What’s bad about chain migration?

[Correll]

chain migration brings in relatives of Americans from other countries. They are sponsored by the Americans , which helps with intergration and means they are not any welfare burden .

Why would conservatives be against this ? Especially since it was their idea decades ago .

The idea was sort of like that.


Instead it has become a back door for an additional millions of Third Worlders that we don't need and who are a burden on US.


A naturalized citizen would certainly care for his wife and child. His second cousin? And his wife, and their 5 kids? Not so much.

That’s not how it works .

You can’t just bring over anyone at anytime . Close family is priority, and it takes years . Being a sponcer means you are responsible as the immigrant doesn’t qualify for government benefits .

Then it won't be a hardship if we change the rules to be JUST close family.

 

[Unkotare]

chain migration brings in relatives of Americans from other countries. They are sponsored by the Americans , which helps with intergration and means they are not any welfare burden .

Why would conservatives be against this ? Especially since it was their idea decades ago .

Yeah, but they tend to be brown people, and conservatives hate that.

Do you prefer to live among immoral, taxpayer dependent lowlifes, criminals and jibber-jabber speaking thirdworlders?

I believe native Americans would disagree with the above .

There ain't native Americans left, to speak of. We killed them all.

No, we didn't.

 

[otto105]

Because soon their whole fucking country is here if this crazy idea is in place. Then we will be the ones integrating to that new (shithole) country.

One of the worst ideas mankind has ever come up with.

Yeah! Like That chick’s family after she married an orange guy.

 

[Norman]

Because soon their whole fucking country is here if this crazy idea is in place. Then we will be the ones integrating to that new (shithole) country.

One of the worst ideas mankind has ever come up with.

Yeah! Like That chick’s family after she married an orange guy.

What in the fucking fuck? I have nothing against the president's wife integrating. In what world is that the same as chain migration for all? Obviously a PRESIDENT can bring over his family.

Besides east Europeans are infinitely more compatible with American values than Mexicans. Bring them over...

 

[Kondor3]

chain migration brings in relatives of Americans from other countries. They are sponsored by the Americans , which helps with intergration and means they are not any welfare burden .

Why would conservatives be against this ? Especially since it was their idea decades ago .

Lets in too many Beaners...

 

[LuckyDuck]

chain migration brings in relatives of Americans from other countries. They are sponsored by the Americans , which helps with intergration and means they are not any welfare burden .

Why would conservatives be against this ? Especially since it was their idea decades ago .

Personally, I look at it mostly from an environmental aspect, which the left and so-called pro-environment herd doesn't.
To date, it still takes 1.5 acres of land to feed one single human for a year. The more people you bring in, the more deforestation and available resources are depleted. When you bring in thousand or millions, those same people make more people and since much those who come here, do so from south of the border, are almost exclusively "Catholic" and they spit out kids left and right, with a continued belief that they should "be fruitful and multiply."
If you look at the African and Middle East "so-called" refugees (which are really just performing a Hegira (the migration for the express purpose of changing an infidel nation into an Islamic Theocracy). If one looks at what comes over from there, it's "mostly" fighting aged males. One just has to look at what is happening to Europe to see that that is not needed here.
Back to the environmental aspect of the migration, along with deforestation and destruction of wetlands, comes the inevitable demise of animal life in those areas. Over time, the ignorant people would look to our National Parks and National Forests and demand they be cut down, paved over and more parking lots, stores and homes be put there.
To me, immigration has to end, across the board.

Thats not going to stop "over population" it will only slow it down with a higher infant mortality rate.

Slowing it down is a positive thing.
Just what do you think the infant mortality rate will look like after we've completely deforested the nation, paved over former forests, replacing them with housing structures and depleted our resources, as family farms disappear daily and food becomes scarce?!

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

chain migration brings in relatives of Americans from other countries. They are sponsored by the Americans , which helps with intergration and means they are not any welfare burden .

