What impeachment is really about

DOTR

Gold Member
Oct 24, 2016
14,270
3,524
290
...and why it’s moving so slow.

There are two existential terrors Democrats face. First, their internal polling shows Trump winning again and secondly Ginsberg is dying.

“By almost all accounts, conservatives are one Justice short of the comfortable margin they’d need to reverse major Supreme Court precedents such as Roe v. Wade or the constitutional validation of the Affordable Care Act. It’s unlikely that today’s Court will remain unchanged until 2025, when a reelected Donald Trump would finally be forced to retire”
Supreme Court Vacancy in 2020 Would Change Everything

Now think to some of their past efforts to subvert our political processes. For instance using a fake Russia investigation, in which Trump was cleared after years of dragging it out, to try and make the claim no appointments should be made by a President under investigation by his opponents.
Here is an example from 2017 from <<<Schumer>>>.

8E356862-9BCC-4FA6-A912-956279A5C681.jpeg


And that’s still the game plan. An unwinnable, baseless, slow, never completely official “impeachment inquiry” so that when Ginsberg kicks they can moan “no president should appoint a justice while being investigated for impeachment”

It’s their last chance to save their ruling politburo. She must be very very sick...and those polls must be terrifying.

No worries. Trump will ignore their histrionics and appoint Ginsberg’s replacement. The Senate will approve it. And in his second term he will appoint Breyers replacement.
And after that Pence will get his shot.
 
Last edited:
...and why it’s moving so slow.

There are two existential terrors Democrats face. First, their internal polling shows Trump winning again and secondly Ginsberg is dying.

“By almost all accounts, conservatives are one Justice short of the comfortable margin they’d need to reverse major Supreme Court precedents such as Roe v. Wade or the constitutional validation of the Affordable Care Act. It’s unlikely that today’s Court will remain unchanged until 2025, when a reelected Donald Trump would finally be forced to retire”
Supreme Court Vacancy in 2020 Would Change Everything

Now think to some of their past efforts to subvert our political processes. For instance using a fake Russia investigation, of which Trump after years of dragging it out, to try and make the claim no appointments should be made by a President under investigation by his opponents.
Here is an example from 2017 from <<<Schumer>>>.

View attachment 283115

And that’s still the game plan. An unwinnable, baseless, slow, never completely official “impeachment inquiry” so that when Ginsberg kicks they can moan “no president should appoint a justice while being investigated for impeachment”

It’s their last chance to save their ruling politburo. She must be very very sick...and those polls must be terrifying.

No worries. Trump will ignore their histrionics and appoint Ginsberg’s replacement. The Senate will approve it. And in his second term he will appoint Breyers replacement.
And after that Pence will get his shot.
This makes a lot of sense. Thank you.
 
What impeachment is really about is the people (the House) telling the states (the Senate) that the states made a mistake when they elected whomever president.

The people submit evidence to the states – articles of impeachment – as to why the states erred, and why the states should remove from office someone unfit to be president, such as Trump.

If the states agree with the people that an error was made, the states’ representatives in the Senate vote to remove that unfit individual from office.

That’s what impeachment is really about.
 
What impeachment is really about is the people (the House) telling the states (the Senate) that the states made a mistake when they elected whomever president.

The people submit evidence to the states – articles of impeachment – as to why the states erred, and why the states should remove from office someone unfit to be president, such as Trump.

If the states agree with the people that an error was made, the states’ representatives in the Senate vote to remove that unfit individual from office.

That’s what impeachment is really about.
Not THIS impeachment, Sparky. Try again after the brainwashing has worn off.
 
What impeachment is really about is the people (the House) telling the states (the Senate) that the states made a mistake when they elected whomever president.
The people submit evidence to the states – articles of impeachment – as to why the states erred, and why the states should remove from office someone unfit to be president, such as Trump.
If the states agree with the people that an error was made, the states’ representatives in the Senate vote to remove that unfit individual from office.
That’s what impeachment is really about.


Man, do you live in a world of stunning horseshit bubble fantasy or what?

The people do not "mistakes," numbnut, they elect choices. The House is acting solely on its own interest.

Stop your tear-jerk rationalizations and admit the impeachment talk is all about one thing only: the democrats trying to preserve their POWER:


Real Case on Trump.png
 
What impeachment is really about is the people (the House) telling the states (the Senate) that the states made a mistake when they elected whomever president.

