Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
From what little I heard about it on the radio this morning I'm glad I ignored it.
I thought of watching it, but figured I'd wait an hour, and read the highlights in the news. Let me give you the gist of it. Trump cheated on his wife. I know. It's shocking, right?
Nobody gives a shit about that. It's what went down in October of 2016 that's relevant.
Did she go into any detail about that?
I can't remember what she said about the hush money, but nothing is going to become of that either way. Trump isn't a dummy. His name isn't on the NDA, and Cohen claims he made the payment out of his own pocket. Trump is completely insulated from the situation.
Actually he's completely painted into a corner. Into two corners you might say.
In this corner we have Rump suing or threatening to sue over an NDA that, as you just noted, doesn't even have his name on it. That means he has no standing to sue.
And in that corner you have him claiming that the fling never happened, which if that were true, would completely remove any reason for a payoff to keep quiet about some event that never happened. And if it did happen, triggering the payoff, then he admits he's a liar. Which he also does by suing under the NDA.
It's a veritable pretzel factory.
And in that corner you have him claiming that the fling never happened, which if that were true, would completely remove any reason for a payoff to keep quiet about some event that never happened.
Can you believe Fat Donnie had sex with that slut without wearing a condom and then went home to his wife?i didn't see it , i wouldn't waste my time . But as regards SHE the slut . A person can't avoid seeing on the tv what she looks like and she ain't any big deal as far as looks go , imo .
Some background. Personally I think it would be more surprising for a fella like Trump to have NOT played around than to have. FDR died with his mistress alongside if I recall and Bill Clinton, well, he would have been fun to party with I suppose. So the only real point of this for me is to use it as a yardstick/check for hypocrisy in folks who ridicule B. Clinton, JFK or whoever for their promiscuity.
That said, did you all find "Stormy" to appear credible in the interview? It is the least goofy she has ever seemed to me. Maybe the background skepticism I brought in from the Kimmel interview where I found her to be goofy bled over?
I was waiting for her to say, "I can describe his genitals to you and an independent investigator can verify".
Threatening her is the only thing which would bother me. That relies totally on how much I believe Stormy. Remembering the gals in my life she reminds me of, I'm not ready to hang someone on her word.
The facts of the payoff lend more credence to her claim than she does. Not that it is high treason but the details given of the $130,000 payoff seem to warrant the slap on the wrist rich people get in these cases.
Just wondering what the scuttlebut is on this one.
I’m sure that is consoling to Melaniacourse i don't know if he did , if he did he can afford the best Doctors if the wife gets sick RWinger !!
Can you believe Fat Donnie had sex with that slut without wearing a condom and then went home to his wife?i didn't see it , i wouldn't waste my time . But as regards SHE the slut . A person can't avoid seeing on the tv what she looks like and she ain't any big deal as far as looks go , imo .
You realize which zone you posted in, right?
---------------------------------- good Doctor is nothing to sneer at , ask 'juan mcstain' RWinger !!I’m sure that is consoling to Melaniacourse i don't know if he did , if he did he can afford the best Doctors if the wife gets sick RWinger !!
Some background. Personally I think it would be more surprising for a fella like Trump to have NOT played around than to have. FDR died with his mistress alongside if I recall and Bill Clinton, well, he would have been fun to party with I suppose. So the only real point of this for me is to use it as a yardstick/check for hypocrisy in folks who ridicule B. Clinton, JFK or whoever for their promiscuity.
That said, did you all find "Stormy" to appear credible in the interview? It is the least goofy she has ever seemed to me. Maybe the background skepticism I brought in from the Kimmel interview where I found her to be goofy bled over?
I was waiting for her to say, "I can describe his genitals to you and an independent investigator can verify".
Threatening her is the only thing which would bother me. That relies totally on how much I believe Stormy. Remembering the gals in my life she reminds me of, I'm not ready to hang someone on her word.
The facts of the payoff lend more credence to her claim than she does. Not that it is high treason but the details given of the $130,000 payoff seem to warrant the slap on the wrist rich people get in these cases.
Just wondering what the scuttlebut is on this one.
Who would watch that garbage?
-Geaux
Those are the very women Trump has chosen to hang out with throughout his lifeSome background. Personally I think it would be more surprising for a fella like Trump to have NOT played around than to have. FDR died with his mistress alongside if I recall and Bill Clinton, well, he would have been fun to party with I suppose. So the only real point of this for me is to use it as a yardstick/check for hypocrisy in folks who ridicule B. Clinton, JFK or whoever for their promiscuity.
That said, did you all find "Stormy" to appear credible in the interview? It is the least goofy she has ever seemed to me. Maybe the background skepticism I brought in from the Kimmel interview where I found her to be goofy bled over?
I was waiting for her to say, "I can describe his genitals to you and an independent investigator can verify".
Threatening her is the only thing which would bother me. That relies totally on how much I believe Stormy. Remembering the gals in my life she reminds me of, I'm not ready to hang someone on her word.
