What Makes Poor People Poor? - Special Segment

[Ame®icano]

just stories?

The Poor Pay More in Taxes | The Economic Populist

From your link.

"According to a new report from the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, in nearly every state, low- and middle-income families pay a bigger share of their income in state and local taxes than wealthy families."

"According to the study, in 2015 the poorest fifth of Americans will pay on average 10.9 percent of their income in state and local taxes, the middle fifth will pay 9.4 percent and the top 1 percent will average 5.4 percent."

State and local taxes.

State and local taxes.

State and local taxes.

Let that sink in. Moron.

taxes are taxes. and the Poor can afford taxes the least.

Yes, the rich pay more in taxes (because they earn so much more) — but they don't usually pay more as a percentage of their incomes.

They do on a federal level, moron.

Apples and oranges.

 

[Papageorgio]

compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment automatically stabilizes that.

thats theft

a lack of equal protection of the law is theft.

what law???

a federal doctrine and State laws regarding the concept of employment at will.

what laws????

please be specific

Good luck with that! LOL!

 

[danielpalos]

no, it won't. the right wing doesn't care about economics and prefer to make up stories.

How does raising the taxes on the middle class help the middle class? How does taxing the rich more to pay for services help the middle class when we all know that the cost of the raised taxes get passed down to the middle class?

not sure what you mean. compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment should be public policy and a promotion of the general welfare.

everyone benefits with more liquidity in our economy.

So if everyone benefits from the liquidity in our economy, the tax cuts for the rich helps the economy and the poor, at least that is your claim? Still no cure?

tax cuts for the rich does nothing for the poor.

You just said liquidity benefits the economy.

How do we define rich ?

Liquidity for the rich doesn't translate to actually solving simple poverty for the poor.

 

[danielpalos]

just stories?

The Poor Pay More in Taxes | The Economic Populist

From your link.

"According to a new report from the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, in nearly every state, low- and middle-income families pay a bigger share of their income in state and local taxes than wealthy families."

"According to the study, in 2015 the poorest fifth of Americans will pay on average 10.9 percent of their income in state and local taxes, the middle fifth will pay 9.4 percent and the top 1 percent will average 5.4 percent."

State and local taxes.

State and local taxes.

State and local taxes.

Let that sink in. Moron.

taxes are taxes. and the Poor can afford taxes the least.

Yes, the rich pay more in taxes (because they earn so much more) — but they don't usually pay more as a percentage of their incomes.

They do on a federal level, moron.

Apples and oranges.

because they earn so much more

 

[danielpalos]

thats theft

a lack of equal protection of the law is theft.

what law???

a federal doctrine and State laws regarding the concept of employment at will.

what laws????

please be specific

Good luck with that! LOL!

you all are clueless and Causeless if you don't know what I am talking about by now.

 

[progressive hunter]

How does raising the taxes on the middle class help the middle class? How does taxing the rich more to pay for services help the middle class when we all know that the cost of the raised taxes get passed down to the middle class?

not sure what you mean. compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment should be public policy and a promotion of the general welfare.

everyone benefits with more liquidity in our economy.

So if everyone benefits from the liquidity in our economy, the tax cuts for the rich helps the economy and the poor, at least that is your claim? Still no cure?

tax cuts for the rich does nothing for the poor.

You just said liquidity benefits the economy.

How do we define rich ?

Liquidity for the rich doesn't translate to actually solving simple poverty for the poor.

what does solve poverty is the poor getting off their ass and getting a job so they can pay their fair share and not be a burden to humanity

 

[progressive hunter]

a lack of equal protection of the law is theft.

what law???

a federal doctrine and State laws regarding the concept of employment at will.

what laws????

please be specific

Good luck with that! LOL!

you all are clueless and Causeless if you don't know what I am talking about by now.

we know youre talking about communism, and we reject it

 

[danielpalos]

not sure what you mean. compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment should be public policy and a promotion of the general welfare.

everyone benefits with more liquidity in our economy.

So if everyone benefits from the liquidity in our economy, the tax cuts for the rich helps the economy and the poor, at least that is your claim? Still no cure?

tax cuts for the rich does nothing for the poor.

You just said liquidity benefits the economy.

How do we define rich ?

Liquidity for the rich doesn't translate to actually solving simple poverty for the poor.

what does solve poverty is the poor getting off their ass and getting a job so they can pay their fair share and not be a burden to humanity

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment that benefits the Rich not the Poor.

 

[danielpalos]

what law???

a federal doctrine and State laws regarding the concept of employment at will.

what laws????

please be specific

Good luck with that! LOL!

you all are clueless and Causeless if you don't know what I am talking about by now.

we know youre talking about communism, and we reject it

lol. you don't care about the law, right wingers. just a bunch of pots calling kettles black.

 

[progressive hunter]

So if everyone benefits from the liquidity in our economy, the tax cuts for the rich helps the economy and the poor, at least that is your claim? Still no cure?

tax cuts for the rich does nothing for the poor.

You just said liquidity benefits the economy.

How do we define rich ?

