What if we took white cops OUT of black neighborhoods?

What does that have to do with complaints about racism? Detroit would be worse of a trainwreck if the PD was all white. Where I grew up we had a predominantly white PD and led the nation in murders a couple of years.

Thats because you lived in the ghetto you knucklehead.
Thats my point monkey.

So you think having black cops would have made a difference nlgger? :cuckoo:
Yes I do cave monkey.

By God there may be something to the theory that blacks have a low IQ.

That's not a theory. The State of the Black Union US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

iq-test_by_race_eu.png
 
What does that have to do with complaints about racism? Detroit would be worse of a trainwreck if the PD was all white. Where I grew up we had a predominantly white PD and led the nation in murders a couple of years.

Thats because you lived in the ghetto you knucklehead.
Thats my point monkey.

So you think having black cops would have made a difference nlgger? :cuckoo:
Yes I do cave monkey.

By God there may be something to the theory that blacks have a low IQ.
No. There is nothing to the theory. Thats why they call it that.
 
Thats because you lived in the ghetto you knucklehead.
Thats my point monkey.

So you think having black cops would have made a difference nlgger? :cuckoo:
Yes I do cave monkey.

By God there may be something to the theory that blacks have a low IQ.
No. There is nothing to the theory. Thats why they call it that.

You skipped a post. What if we took white cops OUT of black neighborhoods Page 4 US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
 
Thats because you lived in the ghetto you knucklehead.
Thats my point monkey.

So you think having black cops would have made a difference nlgger? :cuckoo:
Yes I do cave monkey.

By God there may be something to the theory that blacks have a low IQ.

That's not a theory. The State of the Black Union US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

iq-test_by_race_eu.png

I was trying to give him the benefit of the doubt. You'd think I would have learned by now...
 
Thats because you lived in the ghetto you knucklehead.
Thats my point monkey.

So you think having black cops would have made a difference nlgger? :cuckoo:
Yes I do cave monkey.

By God there may be something to the theory that blacks have a low IQ.
No. There is nothing to the theory. Thats why they call it that.

You're making it more provable everyday...
 
Thats my point monkey.

So you think having black cops would have made a difference nlgger? :cuckoo:
Yes I do cave monkey.

By God there may be something to the theory that blacks have a low IQ.

That's not a theory. The State of the Black Union US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

iq-test_by_race_eu.png

I was trying to give him the benefit of the doubt. You'd think I would have learned by now...

I learned long ago not the debate the facts with him. (he simply tells us that the facts are biased without any counterargument). But thus far on this thread he has been reasonable. Lets nee how he responds to my post he skipped.
 
So you think having black cops would have made a difference nlgger? :cuckoo:
Yes I do cave monkey.

By God there may be something to the theory that blacks have a low IQ.

That's not a theory. The State of the Black Union US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

iq-test_by_race_eu.png

I was trying to give him the benefit of the doubt. You'd think I would have learned by now...

I learned long ago not the debate the facts with him. (he simply tells us that the facts are biased without any counterargument). But thus far on this thread he has been reasonable. Lets nee how he responds to my post he skipped.
You have no facts. Opinions and discredited studies dont equal facts.
 
So you think having black cops would have made a difference nlgger? :cuckoo:
Yes I do cave monkey.

By God there may be something to the theory that blacks have a low IQ.

That's not a theory. The State of the Black Union US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

iq-test_by_race_eu.png

I was trying to give him the benefit of the doubt. You'd think I would have learned by now...

I learned long ago not the debate the facts with him. (he simply tells us that the facts are biased without any counterargument). But thus far on this thread he has been reasonable. Lets nee how he responds to my post he skipped.

We know he'll just ignore anything he cant counter with his BS.
Thats his standard MO.
 
Yes I do cave monkey.

By God there may be something to the theory that blacks have a low IQ.

That's not a theory. The State of the Black Union US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

iq-test_by_race_eu.png

I was trying to give him the benefit of the doubt. You'd think I would have learned by now...

I learned long ago not the debate the facts with him. (he simply tells us that the facts are biased without any counterargument). But thus far on this thread he has been reasonable. Lets nee how he responds to my post he skipped.

We know he'll just ignore anything he cant counter with his BS.
Thats his standard MO.
I always ignore aborted attemtps to divert. I dont cater to monkey tactics.
 
By God there may be something to the theory that blacks have a low IQ.

That's not a theory. The State of the Black Union US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

iq-test_by_race_eu.png

I was trying to give him the benefit of the doubt. You'd think I would have learned by now...

I learned long ago not the debate the facts with him. (he simply tells us that the facts are biased without any counterargument). But thus far on this thread he has been reasonable. Lets nee how he responds to my post he skipped.

We know he'll just ignore anything he cant counter with his BS.
Thats his standard MO.
I always ignore aborted attemtps to divert. I dont cater to monkey tactics.

Am I mistaken that you ignored my previous response to you? Or are you going to reply? What if we took white cops OUT of black neighborhoods Page 4 US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
 

I was trying to give him the benefit of the doubt. You'd think I would have learned by now...