The people submit evidence to the states – articles of impeachment – as to why the states erred, and why the states should remove from office someone unfit to be president, such as Trump.

If the states agree with the people that an error was made, the states’ representatives in the Senate vote to remove that unfit individual from office.

That’s what impeachment is really about.


It's not 1912....


News flash we have the 16th amendment now.


.
 
How would you republicans feel if per say a democratic president in the future want to the chinese for help in taking down your republican political candidate? Would you be ok with them launching a massive investigation against your guy? If not then remind me again why this isn't wrong.
 
Last edited:
What impeachment is really about is the people (the House) telling the states (the Senate) that the states made a mistake when they elected whomever president.

The people submit evidence to the states – articles of impeachment – as to why the states erred, and why the states should remove from office someone unfit to be president, such as Trump.

If the states agree with the people that an error was made, the states’ representatives in the Senate vote to remove that unfit individual from office.

That’s what impeachment is really about.
Did you graduate from the Al Sharpton School of Political Science?
 
How would you republicans feel if per say a democratic president in the future want to the chinese for help in taking down your republican political candidate? Would you be ok with them launching a massive investigation against your guy? If not then remind me again why this isn't wrong.
I tried google translate but it still didn't make any sense.
 
What impeachment is really about is the people (the House) telling the states (the Senate) that the states made a mistake when they elected whomever president.

The people submit evidence to the states – articles of impeachment – as to why the states erred, and why the states should remove from office someone unfit to be president, such as Trump.

If the states agree with the people that an error was made, the states’ representatives in the Senate vote to remove that unfit individual from office.

That’s what impeachment is really about.

I gotta disagree. The impeachment isn't about anything that happened before the inauguration. Whether he was a good or bad choice is a moot point. He is president. It's about his behavior as president. He has done lots that seemed to favor Russia over the US, and that could very well be because of agreements he made before taking office, but if he would have been inaugurated and not done the things he has done since, there would be no impeachment investigation.
 
What impeachment is really about is the people (the House) telling the states (the Senate) that the states made a mistake when they elected whomever president.

The people submit evidence to the states – articles of impeachment – as to why the states erred, and why the states should remove from office someone unfit to be president, such as Trump.

If the states agree with the people that an error was made, the states’ representatives in the Senate vote to remove that unfit individual from office.

That’s what impeachment is really about.




What this impeachment is about is the ruling class throwing a shit fit because their corrupt actions are being investigated.
 
How would you republicans feel if per say a democratic president in the future want to the chinese for help in taking down your republican political candidate? Would you be ok with them launching a massive investigation against your guy? If not then remind me again why this isn't wrong.
you mean like what Obama and Hilary did with the Russian dossier ??
 
How would you republicans feel if per say a democratic president in the future want to the chinese for help in taking down your republican political candidate? Would you be ok with them launching a massive investigation against your guy? If not then remind me again why this isn't wrong.
you mean like what Obama and Hilary did with the Russian dossier ??


Did you like that they did that too you?
 
How would you republicans feel if per say a democratic president in the future want to the chinese for help in taking down your republican political candidate? Would you be ok with them launching a massive investigation against your guy? If not then remind me again why this isn't wrong.
you mean like what Obama and Hilary did with the Russian dossier ??


Did you like that they did that too you?
Clinton and Obama used foreign governments to fabricate and lie to frame Trump ..... big difference ...thats tantamount to a foreign assisted coup !!! Trump has not asked anyone to commit fraudulent investigations to frame anyone ....it is his duty to investigate crimes committed by high ranking officials !! it is part of his responsibility in upholding the laws of the Uniteed States .
 
...and why it’s moving so slow.

There are two existential terrors Democrats face. First, their internal polling shows Trump winning again and secondly Ginsberg is dying.

“By almost all accounts, conservatives are one Justice short of the comfortable margin they’d need to reverse major Supreme Court precedents such as Roe v. Wade or the constitutional validation of the Affordable Care Act. It’s unlikely that today’s Court will remain unchanged until 2025, when a reelected Donald Trump would finally be forced to retire”
Supreme Court Vacancy in 2020 Would Change Everything

Now think to some of their past efforts to subvert our political processes. For instance using a fake Russia investigation, in which Trump was cleared after years of dragging it out, to try and make the claim no appointments should be made by a President under investigation by his opponents.
Here is an example from 2017 from <<<Schumer>>>.

