Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I see that some people have produced explanations that make one a part of the other. I see them as being commonly used together but separate. For example, while Russia is clearly a command based economy, they have also embraced capitalism and now spit on the word socialism.But that does not mean that socialism and command based economic systems are the same thing.
they are essentially the same especially given that both terms have several and imprecise meanings!!
Google:
command economy
noun
1.
a socialist economic system in which production anddistribution of goods and services are controlled by thegovernment and industry is mostly publicly owned.
I like the old way best. where if we didn't like something or someone we labeled them communist, fascist, socialist, traitor, sellout, liberal, conservative and so on. Seems like a waste of good names.
Incorrect. Central government is not a requirement for socialism.I see that some people have produced explanations that make one a part of the other. I see them as being commonly used together but separate. For example, while Russia is clearly a command based economy, they have also embraced capitalism and now spit on the word socialism.But that does not mean that socialism and command based economic systems are the same thing.
they are essentially the same especially given that both terms have several and imprecise meanings!!
Google:
command economy
noun
1.
a socialist economic system in which production anddistribution of goods and services are controlled by thegovernment and industry is mostly publicly owned.
they may spit in socialism but they still have huge commands from central govt which is the point of socialism. In any case the debate remains the same: does freedom work better than liberalism communism socialism monarchy command fascism and dictatorship etc etc.
Well that goes without saying. Of course free market capitalism outperforms liberalism communism socialism monarchy command fascism and dictatorship etc etc. Why do you think liberalism communism socialism monarchy command fascism and dictatorship etc. are all borrowing from free market capitalism?I see that some people have produced explanations that make one a part of the other. I see them as being commonly used together but separate. For example, while Russia is clearly a command based economy, they have also embraced capitalism and now spit on the word socialism.But that does not mean that socialism and command based economic systems are the same thing.
they are essentially the same especially given that both terms have several and imprecise meanings!!
Google:
command economy
noun
1.
a socialist economic system in which production anddistribution of goods and services are controlled by thegovernment and industry is mostly publicly owned.
they may spit in socialism but they still have huge commands from central govt which is the point of socialism. In any case the debate remains the same: does freedom work better than liberalism communism socialism monarchy command fascism and dictatorship etc etc.
Incorrect. Central government is not a requirement for socialism.I see that some people have produced explanations that make one a part of the other. I see them as being commonly used together but separate. For example, while Russia is clearly a command based economy, they have also embraced capitalism and now spit on the word socialism.But that does not mean that socialism and command based economic systems are the same thing.
they are essentially the same especially given that both terms have several and imprecise meanings!!
Google:
command economy
noun
1.
a socialist economic system in which production anddistribution of goods and services are controlled by thegovernment and industry is mostly publicly owned.
they may spit in socialism but they still have huge commands from central govt which is the point of socialism. In any case the debate remains the same: does freedom work better than liberalism communism socialism monarchy command fascism and dictatorship etc etc.
I see that some people have produced explanations that make one a part of the other. I see them as being commonly used together but separate. For example, while Russia is clearly a command based economy, they have also embraced capitalism and now spit on the word socialism.But that does not mean that socialism and command based economic systems are the same thing.
they are essentially the same especially given that both terms have several and imprecise meanings!!
Google:
command economy
noun
1.
a socialist economic system in which production anddistribution of goods and services are controlled by thegovernment and industry is mostly publicly owned.
they may spit in socialism but they still have huge commands from central govt which is the point of socialism. In any case the debate remains the same: does freedom work better than liberalism communism socialism monarchy command fascism and dictatorship etc etc.
Me not freedom, you freedom? Its makes sense to me.I like the old way best. where if we didn't like something or someone we labeled them communist, fascist, socialist, traitor, sellout, liberal, conservative and so on. Seems like a waste of good names.
can you try that again only in better english so its makes sense? better yet why not tell us if you're freedom or govt and why.
Why do you think central government is a requirement for socialism? Why can't two people implement socialism? Why do they need a central government to implement socialism between two people?Incorrect. Central government is not a requirement for socialism.I see that some people have produced explanations that make one a part of the other. I see them as being commonly used together but separate. For example, while Russia is clearly a command based economy, they have also embraced capitalism and now spit on the word socialism.But that does not mean that socialism and command based economic systems are the same thing.
they are essentially the same especially given that both terms have several and imprecise meanings!!
Google:
command economy
noun
1.
a socialist economic system in which production anddistribution of goods and services are controlled by thegovernment and industry is mostly publicly owned.
they may spit in socialism but they still have huge commands from central govt which is the point of socialism. In any case the debate remains the same: does freedom work better than liberalism communism socialism monarchy command fascism and dictatorship etc etc.
That's what socialists like to believe. Reality has proven otherwise.
Are families guilty of socialism?Why do you think central government is a requirement for socialism? Why can't two people implement socialism? Why do they need a central government to implement socialism between two people?Incorrect. Central government is not a requirement for socialism.I see that some people have produced explanations that make one a part of the other. I see them as being commonly used together but separate. For example, while Russia is clearly a command based economy, they have also embraced capitalism and now spit on the word socialism.they are essentially the same especially given that both terms have several and imprecise meanings!!