I learned long ago not the debate the facts with him. (he simply tells us that the facts are biased without any counterargument). But thus far on this thread he has been reasonable. Lets nee how he responds to my post he skipped.

We know he'll just ignore anything he cant counter with his BS.
Thats his standard MO.
I always ignore aborted attemtps to divert. I dont cater to monkey tactics.

Am I mistaken that you ignored my previous response to you? Or are you going to reply? What if we took white cops OUT of black neighborhoods Page 4 US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
No you are not mistaken. I dont indulge in diversionary tactics.
 
I was trying to give him the benefit of the doubt. You'd think I would have learned by now...

I learned long ago not the debate the facts with him. (he simply tells us that the facts are biased without any counterargument). But thus far on this thread he has been reasonable. Lets nee how he responds to my post he skipped.

We know he'll just ignore anything he cant counter with his BS.
Thats his standard MO.
I always ignore aborted attemtps to divert. I dont cater to monkey tactics.

Am I mistaken that you ignored my previous response to you? Or are you going to reply? What if we took white cops OUT of black neighborhoods Page 4 US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
No you are not mistaken. I dont indulge in diversionary tactics.

How was that diversionary? You made the claims. Defend them.
 
I learned long ago not the debate the facts with him. (he simply tells us that the facts are biased without any counterargument). But thus far on this thread he has been reasonable. Lets nee how he responds to my post he skipped.

We know he'll just ignore anything he cant counter with his BS.
Thats his standard MO.
I always ignore aborted attemtps to divert. I dont cater to monkey tactics.

Am I mistaken that you ignored my previous response to you? Or are you going to reply? What if we took white cops OUT of black neighborhoods Page 4 US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
No you are not mistaken. I dont indulge in diversionary tactics.

How was that diversionary? You made the claims. Defend them.
Has nothing to do with my point. I dont need to defend them. You dont have an offense to defend against.
 
We know he'll just ignore anything he cant counter with his BS.
Thats his standard MO.
I always ignore aborted attemtps to divert. I dont cater to monkey tactics.

Am I mistaken that you ignored my previous response to you? Or are you going to reply? What if we took white cops OUT of black neighborhoods Page 4 US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
No you are not mistaken. I dont indulge in diversionary tactics.

How was that diversionary? You made the claims. Defend them.
Has nothing to do with my point. I dont need to defend them. You dont have an offense to defend against.

Ok, point out where I went wrong and set me back on track. I'm lost.
 
I always ignore aborted attemtps to divert. I dont cater to monkey tactics.

Am I mistaken that you ignored my previous response to you? Or are you going to reply? What if we took white cops OUT of black neighborhoods Page 4 US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
No you are not mistaken. I dont indulge in diversionary tactics.

How was that diversionary? You made the claims. Defend them.
Has nothing to do with my point. I dont need to defend them. You dont have an offense to defend against.

Ok, point out where I went wrong and set me back on track. I'm lost.
We know you are lost. You frequently are. You went wrong from the beginning.
 
Am I mistaken that you ignored my previous response to you? Or are you going to reply? What if we took white cops OUT of black neighborhoods Page 4 US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
No you are not mistaken. I dont indulge in diversionary tactics.

How was that diversionary? You made the claims. Defend them.
Has nothing to do with my point. I dont need to defend them. You dont have an offense to defend against.

Ok, point out where I went wrong and set me back on track. I'm lost.
We know you are lost. You frequently are. You went wrong from the beginning.

Message received. This is where I ignore you for the rest of the post for failure to argue on the merits. Until next time.
 
No you are not mistaken. I dont indulge in diversionary tactics.

How was that diversionary? You made the claims. Defend them.
Has nothing to do with my point. I dont need to defend them. You dont have an offense to defend against.

Ok, point out where I went wrong and set me back on track. I'm lost.
We know you are lost. You frequently are. You went wrong from the beginning.

Message received. This is where I ignore you for the rest of the post for failure to argue on the merits.
I dont argue false merits. When you can address my post without diverting I may deign to discuss things with you.
 
How was that diversionary? You made the claims. Defend them.
Has nothing to do with my point. I dont need to defend them. You dont have an offense to defend against.

Ok, point out where I went wrong and set me back on track. I'm lost.
We know you are lost. You frequently are. You went wrong from the beginning.

Message received. This is where I ignore you for the rest of the post for failure to argue on the merits.
I dont argue false merits. When you can address my post without diverting I may deign to discuss things with you.

Ignored.
 
Has nothing to do with my point. I dont need to defend them. You dont have an offense to defend against.

Ok, point out where I went wrong and set me back on track. I'm lost.
We know you are lost. You frequently are. You went wrong from the beginning.

Message received. This is where I ignore you for the rest of the post for failure to argue on the merits.
I dont argue false merits. When you can address my post without diverting I may deign to discuss things with you.

Ignored.
Lucky for you.
 

Forum List

Back
Top