Dr.House
Lives on in syndication!
How is that statement false? It's impossible to want to ban abortion and allow it at the same time.
I explained it already... I know you are slow, but you'll have to keep up....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How is that statement false? It's impossible to want to ban abortion and allow it at the same time.
How is that statement false? It's impossible to want to ban abortion and allow it at the same time.
I explained it already... I know you are slow, but you'll have to keep up....
How is that statement false? It's impossible to want to ban abortion and allow it at the same time.
I explained it already... I know you are slow, but you'll have to keep up....
His current position is that he wants to ban it, with certain exceptions. That's not the same as allowing it.
My statement operates the same way. You can't ban something and allow (in the legal sense) it at the same time.
My statement operates the same way. You can't ban something and allow (in the legal sense) it at the same time.
There was no mention of "banning" in your statement...
Your statement alone is false...
My statement operates the same way. You can't ban something and allow (in the legal sense) it at the same time.
There was no mention of "banning" in your statement...
Your statement alone is false...
That's what "pro-life" means. That you want to ban abortion.
My statement operates the same way. You can't ban something and allow (in the legal sense) it at the same time.
There was no mention of "banning" in your statement...
Your statement alone is false...
That's what "pro-life" means. That you want to ban abortion.
The real story of Romneys conversiona series of tentative, equivocal, and confused shifts, accompanied by a constant rewriting of his pastpaints a more accurate picture of who he is. Romney has complex views and a talent for framing them either way, depending on his audience. He values truth, so he makes sure theres an element of it in everything he says. He cant stand to break his promises, so he reinterprets them.
...
Romney began to think about running against Sen. Ted Kennedy. Romney approached the idea as he had always approached things: with a businessmans prudence. He hired Republican pollster Dick Wirthlin to survey the Massachusetts electorate and identify challenges Romney might face. Scott, a friend of the Romney family, reports in his book that Wirthlin came back with tough news: No pro-life candidate could win statewide office in Massachusetts.
Until this moment, Romney hadnt taken a public position on abortion. He had pro-life experience as a Mormon leader and counselor. He had pro-choice experience as the relative of a woman who had died from illegal abortion. In general, he respected women, and he didnt like government telling people what to do.
Within the Romney family, his mother had preached the separation of religious practice from public policy.
Mormons, having suffered persecution at the hands of other Christians, feared the injection of sectarian faith into politics.
The LDS church also had a doctrine of free agency that distinguished the rightness of choices, such as whether to drink alcohol, from the freedom to make those choices.
Above all, abortion wasnt Romneys issue. He was a CEO interested in management and finance. His comments throughout the 1994 campaign reflected ignorance about RU486, morning-after pills, and parental consent laws, which in those days were major topics in the abortion debate. Romney was smart enough to learn about these issues if he had wanted to. He just didnt care that much.
Romney could have framed his complex feelings about abortion either way. Wirthlins poll said that if he ran as a pro-lifer, hed lose. It would be simplistic to say that the poll dictated Romneys decision. But we know that he used the poll to influence the most important pro-life organization he had to appease at the time: the elders of the LDS
...
If he didnt frame his position as pro-choice, hed lose. Many of the church leaders were unhappy with Romneys formulation. But if they wanted him in the Senate, this was the best they were going to get.
Scott was present when Romney talked about the meetings after he returned to Boston. Judy Dushku, a Mormon feminist, says she heard a similar account from Romney in 1994:
I went to his office and I congratulated him on taking a pro-choice position. And his response wasWell they told me in Salt Lake City I could take this position, and in fact I probably had to in order to win in a liberal state like Massachusetts.
I said, Mitt, it doesnt make me happy to hear that. What youre suggesting is that youre not genuinely pro-choice. Its a position of convenience. He saidOh no, I actually had an aunt who died of a botched abortion. So I have some positive feelings about choice, but basically I know that I have to take that position.
If you dont think Romney would say such a calculated thing, look at this video. It shows Romney on The OReilly Factor on Dec. 19, 2011, explaining how he came to his pro-choice position.
He tells Bill OReilly: I thought, Well, I can say and can understand the idea of leaving the law the way it is. The Supreme Court has made its decision. I'm just going to say I will support the law and preserve the law as it exists.
Notice the language: I can say Im just going to say. This isnt a man talking about what he believes. Its a man talking about framing a public posture under constraint.
...
Mitt Romney’s abortion record: flip-flop or conversion? - Slate Magazine
Oh, dear Mr. Sallow, I have to hand it to ya, you do love your party. Unfortunately, they don't call it the Executive Branch for advertising purposes.He speaks like a CEO when he knows what he's talking about (business) and a robot the rest of the time.
America needs an Executive. We're already organized to provide for the common defense, which we won't have if we leave the smooth talker who hates our allies as evidenced by his insults against Britain his first month in office, and shows mercy to bullies and cowards. I'm sorry, Obama has fulfilled Peter's Principle to the max.
We're going to do our best to repair his bad-hair carcrash, I mean his very bad Karma.
If only you'd take your good looks and charisma to the people, Mr. Sallow. You're a good sort, but unfortunately, nobody can make a silk purse out of a sow's ear that President Obama has proven himself to be. *sigh*
He's had two different positions on that issue. Pretty hard to be pro-choice and pro-life at the same time.
WOW! Someone changed their mind. In human history, that has almost never happened. Why the likelyhood of any individual ever changing their mind on any given topic is something like 4 billion trillion to 1.
There was no mention of "banning" in your statement...
Your statement alone is false...
That's what "pro-life" means. That you want to ban abortion.
Soooooo, "pro-abortion" means you want to force everyone to have an abortion? See how that works?
There was no mention of "banning" in your statement...
Your statement alone is false...
That's what "pro-life" means. That you want to ban abortion.
Soooooo, "pro-abortion" means you want to force everyone to have an abortion? See how that works?
Quotes without context are not a true representation of position...
If you have the context, I'd be willing to read it...
Romney also said he's been pro-choice since his mother ran for Senate in 1970, when he was debating Ted Kennedy. Face it, the guy was pro-choice his whole career until he decided to run for the nomination. Even he admits he was pro-choice at the time.
So, does that mean you don't have any context on those particular quotes?
...
There was no mention of "banning" in your statement...
Your statement alone is false...
That's what "pro-life" means. That you want to ban abortion.
Soooooo, "pro-abortion" means you want to force everyone to have an abortion? See how that works?
He's had two different positions on that issue. Pretty hard to be pro-choice and pro-life at the same time.
WOW! Someone changed their mind. In human history, that has almost never happened. Why the likelyhood of any individual ever changing their mind on any given topic is something like 4 billion trillion to 1.
Either that, or he's a man with no core values, who will shift his position in a heart beat, because he's a political opportunist. At least that's what the right wing has been saying about him throughout the primary process.
WOW! Someone changed their mind. In human history, that has almost never happened. Why the likelyhood of any individual ever changing their mind on any given topic is something like 4 billion trillion to 1.
Either that, or he's a man with no core values, who will shift his position in a heart beat, because he's a political opportunist. At least that's what the right wing has been saying about him throughout the primary process.
The problem isn't that he changed his mind, it's that it just happened to occur when he started running for president. Sorta like how a lot of people find religion in prison...
That's what "pro-life" means. That you want to ban abortion.
Soooooo, "pro-abortion" means you want to force everyone to have an abortion? See how that works?
How many people do you know who simultaneously refer to themselves as pro-life and pro-choice?