Liquidity for the rich doesn't translate to actually solving simple poverty for the poor.

what does solve poverty is the poor getting off their ass and getting a job so they can pay their fair share and not be a burden to humanity

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment that benefits the Rich not the Poor.

without capitalism there would be a lot more poor people,,,just look at the old russia for one of the many examples

 

[progressive hunter]

a federal doctrine and State laws regarding the concept of employment at will.

what laws????

please be specific

Good luck with that! LOL!

you all are clueless and Causeless if you don't know what I am talking about by now.

we know youre talking about communism, and we reject it

lol. you don't care about the law, right wingers. just a bunch of pots calling kettles black.

what law???

 

[Papageorgio]

How does raising the taxes on the middle class help the middle class? How does taxing the rich more to pay for services help the middle class when we all know that the cost of the raised taxes get passed down to the middle class?

not sure what you mean. compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment should be public policy and a promotion of the general welfare.

everyone benefits with more liquidity in our economy.

So if everyone benefits from the liquidity in our economy, the tax cuts for the rich helps the economy and the poor, at least that is your claim? Still no cure?

tax cuts for the rich does nothing for the poor.

You just said liquidity benefits the economy.

How do we define rich ?

Liquidity for the rich doesn't translate to actually solving simple poverty for the poor.

Seems to me you just change your theories to suit your agenda.

 

[danielpalos]

tax cuts for the rich does nothing for the poor.

You just said liquidity benefits the economy.

How do we define rich ?

Liquidity for the rich doesn't translate to actually solving simple poverty for the poor.

what does solve poverty is the poor getting off their ass and getting a job so they can pay their fair share and not be a burden to humanity

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment that benefits the Rich not the Poor.

without capitalism there would be a lot more poor people,,,just look at the old russia for one of the many examples

we merely need to learn how to Use capitalism for all of its capital worth in modern times. socialism is about Government.

 

[progressive hunter]

So if everyone benefits from the liquidity in our economy, the tax cuts for the rich helps the economy and the poor, at least that is your claim? Still no cure?

tax cuts for the rich does nothing for the poor.

You just said liquidity benefits the economy.

How do we define rich ?

Liquidity for the rich doesn't translate to actually solving simple poverty for the poor.

what does solve poverty is the poor getting off their ass and getting a job so they can pay their fair share and not be a burden to humanity

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment that benefits the Rich not the Poor.

and there is no better way to reduce poverty than capitalism,,,

just like there is no better way to increase it like communism

 

[danielpalos]

what laws????

please be specific

Good luck with that! LOL!

you all are clueless and Causeless if you don't know what I am talking about by now.

we know youre talking about communism, and we reject it

lol. you don't care about the law, right wingers. just a bunch of pots calling kettles black.

what law???

At-will employment - Wikipedia

 

[progressive hunter]

You just said liquidity benefits the economy.

How do we define rich ?

Liquidity for the rich doesn't translate to actually solving simple poverty for the poor.

what does solve poverty is the poor getting off their ass and getting a job so they can pay their fair share and not be a burden to humanity

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment that benefits the Rich not the Poor.

without capitalism there would be a lot more poor people,,,just look at the old russia for one of the many examples

we merely need to learn how to Use capitalism for all of its capital worth in modern times. socialism is about Government.

and you want government to solve the problem

 

[danielpalos]

not sure what you mean. compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment should be public policy and a promotion of the general welfare.

everyone benefits with more liquidity in our economy.

So if everyone benefits from the liquidity in our economy, the tax cuts for the rich helps the economy and the poor, at least that is your claim? Still no cure?

tax cuts for the rich does nothing for the poor.

You just said liquidity benefits the economy.

How do we define rich ?

Liquidity for the rich doesn't translate to actually solving simple poverty for the poor.

Seems to me you just change your theories to suit your agenda.

seems to me you just make up stories, regardless of any sublime Truth (value) discoverable through argumentation.

 

[danielpalos]

tax cuts for the rich does nothing for the poor.

You just said liquidity benefits the economy.

How do we define rich ?

Liquidity for the rich doesn't translate to actually solving simple poverty for the poor.

what does solve poverty is the poor getting off their ass and getting a job so they can pay their fair share and not be a burden to humanity

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment that benefits the Rich not the Poor.

and there is no better way to reduce poverty than capitalism,,,

just like there is no better way to increase it like communism

the law always seems to favor the rich at the expense of the poor.

 

[danielpalos]

Liquidity for the rich doesn't translate to actually solving simple poverty for the poor.

what does solve poverty is the poor getting off their ass and getting a job so they can pay their fair share and not be a burden to humanity

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment that benefits the Rich not the Poor.

without capitalism there would be a lot more poor people,,,just look at the old russia for one of the many examples

we merely need to learn how to Use capitalism for all of its capital worth in modern times. socialism is about Government.

and you want government to solve the problem

not a border issue?

 

[progressive hunter]

You just said liquidity benefits the economy.

How do we define rich ?

Liquidity for the rich doesn't translate to actually solving simple poverty for the poor.

what does solve poverty is the poor getting off their ass and getting a job so they can pay their fair share and not be a burden to humanity

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment that benefits the Rich not the Poor.

and there is no better way to reduce poverty than capitalism,,,

just like there is no better way to increase it like communism

the law always seems to favor the rich at the expense of the poor.

what law???