What The Hell Does A Normal American Need An Army Assault Weapon For.....Target Practice?

[ThunderKiss1965]

I was in the Army and what you are calling an "Army Assault Weapon" is not.

 

[Brain357]

Define "Assault Weapon" in a way that can be clearly understood, and explain how banning such would "save lives." Unless you can do that - and no one in Congress can - then WTF is your point? Do you know what an "automatic" firearm is?

Do you believe that banning "assault weapons" will render terrorists incapable of murdering large numbers of people? Or will they just have to resort to other available means?

Why does any "normal" American need a street-legal car that will go 200mph? Why does any "normal" American need a 6,000 pound 4WD pickup truck to go to the grocery store? Why does any "normal" American need to eat a 1,000 calorie banana split? Why does any "normal" American need an 8,000 sq ft house? Why does any "normal" American need a PhD in music theory?

I'll try. An assault weapon is a much more effective weapon for killing a large number of human beings in a hurry: It has less recoil than a standard deer rifle (30-30 for example), a larger capacity magazine compared to the clip used in the M1 Garand and much lighter and easier to conceal than the BAR.

Any gun fired at anyone is technically an assault weapon

as is a baseball bat swung at another person

So many dead and the right still plays the definition games. Pathetic. We need to bring back the 10 rd mag limit.

 

[easyt65]

"What The Hell Does A Normal American Need An Army Assault Weapon For.....Target Practice?"

It's really none of your business. All you need to know is that the right to bear arms is protected by the Constitution.

Just because liberals in NY think the same about 32oz sodas and have enacted laws restricting / punishing Americans from buying them doesn't mean they can do the same with our 2nd Amendment.

 

[jon_berzerk]

No rifle any civilian can buy is a military grade weapon

Who in the fuck designated YOU the authority on guns? LMAO.

You probably don't know that the designer of the AR, designed it for the military. And had no intention of it be coming a civilian weapon. According to the designers family.

When the patents expired, the game was on as several gun manufacturers used those patents to build the variety of AR 15s that are out there today.

Now any fucking crazy person can buy a weapon very well suited to kill lots of people. Which was its intent in the first place. Though it was supposed to kill our enemies. Not our fellow citizens.

there you go with your outright lies again

 

[martybegan]

Define "Assault Weapon" in a way that can be clearly understood, and explain how banning such would "save lives." Unless you can do that - and no one in Congress can - then WTF is your point? Do you know what an "automatic" firearm is?

Do you believe that banning "assault weapons" will render terrorists incapable of murdering large numbers of people? Or will they just have to resort to other available means?

Why does any "normal" American need a street-legal car that will go 200mph? Why does any "normal" American need a 6,000 pound 4WD pickup truck to go to the grocery store? Why does any "normal" American need to eat a 1,000 calorie banana split? Why does any "normal" American need an 8,000 sq ft house? Why does any "normal" American need a PhD in music theory?

I'll try. An assault weapon is a much more effective weapon for killing a large number of human beings in a hurry: It has less recoil than a standard deer rifle (30-30 for example), a larger capacity magazine compared to the clip used in the M1 Garand and much lighter and easier to conceal than the BAR.

Any gun fired at anyone is technically an assault weapon

as is a baseball bat swung at another person

So many dead and the right still plays the definition games. Pathetic. We need to bring back the 10 rd mag limit.

The cops would be forced to follow that as well, right?

 

[Skull Pilot]

Define "Assault Weapon" in a way that can be clearly understood, and explain how banning such would "save lives." Unless you can do that - and no one in Congress can - then WTF is your point? Do you know what an "automatic" firearm is?

Do you believe that banning "assault weapons" will render terrorists incapable of murdering large numbers of people? Or will they just have to resort to other available means?

Why does any "normal" American need a street-legal car that will go 200mph? Why does any "normal" American need a 6,000 pound 4WD pickup truck to go to the grocery store? Why does any "normal" American need to eat a 1,000 calorie banana split? Why does any "normal" American need an 8,000 sq ft house? Why does any "normal" American need a PhD in music theory?

I'll try. An assault weapon is a much more effective weapon for killing a large number of human beings in a hurry: It has less recoil than a standard deer rifle (30-30 for example), a larger capacity magazine compared to the clip used in the M1 Garand and much lighter and easier to conceal than the BAR.

Any gun fired at anyone is technically an assault weapon

as is a baseball bat swung at another person

So many dead and the right still plays the definition games. Pathetic. We need to bring back the 10 rd mag limit.

No problem since it only takes a second or two to change out a magazine with a little practice

 

[easyt65]

So many dead and the right still plays the definition games. Pathetic. We need to bring back the 10 rd mag limit.

Says the guy whose past President was held in Contempt Of Court and was disbarred from practicing law for unethically 'playing the definition game', specifically the definition of the word 'is'.

 

[defcon4]

The gun experts have been telling us these rifles aren't military and not that dangerous. Now one shooter killed 50 and injured 50 in minutes. Seems the experts don't know shit or blatantly lie. Oh and an armed defender was there, more pro gun BS.

Approximately 180 minutes that is while he was texting and posting on Facebook. How come out of the 300 people in the club 100 did not attack him while he was posting?

 

[Wilbur Right]

Again, bitch-tits, you are just butt hurt because your line of attempted logic got called out for the bullshit that it was. Deal with it.

You blathered about "abortion" and think you made some valid point? LMAO.

Least I got enough money to have all the guns I want. Sucks to be you.

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

The real question is why shouldn't a lawful american citizen be able to own a semi automatic rifle, which is the proper name for an "Assault weapon".