View attachment 283115

And that’s still the game plan. An unwinnable, baseless, slow, never completely official “impeachment inquiry” so that when Ginsberg kicks they can moan “no president should appoint a justice while being investigated for impeachment”

It’s their last chance to save their ruling politburo. She must be very very sick...and those polls must be terrifying.

No worries. Trump will ignore their histrionics and appoint Ginsberg’s replacement. The Senate will approve it. And in his second term he will appoint Breyers replacement.
And after that Pence will get his shot.


I was thinking the same thing.....ginsberg must be about to go.......they pushed up their impeachment timetable because they suspect Trump will be able to appoint another justice before 2020....and they will claim he can't do that if he is under an impeachment investigation....they always planned on impeaching him, but they wanted it closer to 2020....
 
How would you republicans feel if per say a democratic president in the future want to the chinese for help in taking down your republican political candidate? Would you be ok with them launching a massive investigation against your guy? If not then remind me again why this isn't wrong.

Funny you should use that example. It’s already happened. Clinton and Gore were caught, red handed, and fined the largest fine in FEC history for accepting money from both the Chinese Communist Party and the Red Army.
1996 United States campaign finance controversy - Wikipedia

Over 300 administration officials and campaign workers ended up pleading the 5th or fleeing to communist China to avoid the consequences.
Investigation of Political Fundraising Improprieties and Possible Violations of Law, Interim Report
 
What impeachment is really about is the people (the House) telling the states (the Senate) that the states made a mistake when they elected whomever president.

The people submit evidence to the states – articles of impeachment – as to why the states erred, and why the states should remove from office someone unfit to be president, such as Trump.

If the states agree with the people that an error was made, the states’ representatives in the Senate vote to remove that unfit individual from office.

That’s what impeachment is really about.

I gotta disagree. The impeachment isn't about anything that happened before the inauguration. Whether he was a good or bad choice is a moot point. He is president. It's about his behavior as president. He has done lots that seemed to favor Russia over the US, and that could very well be because of agreements he made before taking office, but if he would have been inaugurated and not done the things he has done since, there would be no impeachment investigation.


It has nothing to do with anything Trump has done, it is only about winning in 2020.....you can piss all over the place but don't tell us it's raining......

He hasn't done anything that favors Russia.......he increased American energy independence, killed Russian Troops in Syria, armed Ukraine with actual weapons, unlike obama, supports Poland, and told Germany not to take Russian fuel.....as well as telling NATO to actually fund their militaries........

hilary took money from Russia, China, and just about every other enemy of this country before the election....then she lost....she's lucky she doesn't have to worry about radioactive tea....
 
And let’s not forget Ted Kennedy and the Democrats attempting to collude with the USSR to bring Reagan down. Our sworn enemies.
Ted Kennedy's Soviet Gambit

Treason is part of Democrat DNA.
 
How would you republicans feel if per say a democratic president in the future want to the chinese for help in taking down your republican political candidate? Would you be ok with them launching a massive investigation against your guy? If not then remind me again why this isn't wrong.

Funny you should use that example. It’s already happened. Clinton and Gore were caught, red handed, and fined the largest fine in FEC history for accepting money from both the Chinese Communist Party and the Red Army.
1996 United States campaign finance controversy - Wikipedia

Over 300 administration officials and campaign workers ended up pleading the 5th or fleeing to communist China to avoid the consequences.
Investigation of Political Fundraising Improprieties and Possible Violations of Law, Interim Report


And you can see the results in the new Missiles that China put on display last week.......courtesy of the 1990s era corruption of the clintons.....
 
How would you republicans feel if per say a democratic president in the future want to the chinese for help in taking down your republican political candidate? Would you be ok with them launching a massive investigation against your guy? If not then remind me again why this isn't wrong.

Funny you should use that example. It’s already happened. Clinton and Gore were caught, red handed, and fined the largest fine in FEC history for accepting money from both the Chinese Communist Party and the Red Army.


Over 300 administration officials and campaign workers ended up pleading the 5th or fleeing to communist China to avoid the consequences.


And you can see the results in the new Missiles that China put on display last week.......courtesy of the 1990s era corruption of the clintons.....


They probably would have gotten the tech anyways as their spies are in our labs and their students are taking over our science departments. The chinese people are cunning people.
 

Forum List

Back
Top