Why would conservatives be against this ? Especially since it was their idea decades ago .

Personally, I look at it mostly from an environmental aspect, which the left and so-called pro-environment herd doesn't.
To date, it still takes 1.5 acres of land to feed one single human for a year. The more people you bring in, the more deforestation and available resources are depleted. When you bring in thousand or millions, those same people make more people and since much those who come here, do so from south of the border, are almost exclusively "Catholic" and they spit out kids left and right, with a continued belief that they should "be fruitful and multiply."
If you look at the African and Middle East "so-called" refugees (which are really just performing a Hegira (the migration for the express purpose of changing an infidel nation into an Islamic Theocracy). If one looks at what comes over from there, it's "mostly" fighting aged males. One just has to look at what is happening to Europe to see that that is not needed here.
Back to the environmental aspect of the migration, along with deforestation and destruction of wetlands, comes the inevitable demise of animal life in those areas. Over time, the ignorant people would look to our National Parks and National Forests and demand they be cut down, paved over and more parking lots, stores and homes be put there.
To me, immigration has to end, across the board.

Thats not going to stop "over population" it will only slow it down with a higher infant mortality rate.

Slowing it down is a positive thing.
Just what do you think the infant mortality rate will look like after we've completely deforested the nation, paved over former forests, replacing them with housing structures and depleted our resources, as family farms disappear daily and food becomes scarce?!

chain migration brings in relatives of Americans from other countries. They are sponsored by the Americans , which helps with intergration and means they are not any welfare burden .

Why would conservatives be against this ? Especially since it was their idea decades ago .

Personally, I look at it mostly from an environmental aspect, which the left and so-called pro-environment herd doesn't.
To date, it still takes 1.5 acres of land to feed one single human for a year. The more people you bring in, the more deforestation and available resources are depleted. When you bring in thousand or millions, those same people make more people and since much those who come here, do so from south of the border, are almost exclusively "Catholic" and they spit out kids left and right, with a continued belief that they should "be fruitful and multiply."
If you look at the African and Middle East "so-called" refugees (which are really just performing a Hegira (the migration for the express purpose of changing an infidel nation into an Islamic Theocracy). If one looks at what comes over from there, it's "mostly" fighting aged males. One just has to look at what is happening to Europe to see that that is not needed here.
Back to the environmental aspect of the migration, along with deforestation and destruction of wetlands, comes the inevitable demise of animal life in those areas. Over time, the ignorant people would look to our National Parks and National Forests and demand they be cut down, paved over and more parking lots, stores and homes be put there.
To me, immigration has to end, across the board.

Thats not going to stop "over population" it will only slow it down with a higher infant mortality rate.

Slowing it down is a positive thing.
Just what do you think the infant mortality rate will look like after we've completely deforested the nation, paved over former forests, replacing them with housing structures and depleted our resources, as family farms disappear daily and food becomes scarce?!

You're a fucken idiot.
This is about killing off the gen population.

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

It's just another angle...like the gun issue.
It's all about votes. Without illegal votes, they don't have a change in hell because Americans are finally wising up to their tricks and lies.
The Southern Poverty Law Center and numerous deep pocketed leftist "think" tanks probably come up with these schemes.

They find an emotional weakness in bleeding heart leftists and then exploit it for all it's worth, with the fully complicit Left Media pounding the masses day and night on how evil the Rightwing is.

But look at all the homeless people in California...the Leftist Mecca. They're constantly pushing them out of parks and places. A real bunch of caring people.
And look at what they did to Vets under Obama. Disgraceful. Look at all the drug addicts there with nowhere to go and no support.
With all the liberal billionaires in California, they could have bought every homeless person in California a 4 bedroom home with a pool and food for life.
California has an economy bigger than most nations....so why so much suffering in the "Golden State"?
These people don't care about ANYONE unless they can exploit them to push their agenda.

So glad Americans as a whole are seeing through it now.