You read the article about the family of the AR 15 designer who said that their father (designer/builder of AR 15s) had zero intention of it being a weapon for civilians.

How about that?

You are talking about the full automatic version that became the first M-16 not the semi-automatic of today. Civilians can legally own fully automatic weapons but the red tape and cost isn't easy and criminals won't bother.

 

[Brain357]

This idea of the NRA governing the types of weapons available in gun shops is rank bull shit! Why is it that we're the only industrialized nation in the world which feels the necessity of a ordinary citizen to go armed with a killing machine?

No rifle any civilian can buy is a military grade weapon

Yet the one used in Orlando killed so many so quickly. Too dangerous for people to own.

Your opinion.

BTW I could have killed just as many with a 1 ton 4 by 4 with a plow on the front

No it's a fact moron. 50 dead and 50 injured in minutes with an armed off duty cop there trying to stop him. All your pro gun bs out the window.

It's your opinion that the gun is dangerous. The person doing the shooting was dangerous not the gun

No it is a dangerous gun. Just bought it like 2 weeks ago and killed and injured so many with a cop there trying to stop him.

 

[Skull Pilot]

No rifle any civilian can buy is a military grade weapon

Yet the one used in Orlando killed so many so quickly. Too dangerous for people to own.

Your opinion.

BTW I could have killed just as many with a 1 ton 4 by 4 with a plow on the front

No it's a fact moron. 50 dead and 50 injured in minutes with an armed off duty cop there trying to stop him. All your pro gun bs out the window.

It's your opinion that the gun is dangerous. The person doing the shooting was dangerous not the gun

No it is a dangerous gun. Just bought it like 2 weeks ago and killed and injured so many with a cop there trying to stop him.

Sorry the gun didn't do anything the person did.

People are violent. People are dangerous. Always have been always will be

 

[Brain357]

The gun experts have been telling us these rifles aren't military and not that dangerous. Now one shooter killed 50 and injured 50 in minutes. Seems the experts don't know shit or blatantly lie. Oh and an armed defender was there, more pro gun BS.

If the shooter has chosen the correct weapons for his mission, he would have racked up many more kills.

When you figure 300+ targets and 3 hours..... not a great score.

He didn't have 3 hours. The police had him holed up in the bathroom in minutes. The hostage situation took hours. Most the killing just minutes.

 

[defcon4]

A semi auto rifle with high capacity magazines just killed 50 and injured 50 in minutes with an armed off duty cop there trying to stop him. Nobody should have that kind of firepower.

Yeah, you are stupid. The semiauto rifle did not kill anybody, the terrorist did. Applying your logic, when ISIS terrorists behead people it is not ISIS terrorists but the blade they are using is beheading people. Retard....

Stupid is letting terrorists legally buy guns that are so dangerous. When did the right become so pro terrorist?

It is not pro terrorist moron. It is the right of American Citizens and legal alien residents own firearms.
Let's introduce censorship....

 

[jon_berzerk]

2nd amendment retard.




.

Why then can I not go to the local gun shop and buy a BAR and a few frag grenades? I could us the Browning for curls when I'm not hunting squirrels. The frag grenade would be great for those a-holes who tailgate, that would awaken them to the dangers they create.

Answer these questions, genius

if you can afford it you can get a BAR

--LOL

Not without jumping through hoops. See the word Infringe? Think once in while.

yes that is one of the reasons the govenment did not pursue millers gun

the very question asked

was millers shotgun usefully as a military weapon

 

[dannyboys]

The real question is why shouldn't a lawful american citizen be able to own a semi automatic rifle, which is the proper name for an "Assault weapon".

You read the article about the family of the AR 15 designer who said that their father (designer/builder of AR 15s) had zero intention of it being a weapon for civilians.

How about that?

Ya and the designer of the first automobile had no intention that it would be available to buy other than by the very wealthy.
The designer's "intention" is fucking irrelevant.
Wise up asshole!

 

[Wilbur Right]

How come out of the 300 people in the club 100 did not attack him while he was posting

You ever hear of "self preservation". Read up on it. Learn something. There are studies that have been done examining that lack of aggression when someone is holding a gun on you.

A dark club, most everybody with a buzz and now in shock, trying to save their asses. And you want to know why a hundred people didn't attack the shooter.

Self preservation.

 

[there4eyeM]

Need has nothing to do with it. It is all about appearance. Somehow, it enhances self perception for certain persons.

 

[martybegan]

Again, bitch-tits, you are just butt hurt because your line of attempted logic got called out for the bullshit that it was. Deal with it.

You blathered about "abortion" and think you made some valid point? LMAO.

Least I got enough money to have all the guns I want. Sucks to be you.

No, i called out your bullshit comparison, i.e :if X created/invented Y, then X dictates how Y can be used".

So by your logic Roe V Wade should go down the shitter because Roe doesn't support it anymore.

And for your 2nd point bitch-tits, only rich people with time to spare should have the RKBA?

Why do you hate poor and/or busy people?

 

[Brain357]

Yet the one used in Orlando killed so many so quickly. Too dangerous for people to own.

Your opinion.

BTW I could have killed just as many with a 1 ton 4 by 4 with a plow on the front

No it's a fact moron. 50 dead and 50 injured in minutes with an armed off duty cop there trying to stop him. All your pro gun bs out the window.

It's your opinion that the gun is dangerous. The person doing the shooting was dangerous not the gun

No it is a dangerous gun. Just bought it like 2 weeks ago and killed and injured so many with a cop there trying to stop him.

Sorry the gun didn't do anything the person did.

People are violent. People are dangerous. Always have been always will be

And a dangerous asshole with a gun can kill way more than one with a knife.