Google:
command economy
noun
1.
a socialist economic system in which production anddistribution of goods and services are controlled by thegovernment and industry is mostly publicly owned.
they may spit in socialism but they still have huge commands from central govt which is the point of socialism. In any case the debate remains the same: does freedom work better than liberalism communism socialism monarchy command fascism and dictatorship etc etc.
That's what socialists like to believe. Reality has proven otherwise.
Some employ socialism, yes.Are families guilty of socialism?Why do you think central government is a requirement for socialism? Why can't two people implement socialism? Why do they need a central government to implement socialism between two people?Incorrect. Central government is not a requirement for socialism.I see that some people have produced explanations that make one a part of the other. I see them as being commonly used together but separate. For example, while Russia is clearly a command based economy, they have also embraced capitalism and now spit on the word socialism.
they may spit in socialism but they still have huge commands from central govt which is the point of socialism. In any case the debate remains the same: does freedom work better than liberalism communism socialism monarchy command fascism and dictatorship etc etc.
That's what socialists like to believe. Reality has proven otherwise.
Why do you think central government is a requirement for socialism? Why can't two people implement socialism? Why do they need a central government to implement socialism between two people?Incorrect. Central government is not a requirement for socialism.I see that some people have produced explanations that make one a part of the other. I see them as being commonly used together but separate. For example, while Russia is clearly a command based economy, they have also embraced capitalism and now spit on the word socialism.they are essentially the same especially given that both terms have several and imprecise meanings!!
Google:
command economy
noun
1.
a socialist economic system in which production anddistribution of goods and services are controlled by thegovernment and industry is mostly publicly owned.
they may spit in socialism but they still have huge commands from central govt which is the point of socialism. In any case the debate remains the same: does freedom work better than liberalism communism socialism monarchy command fascism and dictatorship etc etc.
That's what socialists like to believe. Reality has proven otherwise.
There are different aspects of socialism:
Socialism - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
including
Market socialism - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
and different types of capitalism:
Capitalism - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
including state capitalism:
Capitalism - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
No. Socialism is not the same thing as a command based economic system. While you can have a command based economic system that includes socialsm, they are not the same thing.Incorrect I gave an example. Do you need a link to command based economic system? Most economic systems are a mix.Not necessarily. Socialism can be a component of a command based economic system but that would require it to be a mix of market and command based systems. Otherwise there is nothing to socialize. If the government owns you and all land and all commodities, and you are just a slave to the government... Then there is no distribution from one group to another, there is only top down distribution.Um...that's socialism, it's central economic planning. You are very confused today, you should take a nap and start over
What you said was that government can own all property and the economy not be socialist, you have yet to back it up and this sure doesn't do it
I already replied to that. A command based economic system is a centrally planned economy, it is directly socialism. The question is to name a system where government owns all property and the economy is NOT socialist, not one that is socialist
Said another way a feature of communist system is using a command based economic system. But that does not mean that socialism and command based economic systems are the same thing.
Of the fifteen or so types of socialism one was Marx's Scientific Socialism. It was to ready people for communism. The USSR dropped scientific socialism in a couple of years, it was a bomb and created the New Economic "Program. Because Marx had used the scientific socialism label, many associated socialism with communism.There are different aspects of socialism:
Socialism - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
including
Market socialism - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
and different types of capitalism:
Capitalism - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
including state capitalism:
Capitalism - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
"Market socialism" is an oxymoron.
"State capitalism" is a euphemism for "communism.
"capitalism" is not socialism. It's the opposite of socialism.
Of the fifteen or so types of socialism one was Marx's Scientific Socialism. It was to ready people for communism. The USSR dropped scientific socialism in a couple of years, it was a bomb and created the New Economic "Program. Because Marx had used the scientific socialism label, many associated socialism with communism.There are different aspects of socialism:
Socialism - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
including
Market socialism - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
and different types of capitalism:
Capitalism - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
including state capitalism:
Capitalism - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
"Market socialism" is an oxymoron.
"State capitalism" is a euphemism for "communism.
"capitalism" is not socialism. It's the opposite of socialism.
I read thread after thread where evil corporations and the free market are castigated by liberals and progressives. So, when I ran across this item, I decided to share it. The video is six minutes long but has some pretty interesting content. It can be viewed
Of the fifteen or so types of socialism one was Marx's Scientific Socialism. It was to ready people for communism. The USSR dropped scientific socialism in a couple of years, it was a bomb and created the New Economic "Program. Because Marx had used the scientific socialism label, many associated socialism with communism.There are different aspects of socialism:
Socialism - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
including
Market socialism - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
and different types of capitalism:
Capitalism - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
including state capitalism:
Capitalism - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
"Market socialism" is an oxymoron.
"State capitalism" is a euphemism for "communism.
"capitalism" is not socialism. It's the opposite of socialism.
Why do you think central government is a requirement for socialism? Why can't two people implement socialism? Why do they need a central government to implement socialism between two people?
