What Is It With Democrats?

Thanks for posting this thread. The mainstream media doesn't cover stuff like this....so we need people like you to help us stay on top of the info.
 
I hardly think this rises to the level, worthy of discussion, when we only just learned about the repubs using a child molester to impeach a sitting president.

Just saying.
 
Elizabeth Warren claimed to be Cherokee. She isn't.
Link?

Is Elizabeth Warren Native American or What - The Atlantic

Oh btw -- nothing about anyone named "Churchill" in the story either.

Oh btw - It was merely another example. Did it confuse you?

There's no such person in the story. Who in the fuck is "Ward Churchill"? Are we supposed to just somehow know by some osmosis of the universal subconscious?

RE Warren: your link does not show the negative, which is what you asserted, which is what I asked for.
So you lose.

I just told you "don't play stoopid". I didn't figure on it not being a 'play'.
 
There's no such person in the story.

Irrelevant. It was given as a further example of common Democrat psychoses.

Who in the fuck is "Ward Churchill"?

"Don't play stoopid" You know who Ward Churchill is.

RE Warren: your link does not show the negative, which is what you asserted, which is what I asked for.

Lack of proof is either a negative, or an act of faith. Faith is not warranted in this circumstance.

So you lose.

Self-aggrandizing will not help you.

I just told you "don't play stoopid". I didn't figure on it not being a 'play'.

Your arguments are erudite and clearly stated. Oh, I'm just playin' with ya ...:laugh2:
 
Elizabeth Warren claimed to be Cherokee. She isn't.
Link?

Is Elizabeth Warren Native American or What - The Atlantic

Oh btw -- nothing about anyone named "Churchill" in the story either.

Oh btw - It was merely another example. Did it confuse you?

There's no such person in the story. Who in the fuck is "Ward Churchill"? Are we supposed to just somehow know by some osmosis of the universal subconscious?

RE Warren: your link does not show the negative, which is what you asserted, which is what I asked for.
So you lose.

I just told you "don't play stoopid". I didn't figure on it not being a 'play'.
You wouldn't know much about Ward Churchill because left wing media did not expose his fraud and anti-American curriculum as a professor.
 
There's no such person in the story.

Irrelevant. It was given as a further example of common Democrat psychoses.

Who in the fuck is "Ward Churchill"?

"Don't play stoopid" You know who Ward Churchill is.

No actually I do not. I don't live in this soup of Fox Noise and MSNBCs and Limblobs that summa y'all seem to. If I had to guess I'd guess Winston Churchill was a fan of Leave it to Beaver when he named his son. That's all I got until somebody gives me a reason to care. Or a link like the one you forgot.


RE Warren: your link does not show the negative, which is what you asserted, which is what I asked for.

Lack of proof is either a negative, or an act of faith. Faith is not warranted in this circumstance.

"Warranted", I get it. Nice pun. :thup:
Here's the bad news: no it isn't. Lack of proof is simply not documenting an assertion. Which is what you just did failing to back up, and I quote,

"Elizabeth Warren claimed to be Cherokee. She isn't."

-- you remember that quote. It's the one you keep stripping out of these posts because it's inconvenient. You assert the negative, but can't prove it. Therefore the negative falls.

Busted.


So you lose.

Self-aggrandizing will not help you.

I just told you "don't play stoopid". I didn't figure on it not being a 'play'.

Your arguments are erudite and clearly stated. Oh, I'm just playin' with ya ...:laugh2:

Fair enough! :beer:
 
I don't live in this soup of Fox Noise and MSNBCs and Limblobs that summa y'all seem to. If I had to guess I'd guess Winston Churchill was a fan of Leave it to Beaver when he named his son. That's all I got until somebody gives me a reason to care. Or a link like the one you forgot.

What you're saying is that you rely exclusively on institutionally left wing biased news sources.
Like it or not, FNC is necessary for balance and for vetting and for info that is often omitted by mainstream news because it doesn't jibe with the politic (e.g., Ward Churchill). Get past the obvious right wingers on FNC and you'll realize you'll be informed more than you knew you needed.
It's important to know about Churchill, etc., to realize how corrupt college curriculum can be. Especially at a state school funded in part by taxpayers.
 
I don't live in this soup of Fox Noise and MSNBCs and Limblobs that summa y'all seem to. If I had to guess I'd guess Winston Churchill was a fan of Leave it to Beaver when he named his son. That's all I got until somebody gives me a reason to care. Or a link like the one you forgot.

What you're saying is that you rely exclusively on institutionally left wing biased news sources.
Like it or not, FNC is necessary for balance and for vetting and for info that is often omitted by mainstream news because it doesn't jibe with the politic (e.g., Ward Churchill). Get past the obvious right wingers on FNC and you'll realize you'll be informed more than you knew you needed.
It's important to know about Churchill, etc., to realize how corrupt college curriculum can be. Especially at a state school funded in part by taxpayers.

Aha, a clue.
So this Ward Churchill has something to do with Fox Noise stories?

He must be black then, amirite?

Btw, most of my news exposure comes from outside this country altogether. It's less biased that way.
 

Forum List

Back
Top