The facts of the payoff lend more credence to her claim than she does. Not that it is high treason but the details given of the $130,000 payoff seem to warrant the slap on the wrist rich people get in these cases.
Just wondering what the scuttlebut is on this one.
Who would watch that garbage?
-Geaux
I watched it. I think it was funny watching it actually. Stormy has brought much laughter to my life:
Here is what the left believes is a credible witness:
An actress who has performed sex acts for money hundreds, if not thousands of times for money.
A Stripper
A Porn Film Producer
A Porn Film Director
A woman who has slept with more Men (and likely women, and who knows how many combinations of both) then most people have shaken hands with in a life time.
A women who publicly declared it didn't happen, then back that up a second time, now says it did.
And then theres her attorney who doesn't care if the evidence will stand up in court (what attorney says that!), its what the public thinks that matters.
If this thing is anything, it's a poorly written comedy.
Those are the very women Trump has chosen to hang out with throughout his lifeSome background. Personally I think it would be more surprising for a fella like Trump to have NOT played around than to have. FDR died with his mistress alongside if I recall and Bill Clinton, well, he would have been fun to party with I suppose. So the only real point of this for me is to use it as a yardstick/check for hypocrisy in folks who ridicule B. Clinton, JFK or whoever for their promiscuity.
That said, did you all find "Stormy" to appear credible in the interview? It is the least goofy she has ever seemed to me. Maybe the background skepticism I brought in from the Kimmel interview where I found her to be goofy bled over?
I was waiting for her to say, "I can describe his genitals to you and an independent investigator can verify".
Threatening her is the only thing which would bother me. That relies totally on how much I believe Stormy. Remembering the gals in my life she reminds me of, I'm not ready to hang someone on her word.
The facts of the payoff lend more credence to her claim than she does. Not that it is high treason but the details given of the $130,000 payoff seem to warrant the slap on the wrist rich people get in these cases.
Just wondering what the scuttlebut is on this one.
Who would watch that garbage?
-Geaux
I watched it. I think it was funny watching it actually. Stormy has brought much laughter to my life:
Here is what the left believes is a credible witness:
An actress who has performed sex acts for money hundreds, if not thousands of times for money.
A Stripper
A Porn Film Producer
A Porn Film Director
A woman who has slept with more Men (and likely women, and who knows how many combinations of both) then most people have shaken hands with in a life time.
A women who publicly declared it didn't happen, then back that up a second time, now says it did.
And then theres her attorney who doesn't care if the evidence will stand up in court (what attorney says that!), its what the public thinks that matters.
If this thing is anything, it's a poorly written comedy.
He likes arm candy and thinks others are impressed with the women he pays for
From what little I heard about it on the radio this morning I'm glad I ignored it.
I thought of watching it, but figured I'd wait an hour, and read the highlights in the news. Let me give you the gist of it. Trump cheated on his wife. I know. It's shocking, right?
Nobody gives a shit about that. It's what went down in October of 2016 that's relevant.
Did she go into any detail about that?
I can't remember what she said about the hush money, but nothing is going to become of that either way. Trump isn't a dummy. His name isn't on the NDA, and Cohen claims he made the payment out of his own pocket. Trump is completely insulated from the situation.
Actually he's completely painted into a corner. Into two corners you might say.
In this corner we have Rump suing or threatening to sue over an NDA that, as you just noted, doesn't even have his name on it. That means he has no standing to sue.
And in that corner you have him claiming that the fling never happened, which if that were true, would completely remove any reason for a payoff to keep quiet about some event that never happened. And if it did happen, triggering the payoff, then he admits he's a liar. Which he also does by suing under the NDA.
It's a veritable pretzel factory.
And in that corner you have him claiming that the fling never happened, which if that were true, would completely remove any reason for a payoff to keep quiet about some event that never happened.
Not always true. Many times these are done to simply stop an annoying false claim. And the question remains. If she signed it, plus several other documents saying it never happened, then what is her credibility now?
I think her attorney showed his hand when he stated publicly that (and I am paraphrasing) he did not care if the evidence would stand up in court, what matters is what the public thinks. Appears he may have been bluffing that any real evidence actually does exist.
Creepy Donnie was trying to bribe her with an offer to appear on Celebrity ApprenticeThose are the very women Trump has chosen to hang out with throughout his lifeSome background. Personally I think it would be more surprising for a fella like Trump to have NOT played around than to have. FDR died with his mistress alongside if I recall and Bill Clinton, well, he would have been fun to party with I suppose. So the only real point of this for me is to use it as a yardstick/check for hypocrisy in folks who ridicule B. Clinton, JFK or whoever for their promiscuity.
That said, did you all find "Stormy" to appear credible in the interview? It is the least goofy she has ever seemed to me. Maybe the background skepticism I brought in from the Kimmel interview where I found her to be goofy bled over?
I was waiting for her to say, "I can describe his genitals to you and an independent investigator can verify".
