Dogmaphobe
Diamond Member
That's why old people all look like they have big noses and ears.
I beg your pardon!
I mean, who can even see my ears with all that hair that grows out of them, anyway?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
That's why old people all look like they have big noses and ears.
The age category photos were all pulled from "10s"The bottom pictures . . . there really isn't much of a difference at all. All of them are relatively attractive females who you would be lucky to have approach you, I'm sure. Lol!
A picture tells a tale of a thousand words.The age category photos were all pulled from "10s"The bottom pictures . . . there really isn't much of a difference at all. All of them are relatively attractive females who you would be lucky to have approach you, I'm sure. Lol!
I think you're charts and graphs are retarded, to be honest. I laugh when you post them, and people take them seriously.
Hmmm, don't do a thing for me.As far as I can tell, by inspecting Renee's photo, her nose and mouth are exactly the same. Her eyes look smaller, but that is normal when people age and the skin over the upper eyelids begins to get a big saggy. This is what tells me that she hasn't had a lot of work done and is trying to age gracefully. I don't think she looks bad for her age at all. I hope I look as good when I'm her age.
Come on Sgt_Gath, you know you would go for it!
This was her in 2010.
This is her now.
I'm sorry, but she looks like a completely different person to me.
That's not to say that she's ugly. She actually looks a bit like Robin Wright.
She just doesn't look like herself.
Unique is dogwhistle for ugly?Rene had a unique face
Now she doesnt
A picture tells a tale of a thousand words.The age category photos were all pulled from "10s"The bottom pictures . . . there really isn't much of a difference at all. All of them are relatively attractive females who you would be lucky to have approach you, I'm sure. Lol!
I think you're charts and graphs are retarded, to be honest. I laugh when you post them, and people take them seriously.
Sixty years of porn films????This is Betty White at 20
This is Betty white now.
What the hell happened?
All are the SAME person. The facial features in each photo are slightly altered to serve a pointNo, too many photographers from different angles.
I suspect that she works hard to keep her figure and that when the weight comes off, some is coming off of her face. Combine aging skin with changing subcutaneous fat distribution.
She doesn't have those pinchable baby cheeks anymore. I suspect that if she quit fighting middle-aged spread, that her face would be fuller and there would be a clearer line between young Renee and old Renee, but she's look more matronly.
Silly. She looks just fine. Obviously you are into babies.
Nah. I'm just realistic. I recognize that women enters their mid-teens very wealthy and then their assets begin depreciating over time. For women, male attention is at a peak from 15-35. For starlets, the primary appeal they have for an audience is their appearance.
blah, blah. Tell that to Angelina Jolie, among others. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, obviously.
Every starlet has a shelf life.
No, beauty is not in the eyes of the beholder.
I don't see much difference in any of those women except for the chubby ones look less attractive.
All are the SAME person. The facial features in each photo are slightly altered to serve a pointSilly. She looks just fine. Obviously you are into babies.
Nah. I'm just realistic. I recognize that women enters their mid-teens very wealthy and then their assets begin depreciating over time. For women, male attention is at a peak from 15-35. For starlets, the primary appeal they have for an audience is their appearance.
blah, blah. Tell that to Angelina Jolie, among others. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, obviously.
Every starlet has a shelf life.
No, beauty is not in the eyes of the beholder.
I don't see much difference in any of those women except for the chubby ones look less attractive.
A picture tells a tale of a thousand words.The age category photos were all pulled from "10s"The bottom pictures . . . there really isn't much of a difference at all. All of them are relatively attractive females who you would be lucky to have approach you, I'm sure. Lol!
I think you're charts and graphs are retarded, to be honest. I laugh when you post them, and people take them seriously.
All are the SAME person. The facial features in each photo are slightly altered to serve a pointSilly. She looks just fine. Obviously you are into babies.
Nah. I'm just realistic. I recognize that women enters their mid-teens very wealthy and then their assets begin depreciating over time. For women, male attention is at a peak from 15-35. For starlets, the primary appeal they have for an audience is their appearance.
blah, blah. Tell that to Angelina Jolie, among others. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, obviously.
Every starlet has a shelf life.
No, beauty is not in the eyes of the beholder.
I don't see much difference in any of those women except for the chubby ones look less attractive.
Oh, like your last one where the woman was naked, and men didn't notice her shoes?
A picture tells a tale of a thousand words.The age category photos were all pulled from "10s"The bottom pictures . . . there really isn't much of a difference at all. All of them are relatively attractive females who you would be lucky to have approach you, I'm sure. Lol!
I think you're charts and graphs are retarded, to be honest. I laugh when you post them, and people take them seriously.
Oh, like your last one where the woman was naked, and men didn't notice her shoes?
WHY DO YOU HATE SCIENCE ? ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
If someone smells a fart guess who they are looking at first?
The source of the natural gas?
All are the SAME person. The facial features in each photo are slightly altered to serve a pointNah. I'm just realistic. I recognize that women enters their mid-teens very wealthy and then their assets begin depreciating over time. For women, male attention is at a peak from 15-35. For starlets, the primary appeal they have for an audience is their appearance.
blah, blah. Tell that to Angelina Jolie, among others. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, obviously.
Every starlet has a shelf life.
No, beauty is not in the eyes of the beholder.
I don't see much difference in any of those women except for the chubby ones look less attractive.
He did the same with Miss Universe contestants.
The age category photos were all pulled from "10s"The bottom pictures . . . there really isn't much of a difference at all. All of them are relatively attractive females who you would be lucky to have approach you, I'm sure. Lol!
Ahem!
All are the SAME person. The facial features in each photo are slightly altered to serve a pointblah, blah. Tell that to Angelina Jolie, among others. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, obviously.
Every starlet has a shelf life.
No, beauty is not in the eyes of the beholder.
I don't see much difference in any of those women except for the chubby ones look less attractive.
He did the same with Miss Universe contestants.
What is your point with this? What do these women have to do with anything?