Patriot911
Rookie
- Banned
- #21
Wrong yet again. So explain to us how ONLY a controlled demolition can accomplish free fall. I've already explained to you how the WTC 7 collapsed at free fall for 2.25 seconds, yet fell 40% overall slower than free fall. It is because the internal structures.... you know... the ones that hold up the building.... failed before the external structure failed. Thus the outside "caught up" to what had already collapsed internally.Do you know what the term Newtonian Physics even means? Because if someone defies the laws of physics, there is no argument. It is a FACT that WTC7 Collapsed at FREEFALL for 2.25 at LEAST. That is equivalent to a bowling ball falling the same speed as WTC7 from the top of the WTC7 buildilng. That is impossible, thats why demolitions exist, so they can freefall into their own footprints. Theres no other way to say this but IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO FREEFALL through the path of greatest resistance. That is my Fact. You cannot say i HAVE NOT POSTED ANY. this fact ALONE debunks the WHOLE NIST report. Why are you saying you 'accept facts' but when Newton's Laws of physics are violated, its not a problem?