Threatening her is the only thing which would bother me. That relies totally on how much I believe Stormy. Remembering the gals in my life she reminds me of, I'm not ready to hang someone on her word.
The facts of the payoff lend more credence to her claim than she does. Not that it is high treason but the details given of the $130,000 payoff seem to warrant the slap on the wrist rich people get in these cases.
Just wondering what the scuttlebut is on this one.
Who would watch that garbage?
-Geaux
I watched it. I think it was funny watching it actually. Stormy has brought much laughter to my life:
Here is what the left believes is a credible witness:
An actress who has performed sex acts for money hundreds, if not thousands of times for money.
A Stripper
A Porn Film Producer
A Porn Film Director
A woman who has slept with more Men (and likely women, and who knows how many combinations of both) then most people have shaken hands with in a life time.
A women who publicly declared it didn't happen, then back that up a second time, now says it did.
And then theres her attorney who doesn't care if the evidence will stand up in court (what attorney says that!), its what the public thinks that matters.
If this thing is anything, it's a poorly written comedy.
He likes arm candy and thinks others are impressed with the women he pays for
Of course you would believe a women that, you yourself has characterized has having low moral standards. Then she actually backs up your assertion by. 1.) going back on her written statement saying that she never had sex with Donald Trump, and 2.) Claiming she felt obligated to have sex with a man she did not want to have sex with because he bought her dinner and used his bathroom.
Just too funny and says more about you then you might think.
Creepy Donnie was trying to bribe her with an offer to appear on Celebrity ApprenticeThose are the very women Trump has chosen to hang out with throughout his lifeSome background. Personally I think it would be more surprising for a fella like Trump to have NOT played around than to have. FDR died with his mistress alongside if I recall and Bill Clinton, well, he would have been fun to party with I suppose. So the only real point of this for me is to use it as a yardstick/check for hypocrisy in folks who ridicule B. Clinton, JFK or whoever for their promiscuity.
That said, did you all find "Stormy" to appear credible in the interview? It is the least goofy she has ever seemed to me. Maybe the background skepticism I brought in from the Kimmel interview where I found her to be goofy bled over?
I was waiting for her to say, "I can describe his genitals to you and an independent investigator can verify".
Threatening her is the only thing which would bother me. That relies totally on how much I believe Stormy. Remembering the gals in my life she reminds me of, I'm not ready to hang someone on her word.
The facts of the payoff lend more credence to her claim than she does. Not that it is high treason but the details given of the $130,000 payoff seem to warrant the slap on the wrist rich people get in these cases.
Just wondering what the scuttlebut is on this one.
Who would watch that garbage?
-Geaux
I watched it. I think it was funny watching it actually. Stormy has brought much laughter to my life:
Here is what the left believes is a credible witness:
An actress who has performed sex acts for money hundreds, if not thousands of times for money.
A Stripper
A Porn Film Producer
A Porn Film Director
A woman who has slept with more Men (and likely women, and who knows how many combinations of both) then most people have shaken hands with in a life time.
A women who publicly declared it didn't happen, then back that up a second time, now says it did.
And then theres her attorney who doesn't care if the evidence will stand up in court (what attorney says that!), its what the public thinks that matters.
If this thing is anything, it's a poorly written comedy.
He likes arm candy and thinks others are impressed with the women he pays for
Of course you would believe a women that, you yourself has characterized has having low moral standards. Then she actually backs up your assertion by. 1.) going back on her written statement saying that she never had sex with Donald Trump, and 2.) Claiming she felt obligated to have sex with a man she did not want to have sex with because he bought her dinner and used his bathroom.
Just too funny and says more about you then you might think.
I hope Trump had fun motorboating that set of boobs. I know I would.
It is hypocritical for Liberals to say anything about Trump's sex life after giving Bill Clinton a pass on being a sexual predator and having sex with a young intern in the White House and then lying about it. Then the Liberals voted for his wife who attacked the women that exposed Bill Clinton being a sexual predator.
Yeah, like I said, voting for Trump just proved there was no "moral" in the "minority".
Not that I care if Trump dies next to his mistress as long as he leads the country well. Just loving that pretenders can't make fun of B. Clinton anymore w/o making fun of Trump unless they are a hypocrite or cheerleader.
Newsflash - Billionaire gets some hot nookie!
There was no rape like with Bill Clinton.
There was getting blowjobs in the White House like with Bill Clinton.
There was no lying to a judge about it like there was with Bill Clinton.
There was no looking the American people in the eye and lying to them like it was with Bill Clinton.
There was no Hillary Clinton demeaning and attacking the women that exposed the sexual attacks.
i didn't see it , i wouldn't waste my time . But as regards SHE the slut . A person can't avoid seeing on the tv what she looks like and she ain't any big deal as far as looks go , imo .
No matter what, after all the shit the libturds have been forced to admit to, never mind the mountains of sinister shit they deny doing, Trump looks like a celibate monk.
The Press is trying to make it a big issue to hurt Trump