grip, kid, and get some eyeglasses...
You're gonna need 'em when it comes time to take that long, hard look in the mirror, seeking the true cause for your defeat at the polls.
For those few of you who are honest enough and pragmatic enough to do it, anyway...
Bernie says there was no rigging DUH. But 8 months of media self promoting BS about STUPID staff bs OF COURSE cost Hillary. Not as much as COMEY the GOP a-hole....just like lying cheating greedy rich GOP and the silly dupes like you. Enjoy the giant tax cuts for the rich...
So C&P this mythical "intelligence community assessment" asshole! They are the famous ubiquitous LIB 'unnamed sources'.this is the wikipedia account:
The United States Intelligence Community has officially concluded that the Russian government interfered in the 2016 United States elections.[1] An intelligence community assessment stated, "Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the U.S. presidential election. Russia’s goals were to undermine public faith in the U.S. democratic process, denigrate Secretary Hillary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency. We further assess Putin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump. We have high confidence in these judgments."[2]
All LIB bullshit!
They are anti Russian to the max. Now they consort with the fascists.Keep tabs of those who talk against the American system in a way that aids and abet the enemy is the actions of a 'thought police.' Who knew?Anyone who approves the idea that the Russians hacked our elections does not support American values and institutions.
Such people should be reported to the feebs. But they already have been, I would suspect.
Thought control police. Interesting, that also seems to go against American values.
What happened to the American right?
They used to be the patriotic stalwarts.
For the thousandth time, they used the criminal enterprise of hacking to invade the privacy rights of people in the DNC and released the stolen material to the public for the express purpose of undermining the Clinton campaign.
So it was better if we didn't know about the lying cheating left then? Would you complain if they have info on Trump and it gets released?
For the thousandth time, they used the criminal enterprise of hacking to invade the privacy rights of people in the DNC and released the stolen material to the public for the express purpose of undermining the Clinton campaign.For the thousandth time, they used the criminal enterprise of hacking to invade the privacy rights of people in the DNC and released the stolen material to the public for the express purpose of undermining the Clinton campaign.
But everyone in charge of investing this has said the opposite. Really, If all you can point to is Russia saying Hillary sucks then y'all are in trouble. I mean hell, when Bammer went on his world apology tour you all said he was the real guy guy because the rest of the world had orgazims every timehe spoke. In this case, yalls hero Julian A, a guy from another country provides proof your democrat party is corrupt and all you can go on about is this fake hacking thing. Pleas provide the proof Russia hacked anything. You can't because there is none.
well said, i guess we're all looking for an email from putin to assange. personally, i'd rather see assange dead than red. he is an enemy of our state.can someone explain this ?
where there russian operatives (e.g. the black panthers) at the polling sites ? did they mess with with electronic ballots. where they having secret russian meetings convincing obama supporters to vote for hillary ?
what specifically did they do to throw our election.
If you look at all the accusations, you see that the left is saying that they helped get the truth out about Hillary and the DNC, and that those facts turned people away.
So, Hillary lost because of the truth. And the left is angry at Russia because they believe that some Russians were behind exposing that truth.
So, we are supposed to be more angry at whoever bought the truth to light than we are about how corrupt Hillary and the DNC have been.
Tough to follow but that's the gist of it.
Of course, WikiLeaks took credit from the start for much of it. Then there was that DNC insider who was murdered right after it was known he might be the one helping Assange.
So many coincidences surrounding this. Yet another person who could hurt Hillary dying a sudden death.
Psy-Ops on RWNJs
right, again the liberal interpretation of evidence turns out to be hearsay. the democrat party is a tortise on it's back, which is unpleasant for all of us.can someone explain this ?
where there russian operatives (e.g. the black panthers) at the polling sites ? did they mess with with electronic ballots. where they having secret russian meetings convincing obama supporters to vote for hillary ?
what specifically did they do to throw our election.
Not a thing.
....the proof that this 'fake news' tale of Russia changing the course of our election....
a. The day before any leaks, wikileaks or otherwise, the RealClearPolitics had Hillary at 48%
b. The election result gave Hillary 48.08% per the election.
Soooo......where is any....ANY....result due to Russia, Putin, Wiki, or Mickey Mouse????
For the thousandth time, they used the criminal enterprise of hacking to invade the privacy rights of people in the DNC and released the stolen material to the public for the express purpose of undermining the Clinton campaign.For the thousandth time, they used the criminal enterprise of hacking to invade the privacy rights of people in the DNC and released the stolen material to the public for the express purpose of undermining the Clinton campaign.
But everyone in charge of investing this has said the opposite. Really, If all you can point to is Russia saying Hillary sucks then y'all are in trouble. I mean hell, when Bammer went on his world apology tour you all said he was the real guy guy because the rest of the world had orgazims every timehe spoke. In this case, yalls hero Julian A, a guy from another country provides proof your democrat party is corrupt and all you can go on about is this fake hacking thing. Pleas provide the proof Russia hacked anything. You can't because there is none.
At this point in time, you can STILL get a crazed post like the one above. Unbe-fucking-lievable.
